Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization” as Want to Read:
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization

3.98 of 5 stars 3.98  ·  rating details  ·  1,019 ratings  ·  216 reviews

Bestselling author Nicholson Baker, recognized as one of the most dexterous and talented writers in America today, has created a compelling work of nonfiction bound to provoke discussion and controversy -- a wide-ranging, astonishingly fresh perspective on the political and social landscape that gave rise to World War II.

Human Smoke delivers a closely textured, deeply movi

Hardcover, 576 pages
Published March 11th 2008 by Simon & Schuster (first published 2008)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Human Smoke, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Human Smoke

The Hunger Games by Suzanne CollinsBreaking Dawn by Stephenie MeyerThe Host by Stephenie MeyerThe Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society by Mary Ann ShafferCity of Ashes by Cassandra Clare
Best Books of 2008
90th out of 1,360 books — 6,770 voters
Band of Brothers by Stephen E. AmbroseBlack Hawk Down by Mark BowdenLone Survivor by Marcus LuttrellFlags of Our Fathers by James D. BradleyThe Guns of August by Barbara W. Tuchman
Best Non-fiction War Books
198th out of 771 books — 952 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,478)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Human Smoke is many things, I think.

Nicholson Baker himself intended it as a memorial to “Charles Pickett and other American and British pacifists. They’ve never really gotten their due. They tried to save Jewish refugees, feed Europe, reconcile the United States and Japan, and stop the war from happening. They failed, but they were right,” and to some extent he intended it as an argument for peace –- more likely peace as pacifism.

It is a chronicle of the worst war criminals that we’ve ever see
David Gross
A collection of vignettes — some only a paragraph long, few longer than a page — of episodes from the years leading up to the second World War, and then from the years of the war itself up through 1941. Baker mostly leaves his own voice out of it, except for a few paragraphs of “afterword” at the end.

The book generated a lot of heat when it was released a few months ago because it challenges the idea that World War II was a “good” war, something that is today an article of faith for all decent c
In a 1942 essay called "Pacifism and the War," Orwell wrote a review of this new book:

"1. The Fascizing processes occurring in Britain as a result of war are systematically exaggerated.
2. The actual record of Fascism, especially its pre-war history, is ignored or pooh-poohed as ‘propaganda’. Discussion of what the world would actually be like if the Axis dominated it is evaded.
3. Those who want to struggle against Fascism are accused of being wholehearted defenders of capitalist ‘democracy’. T
Mar 25, 2008 Ed rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: everybody
Shelves: wwii
An earth shattering book. Baker takes everything you know about the run up to World War II and stands it all on its head. I haven't had a book haunt me like this in a long time. Everything I know is wrong.

Roosevelt knew about the Japanese navy moving toward Pearl Harbor.

Winston Churchill did all he could to antagonize Germany into a war of attrition through the air.

Britain bombed German cities before the London Blitz started.

Jews suffered more due to the English blockade of Germany than anyone e
The brilliance of this book lies in its restraint. Baker is not an academic historian, nor is he writing a work of conventional history. Thus, he has the good sense to make his historical argument--inasmuch as this book has an argument that you can pin down in the text--as obliquely as possible. Baker does not, as some critics would have it, say that World War II was a Bad War. Nor does he claim, as those same critics would have it, that Roosevelt and Churchill were morally no better than Hitler ...more
I found Nicholson Baker's unflinching presentation of the events leading up to America's entry into WWII a moving reminder that getting the facts is a slippery matter at the best of times; in war it is impossible. This makes me think that since we're always either leading up to war or in war, we can never hold onto the facts or apprehend the truth which seems to live forever on a metal table dying of multiple stab-wounds.
There were many moments in this book where I realized everything I knew wa
Books Ring Mah Bell
This book begins in 1892, with Alfred Nobel saying, "Perhaps my factories will put an end to war even sooner than your congresses [re: World's Peace Conference]. On the day when two army corp may mutually annihilate each other in a second, probably all civilized nations will recoil in horror and disband their troops."

Perhaps not, Nobel! That prediction was a big fat FAIL!

The author then takes us into brief passages in time, quick mention of WW1 and onto the start of WW2. This turns out to be the
May 27, 2008 Fred rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: anyone
Human Smoke: The Beginnings of WWII, the End of Civilization was a life-changing book for me.

Using an all factual anecdote approach, Baker completely revised my thoughts on how WWII started, especially casting Churchill into a very gray figure and Roosevelt into a much more gray light than had ever been aware of.

He enumerates the many people who opposed the war and sought to minimize the violence and deprivation wreaked on innocent people. This in itself reminded me of how out-of-favor and margi
What did the English speaking world write in their newspapers about the rise of Hitler, the Jewish propaganda, and the loss of rights of the German Jews? What were the views of Churchill and Roosevelt of Hitler between 1932 to the invasion of Poland in 1939? Volumes have been written by learned authors about this piece of history, but what would it be like to read newspaper accounts that were written in real time? HUMAN SMOKE by Nicholson Baker presents the news as it happened, editorials as opi ...more
Matt Briggs
Filled with unusual quotes regarding the principle actors up to the US Declaration of War in late 1941. Churchill's portrait is particularly zany, deadly, an ebullient megalomaniac. Hitler comes across as a sad megalomaniac. Gandhi as as a slightly unhinged and naive self-obsessive. Throughout, I wondered how Baker would prove pacifism against World War II which essentially defines the idea of a war that "had to be fought." By the end the accretion of destruction and the willful worship of the m ...more
Andrew Skretvedt
Oct 10, 2010 Andrew Skretvedt marked it as considered-and-discarded
No rating, because I've not read it. I'll rate it if I do.

I was prompted to investigate this book after watching two Penn Point episodes on the author, who is a favorite of Jillette.

The author being unknown to me, I elected to collect some reviews on the book. I was also motivated to find a review which addressed the allegations that Baker makes numerous factual errors in presenting his historical treatise (Penn also mentioned he was aware of these allega
A. Jesse
At least as an audio book, this latest from Nicholson Baker is a total bust. Baker turns his detail-obsessed myopic little eyes to a very interesting question: Was pacifism a reasonable response to WWII, and were there any pacifists speaking up at the time? This are very difficult questions. A mature author, experienced in history and rhetoric, writing in a straightforward and persuasive manner, would have a very hard time addressing this topic. Alas, Baker has three problems:

1) His book is a se
A chronicle of obscure but important incidents leading up to World War II "incorporating meticulous research and well-documented sources, including newspaper and magazine articles, radio speeches, memoirs, and diaries, the book juxtaposes hundreds of related moments of decision, brutality, suffering and mercy." The point being, according to Baker, that the pacifists failed, but they were right and the war was wrong. It's a bold contention, considering how resoundingly that war has been ruled goo ...more
About 500 pages of one-to-three-paragraph-long notes about the beginning of World War II and the Holocaust, each about a particular event on a single day, ending on December 31, 1941: summarized diary entries, newspaper articles, letters and so on; the bibliography lists about 400 books. Almost all the notes are about Germany, Great Britain and the United States; the Soviet Union gets almost nary a mention. Baker seems guilty for the Anglo-American civilization, and hateful of its leaders Roosev ...more
Jun 09, 2008 Cindy rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: I hope this book is translated and printed abroad.
This is a truly memorable book from Nicholson Baker. I've enjoyed his artistic fiction for years, but this nonfiction history is by far his best. As always, Baker writes in extraordinary depth and detail, this a sobering portrait of civilization from 1914-1941 ... if you call it civilized. And you may not when you finish the book. It is not one more story of the holocaust, or of isolated ignorance. It is not the stuff of movies. It is about truth and knowledge of historic events.

Like Baker, I w
an unconventional take on the genesis of world war II. To date, the most persuasive argument of the existence of "war fever", a hard to prove, but well documented part of the human experience.

He redefined Churchill and FDR for me and despite the horrors of the nazi regime made a strong case for Hitler initially trying to contain the scope of war.

Ironically, or not, the injection of the "peace" focused elements of the book from gandhi's ridiculousness on had the opposite effect I think was inte
Maria Mazzenga
I like what Baker is trying to do here: readjust the grand narrative of the Second World War as an epic contest between the "Good" Allies and the "[Big]Bad" Axis. The caricature of the Allies and especially the plentiful US with its Greatest Generation stepping up to the plate is loathsome and dangerous because it sets up the US to do anything it damn well pleases subsequently. Oh, and the Allies were not all that grand either, all members containing ugly pockets of fascists within their borders ...more
This is a collection of historical anecdotes, often 2 to a page and mostly contemporaneous, starting in 1892 with a half page about Alfred Nobel’s musings on the possibility that highly destructive weapons would end war and ending on December 31, 1941 with some inappropriate but optimistic thoughts from the pacifist Mihail Sebastian. It is not a steady pace. The focus is World War II so it moves quickly through World War I and the inter war years and begins in earnest in 1938. The author starts ...more
Jun 24, 2008 Sam rated it 3 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: World War II enthusiasts, pacificists
Minimalist writer, pacifist, and print news enthusiast, Nicholson Baker, allegedly started out to write a novel set in World War II, but soon realized he didn't really know how the war got started. His research is presented to the reader in "Human Smoke," gleaned largely from newspapers and radio transcripts of the times, which Baker felt had a "rawer" view of events compared with the distillation of professional historians. It is an interesting approach to a subject that has become a publishing ...more
In a series of meticulously researched vignettes ending in December, 1941, Baker sets out to question whether the use of force by the Allies in World War II was actually the best course of action at the time. Accounts of Churchill, Roosevelt, Hitler, and various other prominent parties are occasionally punctuated by mention of pacifists active at the time, from Gandhi to Americans who refused the draft.

Because so many of us unquestioningly accept the heroism of the Allied role in World War II, B
I don't think I've yet read a book (until this one) that takes me up to the 'beginning' of WWII, then doesn't delve into all the concentration camps in detail.

I really felt like this book gave me a better understanding of the history and overall 'feeling' in the world and society when WWI was in the works. It opened my eyes to the cliche 'things aren't always what they seem.' Time and again, I'd think I had my opinion formed and then another quote by someone else would cause me to see the other
I'm mightily impressed by this so far, 250 pages or so into it. I guess I'm surprised that so many people have been offended by this very notion that war is wrong. Always and always, no exceptions.

And yet, I'm saddened that so many people have been offended by this notion that war is wrong. Always. well, that's where we are right now, as the subtitle of the book indicates.

This is the kind of history book I can deal with, and enjoy reading. Bite size nuggets, glimpses and snapshots. Some appear
Not too long ago I read "The Black Swan" and that author commented that all history books are biased by their author's knowledge of the outcome. Using this logic, the only true histories are contemporary accounts from primary and secondary sources. In "Human Smoke" we read contemporary accounts from diaries, news releases, memoirs, etc. from 1900 through December 31, 1941. What you see is a world complicit in the build up World War II, the genocides in Europe, atrocities in the developing world, ...more
I gave this book my best. It is a unique narrative. Just snippets of text, a diary entry, or quotation. It covers 1932 through 1941 weaving together a narrative about Jewish persecution, pacifists, Hitler, Churchill, and Roosevelt. While I agree Churchill had some very evil and Machiavellian characteristics and Roosevelt was a racist, I can not place them on the same level as Hitler. I also can not say that the disruption of the democratic rights in the UK and USA at the same level as in German. ...more
Soren Narnia
Baker took a lot of heat for this book, a compendium of quoted materials that question the motives, logic, and real facts behind the things we assume we know about World War Two. It's a polemic that takes on the golden aura surrounding the era, and it takes shot after shot at the Allied leaders and their apparent thirst for war. The overall effect is to reduce WWII to just another corrupt, dirty conflict that shouldn't be celebrated above any other. Is it, as many claim, not entirely accurate, d ...more
The subtitle for this book is "The Beginnings of World War II, the End of Civilization." I love it when "they" keep subtitles simple, without overstating their case. The first part of the subtitle meant that I wasn't surprised when the book left off at the end of 1941, after World War II had been thoroughly begun, but before things got completely underway in involving the entire world. The second part is a little more problematic, since really it seems that from some of the evidence presented, c ...more
Uttterly brilliant so far (66 pages). Like Galeano's trilogy from decades ago
Some critics consider this book now as a classic. It is indeed. First, if you were not a History professor nor do you have enough knowledge of the information about the beginnings of World War II; then, it is the key to your cusiosity. The author Nicholson Baker himself, gleaned all the government transcripts, news articles, memoirs, and journals from various personalities to create such a masterpiece compendium. Unlike reading the blow-by-blow accounts of the world history from our school textb ...more
tartaruga fechada
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
This was a very interesting book but I don’t know that Baker succeeded in advancing his argument. He definitely convinced me that the decision to enter WWII wasn’t as morally obvious as history would have you believe; but that’s certainly not the same thing as convincing the reader it was the wrong decision.

Anyone who reads a fair amount of WWII history finds portraits of Churchill to be mostly admiring though always troubled by his tendency to displace, kill, or subjugate dark people. Baker in
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 82 83 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • No Simple Victory: World War II in Europe, 1939-1945
  • Wartime: Understanding and Behavior in the Second World War
  • Among the Dead Cities: The History and Moral Legacy of the WWII Bombing of Civilians in Germany and Japan
  • Lest Innocent Blood Be Shed
  • Year Zero: A History of 1945
  • Germany 1945: From War to Peace
  • Hitler's Empire: How the Nazis Ruled Europe
  • Absolute War: Soviet Russia in the Second World War
  • Churchill, Hitler and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World
  • They Called It Passchendaele
  • Shtetl: The Life and Death of a Small Town and the World of Polish Jews
  • The Bitter Road to Freedom: A New History of the Liberation of Europe
  • The Long Road Home: The Aftermath of the Second World War
  • Gay L. A.: A History of Sexual Outlaws, Power Politics, and Lipstick Lesbians
  • Thunder At Twilight: Vienna 1913/1914
  • Nazi Germany and the Jews, 1933-1945: Abridged Edition
  • Brotherhood of Heroes: The Marines at Peleliu, 1944--The Bloodiest Battle of the Pacific War
  • The Lost Childhood: A World War II Memoir
Nicholson Baker is a contemporary American writer of fiction and non-fiction. As a novelist, his writings focus on minute inspection of his characters' and narrators' stream of consciousness. His unconventional novels deal with topics such as voyeurism and planned assassination, and they generally de-emphasize narrative in favor of intense character work. Baker's enthusiasts appreciate his ability ...more
More about Nicholson Baker...
The Mezzanine Vox The Anthologist The Fermata House of Holes

Share This Book