<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book id="1873944">
  <title><![CDATA[Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0809059193]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780809059195]]></isbn13>
    <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1256156227m/1873944.jpg</image_url>
    <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">1873944</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">6</books_count>
  <default_description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;b&gt;A Lifelong Unbeliever Finds No Reason to Change His Mind&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt; &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are there any logical reasons to believe in God? Mathematician and bestselling author John Allen Paulos thinks not. In &lt;i&gt;Irreligion &lt;/i&gt;he presents the case for his own worldview, organizing his book into twelve chapters that refute the twelve arguments most often put forward for believing in God&amp;#8217;s existence. The latter arguments, Paulos relates in his characteristically lighthearted style, &amp;#8220;range from what might be called golden oldies to those with a more contemporary beat. On the playlist are the firstcause argument, the argument from design, the ontological argument, arguments from faith and biblical codes, the argument from the anthropic principle, the moral universality argument, and others.&amp;#8221; Interspersed among his twelve counterarguments are remarks on a variety of irreligious themes, ranging from the nature of miracles and creationist probability to cognitive illusions and prudential wagers. Special attention is paid to topics, arguments, and questions that spring from his incredulity &amp;#8220;not only about religion but also about others&amp;#8217; credulity.&amp;#8221; Despite the strong influence of his day job, Paulos says, there isn&amp;#8217;t a single mathematical formula in the book.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</default_description>
  <id type="integer">7332388</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2007</original_publication_year>
  <original_title nil="true"></original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:127|5:15|4:34|3:59|2:18|1:1|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">127</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">425</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">270</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.35]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[119]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[35]]></text_reviews_count>
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1873944.Irreligion_A_Mathematician_Explains_Why_the_Arguments_for_God_Just_Don_t_Add_Up]]></url>
  <authors>
        <author id="32711">
      <name><![CDATA[John Allen Paulos]]></name>
      <role><![CDATA[]]></role>
      <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/32711.John_Allen_Paulos]]></url>
      <average_rating><![CDATA[3.63]]></average_rating>
      <ratings_count><![CDATA[769]]></ratings_count>
      <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[126]]></text_reviews_count>
    </author>
      </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="269">
    <review id="73280059">
    <user id="2129172">
    <name><![CDATA[D.]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Everett, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2129172-d-parker]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Oct 03 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Oct 03 01:22:34 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Oct 03 01:22:50 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count>1</read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Written by a mathematician who went out of his way to refrain altogether from using formulas and equations and stick strictly to prose, this charming book is a humble refutation of a collection of the most common arguments in favor of the existence of god.  Paulos goes through these arguments one af...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/73280059">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/73280059]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="33898100">
    <user id="350774">
    <name><![CDATA[Raja99]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/350774-raja99]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="mcpl" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Sep 18 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Sep 26 10:15:38 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Sep 26 10:27:39 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Why I read this book: I saw a mention of it online, either on a website or Amazon. As an atheist married to a mathematics major, I was curious to see Paulos's take.<br/><br/>This was a good book for me to read on the airplane; it was (mostly) interesting, but not too challenging. (As I get older, ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/33898100">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/33898100]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="14308613">
    <user id="743559">
    <name><![CDATA[Adam]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/743559-adam]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>true</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[fellow agnostics and those who love them]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Feb 05 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Feb 01 15:21:26 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Feb 05 15:25:43 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[If Dawkins or Dennett are a little too hardcore for you, Paulos might be the one to truly deflect the mainstream meme that has placed the poorly thought out label of 'fundamentalist atheism' on this movement.  He's thorough in his debunking of 'God Exist' arguments without being arrogant.  For those...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/14308613">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/14308613]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="55804621">
    <user id="1191018">
    <name><![CDATA[Dalebrayden]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Seattle, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1191018-dalebrayden]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat May 09 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue May 12 09:57:34 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat May 23 14:46:31 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Paulos playfully takes on 12 alleged 'proofs' of the existence of a deity - proofs that range from the subtly fallacious to the downright silly. The thing I liked most about the book was that Paulos summarized most of the proofs in syllogistic form, to help expose the flaws in the proofs. He cites a...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/55804621">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/55804621]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="47364209">
    <user id="1100764">
    <name><![CDATA[Shelley]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Leesburg, VA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1100764-shelley]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Mar 12 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Feb 24 07:27:11 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 24 06:01:33 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I only read this book because my sister loaned it to me to read, then my 16 year old son read it &amp; told me, &quot;don't read it!&quot;  Well now I know why, cause I didn't understand it (&amp; neither did he).  What's the need for all these huge words and not just every so often, I mean most of the time...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/47364209">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/47364209]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="14664279">
    <user id="651773">
    <name><![CDATA[David]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/651773-david]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="philosophy-religion" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Feb 01 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Feb 05 15:54:32 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Feb 05 16:07:11 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This small, breezy book covers many of the main arguments for god. Most of the refutations aren't original, but Paulos doesn't claim they are - he just thinks it'd be useful to have them all in one place. Fair enough. He's generally pretty careful, as you'd expect a mathematician to be, but he does ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/14664279">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/14664279]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="16265014">
    <user id="418877">
    <name><![CDATA[Axie]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[New York, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/418877-axie]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="advisory07-08" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jan 15 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Feb 24 14:30:23 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Feb 24 14:33:43 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[At first I saw this book and thought to myself &quot;Ok, another skeptical book that tries to dispprove God. How lovely!&quot; I felt that because it used mathematical concepts, it would be easy to follow...but how wrong I was. <br/><br/>Generally, I liked the book, I thought it was extremely inte...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/16265014">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/16265014]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="58194257">
    <user id="2028832">
    <name><![CDATA[Kathleen]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Milwaukee, WI]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2028832-kathleen]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="math-science" />
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="philosophy" />
        <shelf name="read-in-2009" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jun 02 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jun 02 11:17:51 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jun 02 11:24:55 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The subtitle for this book is fairly descriptive.  Paulos does not attempt to prove that there is no god, or that belief is somehow wrong, he simply uses logic to disprove most of the common arguments that God exists.  It is a good book and well worth perusing whichever side of the great theological...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58194257">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58194257]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="21535304">
    <user id="324928">
    <name><![CDATA[Evan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chicago, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/324928-evan]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed May 07 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat May 03 15:20:41 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed May 07 06:46:22 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I enjoyed the book, and in a climate where millions are convinced that Intelligent Design enjoys validity on par (and even above) hard science it is important to brush up on the debate's basics. The trouble with the book, however, is that Paulos is more comfortable and effective derailing arguments ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/21535304">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/21535304]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="61666108">
    <user id="37832">
    <name><![CDATA[Sarah]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Plymouth, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/37832-sarah]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Jul 11 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jun 30 14:19:45 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jul 11 04:02:14 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[So far so good. It's basically what the title says. He does well with the argument that the world is &quot;too complex&quot; to be made without God. Someone gives the example that the complexity of a watch imitates the complexity of a plant. Man learned this complexity by God. Paulos then offers the...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/61666108">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/61666108]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="11641219">
    <user id="300385">
    <name><![CDATA[Eric]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Apex, NC]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/300385-eric]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="recent-reads" />
        <shelf name="religion" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Jan 04 11:34:55 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 25 18:57:32 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[eh, more of the same.  there wasn't a lot here that isn't discussed in books by victor stenger and, of course, richard dawkins.  he does provide a different perspective here and there that i found interesting.  i found it kind of funny that he states at the beginning that, despite being a mathematic...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/11641219">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/11641219]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="54775019">
    <user id="1345046">
    <name><![CDATA[Todd]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Phoenix, AZ]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1345046-todd]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="atheism---religion---philosophy" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon May 04 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun May 03 07:45:31 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon May 04 19:15:53 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[In &quot;Irreligion&quot; John Allen Paulos uses logical refutation against common arguments for god's existence. Though entertaining, there is little new or insightful about Paulos’ ideas. Since religious apologists typically rely on incoherent rationalizations, emotional appeals and fallacious a...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54775019">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54775019]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="19543198">
    <user id="1058704">
    <name><![CDATA[Michael]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1058704-michael]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu May 01 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Apr 05 16:28:58 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jun 05 15:44:43 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Succinct.  Deftly--and with humor--answers questions related to the discussion of god and atheism.  While he misses some opportunities (his background is in mathematics, as the title says, rather than in philosophy), he takes this subject on in a way no other author has yet done.  This is a quick, i...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/19543198">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/19543198]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="42686668">
    <user id="1685814">
    <name><![CDATA[Louise]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Denver, CO]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1685814-louise]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="agnostic-atheist-skeptic" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jan 11 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Jan 11 11:10:41 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jan 11 22:45:26 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Enjoying the fairly easy logic problems written with intelligent wit and levity. Introduced me again to philosophers I had met years ago in college classes, and made their ideas much more clear to me. More good humor than Christopher Hutchin's <strong>God is Not Great</strong>. A good read for a skeptic who likes to...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42686668">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42686668]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="60092341">
    <user id="2347018">
    <name><![CDATA[Mark]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[London, ON, Canada]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2347018-mark-young]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Feb 20 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Jun 17 16:38:15 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Jun 17 16:40:22 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I was in an atheist phase after &quot;God is not Great&quot; and saw this at the library when I was looking for a short read to take with me to my daughter's ballet class. This is a funny, quirky little handbook on the many arguments for atheism and against the existence of a supreme being. If you'v...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/60092341">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/60092341]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="20559381">
    <user id="746637">
    <name><![CDATA[Sally]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Bellevue, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/746637-sally]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="religion-atheism" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Apr 01 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Apr 19 22:31:52 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Apr 19 22:47:39 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The author, a witty writer, analysizes and refutes the dozen most common logical arguments or proofs for the existence of a personal God.  I found his refutation of arguments for the anthropic principle and the argument from design particularly useful.  There were a few points, however, such as one ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/20559381">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/20559381]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="17609318">
    <user id="569566">
    <name><![CDATA[Michael]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Sterling Heights, MI]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/569566-michael]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Mar 19 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Mar 12 12:19:37 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Mar 19 13:55:07 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[for a book where the author claims that there isn't one mathematical equation, there sure a lot of mathematical equations. um, A LOT. like, almost on every page. strange. paulos is a mathmetician who wrote a book about atheism that doesn't really add much new to the subject (especially if you've rea...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17609318">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17609318]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="37975023">
    <user id="1717479">
    <name><![CDATA[Terry]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Feasterville Trevose, PA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1717479-terry]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[rigorous theology and theosophy]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[Point of Inquiry Podcast]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Nov 05 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Nov 17 14:06:22 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Nov 17 14:09:24 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count>1</read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This short page turner attacks common theological arguments for the existence of God and points out their faults and foibles.  It's not an attack on faith merely a collection of arguments that poke holes in classical proofs of God's existence such as the ontological proof and Pascal's wager.<br/><br/>...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37975023">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37975023]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="20739286">
    <user id="153756">
    <name><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chicago, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/153756-jeffrey]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="science-and-religion" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Apr 01 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Apr 22 14:01:41 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Apr 22 14:08:08 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[An amusing little book, much less confrontational than many other current pro-atheist books these days, but perhaps more devastating, with clearly stated and logical arguments with a good dose of humor and common sense. It's not that any of his deconstructions of various pro-god arguments are new, s...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/20739286">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/20739286]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="34352393">
    <user id="1448616">
    <name><![CDATA[Matt]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Lecompton, KS]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1448616-matt]]></url>
  </user>
      <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Oct 02 06:57:01 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Apr 29 13:30:27 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I'd recommend this for anyone beginning to enter the world of religious discourse between believers and non-believers. It takes some of the most commonly used arguments put forth by theists in defense of their position, and gives pretty good, concise refutations of them in relatively clear language....<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/34352393">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/34352393]]></url>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
        <shelf name="to-read" />
        <shelf name="religion" />
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
        <shelf name="currently-reading" />
        <shelf name="philosophy" />
        <shelf name="science" />
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
        <shelf name="atheism" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link id="8">
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=1873944</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>