<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book>
  <id>2147353</id>
  <title><![CDATA[The Teleology of the Modern Nation-state: Japan and China (Encounters With Asia)]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0812238206]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780812238204]]></isbn13>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <description><![CDATA[<p>Japan and China did not begin to emerge as unified political entities until the nineteenth century. Yet scholars and politicians persistently refer to &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; in discussions of earlier periods, as if the modern nation-state had long been established in these regions. Joshua Fogel here brings together essays by eight renowned East Asian scholars to demonstrate why this oversight distorts our historical analysis and understanding of both countries. The nation-states of Japan and China developed much later and, indeed, far less uniformly than usually conveyed in popular myth and political culture. Moreover, the false depiction of an earlier national identity not only alters the factual record; it serves the contemporary engines of nationalist mythology and propaganda.<br/><br/>This interdisciplinary volume asks deceptively simple questions: When did &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; become Japan and China? When and why do inhabitants begin to define their identity and interests nationally rather than locally? Identifying the role of mitigating factors from disease and travel abroad to the subtleties of political language and aesthetic sensibility, the answers provided in these diverse and insightful essays are appropriately complex. By setting aside Western notions of the nation-state, the contributors approach each region on its own terms, while the thematic organization of the book provides a unique lens through which to view the challenges common to understanding both Japan and China. This highly readable collection will be important to scholars both inside and beyond the field of East Asian studies.</p>]]></description>
  <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">2147353</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">1</books_count>
  <desc_user_id type="integer" nil="true"></desc_user_id>
  <id type="integer">2152845</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer">7</original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer">10</original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2004</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>The Teleology of the Modern Nation-state: Japan and China (Encounters With Asia)</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:3|5:0|4:3|3:0|2:0|1:0|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">3</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">12</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">4</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[4.00]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[3]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[1]]></text_reviews_count>
  
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2147353.The_Teleology_of_the_Modern_Nation_state_Japan_and_China]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2147353.The_Teleology_of_the_Modern_Nation_state_Japan_and_China]]></link>
  <authors>
    <author>
    <id>102477</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Joshua A. Fogel]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/102477.Joshua_A_Fogel]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.53</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>15</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>3</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="4" total="4">
      <review>
  <id>40376307</id>
    <user>
    <id>655443</id>
    <name><![CDATA[K.]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Cambridge, MA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/655443-k]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1196659290p3/655443.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1196659290p2/655443.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2147353</id>
  <isbn>0812238206</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780812238204</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[The Teleology of the Modern Nation-state: Japan and China]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2147353.The_Teleology_of_the_Modern_Nation_state_Japan_and_China</link>
  <average_rating>4.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>3</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>Japan and China did not begin to emerge as unified political entities until the nineteenth century. Yet scholars and politicians persistently refer to &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; in discussions of earlier periods, as if the modern nation-state had long been established in these regions. Joshua Fogel here brings together essays by eight renowned East Asian scholars to demonstrate why this oversight distorts our historical analysis and understanding of both countries. The nation-states of Japan and China developed much later and, indeed, far less uniformly than usually conveyed in popular myth and political culture. Moreover, the false depiction of an earlier national identity not only alters the factual record; it serves the contemporary engines of nationalist mythology and propaganda.<br/><br/>This interdisciplinary volume asks deceptively simple questions: When did &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; become Japan and China? When and why do inhabitants begin to define their identity and interests nationally rather than locally? Identifying the role of mitigating factors from disease and travel abroad to the subtleties of political language and aesthetic sensibility, the answers provided in these diverse and insightful essays are appropriately complex. By setting aside Western notions of the nation-state, the contributors approach each region on its own terms, while the thematic organization of the book provides a unique lens through which to view the challenges common to understanding both Japan and China. This highly readable collection will be important to scholars both inside and beyond the field of East Asian studies.</p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2004</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Dec 18 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Dec 18 07:57:52 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Dec 18 07:59:38 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A central question in the various essays of the book is &quot;When did Japan/China become Japan/China&quot; - Some really great scholars, including the editor Fogel, Eiko Ikegami, William C. Kirby, David L. Howell, Peter Perdue etc. all offer their thoughts and bring their years of research to their...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40376307">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40376307]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40376307]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>40517937</id>
    <user>
    <id>769235</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Sayaka]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[New York, NY]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/769235-sayaka]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1204931663p3/769235.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1204931663p2/769235.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2147353</id>
  <isbn>0812238206</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780812238204</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[The Teleology of the Modern Nation-state: Japan and China]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2147353.The_Teleology_of_the_Modern_Nation_state_Japan_and_China</link>
  <average_rating>4.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>3</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>Japan and China did not begin to emerge as unified political entities until the nineteenth century. Yet scholars and politicians persistently refer to &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; in discussions of earlier periods, as if the modern nation-state had long been established in these regions. Joshua Fogel here brings together essays by eight renowned East Asian scholars to demonstrate why this oversight distorts our historical analysis and understanding of both countries. The nation-states of Japan and China developed much later and, indeed, far less uniformly than usually conveyed in popular myth and political culture. Moreover, the false depiction of an earlier national identity not only alters the factual record; it serves the contemporary engines of nationalist mythology and propaganda.<br/><br/>This interdisciplinary volume asks deceptively simple questions: When did &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; become Japan and China? When and why do inhabitants begin to define their identity and interests nationally rather than locally? Identifying the role of mitigating factors from disease and travel abroad to the subtleties of political language and aesthetic sensibility, the answers provided in these diverse and insightful essays are appropriately complex. By setting aside Western notions of the nation-state, the contributors approach each region on its own terms, while the thematic organization of the book provides a unique lens through which to view the challenges common to understanding both Japan and China. This highly readable collection will be important to scholars both inside and beyond the field of East Asian studies.</p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2004</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="japanese-history" />
        <shelf name="taiwanese-chinese-history" />
        <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Dec 20 07:13:25 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Dec 20 07:13:25 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40517937]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40517937]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>37546530</id>
    <user>
    <id>73858</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Graham]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Somerville, MA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/73858-graham]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2147353</id>
  <isbn>0812238206</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780812238204</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[The Teleology of the Modern Nation-state: Japan and China]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2147353.The_Teleology_of_the_Modern_Nation_state_Japan_and_China</link>
  <average_rating>4.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>3</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>Japan and China did not begin to emerge as unified political entities until the nineteenth century. Yet scholars and politicians persistently refer to &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; in discussions of earlier periods, as if the modern nation-state had long been established in these regions. Joshua Fogel here brings together essays by eight renowned East Asian scholars to demonstrate why this oversight distorts our historical analysis and understanding of both countries. The nation-states of Japan and China developed much later and, indeed, far less uniformly than usually conveyed in popular myth and political culture. Moreover, the false depiction of an earlier national identity not only alters the factual record; it serves the contemporary engines of nationalist mythology and propaganda.<br/><br/>This interdisciplinary volume asks deceptively simple questions: When did &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; become Japan and China? When and why do inhabitants begin to define their identity and interests nationally rather than locally? Identifying the role of mitigating factors from disease and travel abroad to the subtleties of political language and aesthetic sensibility, the answers provided in these diverse and insightful essays are appropriately complex. By setting aside Western notions of the nation-state, the contributors approach each region on its own terms, while the thematic organization of the book provides a unique lens through which to view the challenges common to understanding both Japan and China. This highly readable collection will be important to scholars both inside and beyond the field of East Asian studies.</p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2004</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Nov 15 10:54:28 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Nov 12 13:54:49 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Nov 15 10:54:28 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37546530]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37546530]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>30096526</id>
    <user>
    <id>1406873</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Garrett]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1406873-garrett]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1223852348p3/1406873.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1223852348p2/1406873.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2147353</id>
  <isbn>0812238206</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780812238204</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[The Teleology of the Modern Nation-state: Japan and China]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2147353.The_Teleology_of_the_Modern_Nation_state_Japan_and_China</link>
  <average_rating>4.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>3</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>Japan and China did not begin to emerge as unified political entities until the nineteenth century. Yet scholars and politicians persistently refer to &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; in discussions of earlier periods, as if the modern nation-state had long been established in these regions. Joshua Fogel here brings together essays by eight renowned East Asian scholars to demonstrate why this oversight distorts our historical analysis and understanding of both countries. The nation-states of Japan and China developed much later and, indeed, far less uniformly than usually conveyed in popular myth and political culture. Moreover, the false depiction of an earlier national identity not only alters the factual record; it serves the contemporary engines of nationalist mythology and propaganda.<br/><br/>This interdisciplinary volume asks deceptively simple questions: When did &quot;Japan&quot; and &quot;China&quot; become Japan and China? When and why do inhabitants begin to define their identity and interests nationally rather than locally? Identifying the role of mitigating factors from disease and travel abroad to the subtleties of political language and aesthetic sensibility, the answers provided in these diverse and insightful essays are appropriately complex. By setting aside Western notions of the nation-state, the contributors approach each region on its own terms, while the thematic organization of the book provides a unique lens through which to view the challenges common to understanding both Japan and China. This highly readable collection will be important to scholars both inside and beyond the field of East Asian studies.</p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>2004</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Apr 16 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Aug 13 20:21:36 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Aug 13 20:21:49 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/30096526]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/30096526]]></link>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
          <shelf name="taiwanese-chinese-history" />
          <shelf name="japanese-history" />
          <shelf name="to-read" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link>
  <id>8</id>
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=2147353</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>