Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of Its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status ” as Want to Read:
Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of Its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of Its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status

by
4.67  ·  Rating Details  ·  12 Ratings  ·  3 Reviews
Does traditional credal Christianity involve paradoxical doctrines, that is, doctrines which present the appearance (at least) of logical inconsistency? If so, what is the nature of these paradoxes and why do they arise? What is the relationship between 'paradox' and 'mystery' in theological theorizing? And what are the implications for the rationality, or otherwise, of or ...more
Paperback, Paternoster Theological Monographs, 328 pages
Published March 1st 2007 by Wipf & Stock Publishers (first published 2007)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Paradox in Christian Theology, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Paradox in Christian Theology

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 31)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Paul
I loved this book. Fine piece of philosophical theology. I review this book in depth here:

My review of Paradox In Christian Theology

I will post the introduction of my review:

What would you say of a book that makes it part of its aim to establish that certain essential Christian doctrines (say, the doctrine of the Trinity and the doctrine of the Incarnation) present the appearance of logical contradiction? What would you think of a book that argues that no theologian in history has been able to p
...more
Nate Claiborne
Anderson’s overall conclusion is that “Christians who hold paradoxical views of the Trinity and the Incarnation (whether knowingly or unknowingly) can be epistemically warranted in their doctrinal beliefs” (p. 308). I think he argues his case well, and even in my limited knowledge of philosophical knowledge I think he makes a compelling case for his model. The book itself, as I said before, is a very clear read. For what it could be, Anderson does a superb job of navigating potentially confusing ...more
Kurt
May 04, 2013 Kurt rated it it was amazing
A freeing book for any theologian or philosopher.
Alexey
Alexey marked it as to-read
Jan 30, 2016
David Houston
David Houston rated it really liked it
Jan 21, 2016
Ryan Grooms
Ryan Grooms marked it as to-read
May 30, 2015
Brandon Adams
Brandon Adams marked it as to-read
May 14, 2015
Tim
Tim rated it it was amazing
Jan 04, 2015
Casey
Casey marked it as to-read
Nov 05, 2014
Herman
Herman marked it as to-read
Aug 18, 2014
Marcus
Marcus marked it as to-read
Jul 19, 2014
James
James marked it as to-read
Mar 08, 2014
Dexter
Dexter marked it as to-read
Feb 22, 2013
Anna Kong
Anna Kong marked it as to-read
Feb 12, 2013
Chad
Chad marked it as to-read
Oct 15, 2012
Daniel Wells
Daniel Wells rated it it was amazing
Sep 28, 2012
Jacob
Jacob rated it it was amazing
Jul 19, 2012
Carl Amouzou
Carl Amouzou marked it as to-read
Feb 07, 2012
Evan
Evan rated it really liked it
Jan 17, 2012
Joseph
Joseph marked it as to-read
Apr 18, 2012
David
David marked it as to-read
May 10, 2011
Andrew
Andrew rated it it was amazing
Dec 20, 2010
Jonathan B
Jonathan B rated it it was amazing
May 19, 2010
Charlie
Charlie rated it really liked it
Apr 02, 2010
Gary
Gary marked it as to-read
Jan 03, 2010
Jonathan
Jonathan marked it as to-read
Oct 16, 2009
Caleb
Caleb rated it it was amazing
Oct 04, 2008
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book