The Man in the High Castle
by Philip K. Dick
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of The Man in the High Castle.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
lists with this book
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 3153)
it's difficult to write about this book... the plot is simple enough: an alternate history detailing what would happen had the axis powers won the second world war. thankfully, there is very little of that obvious and dull government intrigue and new-world-order shit that lesser writers focus on -- rather, Dick takes on the spiritual life of the individual in a totalitarian society as his main concern... it's a wonderfully messy jumble of ideas and ruminations on race and history and human conn...more
Like this review?
yes
(8 people liked it)
4 comments
Read in July, 2007
This is an alternative-history novel with a twist. It is the 1960s in North America, and after the axis powers won World War 2, the former United States is divided into Japanese-controlled Pacific States of America on the west coast, the German-controlled United States on the east coast, and the neutral Rocky Mountain States in between. In this neutral zone lives The Man in the High Castle, the writer of an alternative-history novel describing the world as it would have been if Germany and Japan...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in June, 2008
Philip K. Dick looms fairly large in the sci-fi genre, but I had never read anything by him before, despite a great deal of affection for the most famous adaptation of his work, Blade Runner. Then I started taking the Neverending Book Quiz here on GoodReads, and found out that Dick wrote The Man in the High Castle basically by using the I Ching to determine the plot development as he went along (I wildly and correctly guessed that the book and the how-was-it-written story went together.) That ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Has a copy to sell/swap
—
Read in July, 2008
This is the first book I have read by Phillip K. Dick and is also the first of the genre of "alternate-history," that I have read (which he supposedly originated with this classic.) The book has an amazingly exciting premise, what if The Axis Powers won WW2? With a great author and an awesome premise this must be amazing! Well, it wasn't amazing. The premise that Dick used for this book gave him so much to work with, however, he doesn't utilize any of the interesting ways that the worl...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2008
Dick is generally known for his science fiction that blends mysticism and philosophy in a dystopian future. His novels and stories are products of his neurosis (he was diagnosed a paranoid schizophrenic and his condition was exasperated by amphetamine abuse) and his reaction to the rise of technology in the human condition. Generally, Dick's novels ask serious questions about humanity and consciousness, hence is plays on perspective and sometimes the unraveling of entire plots as the narrative c...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2008
I have never been much of a fan of 'alternate reality' fiction, and as such it took me a long time to get around to reading this Philip K. Dick novel, written in the early 60's. I have to admit, the only reason I read it is because it was the only of Dick's works to win a Hugo award, and so I figured there had to be something special about it.
As it turns out, the book was well worth my time, although it's not a book for everyone. Set in the 60's, the book examines a world in which Japan an...more
As it turns out, the book was well worth my time, although it's not a book for everyone. Set in the 60's, the book examines a world in which Japan an...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2007
Dick maintained that all his fiction was realistic. Sometimes this amounts to an omnipotent, childish motive in which one's inner thought directly changes the reality of others. But in this book, somehow this idea works.
Two aspects that impressed me in this book: how the author imagined the inner subjective worlds of his characters under a different political and social order--and expresses it in the very language these characters think through--especially the mental makeup of those colonized...more
Two aspects that impressed me in this book: how the author imagined the inner subjective worlds of his characters under a different political and social order--and expresses it in the very language these characters think through--especially the mental makeup of those colonized...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I'll start with the positives.
The alternate reality of a world where the Axis won WWII is very interesting and well thought out in my opinion. Also, the characters in this book seem realistically complex and deep, especially when compared to those in the other books I've read recently (Snow Crash and Neuromancer). Juliana was particularly interesting and her scenes were very well written. Generally the plot line is pretty good.
But as good as the characters are, I did find that the main ...more
The alternate reality of a world where the Axis won WWII is very interesting and well thought out in my opinion. Also, the characters in this book seem realistically complex and deep, especially when compared to those in the other books I've read recently (Snow Crash and Neuromancer). Juliana was particularly interesting and her scenes were very well written. Generally the plot line is pretty good.
But as good as the characters are, I did find that the main ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in July, 2008
This book had quite a different feel from other books by the same author. I really enjoy Philip's writing because he's always asking the same question: "What is real?" He's pretty obsessed with that question, and if you know about his personal life it makes sense. The thing about this book is that I enjoyed it, but I want to read it again, more carefully, now that I have a sense of it. It's a book that I would've like to have read in a college level course so that I could hear the prof...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2008
An alternate history with a science-fiction twist! The author explores a victory in World War II by Germany and Japan, with most of the United States under Reich or "Home Islands" control. There are a lot of ideas packed into this novel, about history, time, authoritarianism, art and artifact, identity, human relations, cultural conflict, etc. The Man in the High Castle won a Hugo award for SF, and it is easy to see why. The end of this book keeps you going through the last page. I fou...more
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
Read in July, 2007
recommends it for:
alternate history enthusiasts, nerds, and peole that like the I Ching
This is not a perfect book, but it is a brilliant one. That earns it the fifth star. :)
Philip K. Dick apparently utilized the I Ching himself; it's a well-done conceit, as the novel itself details a cast of characters dependent on the Book of Changes for their every decision. In short, it's the early 1960's, the United States stayed neutral in WWII, and subsequently suffered massive defeat and partition at the hands of both Hitler's Reich and ...more
Philip K. Dick apparently utilized the I Ching himself; it's a well-done conceit, as the novel itself details a cast of characters dependent on the Book of Changes for their every decision. In short, it's the early 1960's, the United States stayed neutral in WWII, and subsequently suffered massive defeat and partition at the hands of both Hitler's Reich and ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in August, 2007
recommends it for:
classic sci fi lovers
When I was first getting into scifi, way back sometime around the Norman invasion (or was it the signing of the Magna Carta?), I heard from some review or something that Philip K Dick was a terrible misogynist. Thus, I never wanted to read his books. Then, in my senior year of college, I watched Blade Runner in one of Geller's classes (cause she is awesome) and decided to read the book it was based upon. What a great book! I looked around for misogyny but it didn't seem any worse than your u...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in October, 2007
The strength of the story largely rests on its premise as an alternate history, presenting a world in which Japan and Nazi Germany were the victors in WWII. His descriptions of a Japanese and Nazi-led world are interesting if largely unrealistic, amounting to something like political horror with hints of a genocide in Africa and the reconstitution of slavery in the American South. The book contains a number of parrallel plot-lines, which are interesting but don't really deliver. Most annoying...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
An interesting take on the 'Alternative history' genre of Science fiction. Dick himself didn't consider this to be among his Sci Fi work and was one of the few books he wrote that got published by a main stream publisher during his lifetime (most of his books were published by a sci-fi pulp publisher called Ace who payed by the word and printed 'double backs';two books in one).
A lot of the book is put into constructing this alternative world, not through overt means but mostly by way of char...more
A lot of the book is put into constructing this alternative world, not through overt means but mostly by way of char...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in July, 2008
Reading the synopsis of the book: A world in which the Allied powers lost WW2, may lead you to think that "The Man In High Castle" is focused as a third-person narrative view on the alien world the US must now occupy while being occupied. However, Dick takes on the alternate reality through the lives of its characters which gives a soley human face to the novel.
I liked that approach as it left much up to the imagination and allowed me to buy into the reality of the world as I know...more
I liked that approach as it left much up to the imagination and allowed me to buy into the reality of the world as I know...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in June, 2008
recommended to Nancy by:
Peter and Marisa
Philip Dick's drama takes place fifteen years after WWII in a world conquered by Nazi Germany and Japan. We are in the United States. It has been divided between Germany and Japan. The main characters are people living in the West...dominated by Japan. Each individual drama is an interesting point of view of the larger nightmare. The Asian Oracle, I Ching, is used skillfully by most of the characters to help them understand what's going on in their lives....The book moves very quickly and is ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in July, 2008
I knew plenty about this book before I read it, even the ending (unfortunately). It took long enough to find a copy. The premise rocked. America and the Allies lose WW2, and Japan and Germany now occupy whats left of America. Thoughtout, people talk about a banned book which looks at a different possibility, that the Allies actually won.
It's a rather nasty read in points, mostly for the chilling images it portrays. I wasnt expecting that, but was pleasently surprised. Not only that, but the ...more
It's a rather nasty read in points, mostly for the chilling images it portrays. I wasnt expecting that, but was pleasently surprised. Not only that, but the ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
What should had happened if Nazist Germany had won World War II? This novel is a possible answer to the question and it's a rare example of "earthly science fiction".
Quoting the Italian title of the book, Swastika is over the sun and Dick tries to explain us the reasons why.
Yet I remember how I was disappointed while reading at this book for the relatively few interesting elements given by the author. I mean, starting from such a premise Dick could use more imagination while ...more
Quoting the Italian title of the book, Swastika is over the sun and Dick tries to explain us the reasons why.
Yet I remember how I was disappointed while reading at this book for the relatively few interesting elements given by the author. I mean, starting from such a premise Dick could use more imagination while ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
recommends it for:
Everyone!
After reading A Scanner Darkly and Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? I was hungry for more Philip K Dick. I picked this up, as it had won a Hugo. It deserves a Hugo and a half. When describing the premise of this book to people (Allies lose World War 2, World divided by Reich and Japan), everyone assumed it would be an epic novel that would end with the Axis being overthrown. It does not. This book is more personal, about the emotional journeys of individual characters, and it is far more sat...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
