God After Darwin: A Theology of Evolution
In God After Darwin, eminent theologian John F. Haught argues that the ongoing debate between Darwinian evolutionists and Christian apologists is fundamentally misdirected: Both sides persist in focusing on an explanation of underlying design and order in the universe. Haught suggests that what is lacking in both of these competing ideologies is the notion of novelty, a ne...more
Paperback, 256 pages
Published
July 24th 2007
by Westview Press
(first published October 21st 1999)
There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!
sign in »
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
77)
Saya membeli buku ini karena judulnya yang sangat provokatif. Waktu itu kebetulan saya lagi getol-getolnya ingin mengetahui lebih mendalam mengenai teori evolusi. Apalagi saat saya membaca resensi singkatnya di bagian belakang buku, sangat menantang! Dikatakan bahwa setelah teori evolusi yang dicetuskan Darwin menjadi populer, teriakan "Tuhan telah mati" milik Nietszche semakin menggema ke mana-mana.
Buku ini sebenarnya malah tidak menyerang teori evolusi, meskipun mencatut ...more
Buku ini sebenarnya malah tidak menyerang teori evolusi, meskipun mencatut ...more
skimmed a lot of this one . . swung a little too far to the process-theology side of things for me . . i guess i'd like to see something closer to an orthodox theology--and especially orthodox language--that also takes evolutionary science seriously . .
Not completely convincing.
Perdebatan mengenai teori evolusi darwin yang bertolak belakang dengan keterangan kitab suci. Bagaikan dua sisi mata uang yg bertolak belakang, dua teori tersebut saling melengkapi argumen masing-masing. Lumayan sebagai penghilang rasa kantuk..:p
Haught makes an effort to take seriously the role of chance in evolution and to integrate that with Christian theology. I respect him for this, and appreciate his efforts, but the theology he ends up with is not entirely satisfying to me.
If you like process theology... you'll like this one. Good book, reasonably argued, but has theological holes.
religion,science,nonfiction,philosophy
Elizabeth
added it
David Bazett-jones
marked it as to-read
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »

Loading...





view 1 comment




























