The Witches of Eastwick (Eastwick, #1)

May 27, 2008 matt rated it 2 of 5 stars

Shelves: america-f-k-yeah, fictions-of-the-big-it

I read this book the way it ought to be read, or at least in the circumstances which are best suited for it.

I was away at a beach house for a weekend in the middle of summer and had pretty much nothing to do but lollygag around, smoke cigarettes, and read this book.

It's perfect for sunny clear skies and long hours drinking lemonade by the ocean.

The writing is crisp, quick and clear. Updike's pretty much encyclopedic when it comes to writing skills and he's doing everything pretty smoothly here:...more

13 likes · like · see review

May 23, 2011 Almeta rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: flick-lit, serial, reviewed

Having seen the movie first, the cast of characters was already set in my mind. I could not envision them in any other way. This didn't really get in the way, but some of the differences in premise and plot did disappoint.

(view spoiler)...more

2 likes · like · see review

Mar 28, 2009 Celery rated it 3 of 5 stars

I must confess that I was hoping that this book would be a light/fluffy/fun read. I really loved the movie and was looking forward to some light hearted revenge to ease the aching in my brain. Unfortunately for me and my brain, the only things from this book that made it into the movie were the three witches, the horrible rich man (wasn't Jack Nicholson just perfect in this role...totally disgusting but still Jack...you gotta love him), and the game of tennis. Okay, maybe some other stuff too, b...more I must confess that I was hoping that this book would be a light/fluffy/fun read. I really loved the movie and was looking forward to some light hearted revenge to ease the aching in my brain. Unfortunately for me and my brain, the only things from this book that made it into the movie were the three witches, the horrible rich man (wasn't Jack Nicholson just perfect in this role...totally disgusting but still Jack...you gotta love him), and the game of tennis. Okay, maybe some other stuff too, but not much. This novel is to its movie what Wicked by Gregory Maguire is to its musical. Deep and Dark vs. Warm and Fuzzy.

That being said, it was still a good book. Something darker that takes all our faults (physical or otherwise) and displays them right out in the light. A view from the other side of the fence, you know, the side where the people we all judge live. Here are these people, and they're doing these "bad" things, and look, here are the reasons they do them. Not really good reasons, but still reasons. And then, how they feel afterwards. The way Updike writes (or wrote...we lost a great writer this year) you can put yourself in their shoes...I don't think I have ever heard -or will ever hear again- a better justification for a woman who sleeps with married men. Still not totally justified, but with this explanation, you have to say, "Yeah, I can see that." Reminds me a little of Watchmen...people with powers are still people after all, with all the character flaws, but maybe natural reactions are harder to suppress, like picking up a Faberge egg with super strength. Super powers don't come with super control. Wishing the barking dog across the street would just shut up and die doesn't end with a dead dog, but if it did...would you be able to control yourself at two in the morning during a bout of insomnia and menstrual cramps?

Updike's descriptives were really potent and he seemed to have a pretty good idea of how the female brain operates even if he didn't present us in the best light. So, over all a pretty good read, even though the ending of the book really makes the feminist in me go, "What!?!" But my feminist side is pretty small so I'll have to read The Widows of Eastwick to see what Mr. Updike had in mind for us (I mean the characters...see what I mean about putting yourself in their shoes?) 26 years later.

Favorite quote, "It was nice to have yourself known by a man; it was getting to be known that was embarrassing: all that self-conscious verbalization over too many drinks, and then the bodies revealed with the hidden marks and sags like disappointing presents at Christmastime. But how much of love, when you thought about it, was not of the other but of yourself naked in his eyes: of that rush, that little flight, of shedding your clothes, and being you at last."(less)

5 likes · like · see review

Oct 21, 2009 Lori rated it 3 of 5 stars

Shelves: fiction

High Hopes will almost always set a reader up for a fall. The excitement of chosing a book, THIS book, to begin my month... Witches and spells to celebrate the Halloween spirit of October.
(sigh)

Having never seen the film, or read any Updike novels before, I really did not know what to expect. I only knew that I expected great things. And sadly, this novel did not deliver many great things at all.
(sigh)

A little over two weeks spent trying to get into a novel that is only 306 pages long. That's an...more High Hopes will almost always set a reader up for a fall. The excitement of chosing a book, THIS book, to begin my month... Witches and spells to celebrate the Halloween spirit of October.
(sigh)

Having never seen the film, or read any Updike novels before, I really did not know what to expect. I only knew that I expected great things. And sadly, this novel did not deliver many great things at all.
(sigh)

A little over two weeks spent trying to get into a novel that is only 306 pages long. That's an average of about 150 pages week. That's an average of 21 pages a day. That's an awful average. Wanna know what's even worse than that average? The fact that whole days went by without me even WANTING to pick this book up again when I first started it.

The characters were not really likable. I could not find anyone that I felt connected to, or at least even slightly cared about. Updike has this uncanny way of making them all ugly, even if they are supposedly attractive. Pointing out every flaw - though he went much easier on the woman. The poor men characters in this book never stood a chance. All are balding, bad breathed, hairy knuckled, sweating things. Gross!

His idea of what women want, what women talk about, and how women act around each other was completely off-base. And coarse. And he likened things about a womans body and attitude to things that didn't even make sense. To things that made me cringe and grimace. It was quite painful at times.

Imagine taking one of those eye-clops toys they sell for the kids now, that are like a microscope, and can project images onto the television screen. Updike uses the same format... placing all the knicks and warts and liver spots and hallitosis out there for the whole world to read.

At about the 2/3rds mark, I found myself finally engaged in the novel and reading through the pages much quicker, trying to find out just where Updike was going to leave these three witches and their wacky zany neighbor. 100 pages devoured yesterday. Amazing!

Will I be reading any other novels by Updike, after this slightly disappointing introduction to his work? Sadly, I may just pass. Am I happy to have read it? Eh. Jury is out on that one, at this time. Would I recommend it to someone? Well, I did give it 3 stars, after all. So, I suppose if someone told me they were looking for a book that involved horribly flawed witches and wasn't so much focused on the witchyness of those witches, then, ok, I could recommend this to them. But I would have to be certain that they weren't looking for anything great. Because then I would setting them up for a fall.

(less)

10 likes · like · see review

Nov 11, 2008 Ellen rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

I'm suprised by all the reviews of this book that speak of Updike's ability to "get" and fully understand women ... because that seemed to me to be the most blatantly lacking part of this novel. There is not one redeemable female character in this novel. All of the women are vapid, vacuous and more often than not cruel, indifferent and self-absorbed.

I am not being prudish, I'm not suggesting that every female character should be a paradigm of female virtue - but what is Updike saying about wome...more

18 likes · like · see review

May 10, 2009 Greg of A2 rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: fiction-general, read-before-1990

This is "fun" Updike. It's hard to compare this novel to many other Updike works because even though it focuses on suburbanites and their relationships (mostly infidelities), they are indeed witches. Real hex wielding witches. The supernatural isn't overplayed but it's there and used to mostly fun effect (but not always fun for the recipient).

1 like · like · see review

Feb 05, 2008 portia rated it 3 of 5 stars

Shelves: recentlyread

Characteristically Updike--bitter, poignant, and incisive. Three women find that their failed marriages have brought them not only freedom but also magic powers. They need each other for friendship and support but also can't help but put each other, and the other women in their small town, down from time to time. I think I would find this kind of misogyny trite and offensive if the characters didn't have the depth that they do, and if he wasn't even worse about men. The promiscuity had even me a...more

2 likes · like · see review

Mar 16, 2009 Jocardo rated it 3 of 5 stars

I always wanted to read this book and when I saw that a sequel had been written, I decided that it was time. This book was a hard read at times. It takes a lot of concentration to read Updike. Many times his sentences seem to go on for paragraphs, but he is one of the most prolific American writers of late. I am going to attempt to read the sequel and at least one of the Rabbit books. I do have to say that this book was nothing like the movie (which I loved) and the three main characters are qui...more

1 like · like · see review

Mar 18, 2008 Kylin Larsson rated it 4 of 5 stars

The Witches of Eastwick feels like John Updike's reaction to the phenomenon of feminism. The classic witchy features of the three divorced women felt familiar from other stories and films. The three witches unstick themselves from small town drudgery when a warlock (or demon) in the guise of Daryl Van Horne buys an old residence on the outskirts of town. I was sometimes conscious of a forced feeling to the writing, a sense of trying too hard and stumbling. That writing possesses a haunting rhyth...more

2 likes · like · see review

Dec 11, 2007 Rebecca rated it 5 of 5 stars

I love this book. Not only does John Updike write heavenly prose, but this book is quite the feminist manifesto. Jane, Sukie, and Alexandra are created by Updike with care and attention, and they are fun, well-drawn personalities to spend a little time with. Updike uses the natural setting of Eastwick, Rhode Island to great advantage. If you feel like getting away to one of those small hamlets on the eastern seaboard, watching a storm come in from the sea, this is the book that will take you the...more

3 likes · like · see review

Apr 30, 2013 Tani rated it 1 of 5 stars

Shelves: 2013, fiction, male-author

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

like · see review

Feb 28, 2013 Jason Luna rated it 5 of 5 stars

A departure for John Updike, in that it attempts to create an exclusively woman's point of view. In many ways, this is sort of a window dressing. Instead of the usual Updike mystique of looking through a man's eyes at female form, women or the nameless narrator do it. Even the "male lead", if you will, the mysterious rich guy who buys the old Lenox mansion, is given a feminine veneer. His face is described as softer, he is shy, insecure, etc. The women are more manly than he is.

It is as feminist...more

like · see review

Jun 26, 2012 Lina K rated it 1 of 5 stars

I have just finished watching the last episode of short lived tv series "Eastwick" and it made me wonder about the ideas that the story explores.

I found some interesting reviews on this site and it brought back the memory of this book. I believe I read it a couple of years ago - I still remember how disappointing it was... In some way I could compare it to The Vanity Fair which I really didn't like - I am not sure I was able to even finish it (or maybe it was so disappointing that I don't even r...more I have just finished watching the last episode of short lived tv series "Eastwick" and it made me wonder about the ideas that the story explores.

I found some interesting reviews on this site and it brought back the memory of this book. I believe I read it a couple of years ago - I still remember how disappointing it was... In some way I could compare it to The Vanity Fair which I really didn't like - I am not sure I was able to even finish it (or maybe it was so disappointing that I don't even remember the end).

I've seen the film of 1987 at least twice - I thought it thrilling and fun, dark but in a good way.

When I found the book I hoped for more of the good stuff, books are so much more than their adaptations in film or theatre - not in this case.

I don't know how I managed to finish this book - it was so sad, so empty and repulsive. What was it really about? That we are all disgusting and petty creatures with excessive body hair? Or was it armpit hair - there were a quite of "yuck" moments in this story.

The film made sense out of it all, made the participants, especially the witches both more wicked and more human at the same time. Yes, they had their flaws but they also had their virtues (are we still allowed to use this word nowadays when "being good" is an expression mainly used in connection to eating habits? I will anyway). As soon as they realized that it's the mysterious man who is causing all the trouble they did their best to stop him.
This is essentially why I like the (sadly) short lived tv series - especially in the first few episodes: the idea that you are both good and bad, that you can do bad things but you can also atone and learn; the idea that everything has it's cost.

I don't agree with the philosophy of this book - I don't believe people are vain, stupid, remorseless and unfeeling. The fact is, even if one takes the view that life is pointless, being human is the one thing that makes it worth something.

Unfortunately, a truly disappointing book. I'm aware of other books and a sequel to this one that Mr. Updike wrote - I don't feel a slightest temptation to even Google it, let alone read any of them. Give me something human, L. M. Bujold and Terry Pratchett, here I come.

(less)

like · see review

Mar 04, 2012 Aaron Brame rated it 3 of 5 stars

The Witches of Eastwick is a prickly little book that Updike reportedly wrote in response to feminist criticism of his work. There are three witches in Eastwick, of course, (and, no, none of them are Cher), and they are nasty, heartless, murderous things. But they're also sort of heroic, raising children, playing the cello, summoning thunderstorms from a clear blue sky, et cetera, et cetera.

And isn't a witch, after all, a perfect example of a liberated woman? Put the three of these characters to...more

like · see review

Jan 25, 2012 Eric Chappell rated it 5 of 5 stars

Read Summer 2010; Re-read January 2011

Summary: Wickedly entertaining. The Witches of Eastwick is about three divorced women in the New England town of Eastwick who discover that after being abandoned or divorced from their husbands, they have supernatural powers. Alexandra Spoffard, the sculptress, is the leader of the three. She makes little clay figurines (called "bubbies"), stores too much tomato sauce, and is carrying on an affair with Joe Marino, the town plumber. Jane Smart, the cellist, i...more

1 like · like · see review

Jan 03, 2012 Delilah rated it 3 of 5 stars

I just finished this as part of an online book club. The idea was to read something spooky heading into Halloween but I got a late start and finished by Christmas. I barely recognized the movie with Jack Nicholson, but he was a good choice for the part. I had never read an Updike novel before and have decided I'm not a fan. The first half of the book he definitely works too hard at being clever with his descriptions. The second half was more relaxed, not trying to impress the reader as much with...more

1 like · like · see review

Dec 23, 2011 Stephen rated it 2 of 5 stars

Shelves: my-aborted-50-states-in-50-weeks-pr

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here. So far on this trip around New England we have had two appearances of the supernatural (most prominently in Carrie, and with the brief appearance of the real-life executed “witch” Ann Hibbins in The Scarlet Letter), two cases of adultery (Constance Mackenzie and Hester Prynne’s illegitimate daughters in Peyton Place and The Scarlet Letter respectively), and small-town gossiping has been rife (nowhere more so than in Peyton Place). Now with John Updike’s The Witches of Eastwick we have all three...more So far on this trip around New England we have had two appearances of the supernatural (most prominently in Carrie, and with the brief appearance of the real-life executed “witch” Ann Hibbins in The Scarlet Letter), two cases of adultery (Constance Mackenzie and Hester Prynne’s illegitimate daughters in Peyton Place and The Scarlet Letter respectively), and small-town gossiping has been rife (nowhere more so than in Peyton Place). Now with John Updike’s The Witches of Eastwick we have all three – a novel about gossiping adulterous witches. It makes sense that we have reached this point – the themes of fear of the supernatural and suspicion of one’s own neighbours are embedded into the roots of New England. The first known person to have been executed as a witch in the region was Alice Young at Hartford, Connecticut in 1647, just 19 years after the founding of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. A further 11 are recorded as having been executed from 1648 to 1688 (including Ann Hibbins) and from 1692 to 1693 the Salem Witch Trials led to the hanging of fourteen women and five men (more of the accused died from torture and in prison) famously dramatised in Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible. The episode is one of the darkest in America’s history and understandably the shadow it cast has long resonated in the literature of the region.

“Puritanism had landed smack on that rock and after regaining its strength at the expense of the soft-hearted Indians had thrown its steeples and stone walls all across Connecticut, leaving Rhode Island to the Quakers and Jews and antinomians and women.”

As with Peyton Place any work that features in its title the name of the town or city where the action occurs you would expect the said place to feature as prominently as any character, and in the Witches of Eastwick Updike includes some wonderfully biting passages describing both the fictional town and the state of Rhode Island, especially in the opening chapters. However, I'm disappointed to say the story did not bewitch me at all. Aside from a few key set-pieces (the tennis match, the hot-tub orgy, and a murder/suicide scene that is the main turning point) most of what happens over the course of the novel is related from one character to another after the fact during a series of extended gossip-sessions between the three witches, in a manner that I personally founded extremely tiresome. Even the Darryl Van Horne character appears mostly in the conversations of others, like a mysterious Gatsby-type figure. In the 1987 film Darryl Van Horne, played by Jack Nicholson, turns out to be the devil (cue some quite ridiculous and rather dated 1980s stop-motion). In the book there is barely even the implication, other than that his skin and, erm, bodily fluids are cold to the touch. He is devilish, Machiavellian even, but a man all the same. It is no wonder that fans of the book AND the film are so hard to pin down. I think it's safe to say I'm neither.

Text taken from my aborted project to read 50 books set in 50 states in 50 weeks.(less)

like · see review

Nov 15, 2011 Stephanie rated it 2 of 5 stars

John Updike’s “The Witches of Eastwick” was disappointing for me. I’m going to be completely honest: I read this book because I absolutely loved the movie. I know that there is a lot of risk in doing that but I thought with all of the good things I have heard of Updike that I would have enjoyed it. I put it down after the first page and had to force myself to pick it back up. In this case I am extremely glad I watched the film first, I doubt I would have given it a real shot had I read it first....more

like · see review

Nov 15, 2011 Alex rated it 2 of 5 stars

The Witches of Eastwick is a John Updike novel published in 1984 by Ballantine Books. Updike was a Harvard school graduate, and also attended the Ruskin school of Drawing and Fine Art. He was a member of the staff of The New Yorker for two years, and he has achieved the Pulitzer Prize for his novels. He died in 2009 at the age of 76.
Many have said that this novel by John Updike is “bewitching,” a play on words because the novel is about 3 witches. I think the word is clever, but perhaps misused...more The Witches of Eastwick is a John Updike novel published in 1984 by Ballantine Books. Updike was a Harvard school graduate, and also attended the Ruskin school of Drawing and Fine Art. He was a member of the staff of The New Yorker for two years, and he has achieved the Pulitzer Prize for his novels. He died in 2009 at the age of 76.
Many have said that this novel by John Updike is “bewitching,” a play on words because the novel is about 3 witches. I think the word is clever, but perhaps misused. I think The Witches of Eastwick was as enjoyable as Rotten Tomatoes thought the movie Bewitched was. That's not very enjoyable at all, by the way.
This is the first novel I have read by John Updike, and I sincerely doubt I will ever pick another one up. When I first started reading, Updike had striked me as a sort of feminist. He referenced a lot to women's menstrual cycles (although he did this in such an awkward way by comparing tomato sauce to period blood.) An example of this would be in the beginning, when our main narrator Alexandra attends a concert. “Alexandra couldn't stop seeing auras, it went with the menstrual cramps,” Updike writes. For this reason, I had started to assume that Updike revered the female body as empowering. That heightened senses during menstruation was his way of bringing notice to powerful womanly things.
Unfortunately, as I read on, I was mistaken.
Updike writes the witches (Alexandra, Sukie, and Jane) as promiscuous, vindictive, jealous hags. They sleep around with married men, even share the men between themselves, but when Darryl Van Horne arrives in town, the three women flock to him.
At first, it's a strange orgy between them, where they pass him from woman to woman and once share him all together, but then it turns into something more sinister.
The women start feeling possessive and jealous, and Darryl is able to manipulate them to distances themselves from one another. Not only that, but Darryl convinces them to use their powers to get revenge on the wives of the men they are sleeping with. Sukie starts sleeping with her boss, and inflicts his wife some sort of disease where she coughs up feathers and smells like a chicken coop.
Towards the end, Darryl ends up caring for two college-age kids that belonged to Sukie's boss and his wife, who end up dying in a horrible murder/suicide (but the energy was placed there by Sukie and Darryl's magic).
The daughter, Jenny, ends up the object of Darryl's affections, and he marries her. This prompts our witches to bond once more- but in the spirit of revenge, as they plot to kill her by giving her cancer. Updike makes us dislike our “protagonists” even more at this point.
Add John Updike's misogyny to the fact that he is very wordy and spends pages describing an event that is at the same time uncomfortable and boring (like the description of Clyde murdering his wife that just drags on), and I'd give this book a 2 out of 5 stars.(less)

1 like · like · see review

Nov 15, 2011 Julie Fishpaugh rated it 2 of 5 stars

When I set out to read “The Witches of Eastwick” by John Updike, I was highly excited due to my interest in the former ABC TV show Eastwick. However, my enthusiasm was abruptly killed by Mr. Updike’s writing style. This had to be one of the longest 300-some page novels I have ever read.

The novel is set in the small, fictional town of Eastwick, Rhode Island. The story centers on a coven of three witches, Alexandra Spofford, Jane Smart, and Sukie Rougemont. Each of them find interest in the new ma...more When I set out to read “The Witches of Eastwick” by John Updike, I was highly excited due to my interest in the former ABC TV show Eastwick. However, my enthusiasm was abruptly killed by Mr. Updike’s writing style. This had to be one of the longest 300-some page novels I have ever read.

The novel is set in the small, fictional town of Eastwick, Rhode Island. The story centers on a coven of three witches, Alexandra Spofford, Jane Smart, and Sukie Rougemont. Each of them find interest in the new man in town, Darryl Van Horne. Darryl is a devilish character who entices the coven to develop and use their powers. When Darryl suddenly heads in another direction, the witches get extremely jealous and take revenge.

The main cause of disappointment in this novel is the author’s over use, and sometimes poor use, of metaphors and similes. They are used to the point of reader getting lost several times throughout the piece. Several paragraphs were read and reread before understanding, or sometimes skipping, what the author is trying to describe.

However, there were some similes and metaphors that were effectively used within the writing, such as:
“The crooked little tomato branches, pulpy and pale as if made of cheap green paper, broke under weight of so much fruit; there was something frantic in such fertility, a crying-out like that of a child eager to please. Of plants tomatoes seemed the most human, eager and fragile and prone to rot.”
At first, one might question why Updike used so much description for some vegetables. Though, when you read through the novel and see what unfolds, it kind of makes sense.

The second thing that was found negative about “The Witches of Eastwick” was the author’s sense of organization. For example, in the beginning of the novel Updike has the reader in a kitchen with all three women talking, and the next moment the reader is following one of the women in her car to the beach and wondering, “How in the heck did I get here?” Basically, the author lacks smooth transitions from scene to scene.

Also, the book is divided into three sections of 120 pages or less. This could have been chosen to reflect the coven of three. However, it has a negative effect on the novel. This format actually causes the book to feel like a longer read.

Even though “The Witches of Eastwick” by John Updike is not the best of reads, it has a lot of lessons to teach a writer. For instance, it shows you how the over use of similes and metaphors can lose the attention of your readers. When read as a writer, you can see the importance of smooth transitions and the negative correlation to the lack thereof. Also, the novel shows you how the format and division of your writing can affect how it is read and perceived.

Though this reader did not find “The Witches of Eastwick” to be particularly engaging, she recognizes this novel as a cult classic. It has inspired several movies, television shows, and plays. So, there might just be something about this novel that will interest other readers.
(less)

like · see review

Nov 15, 2011 Jade rated it 2 of 5 stars

Overall, while reading John Updike’s book The Witches of Eastwick, I found myself disgusted and appalled. I expected a witty, entertaining story about a coven of witches, but was greatly disappointed. I’m not a prude or anti-feminist by any standards, but I felt like Updike was just trying to cover up any real writing style by including explicit sexual content. I found no purpose or deeper meaning in this book.

Now I’ve read that many have seen this work as an example of Updike as a feminist, bu...more Overall, while reading John Updike’s book The Witches of Eastwick, I found myself disgusted and appalled. I expected a witty, entertaining story about a coven of witches, but was greatly disappointed. I’m not a prude or anti-feminist by any standards, but I felt like Updike was just trying to cover up any real writing style by including explicit sexual content. I found no purpose or deeper meaning in this book.

Now I’ve read that many have seen this work as an example of Updike as a feminist, but I must say I don’t see any or superficial feminism ideals. Alexandra, Jane and Sukie are unfeeling, unoriginal, and cruel. I didn’t notice how they were independent in any way unless you include that they did away with their husbands, but they’re numerous frivolous affairs prove that these women cannot live without a man in their lives. I don’t recall ever picking up any feminist ideals from these women. From what I read, these three witches are not concerned with anything other than guiltlessly neglecting their children, pursuing sexual relationships, and being vindictive—I thought their development was weak and they weren’t well rounded characters.

What I also noticed while reading this book is that instead of being a feminist, it seems as if Updike might even be anti-woman. Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie have no redeeming qualities. Updike only gives these women jealous, vindictive, and shallow characteristics—the stereotypical characteristics given to all females that aren’t meant to be pure. Women are either meant to be pure or petty and Updike follows this formula; the witches have primitive goals and basic thoughts.

Returning back to feminism, I did find evidence where feminism can be found. Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie deviate from ordinary convention of a typical female character—women often portrayed as the happy housemother with no intense ambition or desires. Also, this novel being written in the 1960s, the midst of the feminist movement, would support their actions and provide a reason for why Updike chose a small Rhode Island town in the 1960s for the backdrop of the story. For example, each woman having children was minor inclusion; they’re briefly mentioned, their names mentioned once or twice, and the mothers even admit to neglecting them. Before, children were portrayed to be a center of the house-mom’s world, but in this story they are more of an imposition than a joy, “At Sukie’s end of the line a crying female child came up to her…Sukie wanted to slap the repulsive child’s dirty face and knock a little sense into those TV-glazed eyes,” (77). Another example I thought of was that birth control was invented in the 1960s which broke out a new sexual movement and freedom. This sexuality was definitely present in the numerous affairs each woman has throughout the book. If feminism ideals were included in this story, I find them to be circumstantial and act as an excuse for the witch’s behavior.

While many found The Witches of Eastwick a fantastic story of sexuality and feminism, I thought it was disgusting and lacked any depth or meaning. I didn’t find any entrancing qualities, but I encourage anyone to read and try to find any kind of meaning in the story.
(less)

like · see review

Oct 09, 2011 C_ rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: deutsch, fantastisch, lieblich, lies

Drei Freundinnen - Alexandra, Sukie und Jane - erfahren nach ihrer (mehr oder weniger realen) Scheidung neue hexerische Fähigkeiten, die sie anfangs auf eine charmante Art und Weise einsetzen und die die drei noch enger zusammenschweißt. So wird das Wetter einem Hundespaziergang angepasst oder ein Tennisball in einen Vogel verwandelt...als jedoch ein neuer Mann in die Kleinstadt kommt, fängt ihr Band an, aufzubrechen, werden ihre Fähigkeiten für dunklere Zwecke missbraucht...

Mein erster John Upd...more

like · see review

Oct 04, 2011 Sierra Chescheir-vemeyer rated it 4 of 5 stars

Something Witchy

The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike. Ballantine Books, New York, 2008.

John Updike’s The Witches of Eastwick is a sexually charged novel that delves into the world of witchcraft found in a small Rhode Island town. While it is suggested in the title that the novel will encompass the fantastical idea of the magical powers of witches, this is not the central focus. Sex plays a pivotal part in the construction of the story and the downfall of its characters..

The “witches” are three...more Something Witchy

The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike. Ballantine Books, New York, 2008.

John Updike’s The Witches of Eastwick is a sexually charged novel that delves into the world of witchcraft found in a small Rhode Island town. While it is suggested in the title that the novel will encompass the fantastical idea of the magical powers of witches, this is not the central focus. Sex plays a pivotal part in the construction of the story and the downfall of its characters..

The “witches” are three women by the names of Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie. All three have been married before and possess magical powers- creating a covenant of their own. They are sexually driven women, having had intimate relations with the majority of the men who live there. The mysterious appearance of a man by the name of Darryl Van Horne, who moves into the luxurious old Lenox mansion, upsets the established order of their lives in Eastwick. A fascination with this man takes hold of them and they find themselves sexually involved with the “devil” in a sense.

The three female protagonists are far from being heroic and sympathetic leading characters. In fact, the women are for the most part depicted in a negative light and are easily distinguished from each other. Updike touches on the jealousy and vindictive nature that comes with competing for the attention of one man whom all have slept with. Sex in this situation adds fuel to the fire in the worst possible way to the relationship between these witchy “sisters”. Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie are hardly the kindhearted characters one might expect them to be. They are selfish and vain, looking out for themselves only.

John Updike’s writing style is quite beautiful in my opinion. He is detail oriented as opposed to focusing too heavily on the plot. This is a more character driven piece. He spends his time seriously developing each of his characters, especially that of our three witches here. He really wants to give his audience a feel for each of their individual psyche. He paints each and every scene so that the reader can actually envision the world he is attempting to create. He writes for the senses here. It’s as if you can smell, feel, touch, see, and hear everything he depicts about this town and these situations.

For anyone who is a fan of the film version and who is seeking to read a story that focuses more heavily on witchcraft, this book is not quite what you would expect. The witchcraft takes a back seat to the characters and their sexuality in the story and the film is hardly recognizable by the book. I enjoyed reading John Updike’s novel for I prefer character driven pieces that really explore the psychology of the characters. Because it is not plot driven, the story has a slow pace to it, as many character driven pieces do. Despite the witches here being “bad”, the novel is satirical and at the same time quite charming. It entrances you in one way or another.
(less)

like · see review

Oct 04, 2011 Christine rated it 5 of 5 stars

John Updike. The Witches of Eastwick. Ballantine Books: New York, 1984.
Capturing the images of mystery embodied, John Updike's descriptive imagery and character specificity bring the seaside setting of his Rhode Island Eastwick to life. Experienced through the (often-maternal) instincts and feelings of Alexandra Spofford and her best friends, Sukie Rougemont and Jane Smart, the story centers on the “freedom” and “dark[ness]” in the witches' lives. Alexandra, admired like a mother by her coven s...more John Updike. The Witches of Eastwick. Ballantine Books: New York, 1984.
Capturing the images of mystery embodied, John Updike's descriptive imagery and character specificity bring the seaside setting of his Rhode Island Eastwick to life. Experienced through the (often-maternal) instincts and feelings of Alexandra Spofford and her best friends, Sukie Rougemont and Jane Smart, the story centers on the “freedom” and “dark[ness]” in the witches' lives. Alexandra, admired like a mother by her coven sisters, displays a slight stubbornness in submerging herself in the magical mode of inhibition that Darryl Van Horne stirs, an effort to get them to “Think bigger.” However, as with Sukie and Jane, Alexandra's passionate desire (and even desire for desire) is felt through the impeccable displays of cognition in Updike's prose. As the motivations of each witch are shifted by Darryl's mysteriousness, so to the atmosphere of the novel nudges readers into greater uncertainty and intrigue.
Specifically, the use of unique techniques, such as describing Jane's “Massachusetts style” pronunciation of “r['s]” and “s's,” the “telepathic” connection among the witches, and the numerous dualistic tensions the characters face, enveloped me in the story's reality and exemplified interesting distinctions between fantastic and “supernatural.” His attentiveness to the, sometimes awkward, intimate and sexual details of the witches allows readers to step into the character circumstances, and even motivations, through a nearly universal doorway—an exquisite balancing act between the preternaturally uncertain or mysterious and the concreteness of reality.
Whether focusing on the struggle between power and helplessness, between masculinity and femininity, or between righteousness and wickedness, the duality in The Witches of Eastwick pulls at the air of the story and fosters a growing (as well as charming) uneasiness that remains “delicious.” As Updike writes, “Wickedness was like food: once you got started it was hard to stop; the gut expanded to take in more and more.” (less)

like · see review

Oct 04, 2011 Kelly Gravedoni rated it 4 of 5 stars

The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike. Ballantine Books, New York, 1984.

Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie aren’t your normal divorced women. They are witches. Not the nature loving kind but something completely different. They do not use their powers for the good of others but for their own good. The Witches of Eastwick focuses on the lives of these three women living in a fictional Northeastern town. After their divorces, each woman discovers that she has magical abilities. Each Thursday, they get to...more The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike. Ballantine Books, New York, 1984.

Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie aren’t your normal divorced women. They are witches. Not the nature loving kind but something completely different. They do not use their powers for the good of others but for their own good. The Witches of Eastwick focuses on the lives of these three women living in a fictional Northeastern town. After their divorces, each woman discovers that she has magical abilities. Each Thursday, they get together to use their powers to spy on their neighbors. They know who is ill, who is in debt, and many other secrets about their fellow townsmen.

However, they have secrets of their own. All three women have had numerous affairs with the majority of the married men in town. They are each attracted to their new neighbor, Darryl Van Horne. He seduces them and takes each woman as his lover, causing a rift between the friends as they each compete for his attention. However, they have opposition from Felecia Gabriel and use their magic to pull all sorts of pranks on her which lead to further complications.

Updike very rarely portrays women sympathetically and The Witches of Eastwick is no exception. As a matter of fact, all of Updike’s characters in Eastwick are terribly flawed. While this may upset some readers, it was a bit refreshing for me. No person on Earth is perfect and our flaws are what make us who we are. Updike is a master at creating characters that are not only believable but also relatable. While we may not agree with the actions the witches take, most of us can understand the motivation behind those actions.

Eastwick is not terribly long, roughly 300 pages, but it may take some time to get through due to Updike’s use of details. He will sometimes stop in the middle of a conversation and explain the character’s thoughts or surroundings in great detail, usually in multiple paragraphs. One conversation can take multiple pages to finish, thereby losing a reader who is not paying strict attention. However, these same details make the scenes of the novel feel so real. Any reader of Updike is able to vividly describe his fictional town as if they had visited it themselves.

The Witches of Eastwick is not so much a novel about the magic of three women but a novel of how scandal can affect an entire town and the relationships between people. Magic plays an important part in Eastwick, not in how it is performed, but how it affects the relationships between the three friends and everyone they know. Updike easily conveys how fragile the bonds between people are and how little it takes to break them. Truly an excellent read for those who love vivid descriptions and true to life characters.

(less)

like · see review

Oct 04, 2011 S rated it 2 of 5 stars

Some things are not what they seem to be...

Witches of Eastwick by John Updike. Puffin Classics, Kindle Edition.

The setting of the story is a town called Eastwick. There are three women: Alexandra Spofford, Jane Smart, and Sukie Rougemont. These are no ordinary women. They are actually witches who gained their powers after their husbands mistreated them by leaving or making them leave. They can change the weather or physical objects. The witches make the men of the town their own sexual conques...more Some things are not what they seem to be...

Witches of Eastwick by John Updike. Puffin Classics, Kindle Edition.

The setting of the story is a town called Eastwick. There are three women: Alexandra Spofford, Jane Smart, and Sukie Rougemont. These are no ordinary women. They are actually witches who gained their powers after their husbands mistreated them by leaving or making them leave. They can change the weather or physical objects. The witches make the men of the town their own sexual conquest. They cycle through them. Soon a new character is introduced. Darryl Van Horne moves into town cause a stir with the three witches. He definitely sparks a curiosity or perhaps an unconscious suspicion within the three witches. Darryl seduces all of the women at the same time and they all begin their “relationship” with him. However, girls will be girls. They all become jealous and want Darryl to pay more attention to them individually. The story plays out their “love” quarrels.
I decided to read this novel because I saw the movie when I was a child and I remembered John Updike from a short story called A&P. The book was well written, but I had my problems with it. From what I have read by John Updike I am getting the hint that he is a bit of a misogynist. A&P had the whole segments devoted to the girls in the bikinis. However, this book was more severe. These women were “witches”. They did not seem to have any redeeming qualities. All of them were sexually promiscuous, jealous and vindictive. They use their abilities for their own gain and interests. They end up hating Darryl’s new-younger girl and become very jealous. They use their magic on frivolous things like changing the weather so they could be the only one on the beach. They also want to have a more difficult game of tennis so they turn the balls into frogs. None of these characters garner any sympathy from the reader. Also, Updike cripples the women in this story by making them dependent on a man or men in general. They could be using magic to make their life better in some other way. However, all of their focus and abilities are concentrated on keeping Darryl for themselves or getting a different ideal man. I wonder if this is Updike’s real view of women.
The more that I think about it the more I start to dislike this book. Who wants to spend three hundred pages reading a book with worthless characters who completely downplay my gender. I hate watching movies or reading books were the character can’t seem to help themselves or be strong individuals. There is nothing more frustrating than observing spineless individuals. I should have remembered this from the movie and spared myself the pain. However, if I remember correctly, the movie was very different from the novel.
I don’t want to completely trash the book. I really like the way that Updike writes. He does tell a story. I just did not enjoy the subject matter of the novel.
(less)

like · see review

Oct 04, 2011 Ryan Healy rated it 3 of 5 stars

THESE WICKED WITCHES OF THE NORTHEAST COULD MAKE GLINDA CRY
The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike
Ballantine Books, 1984

The Witches of Eastwick is a great departure from John Updike’s usual work, what with its supernatural storyline. However, the novel still fits within his established canon due to its exploration of human sexuality and the ways that it affects various relationships within a suburban setting. With a keen eye for highly detailed descriptions and a fascination with opening the door...more THESE WICKED WITCHES OF THE NORTHEAST COULD MAKE GLINDA CRY
The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike
Ballantine Books, 1984

The Witches of Eastwick is a great departure from John Updike’s usual work, what with its supernatural storyline. However, the novel still fits within his established canon due to its exploration of human sexuality and the ways that it affects various relationships within a suburban setting. With a keen eye for highly detailed descriptions and a fascination with opening the doors to his characters’ minds, Updike’s writing is a great example for aspiring authors to look at when they need a little inspiration while exploring their own characters to their very cores.

On the very first page we meet our titular witches: Alexandra Spoffard, Jane Smart, and Sukie Rougemont. Living in a small town in Rhode Island in the 1960s, these three ex-wives spend much of their time gossiping, working (as a sculptress, cellist, and gossip columnist, respectively), sleeping with the local men – and the more unavailable they are, the better – and practicing their witchcraft. When the devilishly handsome Darryl Van Horne, a seductive man from Manhattan, moves into a local mansion, the three women find themselves competing for his love and doing whatever they can – including magically terrorizing the townspeople – to secure it. What ensues is a series of sexual encounters – namely in Darryl’s monstrous hot tub – and witchy in-fighting that could permanently drive a wedge between these long-time friends.

Updike excels when it comes to his descriptions throughout the novel. They are so precise that any and every reader can easily visualize the rooms that the characters are in, the clothes that they are clad in, and the expressions that cross their beautiful faces at any given point in the story. One of the best examples of this is in the first third of the book when Alexandra tests the water in Van Horne’s hot tub and likens it to the witch trials when “they would pull piece of flesh from a witch’s flesh with red-hot tongs” – a surprisingly poignant example of symbolism in the novel. Updike also succeeds in keeping the novel lighthearted at different moments when it could easily have just been a macabre piece of erotica – most notably when the witches cast a hex using items that they find in their houses, which is a concept that seems so ludicrous that you can’t help but laugh, or any of the times that they use their powers to get revenge against the irritating wives of their lovers.

However, his exploration of his characters sometimes leaves something to be desired. Yes, Alexandra, Jane, and Sukie are believable women that readers could encounter on a daily basis, but they sometimes come across as people that are best avoided by any means necessary. They are selfish and narcissistic, basking in their beauty and sexuality more than anything else. While they ultimately succumb to their guilty consciences near the end of the novel, they sometimes come across more like stereotypical witches than like human beings. This and the often unnecessary sexual encounters end up making the novel tread a thin line between satire and serious commentary to the point where I had to stop looking at it through a feminist lens and just accept it as a fun read.

A really interesting strategy that Updike uses throughout the novel is breaking up a conversation with large chunks of prose. This allows him to dive into the minds of the characters at the given moment and to question their motivations and emotions. However, this can sometimes get a bit confusing because the actual conversation can easily get lost during the intermissions. If I were to employ this in my own writing, I would try to use it only during simple, easy-to-follow conversations that the readers don’t have to flip back and forth between pages to understand.

The Witches of Eastwick isn’t for everyone. If you are a self-proclaimed feminist, it might be difficult to take the characters seriously. If you don’t enjoy multiple sex scenes throughout the books you read, then you should probably pick up Twilight instead. But if you want a highly descriptive, fun-to-the-point-of-being-vapid read, then Updike’s (arguably) most famous novel is for you.(less)

like · see review

Oct 04, 2011 Janine added it

The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike, Knopf, 1984
When I first chose to read this book, it was because I had seen the title on a Netflix menu and wanted to read the book before seeing the film. I had no idea how racy it would be! Updike describes the lives of three recently divorced Rhode Island women who have simultaneously been gifted “powers.” The women are also endowed with the “freedom” of being single and often are found in fantasies or real-life sexual encounters. In doing so, the women...more The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike, Knopf, 1984
When I first chose to read this book, it was because I had seen the title on a Netflix menu and wanted to read the book before seeing the film. I had no idea how racy it would be! Updike describes the lives of three recently divorced Rhode Island women who have simultaneously been gifted “powers.” The women are also endowed with the “freedom” of being single and often are found in fantasies or real-life sexual encounters. In doing so, the women (Jane, Alexandra, and Sukie) gain more than a few enemies in the small town of Eastwick, where gossip travels fast.
With so much negativity being spread about them, the women spare no vindictiveness. They have absolutely no problem resorting to spells and curses being cast upon their “friends.” This past-time only becomes more inherent after Mr. Daryl Van Horne moves in to an old mansion on the outskirts of town. Each woman is abruptly taken aback by the man, despite each having their own qualms about him, as well (Alexandra “hates” him). Van Horne is devilishly charming, and soon leads all three women into some crazy sex scenes. He also begins to bend the women to his will, suggesting to Alexandra, a sculptor that she try creating bigger masterpieces, after which she becomes depressed about her work.
However, despite their knack for “sharing” each woman soon vies for more independent attention, and the friendship begins to waver. That is, until the daughter of one of their victimized enemies comes to town. Jenny grabs hold of all of Van Horne’s attentions, and the women soon erupt into a jealous frenzy. The end result, as ironic as it is, is quite abrupt and shocking.
This novel definitely parodies the feminist movement of the sixties (the time period in which it is based), but I believe it also parodies the ideas of sexuality, both straight and gay. Updike may be a mysoginist, as many other reviewers have stated, but I believe that he is more or less a critic of human sexuality, a theme quite common throughout the novel.
Characterization is vital to the plot. None of the characters are very likeable, but each one has a knack for pulling you deeper into the storyline. Each character is portrayed as ugly, both inside and out, which furthers the dark tones of the story. The powers held by each woman is hardly as much of a trait as their desires- first to be promiscuous and then to be back in a stable relationship. The powers are a little weak in effect, the most powerful being Alexandra’s ability to control the weather. The others are much more watered-down, Jane can fly (an overused power in literature) and for some strange reason Sukie can turn milk to cream.
All in all, if you’re not a prude or are not offended by murderous plots, this book is quite fun to read. Updike uses many similes and metaphors, often taking more than a few paragraphs to describe a character or setting. So, if you’re not opposed to reading a long, well-written novel that offers much explanatory language and racy sex scenes, I’d recommend this novel to anyone.
(less)

like · see review

Sep 11, 2011 Matthew Garcia rated it 2 of 5 stars

I once read a summary of Updike's oeuvre that went: "Old people fucking," and hey, lookit that, that's what happens in this book.

Actually, apart from a few funny scenes (assembling a curse with household utensils), this book was incredibly disappointing. On one end, it reads like a parody of a lot of those female empowerment books from the 60s and 70s, where women are doing it for themselves, but they still need to the jumping board of men to accomplish what they want (and Darryl Van Horne is a...more

like · see review

Aug 09, 2011 Stewart rated it 4 of 5 stars

I came into possession of a paperback copy of John Updike's 1984 novel "The Witches of Eastwick" at a Borders store in Burleson, Texas, on March 30 of this year, the bookstore closing its doors at the end of business that very day. There were a few half-filled bookshelves left in an otherwise empty interior. The books were 90% off, and I bought this $15 paperback for $1.50. Updike is worth full price; a bargain is even better.
The novel looks at the lives of three women with witch-like powers i...more I came into possession of a paperback copy of John Updike's 1984 novel "The Witches of Eastwick" at a Borders store in Burleson, Texas, on March 30 of this year, the bookstore closing its doors at the end of business that very day. There were a few half-filled bookshelves left in an otherwise empty interior. The books were 90% off, and I bought this $15 paperback for $1.50. Updike is worth full price; a bargain is even better.
The novel looks at the lives of three women with witch-like powers in a coastal Rhode Island town in the late 1960s and the arrival of a mysterious man from New York City. The book has Updike's amazing prose, his extraordinary power of observation and detailed description, and a healthy dose of humor. Take this description of Rhode Island: "There is a kind of metallic green stain, bitten deep into Depression-era shingles, that exists nowhere else. Once you cross the state line, whether at Pawtucket or Westerly, a subtle change occurs, a cheerful dishevelment, a contempt for appearances, a chimerical uncaring. Beyond the clapboard slums yawn lunar stretches where only an abandoned roadside stand offering the ghost of last summer's CUKES betrays the yearning, disruptive presence of man."
Updike, who died in 2009, does a believable job, I think, in creating the three central female characters and inhabiting their minds. His wife must have helped in his descriptions of hairstyles, clothing, and accessories. This is a description of one of the women, Sukie, the reporter, mentioning the other two women: "Sukie had nothing of what she would call an artistic talent but she loved social existence and had been driven by the reduced circumstances that attend divorce to write for the local weekly, the Eastwick Word. As she marched with her bright lithe stride up and down Dock Street listening for gossip and speculating upon the fortunes of the shops, Alexandra's gaudy figurines in the window of the Yapping Fox, or a poster in the window of the Armenians' hardware store advertising a chamber-music concert to be held in the Unitarian Church and including Jane Smart, cello thrilled her like a glint of beach glass in the sand or a quarter found shining on the dirty sidewalk – a bit of code buried in the garble of daily experience, a stab of communication between the inner and outer world."
Having lived in New England for 10 years, I enjoyed Updike's topographical and psychological portrayal of that region and its residents and the play of ocean and land. Updike lived in Massachusetts for five decades.
"Witches" is not quite on the same level as the "Rabbit" quartet, which won Updike two Pulitzer Prizes, but it is a fun and rewarding read.

(less)

1 like · like · see review

title link	preview: The Witches of Eastwick
avg rating	preview: The Witches of Eastwick Goodreads rating: 3.26 (7384 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/217518.The_Witches_of_Eastwick?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1355681807l/217518.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/217518.The_Witches_of_Eastwick?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]The Witches of Eastwick by John Updike[/url]

The Witches of Eastwick (Eastwick #1)

Friend Reviews

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topic
Discuss This Book

combine
Other Editions (44)

Genres

Readers also enjoyed similar books

About John Updike

Books by John Updike

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website

Trivia About The Witches of Ea...

Quotes from The Witches of Eastwick