103rd out of 109 books — 14 voters
An African Centered Response to Ruby Payne's Poverty Theory
This challenge to influential educator Ruby Payne's theories about the impactof class differences andeconomicson teaching and learningputs forwardother factors as better predictors of student performance.Pointing to success stories in schools that serve low-income students, this refutationof Payne's popular teacher-training program asserts thatteacher expectations, time on...more
Paperback, 180 pages
Published April 1st 2007 by African American Images
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
To ask other readers questions about An African Centered Response to Ruby Payne's Poverty Theory, please sign up.
Be the first to ask a question about An African Centered Response to Ruby Payne's Poverty Theory
(showing 1-30 of 79)
The author did a much better job using valid research references than Ruby Payne does. His recommendations for closing the poverty and educational gaps sound more solid than Payne's. In my opinion, Payne's recommendations are only behavioral, while Kunjufu's may actually get more deep down to the root problems faced by impoverished Americans; particularly African Americans. However, I still get a sense of bias--much like the sense of bias I felt when reading Payne.
Wow, this book is just terrible. The author almost routinely misrepresents Ruby Payne's positions, making any ensuing "critique" worthless. Anyone (except maybe this author) can win an argument against a strawman of his own concoction. I was really interested to read a counterpoint to Payne's book, but unfortunately this book is a total waste of time.
Aug 15, 2007 Katie Ulrich rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: educators or anyone seeking a fresh perspective on education
I found this book to be biased at times. Additionally, the charts and tables were not valid due to the date of their origination. However, it lent great perspective to strategies for successful academic engagement of African American Students living in poverty.