Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Pride and Prejudice” as Want to Read:
Pride and Prejudice
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
read book* *Different edition

Pride and Prejudice

4.23 of 5 stars 4.23  ·  rating details  ·  1,511,858 ratings  ·  36,543 reviews
"It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife."

So begins Pride and Prejudice, Jane Austen's witty comedy of manners--one of the most popular novels of all time--that features splendidly civilized sparring between the proud Mr. Darcy and the prejudiced Elizabeth Bennet as they play out their spirited cou
Hardcover, 334 pages
Published by Listening Library (first published 1813)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Pride and Prejudice, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Thomas Do you have a phone, Kindle, tablet, or anything that can read eBooks? I would recommend reading Pride and Prejudice as an eBook, because most…moreDo you have a phone, Kindle, tablet, or anything that can read eBooks? I would recommend reading Pride and Prejudice as an eBook, because most eReaders/eReader apps come with an inbuilt dictionary. I think that being able to look up words and phrases immediately helped me to enjoy Pride and Prejudice and understand it well, unlike most of my classmates, who ended up hating it because they were frustrated with the writing. I'm 14 years old and I read it this year so age shouldn't be a problem.

As weird as this method sounds, it really worked and for me, has made reading classics fun rather than a chore. Pride and Prejudice is (legally) free to download as an eBook, so why not give it a try?

Whatever you choose to do, I hope that you enjoy Pride and Prejudice; it's such a great book :)(less)
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
6.0 stars. Confession...this book gave me an earth-shattering Janeaustegasm and I am feeling a bit spent and vulnerable at the moment, so please bear with me. You see, I decided I wanted to get more literated by reading the "classicals" in between my steady flow of science fiction, mystery and horror. The question was where to begin.

After sherlocking through my Easton Press collection, I started by pulling out my Dickens and reading A Tale of Two Cities which I thought was jaw-dropping AMAZO and
Where my massive crush on Jane Austen began: alone, on a hot day in Montana, cursing her name.

I had to read it for AP English and I could not see the point. Girls need to marry. Girls can't get married. Girls are sad. Girls get married. Girls are happy.

I went to school to half heartedly discuss it and waffled and wavered in an effort to please my teacher. Finally she said: "was it good or not, Ben?"

"No it wasn't."

"Thank read this twenty pages of literary criticism for homework."

Mar 12, 2007 Rolls rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone who is unafraid to be seen reading this on the subway
"Pride and Prejudice" by Jane Austen started off annoying me and ended up enchanting me. Up until about page one hundred I found this book vexing, frivolous and down right tedious. I now count myself as a convert to the Austen cult.

I must confess I have been known to express an antipathy for anything written or set before 1900. I just cannot get down with corsets, outdoor plumbing and buggy rides. Whenever someone dips a quill into an inkwell my eyes glaze over. This is a shortcoming I readily
Dec 15, 2012 EMi rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Mindless Austen-adoring idiots.
Shelves: i-own
This book is quite possibly the most insipid novel I have ever read in my life. Why this book is so highly treasured by society is beyond me. It is 345 pages of nothing. The characters are like wispy shadows of something that could be interesting, the language that could be beautiful ends up becoming difficult to decipher and lead me more than once to skip over entire paragraphs because I became tired of having to stumble through them only to emerge unsatisfied, and the plot is non-existent, as ...more
Feb 22, 2011 Anne rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: mainly women
Critics who consider Austen's works trivial because of their rigid, upper-class setting, wealthy characters, domestic, mannered plots and happy endings are almost totally disconnected from reality, as far as I can tell. What can they possibly expect an upper-middle class English woman to write about in 1813 but what she knows or can imagine? Sci-fi? A history of the American Revolution? A real-life exposé of underage exploitation in the garment district of London? Come on. What other setting can ...more
I was forced to read this by my future wife.
I was not, however, forced to give it 5 stars.
Richard Reviles Censorship Always in All Ways
Well-loathed books I've re-read

Rating: 4 very annoyed, crow-feathered stars out of five

The Book Report: No. Seriously. If your first language isn't English, or if you're like nine years old, you might not know the story. Note use of conditional.

My Review: All right. All right, dammit! I re-read the bloody thing. I gave it two stars before. I was wrong-headed and obtuse and testosterone poisoned. I refuse to give it five stars, though. Look, I've admitted I was wrong about how beautiful the writ
Sherwood Smith
Some years back in one of my APAs, someone castigated Jane Austen's books like this: "All those daft twits rabbiting on about clothes and boyfriends and manners."

Since then, I’ve encountered other variations on the theme that a modern woman ought not to be reading such trash because it sets feminism back two centuries.

Well, much as I laughed over the first caveat, that isn't Austen. It sounds more like the silver fork romances inspired by Georgette Heyer. Austen's characters don't talk about clo
Jan 25, 2011 Jasmin rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: People who want to widen their vocabulary and of course hopeless romantics
Recommended to Jasmin by: Filipino Group
"I cannot fix on the hour, or the spot, or the look, or the words, which laid the foundation. It is too long ago. I was in the middle before I knew that it had begun."

This was Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy's reply when Ms. Elizabeth Bennet asked him when he fell in love with her.

Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen had put my left out dictionary into good use. I have to admit, I was very slow in the first pages, however, nearing the end, I was like a driver going at 100mph, eager to reach the finish lin
Otis Chandler
Dec 04, 2013 Otis Chandler rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
May 31, 2009 karen rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people who like their pride and prejudice without zombies
Recommended to karen by: the whole world
it is official: now everyone on the planet has read this book. i was the last holdout, and being the last person (excluding those who are just being born...... now) i am sorry i didnt like it more. i knew going into it that i was not a jane austen girl; i had read two others and thought them bloodless and mercantile. but everyone said to me, "well, you havent read pride and prejudice is why you dont like her." which i thought might be valid. but its not. because i still dont care. this is not th ...more
I'm a great believer in the idea that if anyone didn't like this book it's because they didn't read it properly and/or are possessed. In all seriousness, the wit is timeless and Austen should always be remembered as a literary genius, as I hope she will.
Peter Meredith
18 chapters in... I want that to sink in for a moment... ok. 18 chapters in and NOTHING has happened. I am enjoying her writing style very much, but I also enjoy the back of an occasional cereal box so that may not mean much. We will see.
I am sitting here eating a tootsie roll, a Halloween left over, and I can't help notice the similarities between it and the novel Pride and Prejudice. First off, like P and P, the tootsie roll wasn't one of those dinky ones that you can almost swallow in a singl
Jason Koivu
Will I read Pride and Prejudice again? Yes, a thousand times, yes!

Near perfection! P & P is one of those rare gems that weds character, plot and language all in one harmonious marriage.

Austen's plotting is so very precise here. It's an absolute pleasure to behold. The timing is impeccable and there is very little, if any, fat in the prose to slow it down. Finding new clues to future plot twists and turns with each reread has reached the level of a sport for me now!

They say, write what you
For a lover of books, I came to Pride and Prejudice (P&P from now on) very, very, very late.

The reasons are myriad: my mother hated Austen (a disdain she took to the grave without ever explaining), so she never recommended her to me; I was a boy in the '70s and a teen in the '80s and even though I loved Barbra Streisand, ABBA, Wham!, Spandau Ballet and Duran Duran (and...yes...I still do) I wasn't about to let people know that, and since I carried whatever book I was reading with me wherever
This is not a women’s book. Or if the 429 users who have shelved this book as “Chick Lit” are right, then color me Summer’s Eve because this book gets ALL THE STARS.

I’m not sure that I could adequately express what I loved best about Pride and Prejudice, because there are so many things. The writing, for one, is superb. There is a flawless eloquence to Austen’s writing whereby every situation, every thought, every turn of phrase is delivered gracefully, yet with the greatest exactitude. Clunkine
Jun 21, 2013 Steve rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Steve by: Susan, Gary, Suzanne
It is a truth universally acknowledged, that an author possessing immense talent and a good story to tell, must be in want of a reader like me to bestow upon it the laurels it merits. How else will anyone hear of it?

OK, so P&P may not need my help. The word is likely already out. What that means is that I can scurry around the periphery of the story itself, make a few small points, and move on with near certitude that Miss Austen will have an audience regardless.

It had been quite a while sin
I probably can't add anything to the hundreds of other reviews of this classic, so I'll tell a story about it instead.

When I was about 26, I decided to go back to school for my Master's (in Computer Science). As part of the application process, I had to take the GRE. One evening I was hanging out with my girlfriend and going through one of those vocabulary guides that list words you might see on standardized tests like the GRE. I was reading out to her the words I didn't know and was amazed at h
Oct 20, 2007 Sarah rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Everyone
I can't say anything fascinating about Pride and Prejudice that hasn't already been said a thousand times. It is one of the best books I've ever read, if not the best. It is like a textbook on how to pace a story, which is a hard thing to do, for me at least. It is a perfect social comedy. The dialogue is both believable, natural-seeming, and yet ten million times more interesting, witty and articulate than anything real people say. The characters are so well-drawn, interesting, and deep that yo ...more
Books Ring Mah Bell
P to-the-double-O P.
Ugh. Will you two get together already?
This is taking a year.
Wait, who's Aunt is who's?
Funny that you Bennet parents birthed both flat characters and round characters. Is "round character" a recessive gene?
No! Don't write another long letter.
Oh, you should like him. He's got a kick-ass house.
It is a truth which I would like to see universally acknowledged, that no one voluntarily reads any 19th century novels unless they are by Jane Austen. I fear that modern readers think all these Radcliffes, Disraelis, Eliots, Gissings and so forth tolerable, but not handsome enough to tempt them, or even, that they are most disagreeable, horrid books, not at all worth reading. They look at them without admiration at the library. They tell me they are all too long, but for my own part, if a book ...more
Katrina Passick Lumsden
I heartily enjoy period romance. Jane Austen's particular style of writing, however, leaves me a bit cold.

It's a rule that writers are supposed to write what they know. If Austen stayed true to that rule, I really feel bad for her. Because she must have known nothing but shallow, self-absorbed, slightly idiotic people.

While the sisters Bronte were capable of creating characters that even today's reader can identify with (complete with passion and realistic, heart-warming flaws), Austen's charac
Nandakishore Varma
If somebody had told me that I'd love a romance before I read this book, I would have laughed derisively.

In my late teens, romance was just not my cup of tea: it was meant for (yechch!) - girls. I was happily reading about those brave and hardy men who blew up German castles (during World War II) and evil Communist strongholds (after the war). The only women in those books were beautiful spies or dangerous adventuresses.

A few years later, my aunt pointed me to this book, after I had rather enjoy
Sep 09, 2007 Rex rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Kindling Inc.
Shelves: classics
The most overated book in history of literature. The "plot" borders between meaningless and trivial.

I was forced to read the book in 9th grade English class. This was perhaps the most tedious school assignment I've received to date. For several pages a lady remarks to a man about what wonderful handwriting he has. Not exactly gripping material. The entire book seemed to be about hormone-driven marriageable-age creatures trying to outwit each other in word and on the dance floor.

The book itself
Edit: 01/30/15

I watched the movie (the Knightley version) and can I just tell you guys that I FELL IN LOVE WITH THIS WHOLE STORY A BIT MORE. okay. A LOT. I want all my friends to read this because I CANNOT FANGIRL WITH ANYONE!!! (sadly, it's not a required reading in our school like in some other places.)

I was like oh no no no so not a good time (BUT ALL THE FEELS)

hi hi hi

At first, this was really so hard to get into because of some terms that I've encountered only for the first time. English
Amy (Foxy)

Until now I had only seen the Kiera Knightly movie of this book.

Below is for my benefit of keeping all the characters straight.


Parents: Mr. & Mrs. Bennett
Child: Jane, Elizabeth, Mary, Catherine (Kitty), Lydia

Older Relative: Lady Catherine de Bourgh (Aunt of)
Nieces/Nephews: Fitzwilliam Darcy, Georgiana Darcy

Significant other: William Collins/Charlotte Lucas

Siblings: Charles Bingley, Caroline Bingley

Significant other: George Wicklam/Lydia Bennett

Elizabeth Bennet is th
Favourite classic book that I've read this year!

Initial thoughts:
1. Surprisingly relatable and relevant. The family dynamic between all the members is all over the place (like it should be). There's love, annoyance, exasperation, loyalty, and concern. I was thoroughly entertained.
2. I really enjoyed the plot direction. I was surprised by the twists, and actions of the characters.
3. The writing is excellent. Yes, there are aspects of the book I had to re-read to understand what was going on, but
ياسمين ثابت

اعتقد ان ده اطول كتاب اخد وقت معايا في قراءته
وده راجع لعدة اسباب اولهم اني اقراه بالانجليزية والسبب التاني انشغالي بحاجات كتير في وقت واحد
كنت متخيلة انه حياخد مني 5 ايام بالكتير ماكنتش اتوقع انه حياخد اسبوعين
برغم عشقي للقصة ورؤيتي للفيلم وبالرغم انه كتاب يتحدث عن قصة حب (يعني مفيش احلى من كدة)
بس مش فاهمة ايه كل الوقت ده
وليه كل ما اقعد عليه احس اني مش قادرة اكمل
فعلا القراءة بالانجليزية صعبة ربنا يكون في عون الناس اللي قراءاتهم كلها انجليزي دول ابطال بجد

عودة للرواية:

اعشق الحقبة دي وبعشق الاعمال ا
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Old Books, New Re...: 2015 February Book- Pride and Prejudice 26 30 Mar 01, 2015 12:23PM  
FHS English 12 - ...: Week Four 1 1 Feb 27, 2015 12:26PM  
FHS English 12 - ...: Week Three 6 4 Feb 27, 2015 12:25PM  
Catching up on Cl...: Pride and Prejudice Discussion NO Spoilers 29 60 Feb 27, 2015 05:27AM  
Which book did you enjoy more P&P or Wuthering Heights? 427 1501 Feb 26, 2015 10:26PM  
The Better Book C...: Pride and Prejudice 2 3 Feb 25, 2015 11:48AM  
  • North and South
  • Cotillion
  • These Three Remain (Fitzwilliam Darcy, Gentleman #3)
  • Anne of the Island (Anne of Green Gables, #3)
  • The Custom of the Country
  • Jo's Boys (Little Women, #3)
  • Nicholas Nickleby
  • Jane Eyre
  • The Last Man in The World
  • Lady Windermere's Fan
  • Henry V
  • The Scarlet Pimpernel (The Scarlet Pimpernel, #1)
  • Lord of Scoundrels (Scoundrels, #3)
  • Felix Holt: The Radical
Also known as Jennifer Mendenhall and Johanna Ward

Kate Reading has been a freelance narrator for over twenty years. She received an Audie Award for Bellwether by Connie Willis; an Audie nomination for The Gathering Storm by Robert Jordan and Brandon Sanderson, recorded with her husband, Michael Kramer; and an Audie nomination for Blow Fly by Patricia Cornwell. She has also received numerous Earpho
More about Kate Reading...
Unnatural Exposure (Kay Scarpetta, #8) The Host (The Host, #1) A Long Way Down The Eye of the World (Wheel of Time, #1) Eleanor Roosevelt, Vol 1, 1884-1933

Share This Book

“A lady's imagination is very rapid; it jumps from admiration to love, from love to matrimony in a moment.” 13729 likes
“I declare after all there is no enjoyment like reading! How much sooner one tires of any thing than of a book! -- When I have a house of my own, I shall be miserable if I have not an excellent library.” 12661 likes
More quotes…