Goodreads | The Pillars of the Earth (Deluxe Edition)

topics	replies	last activity
Afred's plead for work from Jack	10	4 days ago, 06:51AM
Possible dry spell?	39	14 days ago, 08:23AM
There's going to be a sequel!	14	3 days ago, 10:55PM

Francine rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

07/31/08

Read in July, 2008

I did not hate this book (hate would be too strong a word, and I can't hate it because I applaud the fact that Ken Follett attempted to write an epic novel). But I did not like it. I didn't like it from the start; his writing style hit me like a brick, but Jim thoroughly enjoyed the book that I kept trying to convince myself that I ought to give it a chance, hoping it would get better. When I was about 500 pages in, he saw how miserable I was and asked why I didn't just stop reading it...more I did not hate this book (hate would be too strong a word, and I can't hate it because I applaud the fact that Ken Follett attempted to write an epic novel). But I did not like it. I didn't like it from the start; his writing style hit me like a brick, but Jim thoroughly enjoyed the book that I kept trying to convince myself that I ought to give it a chance, hoping it would get better. When I was about 500 pages in, he saw how miserable I was and asked why I didn't just stop reading it, but at that point, I was invested in it; I had spent all that time getting that far, that I needed to finish it, and I couldn't wait to come to the end. I kept counting down: "Only 450 pages left; only 300 to go; last 200 pages...yay, I have 50 pages left!" Those fifty pages were the toughest to get through. By the time I was at the end, I thought it was a wasted effort - both on his part and mine.

It's so much easier to explicate on what I did not like because there were so many things:
- I loathed the writing style (he vacillated between pages and pages of highly complex architectural discourses to third-grade level simple sentences grouped into short paragraphs). Sometimes it was bearable. Other times, I wanted to pull my hair out. There were times when I felt the only time he came alive as an author was when he was discussing architecture, but these parts were so didactic in nature that it couldn't hold my interest for long periods of time.
- I did not like the author's narrative style. He had to tie everything together (causality was so prevalent throughout the text that I wondered how he didn't work in how the killing of a fly affected events 60 years later). Every single storyline was wrapped up - too neatly for my liking, in some cases. Everyone was tied to someone else (it was like playing Six Degrees); every single character had to have a denouement; every little plot twist had to be explained; closure had to be achieved, no matter how preposterous the circumstances, over time and space.
- The characterization was poor. In fact, it was appalling how two-dimensional these characters were. Good people were good. Bad people were loathsome. As time went on, the good were always suffering one thing or another; they were put upon; they were harrassed; they were constantly challenged and put to the test like Job (something Follett actually used as a sermon!). The badfolk became more oppressive over time; they were not only detestable, but they had absolutely no redeeming qualities. And to go with a typical medieval stereotype, the good were always excessively beautiful, honorable, intelligent (geniuses or savants, even!) - and if they weren't rich, they would be at the end (I half expected Havelok the Dane and his refrigerator mouth to pop up somewhere, proving once and for all that in the medieval period, to be good was to have the purest light shining out of your mouth each time you opened it). Nevertheless, the bad became uglier, became more despotic, scheming throughout life to get the better of their enemies (the goodfolk). But in the end, good always triumphed over evil; those who could, repented and were forgiven. Those who couldn't, were killed off somehow, because apparently, death is the only way an evil person gets his (or her) dues. And then everyone had a happy ending. I hate happy endings when they're so obviously contrived. And this work was so elaborately, exhaustively, thoroughly contrived. (Maybe it's not too late for me to change my mind and say I hated it. *grin*)
- Historically speaking, there was so much left to be desired. Granted, this novel was written two decades ago, and there have been new discoveries about the medieval period since Follett started his research. But he got it all wrong anyhow. His idea of medieval life was so...off, that it hurt my head to continue reading sometimes. I had to pause periodically and rant to Jim about what I currently found off-putting (for example, there weren't many literate people at the time; at the time this novel was set, there was still a distinct divide between England and Wales; reading and writing were two separate skill sets, and people who knew how to read did not necessarily know how to write and vice versa; orality was a prevalent part of storytelling back then and books not so much and yet somehow, he conflated much of both; manuscript writing was either orally dictated or copied tediously by the monks - his concept of a scriptorium was incomplete, defective - and there has been so much written about this that it saddened me; he used modern translations of medieval poetical/verse works and couldn't explain even alliterative verse form effectively - I even wonder if he knew what it was; his understanding of the languages of the period - Old English, Middle English, Latin, Norman French, Old French, Middle French, etc. - and what was spoken by the aristocrats vs. the peasants vs. the growing middle classes disgusts me; he showed a lack of understanding of medieval law, medieval rights, the social classes, gender roles, even the tales and legends of the period, in both England and France; priests were quite low on the totem pole, in terms of the religious hierarchy, and were quite disparaged yet somehow, that didn't quite come across in this novel...I could go on and on, but I won't).

And the historical part of the novel I just found lacking. There are enough histories and chronicles, contemporaneously written, of the time, that he did not have to deviate much from history. There is so much written about the period between the death of Henry I through the civil wars between the Empress Matilda and King Stephen, to the time that Henry II ascended the throne (including the martyrdom of Thomas a Beckett), that I don't quite understand how he couldn't have mined the chronicles for better material. I understand that this is why it's called historical fiction, and that there will always be some element of fiction interspersed with historical fact. But the fictional aspects usually have to do with surrounding characters and situations that bolster the history. The fiction is not necessarily to the history itself. Many times, when writing historical fiction, the author has to beware the pitfalls of creating a revisionist retelling, interspersing his or her own ideals or beliefs of what should have been to what was. If this novel had been marketed as a revisionary narrative, it would have been okay. But it wasn't. I'm just glad that the historical aspect of the novel just served as the background and not the real story. Because then, I probably would've stopped reading.

The premise was a good one and held a lot of promise. It could've been a great historical epic had it been handled by a more assured writer. By someone who was more of a visionary, someone who had the patience to do exhaustive research or who knew how to craft richly developed characters. It needed an author who understood the epic genre, who knew how to mold the epic, who knew how to keep the narrative going, seemlessly binding time with narration and the human condition, without resorting to stereotypes and grating drama. And most importantly, it needed someone who understood when the story had been told; that while there will always be other stories to tell, that each book has its own natural end, and that these stories may not belong in this book.

Ken Follett may be a bestselling author of suspense novels (and even historical fiction such as Pillars of the Earth and World without End), but he is no writer of epics. Compared to writers of historical fiction such as Edward Rutherford, James Michener, Bernard Cornwell or Margaret George, Ken Follett has a long way to go....less

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

Troy rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

05/10/08

Read in March, 2008

Ahem.
"Pillars of the Earth" is a very long book. It's got a lot of soap-opera-like twists and turns - no amnesia, but just about everything else, including mistaken identities, illicit marriages, illicit lack of marriage, illegitimate children, questionable parentage, love triangles, revenge, greed, power, a few murders, rape, witches, politics, knights, swords and horsies. OK, that last bit is not so soap-opera-like. There's also lots and lots of architecture. And it's a very lo...more Ahem.
"Pillars of the Earth" is a very long book. It's got a lot of soap-opera-like twists and turns - no amnesia, but just about everything else, including mistaken identities, illicit marriages, illicit lack of marriage, illegitimate children, questionable parentage, love triangles, revenge, greed, power, a few murders, rape, witches, politics, knights, swords and horsies. OK, that last bit is not so soap-opera-like. There's also lots and lots of architecture. And it's a very long book.

Main story follows a single family of stone masons for (roughly) three generations, and the extended families associated with re-marrying, etc. Around this family revolves an aspiring monk/prior, a powerful but morally questionable bishop, a ruthless Earl (title, not name), and several kings. The thing is, even with all the re-marrying and such, there are so many evolving inter-relationships between these main characters as the struggle for political power unfolds, and of course everybody grows up, has children, etc - that EVERYTHING seems to happen to this small group of people. And just when you think things have settled down for a while, something else happens, or attempts to happen. And these things keep happening for approximately 980 pages.

Along the way, you learn a lot about medieval culture - particularly the role of religion, the political power of a monestary, priory, or diocese - how life is funded, and just how much it sucks to be a serf. There's also quite a bit of focus on the reason for, and the means to, building cathedrals - Follett muses in his Foreward that one of the things he never could understand is why people in such destitute times would have put so much energy into buildings of such scale, and this book addresses that. You also learn a lot about architecture and the evolution of cathedral-building. I can also now tell you the difference between a nave, chancel, transept, cloister, and clerestory. Oh, and probably 7 different words for "horse".

Really though, I very much enjoyed it, despite its very lengthy nature. Very full of words. Long. Not a day went by I didn't read at least 50 pages (note - at that rate, it will still take about 3 weeks to finish).
The building is a constant, its a reason to keep the central family of masons from wandering off and having more illicit marriages, and its a reason for the ongoing political power struggles. It's essential, but it's not distracting, and the cathedral is not the focus. The people are. They're engaging, you feel for them, you assign labels (good, evil) you change labels several times (he's pretty self-serving and conniving for a "good" guy), and you constantly wonder just what more can possibly happen to these people. There's also an underlying mystery that keeps you wondering... right up until 100 pages too soon.

My only complaint is this - the big climax occurs, the mystery is revealed, it all comes together - and there are still 100 pages to go. The last part of the wrap-up, the rise and fall, takes a while, has an interesting but probably unnecessary historically accurate reference to English church vs. king to give the whole novel an air of "this could have really happened in some obscure English medieval village somewhere, I wonder which cathedral this is supposed to be? Can I go see the real thing?" But it loses momentum right at the very end. Loose ends nicely tied up, but it wasn't the gripping page turner it had been in the first 900 pages. By that time, though, you've got so few pages in your right hand you just keep going because the end is in sight.
...less

Like this review? yes (14 people liked it)

4 comments

Jax rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

07/11/08

bookshelves: awful

Has a copy to sell/swap — Read in March, 2008

recommended to Jax by: My mother, who thought I'd like the cover art.
recommends it for: People with iron wills and a surfeit of free time.

A massive tome with a spine thicker than Arnold Schwartzenegger’s forearm, Pillars looks intimidating enough to make even the most avid readers wary; its 973 pages are densely packed with unforgiving walls of 8-point text with nary a line break in sight. Before I was more than a hundred pages in, however, it became apparent that length was among the least of this behemoth of a book’s problems.

Follett's concept—a medieval, generation-spanning epic built around the constructio...more A massive tome with a spine thicker than Arnold Schwartzenegger’s forearm, Pillars looks intimidating enough to make even the most avid readers wary; its 973 pages are densely packed with unforgiving walls of 8-point text with nary a line break in sight. Before I was more than a hundred pages in, however, it became apparent that length was among the least of this behemoth of a book’s problems.

Follett's concept—a medieval, generation-spanning epic built around the construction of a cathedral—is exciting and full of potential (as are the illustrations, which are far too beautiful to serve as bookends to such trash); but the snaillike pacing, nonexistent characterization, and stilted, robotic prose ruin whatever potential the book might have had. Things start off on a sour note as we must bear witness to a painful prologue in which Follett tries to establish some sort of basis for an intersection that we are led to believe is soon to come – only to abandon this plotline for so long that we’ve forgotten what the point of the book is by the time it comes around again.

Then we fast-forward a decade, ending up in a rolling green valley alongside a totally different cast of characters. Before even a single word of dialog has appeared, Follett has described in exhaustive detail the lives thus far of Tom Builder (guess what his profession is), his moderately pregnant wife, Agnes, and their children, Martha and Alfred. Here we run into one of the most irritating faults of the whole book—a descriptiveness that borders on—and then completely transcends—the excessive. One wonders what on earth Follett’s editor was off doing when he should have been cutting Pillars down by several hundred pages’ worth of unruly tresses and twinkling eyes.

A thorough editor, armed with a hacksaw, could have perhaps fashioned this mammoth mishap into a passable pulp page-turner; but left as is, Pillars proves infantile, taxing—and oftentimes just plain disgusting. Fight and torture scenes are pointlessly gratuitous; descriptions of the architecture are historically accurate but impossibly long and boring; attempts to make the solidly one-dimensional characters charming only render them crass, impulsive—and, frankly, kind of gross.

It’s all downhill from there—with the exception of plucky prior Phillip, who could have been the novel’s saving grace if not for Follett’s iron resolution to curdle what little cream rises to the top of this mess. Phillip is smart, tenacious, and intensely likable, and his involvement in Tom’s life (being the prior of Kingsbridge Priory, where the cathedral is being built) gives the impression that he’ll be a key player for a long while. We are sadly mistaken; Phillip barely has time to settle in to his newly-acquired prior’s quarters before he is cast aside like a ragdoll. Oh, sure, he’s still around—but he does little more than pace hallways, issue stale anecdotes, and wring his hands over his inability to keep Kingsbridge safe after it is attacked again and again and again by the bad guys—who, in typical Follett style, would not have looked out of place twirling their moustaches and cackling maniacally. Waleran Bigod (I kid you not) and William Hamleigh fill their roles of ‘cold-hearted evil mastermind’ and ‘sadist thug’, respectively, with menacing glares, cold, unsmiling eyes, and appropriately villainous hubris all around. Follett abandons all pretenses with these two and instead goes for pure shock value, thereby rendering even his silliest characters uniformly unlovable.

This is all well and good (well, truly, not)—but what really had me sputtering with disbelief was the author’s warped sense of justice. Does he honestly think that making William fat and gouty by the book’s end will bring closure? If anything, I found it a little extreme; Willy and Wally (as I took to calling them) were the only ones who even tried to relieve the suffering for the reader brought on by Tom’s (literally) witchy girlfriend (yes, girlfriend) Ellen, her funny-looking son Jack, and his improbable beau Aliena (I couldn’t make this stuff up if I tried); the men deserve pats on the back!

For that matter, so does anyone who managed to overcome the temptation to throw this bloated Colossus out the nearest window halfway through. Congratulations. Now how about that sequel?...less

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

Tina rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

05/28/08

Read in May, 2008

I finally finished this book and I loved it!!

The characters were interesting, flawed, and complex. The storyline was captivating, intricate, and exciting. I think that because the story was told from the point of view of many characters (5 or 6, I think), the author was able to show so much more of what was going on in many different places at the same time. Also, the length of the book allowed for a lot of time to pass (almost 50 years). I love how the author incorporated some actual hi...more I finally finished this book and I loved it!!

The characters were interesting, flawed, and complex. The storyline was captivating, intricate, and exciting. I think that because the story was told from the point of view of many characters (5 or 6, I think), the author was able to show so much more of what was going on in many different places at the same time. Also, the length of the book allowed for a lot of time to pass (almost 50 years). I love how the author incorporated some actual historical events into the story, which made all the other plotlines seem so much more real.

The author spent a great deal of time and effort explaining specific features and aspects of cathedral construction. At first, I really tried to read through these parts carefully and understand them, but later on in the book I found myself skimming over them to get back to the actual plot. It was obvious that he had done extensive research on this topic and his descriptions did help me to appreciate what hard work it was for people to build such magnificent structures at that time in history.

The ending of the book was very gratifying, seriously my favorite type of book- the type that ties up all loose ends.

Now for the downside, this book can be vulgar and downright disgusting at times. The violence depicted is more graphic than I have ever read in any other book before. But I realize that the author was simply trying to be true to life at that period in history- knights, war, pillage, famine, etc. And for this fact, I appreciate the realism- but that didn't make it any easier to read.

Bottom line- I love this book. I qualify my recommendation though because of the reasons listed above. This book is NOT for everyone.

*************************************************************

***Update*** (I went out and bought a copy of this book for myself.)
I am loving this book! I have about 150 pages left and I can't wait to see how it ends. But at the same time, I'm sad for it to end because I'm going to miss the characters.

I still have the same complaint that the story is a bit soap opera-y and some elements of the story seem modernized from what it was probably like in 12th century England. But I'm at the point now where I don't care. Unlike other books I have read lately, once I pick it up, can't put it down. (I find myself reading three or four hours late into the night- not the best way to combat my constant sleepiness.)

******************************************

I started this book in all of its 970 page glory. At first, I couldn't understand all the hype- everyone I have talked to said that they loved this book. I thought the author's writing style was a bit soap opera-y. I don't know much about the Middle Ages, but it seemed to me that some of the dialogue, emotional situations, and social situations were somewhat modernized- it was hard for me to believe that that was really what it was like during that time period. But as the story moved along, I found myself drawn in.

I made it to chapter 5 before I had to turn it back in to the library. (Those of you who have read it know that the chapters are way long, chapter 5 is really around page 275.) I'm now 14 on the waiting list to get it back and I'm really missing it. I'm getting close to just going out and buying myself a copy so I can keep reading....less

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

Callista rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

06/19/08

recommended to Callista by: my science teacher

A mere summary of this work of fiction can't really explain this huge, one thousand page book. It sweeps through so many emotions—fear, love, lust, hatred, terror, ambition—and so many characters, from the ruthless and terrible William Hamleigh to the amazing, ambitious Lady Aliena to Jack Jackson, who spent the first eleven years of his life living in the forest, of all places. A simple two sentence summary can't describe a book this fascinating, this huge, this engrossing.

This book... ...more A mere summary of this work of fiction can't really explain this huge, one thousand page book. It sweeps through so many emotions—fear, love, lust, hatred, terror, ambition—and so many characters, from the ruthless and terrible William Hamleigh to the amazing, ambitious Lady Aliena to Jack Jackson, who spent the first eleven years of his life living in the forest, of all places. A simple two sentence summary can't describe a book this fascinating, this huge, this engrossing.

This book... it kept me captivated. It is the one of the first historical fiction books I ever read, and I'm glad that my science teacher recommended it to me. Even though it's incredibly violent and slightly inappropriate in some parts, I thoroughly enjoyed this book, considering I finished all 973 pages in about five days. I just couldn't put it down—it was that good. Just when you thought things were going to go as planned, something happens (most likely because of the work of William Hamleigh and the bishop he goes to for guidance and forgiveness, Waleran) that throws everything in the opposite direction. The pages literally flew by, and when I finished and got to the last page, I wanted to go out and get the sequel as soon as possible.

Even though the action was amazing, I'd have to say that I was most impressed with the characters. Even though there are so many characters that Ken Follett had to keep an eye on, he kept a firm grip of every single one of them. Each of them had their own ambitions, their own desires, their own fears, their own loves—none of them were exactly the same. The people you thought were good in the beginning turned out to be terrible and loathsome, but it didn't seem out of character, because Ken Follett is that good. Of course, part of the thing I liked most about the characters in the book is that they all had flaws. It's incredibly difficult to make it so that all of your characters have flaws, but Ken Follett handled it brilliantly. There is no really "perfect" character, and that's what drew me to all of them. Even my favorite character, Aliena, ended up having several flaws, all of which could have easily killed her but didn't.

Like my science teacher said, if I ended up screaming at the book, feeling all the terror and fear of the characters, then I was enjoying the book. If I wanted to reach through the pages of the book and strangle a specific character, then I was enjoying it even more. And you know, he was right. Every single thing in the book was written incredibly vividly and, as you can see, I can't seem to run out of things to say about it.

The only thing that I didn't like that much was that Ken Follett seemed to have a bit of a repetitive style—I must have seen some dozen or so "heart in his mouth" lines—but that's easily overlooked, considering the rest of the book was so beautiful.

Before I end up rambling about this book (which I could do, believe me), I'm just going to say that I can definitely see why this is my science teacher's absolute favorite book....less

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

Danny rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

02/24/08

Read in February, 2008

recommends it for: readers of very long/unending series

(one minor spoiler ahead, reader beware...)

I started this book without too much expectation but between the introduction that the author gave to his own book and learning part way through that it had become an Oprah pick I must admit that I mentally raised the bar a bit.

Unfortunately, I found the book fell short...

I was very interested through about the first half of the book, it is clear that Follet writes thrillers in his other life and some of the initial action scenes were fairly...more (one minor spoiler ahead, reader beware...)

I started this book without too much expectation but between the introduction that the author gave to his own book and learning part way through that it had become an Oprah pick I must admit that I mentally raised the bar a bit.

Unfortunately, I found the book fell short...

I was very interested through about the first half of the book, it is clear that Follet writes thrillers in his other life and some of the initial action scenes were fairly exciting. The plot started out a tad slow, but began to build and I was hopeful of a great climax. But found myself becoming more and more sour with the book as I continued. It may be that I was just holding my breath waiting for the end of the book, but the last 100 pages of the book felt tacked on and even more forced. I did not find the book to be terribly enlightening about the period as others have, though some of the architectural information was interesting - I'll admit that I never really thought much before about what it would take to make such a huge building stay together. The characters developed up to a point, and then never really matured, remaining fairly unrealistic. Though the pure malevolent nature of a few of the “bad guys” did have me rooting for the protagonists in the beginning, the repetitive nature of the plot lines and twists eventually just became annoying and I wasn’t really attached to any character.

This book falls prey to far too many of the classic blunders of very long novels or series. I was reminded of the Clan of the Cave Bear series (which initially was quite a fun read too) in that the main characters try to be too much. For example, Jack is not only intelligent, good with stone, handsome and charming, but he is superhumanly inventive and lucky. Like Ayla (from the Clan series) he makes ludicrous mental leaps to revolutionize technology and develops overnight insight into city planning and tactical defense when it is convenient for the plot line (by the way… a city wall in a day? please… wasn’t one of the selling points of this book supposed to be its architectural realism?). On the other end of the spectrum, the antagonists are constantly attempting to one-up their last act of moral depravity and it becomes difficult to believe that anyone would really let them remain in power, regardless of their political tricks or bribes.

This would have made a great yarn if it was about half the size and toned down on the sensationalism a bit. As it is, I am really surprised at the positive outpouring for this book… Maybe I’m missing something…
...less

Like this review? yes (5 people liked it)

add a comment

Kanawinkie rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

01/10/08

Read in January, 2008

Admittedly, I haven’t read any of Follett’s other works. In fact, I can’t say I’ve heard of him as an author before this. And really, I only decided to read this book because my mum practically pushed it into my lap and said “YOU NEED TO READ THIS!”
I do love myself a good piece of historical fiction though, so really, it wasn’t very difficult to convince me to read.

Also unusual for me, I read the forward by the artist that was in the beginning of the book. Usually I’ll skip th...more Admittedly, I haven’t read any of Follett’s other works. In fact, I can’t say I’ve heard of him as an author before this. And really, I only decided to read this book because my mum practically pushed it into my lap and said “YOU NEED TO READ THIS!”
I do love myself a good piece of historical fiction though, so really, it wasn’t very difficult to convince me to read.

Also unusual for me, I read the forward by the artist that was in the beginning of the book. Usually I’ll skip things like that and go back and read it after I’m done with the book, but since I knew very little about the writer himself, I decided to read it first. I’m glad I did! The story surrounding how and why the book was written I found quite interesting; he’s known for his thriller fictions, and he just so happens to have a passion for cathedrals and wanted to write about them. For some reason this greatly increased my interest in the book. Probably from personal experience with paper writing, I know that when you’re writing about a topic that really interests you, it tends to be better.

And boy was it! Follett is a master story-teller. This is a long read and there are a lot of characters to keep track of, but Follett handles it effortlessly. They all interweave with each other nicely and their development makes for some very touching and memorable characters. I’m a sucker for strong, capable females and Ellen, for example, is just that.
I even found myself quite fond of Philip and Tom Builder, and Jack and so many of the other major characters.

Aside from the gripping storyline, Follett’s description of medieval life is rich, and he manages to touch on the lives of many different levels of society and illustrates just how much they relied and affected each other. I have no idea how much research he put into the writing of this book, so I don’t know how historically accurate it is, but boy – if life was as volatile as Follett describes, it’s a wonder any cathedrals managed to get built at all!

The whole novel flowed very smoothly, and it was a joy to read. It picked up in pace gradually as stories began to intersect with each other, and I found I had a difficult time putting the book down. In fact, the only places where he began to lose my interest were the moments when he would go off on extensive tangents describing and glorifying the cathedrals themselves. These were hardly anything I could hold him against doing since it clearly was his passion, and they were easily skipped over if I felt they began to drag on.

I’d definitely recommend this book to be read. Luckily my Dad picked up the sequel to this book as well (World Without End) so I’ve got plans to read that in the near future!...less

Like this review? yes (3 people liked it)

add a comment

Xysea rated it:

(review of isbn 0451166892)

01/09/08

bookshelves: book-on-home-shelf

Read in January, 2008

recommends it for: people who like epic novels

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

This one started out with an interesting hook. The prologue was promising, and necessary to the plot.

However, it took a long time to get it to reconcile with his plot and I grew restless waiting for that to happen. Eventually, enough action started to happen and the lulls disappeared. It flowed pretty smoothly after that, and I'm glad I stuck it out.

It's a huge book, around 1000 pages. Wow. I haven't read a book this long in a while. So, it was good that it engaged me, right up un...more This one started out with an interesting hook. The prologue was promising, and necessary to the plot.

However, it took a long time to get it to reconcile with his plot and I grew restless waiting for that to happen. Eventually, enough action started to happen and the lulls disappeared. It flowed pretty smoothly after that, and I'm glad I stuck it out.

It's a huge book, around 1000 pages. Wow. I haven't read a book this long in a while. So, it was good that it engaged me, right up until the end.

A couple of commments: The bad guys seemed almost cartoonishly bad, and predictable. They rape, torture, murder - all for pleasure, even sexual arousal. It's an over-used plot device. It's supposed to make you hate the bad guy so much you want him to have a grisly demise. However, in this case, with the baddest baddy of them all, the conclusion isn't particularly gruesome or satisfying. It's rather a let-down, especially since he was built up to be so bad.

There were a lot of storylines competing for your attention: I can see how they were interwoven, but I could equally see how one or more of them removed would have made for a tighter story, an easier flowing writing style. The book was ambitious, I'll give it that, and it largely worked.

I felt it didn't do enough to inspire you as to why the cathedral was being built; too much was hung on the dreams of the men (and few women) involved in the building. However, those aspirations didn't necessary seem lofty enough, or perhaps they weren't adequately described?

The most compelling are the undercurrents that show through; the love stories, the families, the lives affected by the building of the cathedral and the town of Knightsbridge.

I thought, for the most part, that the characters were a bit better than two dimensional, and in some particular cases particularly well drawn. Ellen, in my opinion, seemed to come to life more than others. Prior Phillip, too. But many of them were rather flat and seemed to only serve to move the plot along - cardboard cut-outs could have done the same.

All in all, it was worth the read. It was quite the epic novel, and while I don't feel I learned anything particularly new, I also felt mostly entertained.

****SPOILER ALERT****

NOTE TO AUTHOR: It's likely one raid would have succeeded on the town, but I find it unfathomable that they would wait to fortify the town only under the shadow of another raid. Wouldn't they more likely have fortified the town immediately after the first raid, therefore nullifying the second? Perhaps it's a small point, but I noticed....less

Like this review? yes (3 people liked it)

add a comment

Patricia rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

11/16/07

bookshelves: historical-fiction

Read in November, 2007

recommends it for: no one

Hmmm... a family relation lent me this book. I was mostly interested in what kind of books my particular relation was into. I think you can learn a lot about a person by reading their favorite books. I am actually a little disturbed. Yes you may call me a prude, but there was sex in it. I know what your thinking... thats not a shocker. But its not just sex... it is violent sex. It has several graphic rape scenes. And I have to admit violence to women frightens me.
I don't need that graphic of...more

Like this review? yes (13 people liked it)

4 comments

amelia rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

11/18/07

Read in January, 2004

recommends it for: no one! apparently oprah fans

This is seriously one of the worst books I've ever read. The only reason I finished the book is because I cannot put a book down once I start.

The writing is terrible. The plotting may be dramatic, but I had almost zero interest in any of the characters; they seem to exist merely for events to happen to them, like actors in a disaster movie. Beyond that there seemed to be three characters in the book: Bad guy, good guy, and good victimized-yet-able-to -overcome girl.

What got me most was: ...more

Like this review? yes (13 people liked it)

1 comments

Sajitha rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

04/30/08

bookshelves: have-read

Read in September, 2005

The Pillars of The Earth is unlike any other book Ken Follett has written. So don’t judge it by the other books you have read. The book has more than 1000 pages (1335 to be exact) and as you start reading you shall understand why! It is an epic tale of love, hatred, friendship, passion, revenge, and human achievement.

There are wonderful characters with outstanding bravery, commitment, and passion. It makes you weep at misfortune and injustice. Sometimes you smile at the happy times and also...more The Pillars of The Earth is unlike any other book Ken Follett has written. So don’t judge it by the other books you have read. The book has more than 1000 pages (1335 to be exact) and as you start reading you shall understand why! It is an epic tale of love, hatred, friendship, passion, revenge, and human achievement.

There are wonderful characters with outstanding bravery, commitment, and passion. It makes you weep at misfortune and injustice. Sometimes you smile at the happy times and also become nervous of the villains and cheer the victories of the folks you like.

It is a story of a British family that built Cathedrals in England. The story starts with the events that create the political and personal ambitions which lead to the construction of the Cathedrals. It describes the life of Tom who is a builder and his family. As you read this book, you get to know his family and the lives of each member just as you would when you meet a new family. The story deals with all the details (practical as well as the personal), including from where the stone come from, how it is carried, what is medieval mortar etc. So you actually learn history in this story (but unknowingly). You can feel the smell of the woods and towns of olden times. You can feel their feelings, fear their dangers, and respect the heroes.

You also learn about that period of life. Ken Follett has done a lot of research for this novel. A very few authors are able to interlink historical fact in a ripping yarn, romance, mystery or a thriller without loosing the essence and the facts! The book centers on the building of a cathedral and how this mighty achievement rises out of the ambitions of men.

A Word of Caution: It contains details of violent sexual actions. But these blend well into the plot and as a reader you feel that they are integral to the plot. It brings out the brutality of relevant characters. There are a couple of references of animal cruelty which may be disturbing. But when you think of the time the book is set, the scenes described seem to be acceptable. These descriptions (if necessary) can be skimmed without affecting the storyline.

Warning: This is not a book to be picked up for light bedtime reading. You will probably be turning the pages when dawn breaks! You will feel compelled to read the next chapter and the next and the next (at least I did). Thankfully I read it during a lengthy travel (at the airport and during the flight).

According to Ken Follett, it took him three years and three months to complete this book.
...less

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

Liz rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

07/26/08

bookshelves: fiction, mystery

Read in May, 2008

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

I loved this book.

Why was William Hamleigh so afraid of hell?

I remember he talked about his mother saying things about burning in hell and then it was his remembrance of actual burnings and torture he saw. Right?

But I must admit his complete fear about burning in hell was weird. I mean, he would just stop in his tracks. He really believed this would be his fate if he didn't repent or stop his actions. It was very strange. I thought for sure there was more to this fear but I don't r...more I loved this book.

Why was William Hamleigh so afraid of hell?

I remember he talked about his mother saying things about burning in hell and then it was his remembrance of actual burnings and torture he saw. Right?

But I must admit his complete fear about burning in hell was weird. I mean, he would just stop in his tracks. He really believed this would be his fate if he didn't repent or stop his actions. It was very strange. I thought for sure there was more to this fear but I don't remember there being much to it besides stories and having born witnessed to such a thing. I suppose having witnessed something so horrific would make anyone scared-to-death. Seeing it only confirms it can actually happen.

I really hated his character as I'm sure most did. His degradation of women was awful and horrific. Yuck. After reading about what he did to Aliena I just knew this type of behavior would only get worse. He was a psychopath.

..................

It seemed like most of the men featured in this book had lots of flaws. To me, from what I remember (it's been a few weeks since I've finished), Tom and Jack were the only men that lived an authentic life. Not that they were free of flaws themselves but I liked them two the best.

...................

Ken Follett has said: "I'm not a very spiritual person. I'm more interested in the material problems of building a cathedral." Is The Pillars of the Earth a spiritual book?

It wasn't super spiritual or I would rather say, religious. I think Follett just wanted to tell a story. It just happened to involve the church and some monks. I also think that Prior Philip was very naive in the beginning of the book. At first I didn't think Waleran was all that bad just a little ambitious. Prior Philip finds himself finally seeing the world for what it is... A lot of greed and hunger for power. People were willing to do anything to achieve success. "The end justifies the means" as Machiavelli would say. It was almost laughable how naive Prior Philip was. He always seemed shocked when realizing someone's evil plans. It was wonderful to see him take action and stick-up for himself toward the end. He made me proud!

.....................

I wanted to put my thoughts in about Aliena's reaction to William being hanged. If it were me, I would have been hootin' and hollerin' but I think Aliena was just too tired and too worn out mentally and physically to react in an animated way. I was so glad he had to suffer too. I just wish he could have suffered more. I really hated his character. If they ever make a movie or series I pity the actor who has to play him!
...less

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

murph rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

06/03/08

Quality historical fiction. Lots of stonecrafting - with the occasional foray into softcore porn.

Ken Follett does a masterful job of creating a believable setting and populating it with believable male characters. The novel follows the construction of a cathedral in 12th century England.

Being shown how mind bogglingly difficult building a cathedral would have been - as well as its effect on the people who surround it - is the real pleasure of reading this book.

Less enjoyable is Foll...more Quality historical fiction. Lots of stonecrafting - with the occasional foray into softcore porn.

Ken Follett does a masterful job of creating a believable setting and populating it with believable male characters. The novel follows the construction of a cathedral in 12th century England.

Being shown how mind bogglingly difficult building a cathedral would have been - as well as its effect on the people who surround it - is the real pleasure of reading this book.

Less enjoyable is Follet's use of architectural exposition. Two characters will babble on in mason-speak for a paragraph or two that catapults the reader out of the story.

...he saw twelve arches in the arcade. The church was therefore divided into twelve sections, called bays. The nave would be six bays long, the chancel four. In between, taking up the space of the seventh and eight bays, would be the crossing, with the transepts sticking out either side...

Everybody got that?

I'm sure Mr. Follet is hoping that we'll all take the time to learn what all these terms mean - but most will just let the language wash over them like Star Trek's techno-gobblety gook "Captain, the floonian particles are refracting from the Denebian particulate alloys."

Yeah, yeah. Either get to the point, give me a glossary, or draw me a frickin' picture.

More disappointing is Follett's treatment of its female characters. Or as Follett would have them, his excuse to talk about breasts. This is hardly a new thing in fiction - but honestly. With one exception - every single female character gets a verbal up and down look every time they flounce into the page. The lone exception is a woman who is defined by being ugly. The once over stops at her face each time - all others get the grand tour.

There is also an excessive amount of description when two characters finally decide to get busy. In some cases, you could defend this as storytelling - in most, it's just gratuitous.

Oh, sure - I'm a prude. No, I like efficient storytelling, and a writer (even one as established as Ken Follett) shouldn't linger on the salacious bits just because it gets his rocks off. You need it to tell the tale, fine. But by the time the serial-rapist antagonist is assaulting a one-scene whore do I really need to know exactly what sex acts were committed to to establish his malevolence?

It's a great story that is character-driven. Just a few too many scenes that should have been left on Follett's hard drive....less

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

ScottK rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

05/07/08

Read in May, 2008

So, I was feeling really good the other day when I finally broke down and bought this. I started reading it as soon as I got home and so far it has been really good,granted I am only just starting section 2. I am on page 308 or something like that. With over 600 pages to go until it ends I have no idea what else is going to happen to stop the freaking building of the Cathedral. I guess we shall see.........so far though I am loving it,despite it's being on the Oprah list. :)

UPDATE : ...more So, I was feeling really good the other day when I finally broke down and bought this. I started reading it as soon as I got home and so far it has been really good,granted I am only just starting section 2. I am on page 308 or something like that. With over 600 pages to go until it ends I have no idea what else is going to happen to stop the freaking building of the Cathedral. I guess we shall see.........so far though I am loving it,despite it's being on the Oprah list. :)

UPDATE : Alright I have almost made it...there is a light at the end of the tunnel,I am on page 814, only a little over 100 pages from the end. This book has taught me alot about masonry and perseverance. I mean really come on who can read 814 pages and not learn something about perseverance,or Masonry for that matter.But seriously folks ..<*** SPOILERS ***>...I mean really how many times is your cathedral going to get burned,torched smashed,wrecked and how many times are you going to let the people of your village be trampled,torched and starved, before you say enough is enough. I am truly enjoying the book though, not sure if I will read the sequel or not but this book really is a great one with epic scope. The one thing that I still have not gotten over completely is the way Tom Builder's death was handled. He got kicked in the head by a horse and that's about the extent of the coverage.Oh yea and Jack finds the body. Ellen grieves for the rest of the book, but he is hardly given story time in his death that he was when he was usefully building the whole Cathedral and all. The very least that could have been done would have been a huge funeral with alot of crying and swearing of vengence and all , but that's just me.

LAST UPDATE I am done!!!! I actually finished a few days ago but I wanted to ruminate on it a bit. I gave this book 4 stars might have been more but 4 I think is good enough, I just was not happy with the way they just brushed off Tom Builder, I mean c'mon, he was the one that started the freakin' Cathedral for goodness sake. Overall it was an awesome book, my intrest in all of the characters stayed fresh, which I can imagine it is hard, to keep someone interested in others for almost 1000 pages.I am glad that Jonathan did get to find out about his parents and knew that they did love him. Bottom Line : Glad I read it. Still not sure if I will have the fortitude to read the sequel or not but that remains to be seen....less

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

1 comments

Elizabeth rated it:

(review of isbn 0451207149)

07/21/08

bookshelves: adult

Read in July, 2008

recommended to Elizabeth by: Jen, Shelley

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.

The Pillars of the Earth (Deluxe Edition)

discuss this book

groups with this book

friend reviews (0)

lists with this book

other reviews (showing 1-20 of 18958)