<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book id="2067">
  <title><![CDATA[Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[067003472X]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780670034727]]></isbn13>
    <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1159814094m/2067.jpg</image_url>
    <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">2067</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">8</books_count>
  <default_description> &lt;B&gt;An innovative thinker tackles the controversial question of why we believe in God and how  religion shapes our lives and our future&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt; For a growing number of people, there is nothing more important than religion. It is an integral  part of their marriage, child rearing, and community. In this daring new book, distinguished  philosopher Daniel C. Dennett takes a hard look at this phenomenon and asks why. Where does  our devotion to God come from and what purpose does it serve? Is religion a blind evolutionary  compulsion or a rational choice? In &lt;I&gt;Breaking the Spell&lt;/I&gt;, Dennett argues that the time has  come to shed the light of science on the fundamental questions of faith. &lt;P&gt; In a spirited narrative that ranges widely through history, philosophy, and psychology, Dennett  explores how organized religion evolved from folk beliefs and why it is such a potent force today.  Deftly and lucidly, he contends that the &quot;belief in belief&quot; has fogged any attempt to rationally  consider the existence of God and the relationship between divinity and human need. &lt;P&gt; &lt;I&gt;Breaking the Spell&lt;/I&gt; is not an antireligious screed but rather an eyeopening exploration of  the role that belief plays in our lives, our interactions, and our country. With the gulf between  rationalists and adherents of &quot;intelligent design&quot; widening daily, Dennett has written a timely and  provocative book that will be read and passionately debated by believers and nonbelievers alike.</default_description>
  <id type="integer">598404</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2006</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:680|5:165|4:278|3:167|2:51|1:19|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">680</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">2559</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">1388</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">103</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.76]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[528]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[76]]></text_reviews_count>
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2067.Breaking_the_Spell_Religion_as_a_Natural_Phenomenon]]></url>
  <authors>
        <author id="1387">
      <name><![CDATA[Daniel C. Dennett]]></name>
      <role><![CDATA[]]></role>
      <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1387.Daniel_C_Dennett]]></url>
      <average_rating><![CDATA[3.92]]></average_rating>
      <ratings_count><![CDATA[2673]]></ratings_count>
      <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[314]]></text_reviews_count>
    </author>
      </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="1388">
    <review id="15536205">
    <user id="134616">
    <name><![CDATA[Marina]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chicago, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/134616-marina-keenan]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>5</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[People who want to change beliefs that resist  their scrutiny]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Feb 15 19:15:55 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Feb 15 21:00:00 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[To preface my remarks here, I think it is important that I note Dennett's definition of religion and its implications. He defines religion as social systems whose participants avow belief in a supernatural agent or agents whose approval is to be sought. Two elements of the definition almost cause me...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/15536205">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/15536205]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="7359635">
    <user id="308912">
    <name><![CDATA[Tucker]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[West Roxbury, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/308912-tucker]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>9</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="finished" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Sep 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Oct 06 17:56:41 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Oct 06 18:01:43 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[An admirable intellectual, Dennett spends the first several chapters carefully establishing the parameters of his discussion.  His book addresses the adherents of organized religion:  more specifically, those who believe that God is a &quot;who&quot; rather than a &quot;what&quot;, and who hold cert...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7359635">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7359635]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="8662201">
    <user id="578156">
    <name><![CDATA[Jamey]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Los Angeles, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/578156-jamey]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>4</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="religion-culture-criticism" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Nov 04 15:04:22 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Nov 04 15:08:34 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[If I understood it, the basic thesis of Dennett's arrogantly titled <em>Consciousness Explained</em> was that consciousness is a phenomenon that emerges from the harmonious orchestration of many smaller, dumber subsystems in the brain.  Among the good ideas in <em>Breaking the Spell</em> is the claim that one of thes...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8662201">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8662201]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="10034080">
    <user id="659395">
    <name><![CDATA[Paul]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/659395-paul]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>3</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Dec 06 08:49:24 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Dec 06 12:57:57 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I really wanted to like this book, because I'd just finished reading <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/search/search?q=The End of Faith" title="The End of Faith">The End of Faith</a> and <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/search/search?q=God is Not Great" title="God is Not Great">God is Not Great</a>, but this book suffers from lack of conviction.  Where <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/search/search?q=The End of Faith" title="The End of Faith">The End of Faith</a> is the absolute <em>model</em> of conviction, and <a href="http://www.goodreads.com/search/search?q=God is Not Great" title="God is Not Great">God is Not Great</a> lays out convincing arguments (but takes some of their momentum...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10034080">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10034080]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="629831">
    <user id="53216">
    <name><![CDATA[Kat]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Nanticoke, MD]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/53216-kat]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Everyone]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2006</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Apr 08 07:04:43 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Apr 08 07:08:21 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Dennett is a proud atheist, and he does not back away from his convictions.  He is able to singlehandedly defeat many Christian conventions that have become acceptable to our modern American society through the use of pure, philosophic logic that works well to break us all out of the spell in which ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/629831">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/629831]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="40909595">
    <user id="1228813">
    <name><![CDATA[Paul]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Washington, DC]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1228813-paul-fidalgo]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>2</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Jan 08 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Dec 25 20:43:29 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jan 08 12:00:30 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I can't recommend this highly enough. This is not an anti-religion screed at all, but comes at the topic of religion as a naturally emerging aspect of humanity in a thoughtful, funny, accessible way. It is &quot;New Atheist&quot; only in that it calls for open questioning and research of religion an...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40909595">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40909595]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="75056832">
    <user id="2855053">
    <name><![CDATA[Becky]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Lakeside, CA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2855053-becky]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Aug 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Oct 19 15:35:11 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Oct 19 15:49:16 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Although he is a member of the group of freethinkers and &quot;new atheists&quot; who are now speaking out in print against religion, Dennet takes a somewhat different approach. He lays out a case for subjecting religious tenets to scientific scrutiny, treating religion as a natural phenomenon that ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75056832">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75056832]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="64352936">
    <user id="1919652">
    <name><![CDATA[Jon Edward]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Berlin, 16, Germany]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1919652-jon-edward]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="theology" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jul 17 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jul 21 07:42:49 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jul 21 07:58:24 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I considered for the first time that teaching a child religion might be a form of child abuse.  I learned that there might be bio-evolutionary reasons why religions develop and that when we come to see that religion is invented, we need to remember to be gentle with others who might not have seen th...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/64352936">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/64352936]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="53828315">
    <user id="2242165">
    <name><![CDATA[Tyler]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Tooele, UT]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2242165-tyler]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jun 15 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Apr 24 10:05:16 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Apr 24 11:55:45 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Of all the books out there that take on the subject of religion head on, this one definitely has the softest touch. Daniel Dennett doesn't set out to mock people for believing the unbelievable; rather, he makes a very interesting case for religion being a &quot;natural phenomenon,&quot; as the subti...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/53828315">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/53828315]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="60823096">
    <user id="2451237">
    <name><![CDATA[Jason]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Cambridge, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2451237-jason]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Nobody]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jun 30 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jun 23 13:39:37 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jun 30 06:31:58 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I had been looking forward to reading this for some time. Overall, I was disappointed. I do not believe that it adds much to the discussion, and Dennett does not write in as compelling a manner as some of the other authors in the field. In his defense, he begins the book by warning that (1) he sets ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/60823096">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/60823096]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="53429142">
    <user id="1821854">
    <name><![CDATA[Mark]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1821854-mark]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Apr 21 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Apr 20 21:50:52 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Apr 27 21:20:16 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I found this book to be a very easily digested and fascinating proposal for how the principles of evolution (the survival of human attributes that “pay for themselves”, that work for the benefit and survivability of the organism) can be used to understand how today’s organized religions could ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/53429142">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/53429142]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="43205933">
    <user id="1881014">
    <name><![CDATA[Mark]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Salt Lake City, UT]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1881014-mark]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jan 15 21:08:41 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jan 15 21:14:42 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Out of all the &quot;new athiests&quot; - which include Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and Daniel Dennett - I prefer Daniel Dennett's &quot;Breaking The Spell.&quot;  This is a more academically flavored inquirey into the nature of claims made by religious thought and how those c...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/43205933">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/43205933]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="74502227">
    <user id="1594379">
    <name><![CDATA[Dave]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Mount Horeb, WI]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1594379-dave]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Oct 14 08:44:01 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Oct 15 08:53:36 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is one of the more poignant books in &quot;The New Atheism&quot; movement.<br/><br/>Dennett's tone isn't mean, as some people say his more widely read counterpart, Richard Dawkins, is. Dennett actually shows a little compassion for believers, reminding the reader that much of the time the bel...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/74502227">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/74502227]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="56084502">
    <user id="132277">
    <name><![CDATA[Alex]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brooklyn, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/132277-alex]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon May 25 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu May 14 12:56:02 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon May 25 19:40:38 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[best book i've yet read that attempts to parse the origins of religious conviction in humans. Dennett, as opposed to Dawkins or Hitchens, treats the subject matter gently, though very critically. (It is, after all, called &quot;Breaking the Spell&quot;.) Not content to allow pro-religious people to ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56084502">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56084502]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="690080">
    <user id="56395">
    <name><![CDATA[Jason]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brighton, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/56395-jason]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>2</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="philosophy" />
        <shelf name="psychology" />
        <shelf name="religion" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Jul 01 00:00:00 -0700 2006</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Apr 12 10:43:00 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Apr 12 10:44:02 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This book is nothing but straw men fallacies and tired 19th-arguments against religion.  In reality, the general argument of the text is more about the wonderfulness of being Daniel Dennett than anything else.  There are far better accounts of atheism than this one, or Dawkins', or Harris'.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/690080]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="40569573">
    <user id="229372">
    <name><![CDATA[Charles]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/229372-charles]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Open minded people who care about the state of our world.]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 12 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Dec 20 21:34:36 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Jan 12 08:11:09 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count>1</read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/1387.Daniel_C_Dennett" title="Daniel C. Dennett">Daniel C. Dennett</a> is a professor of philosophy so, as might be expected, he doesn't offer many answers in this book. He does however present more than a few questions and interesting ideas. Many of which I feel should be given more than just a casual glance.  <br/>The book is divided into three par...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40569573">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40569573]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="44967338">
    <user id="1978665">
    <name><![CDATA[W Geoff]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1978665-w-geoff]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jan 31 12:21:19 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 31 12:27:30 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Dennett makes me feel like there are still sane people out there, thinking deeply about questions that other people brush under the rug or simply let their gut resolve the complex questions that he addresses. Altough at times he can be pretentious (e.g. calling fellow atheists &quot;Brights&quot; al...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44967338">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44967338]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="45461826">
    <user id="1008236">
    <name><![CDATA[Bookmarks Magazine]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1008236-bookmarks-magazine]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Feb 05 09:45:31 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Feb 05 09:45:31 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[<p>The debate about Daniel C. Dennett's new book has been lively from the get-go. Dennett has already had cause to respond to the <em>New York Times</em> regarding Leon Wielseltier's reduction of his book to &quot;a merry anthology of contemporary superstitions.&quot; Wielseltier's charge of scientism (&quot;th...</p><a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/45461826">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/45461826]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="4787987">
    <user id="106678">
    <name><![CDATA[Amy]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Medford, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/106678-amy]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Aug 19 19:29:25 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu May 01 11:51:05 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[ehh. It's ok, but by the second chapter you get the thesis, and it's jusy more proving, more proving. ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4787987]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="73467550">
    <user id="1377203">
    <name><![CDATA[Karen]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Sharon, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1377203-karen-zelevinsky]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Oct 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Oct 04 20:01:06 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Oct 04 20:15:14 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I'm an avid reader who is interested in this topic, but I had a tough time getting through this book. I found some of the ideas in the first few chapters intriguing and exciting but then it collapsed into philosophical mumbo-jumbo for me. I must admit that I don't tend to like pure philosophy much. ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/73467550">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/73467550]]></url>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
        <shelf name="to-read" />
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
        <shelf name="religion" />
        <shelf name="philosophy" />
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="science" />
        <shelf name="atheism" />
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
        <shelf name="to-buy" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link id="8">
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=2067</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>