Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe” as Want to Read:
The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe

4.04 of 5 stars 4.04  ·  rating details  ·  3,420 ratings  ·  127 reviews
The Road to Reality is the most important and ambitious work of science for a generation. It provides nothing less than a comprehensive account of the physical universe and the essentials of its underlying mathematical theory. It assumes no particular specialist knowledge on the part of the reader, so that, for example, the early chapters give us the vital mathematical bac ...more
Paperback, 1136 pages
Published February 2nd 2006 by Vintage (first published 2004)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Road to Reality, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Road to Reality

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Sep 05, 2011 Manny rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: People who seriously want to understand physics better
Recommended to Manny by: Nick Black
Many of my all-time favourite books make the list because they show you what it's like to be inside the mind of an extraordinary person. While you're reading them, Churchill's History of the Second World War and Yourcenar's Mémoires d'Hadrien let you be a great statesman at a pivotal moment in history. Simone de Beauvoir's autobiography, more than any other book I know, gives you the feeling of being a major literary figure. Polugayevsky's Grandmaster Preparation, which many chessplayers treat a ...more
Dave Langford, SF&F critic and reviewer, in his long-since defunct column for White Dwarf magazine, once said that, "There is a tendency to over-praise big books simply because one has got through them." I agree that this tendency exists but note that Langford gave no reason for it. I think the reason is more or less macho intellectual pride; look at me! I read this honking great saga! It must be great or I'd have to admit wasting my time! And I need to show off my intellectual credentials! ...more
Nick Black
Penrose came to GT and gave an open lecture on cosmic parameters and cosmological arguments from the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics (chapter 27 in this book, one of the most ambitious and impressive -- if incomplete, a bit uneven, and just as taxing as you've heard -- catechisms I've ever read), and a closed lecture on twistor theory (chapter 33), and signed my copy! w00t! I shook Sir Roger's hand as trillions of neutrinos passed through us both, completely undetected, our entangled R-type state evol ...more
Cassandra Kay Silva
Penrose, Penrose, Penrose. Oh how I LONG to know thee. I am becoming minorly obsessed with you and your work. I am pacing for crying out loud. I am running myself in circles. Opening, closing, referencing, coming back, straining my eyes as if that will make me see the world that you do. Why do you elude me so? Why does your tongue speak as if attached to the left temporal lobe itself? I catch glimpses of this reality you see. I feel myself drawn to it in longing for truth and understanding. For ...more
this book RULES. it is a sort of primer on the mathematics required to really understand quantum physics. of course, that is a pretty huge pile of stuff, and this is a damn huge book. it moves faaast too: the entire theoretical foundations of single-variable calculus takes up one chapter. the reader is rapidly pulled through pretty heavy cram sessions in multivariable calculus, algebraic topology, real analysis... everything you need! and yet, it does not feel at all dense, because roger penrose ...more
Nov 15, 2009 DJ marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: priority, physics
I have a suspicion that Penrose hasn't spoken to a undergraduate in 30 years. His notion of "introductory material" is not just wrong, its downright strange.

The famed mathematician devotes several pages to discussing the addition of fractions then breezes through holomorphic functions and Reimann spheres.

I'll return to this book in a year or two when I have the mathematical background to qualify as a "non-mathematician."
So we had a physicist around to dinner the other day and thrust this at him. I can't call T---- by his real name, let's just say he rhymes with a dip made with chickpeas and tahini. The reason I can't call him by his real name is that he works at a place that starts with C and rhymes with a complete lack of humour. He likes his job, I don't want to get him sacked for reading Penrose.

He flicks through it and the first thing I note is that physicists take about 5 nanoseconds to read what it takes
A feast for any physicist, or anyone who wants to learn the depth and beauty of physics, etc. as we know it. Not dumbed down at all. Throws every subject imaginable at you. If you can understand it, this book is truly amazing.

EDIT: I have recently learned in a conversation at uni that there are some controversies with the book and orthodox physics, most notably in the areas of string theory, Penrose's idea of twistors and the idea of more than 4 dimensions. However - considering how much else th
Amazing. While I can not exactly call Road to Reality a popularization of general relativity and quantum theory, it is a peerless introduction to and review of those topics. I have a PhD in mathematics, and studied physics and math as an undergraduate, and there was plenty for me to learn from this book. There are very few people in the world who would not learn much from reading it.

Many years ago, I read Penrose's Emporer's New Mind which was good as far as it went, but earned my derision with
Sanjay Gautam

Its the greatest science book ever written in the whole world since the beginning of the time. Its certainly not popular science, its hardcore science and maths written for general audience.
This book is too sprawling to wait and review all at once at the end, so I've decided to do it little by little as I go along.

I thought the prologue sucked, but immediately after that it became deeply fascinating, so don't get discouraged. I guess I should say why I hated it, though. It seemed as though he was judging former times and societies through a "presentist" lens, as though all people have always and only been scientists since the start of time, only they were really bad at it back then
Ivan Vukovic
wow... I actually managed to read it, 1050 pages, every single one of them.

But can I really say that I'm done with this book? I don't think so... Although it took me a year and a half to read it, I didn't even understand a significant part of it. Since I'm a physics student I understood most of it on some very basic level, but I'm pretty sure I'll have to open this book again and again to take a peek at some of the awesome ideas put here by Penrose.

Did I say awesome? That's a huge understatement
Rajesh Chepuri
Aug 21, 2007 Rajesh Chepuri rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: physics: link to math, relativity, quantum mechanics
This is a great book. I have finished reading the first part i.e, math part of the book. It opened lot of windows for me in the world of mathematics. Though a computer graduate, I have lot of interest in physics. I have read lot of material on relativity but none gave me the the insight to it like this book. Before this book, I had no knowledge of non-eucildean geometry and its importance to physics. But now I know lot about Riemann and other great people's contribution.

The graphical presentatio
Deciphering the laws of physics to create universal reality

This is an exhaustive review of the laws of physics as related to physical reality with significant emphasis on the mathematical component. The author is an outstanding mathematical physicist of our times, and in this book of 1100 pages, he describes the concept of space, time, and matter (energy) in terms of classical physics, quantum physics, string theory and its derivatives.

In physics, the behavior of objects is understood in terms
Yasiru (reviews will soon be removed and linked to blog)
As accurate a title as can be for this tremendously ambitious behemoth. I very much enjoyed the masterful laying of a mathematical framework when first I came across it (the first dozen or so chapters if memory serves; hence the rating, as well as for the aforementioned ambition in the task- I think this is a right way to go, though popular expositors seldom venture down this route), as Penrose does it so efficiently (and naturally too, so that the layman wouldn't shove it aside in disgust after ...more
Penrose examines the turn modern theoretical physics has taken in pursuit of multi-dimensional mathematical models to develop a unified model of the sub-atomic realm. His argument is not entirely mathematical, though he does have good arguments against unnecessary complexity from the point of view of the straightforward progress made by theoretical physics in discovering the mathematical elegance of relationships among various observed constants. His most profound argument against String Theory ...more
Feb 09, 2009 Michael rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Engineers, Teachers & Weird Guys
Recommended to Michael by: Some weird guy at the gym.
I desperately want to make it through this book. I might be crazy. I think part of my fascination with finishing it is to compensate for not finishing engineering school. I can tell you this... It would be a lot easier to read if I had attained my degree (and actually learned the material along the way). Nonetheless, this book opens in the most interesting and captivating fashion, which says a lot about a book that works to explain the universe by walking through the history of mathematics. A co ...more
Nilo De
( Failed my reading challenge. But I chose the wrong book. Not at all what I expected. Maybe abother time, but I doubt it. )

People have asked how Penrose could have written a 1200 page book in his already busy schedule. - Just finished chapter 13 about symmetry groups. I may not be a group theorist, of all mathematics, this is my field. Chapter 13 is just a collection of facts about group theory... But then this is not a book! It's a collection of articles presented as chapters. The articles des
This excellent, definitive work is not for the faint of heart of the weak of mathematics. You'll have finished most of the material for an undergraduate degree in math by the time you've worked your way through this: the first half of the book starts with Pythagorean number theory, complex number calculus, Riemann surfaces, Fourier decomposition, n-dimensional manifolds, Lie symmetry groups, and builds out from there. However, rich fruit is reaped in the second half of the book, which delves dee ...more
Hal Taylor
Many reviewers are harping on the mathematical density of this book as the cause of its failure. But, although I couldn't comprehend 90% of the math, I needed this book to lay out for me just what mathematical abstractions the great thinkers were capable of summoning to apply to their observations of physical phenomena. The presentation of these theories in all their opaque gritty detail 1) vividly demonstrates the astonishing cultural phenomenon of an animal species that has come to understand ...more
Dec 05, 2011 Carlo marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: physics, astronomy
This book is way above my head. I'm gonna shelve it for a while and probably be back to it after some more readings in math. It is certainly not a layman's book, especially if you want to really understand the implications of Penrose's ideas. I have an engineering degree, and yet, from the second chapter on, I was sweating!
One of the best mathematically complete but general and interesting physics books by one of the greatest of the field.
The story goes that Stephen Hawking was once told by a book publisher that every formula in his book would halve the amount of readers (or sales, almost the same thing, but not to a publisher). He was , of course, totally and utterly wrong. The Road to Reality contains about 1100 pages and, on average, there's about 9 formulas per page. That makes roughly 1000 formulas. According to this publisher's law, that would halve the sales a thousand times (2^(-1000)), so a rough estimate of the amount o ...more
Lee Razer
Oct 16, 2014 Lee Razer marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: abandoned
Chapter 4. A complex number is of the form a+ib, where i is an imaginary number, the square root of -1. All regular rules of algebra apply to complex numbers, and it turns out that they govern the behavior of the universe at the tiniest scales. Very good. Illustration of the use of complex numbers in the convergence and divergence of power series, where for ex. 1+x^2+x^4+x^6+... = (1-x^2)^-1. Manually adding up some number of partial sums converges to the "answer" only where |x|<1; for |x|>1, ...more
John Haverkamp
75% of this book is above my head mathematically. But that's ok, because my arithmetic truncates at the 10 grade in 1987, so that's to be expected. What matter's is Mr. Penrose's clear presentation of advanced topics in physics, starting with the theoretical math which underlies them. He shows how the math often predates and thus opens the way for new physical theories. It is really refreshing how forthcoming the author is when presenting theories he either agrees or disagree with; always endeav ...more

This is a might be the best *children* book of our generation. Bear
with me. My favorite book when I was small was a some 1000 pages thick
encyclopedia of astronomy - and I am sure I am not the only who was
fascinated and inspired by a similarly mesmerizing and daunting
book. Full of strange pictures and even stranger ideas. Penrose's book
could be such a book for our kids. Do buy and keep it within easy
reach. Who knows?

LESS IMPORTANTLY (despite attempt still not really a factual rev
This is an audacious book, and a daunting read. Despite the months I spent working my way through it, I feel I barely scratched the surface, and I'm ill-equipped to really review it. A few random thoughts follow.

The book takes the refreshing (and unpopular amongst most pop-science books) view that the physics can't really be discussed without developing the necessary mathematical foundations, and it spends quite a lot of time introducing those mathematical subjects. That being said, it is probab
F Avery
By his own admission in the preface, this is Penrose' attempt to popularize the current thinking in theoretical physics, including quantum mechanics, relativity, and unification theories such as string theories and quantum gravity. In the introduction he says (paraphrased) that he has intentionally gone for the more mathematical route, in spite of advice to the contrary, but he hopes that those without a mathematical bent can just skip the equations and get the gist of the concepts anyway.
With d
There are three great things about this book (apart from the subject itself, which is the reason that I read it in the first place); the scope, the structure, and the level of detail.

The scope is simply all modern fundamental physics, which is impressive in itself. The structure is different from most other popular science books in that the first third of the book is almost entirely pure mathematics, covering most of the theory that is needed to understand the actual physics; basic definitions o
Matt Heavner
This is quite a challenging read -- but definitely worth the effort! The first half is primarily "math" while the second half is "physics." Penrose did an amazing job of writing a guidebook to a great deal of the breadth of both of these fields. I felt there were some uneven sections -- I remember a great deal of discussion on Fourier transforms and thinking that if a whole section of discussion is needed there, how will the reader keep up through differential topology, twistor theory, diagramma ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Gravitation
  • The Princeton Companion to Mathematics
  • Three Roads To Quantum Gravity
  • Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law
  • Warped Passages: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions
  • The Theoretical Minimum: What You Need to Know to Start Doing Physics (Theoretical Minimum #1)
  • The Feynman Lectures on Physics
  • The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes--and Its Implications
  • Just Six Numbers: The Deep Forces That Shape the Universe
  • The End of Time : The Next Revolution in Our Understanding of the Universe
  • From Eternity to Here: The Quest for the Ultimate Theory of Time
  • A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down
  • The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex
  • Introduction to Electrodynamics
  • Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science
  • What Is Mathematics?: An Elementary Approach to Ideas and Methods
  • One, Two, Three...Infinity: Facts and Speculations of Science
  • The Inflationary Universe: The Quest for a New Theory of Cosmic Origins
Sir Roger Penrose OM FRS is an English mathematical physicist and Emeritus Rouse Ball Professor of Mathematics at the Mathematical Institute, University of Oxford and Emeritus Fellow of Wadham College. He has received a number of prizes and awards, including the 1988 Wolf Prize for physics which he shared with Stephen Hawking for their contribution to our understanding of the universe. He is renow ...more
More about Roger Penrose...
The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein The Large, the Small and the Human Mind

Share This Book

“We have a closed circle of consistency here: the laws of physics produce complex systems, and these complex systems lead to consciousness, which then produces mathematics, which can then encode in a succinct and inspiring way the very underlying laws of physics that gave rise to it.” 17 likes
“No doubt there are some who, when confronted with a line of mathematical symbols, however simply presented, can only see the face of a stern parent or teacher who tried to force into them a non-comprehending parrot-like apparent competence--a duty and a duty alone--and no hint of magic or beauty of the subject might be allowed to come through.” 5 likes
More quotes…