Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Autocritique of Enlightenment: Rousseau and the Philosophes” as Want to Read:
The Autocritique of Enlightenment: Rousseau and the Philosophes
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Autocritique of Enlightenment: Rousseau and the Philosophes

3.25  ·  Rating Details ·  4 Ratings  ·  3 Reviews
This text provides an analysis of the life and works of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, an area often overlooked in accounts of 18th-century heritage. Mark Hulliung restores Rousseau to his historical context, the world of the philosophes, and shows how he employed the arsenal of Voltaire, Diderot and others to launch a powerful attack on their vision of the Enlightenment.
Hardcover, 293 pages
Published August 5th 1998 by Harvard University Press
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Autocritique of Enlightenment, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Autocritique of Enlightenment

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-8)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Oct 27, 2015 Varad rated it liked it
This is a strange book which is much better on the philosophes than it is on Rousseau. It’s true that Rousseau often is not served well by scholars who look at the Enlightenment as a whole (though I think Hulliung's criticism of Peter Gay is unfair). But reading Rousseau back into the Enlightenment by reading the Enlightenment back into Rousseau is a bizarre strategy. No matter how much Hulliung would like to convince us otherwise, the Enlightenment wasn't a series of footnotes to Rousseau.

Lawrence A
Sep 25, 2009 Lawrence A rated it really liked it
Shelves: non-fiction
A lucid explanation by my old Brandeis U prof, Mark Hulliung, of how Jean-Jacques Rousseau both epitomized and ruthlessly criticized the 18th-century French Enlightenment of the Encyclopedie and the philosophes. Hulliung cogently argues that it is a mistake to locate Rousseau within the Romantic tradition of 19th-century Europe, but that he instead belongs firmly to the Enlightenment tradition of anti-clericalism, individualism, and empirical observation, even as he was far more radically ...more
Sean Chick
Aug 12, 2011 Sean Chick rated it really liked it
Probably his best book, since he places Rousseau in context of a debate over Enlightenment that never quite occurred, but should have.
Ina Cawl
Ina Cawl rated it it was ok
Dec 02, 2015
never-been-in-a-riot marked it as to-read
May 11, 2013
Christopher Hurtado
Christopher Hurtado marked it as to-read
May 08, 2014
Zayd is currently reading it
Sep 14, 2015
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book