How Doctors Think
by Jerome Groopman
|
|
Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of How Doctors Think.
discuss this book
friend reviews (0)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 766)
bookshelves:
medical-health
Read in January, 2007
Starred Review from Publishers Weekly. Signature Reviewed by Perri Klass
I wish I had read this book when I was in medical school, and I'm glad I've read it now. Most readers will knowJerome Groopman from his essays in the New Yorker, which take on a wide variety of complex medical conditions, evocatively communicating the tensions and emotions of both doctors and patients.But this book is something different: a sustained, incisive and sometimes agonized inquiry into the processes by whi...more
I wish I had read this book when I was in medical school, and I'm glad I've read it now. Most readers will knowJerome Groopman from his essays in the New Yorker, which take on a wide variety of complex medical conditions, evocatively communicating the tensions and emotions of both doctors and patients.But this book is something different: a sustained, incisive and sometimes agonized inquiry into the processes by whi...more
Like this review?
yes
(3 people liked it)
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
recommends it for:
those interested in medical professions or cognitive studies
I got a free advanced reading copy of this book from my workplace, and was really excited about it from the beginning. About 2/3 of the way through it, and still enjoying it though reading it in small chunks at a time-- especially on the bus.
I find the subject fascinating. Doctors are, after all, only people like the rest of us and are thus susceptible to the same mistakes in thought and the (accidental) allowing of biases to affect their judgement. How Doctors Think explores this,...more
I find the subject fascinating. Doctors are, after all, only people like the rest of us and are thus susceptible to the same mistakes in thought and the (accidental) allowing of biases to affect their judgement. How Doctors Think explores this,...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
2007
Read in October, 2007
The Science of Doctor Misdiagnosis -- Jerome Groopman is the chief of experimental medicine at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, teaches at Harvard Medical School and is a writer for the New Yorker. Groopman is a doctor who realizes he needs a doctor as the result of an experience in which he found himself plagued by a wrist injury that resulted in multiple diagnoses and treatments from four different doctors with no clear and rationale diagnosis. As a result, he decides to embar...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in November, 2007
This was an excellent book for what it was, but it certainly doesn't contain the excitement or excellent writing that would warrant a much higher rating.
The title explains this book perfectly, as Groopman shows us that doctors are subject to the same cognitive errors as everyone else. He outlines cognitive traps like availability error and confirmation bias, explains how doctors fall prey to them during diagnosis, and then provides us patients with techniques for helping doctors steer around ...more
The title explains this book perfectly, as Groopman shows us that doctors are subject to the same cognitive errors as everyone else. He outlines cognitive traps like availability error and confirmation bias, explains how doctors fall prey to them during diagnosis, and then provides us patients with techniques for helping doctors steer around ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
The premise is an intriguing one but it's stretched very thin in order to justify an entire book. I read the New Yorker article published on the same topic in anticipation of the book release and was impressed with the logical structure that Groopman applied to medical mistakes. I was hoping for a more detailed discussion of the same in the book and it failed for the most part. A good consideration of the role that uncertainty plays in physicians' decision making, but the ways in which doctors ...more
Like this review?
yes
1 comments
Read in March, 2008
recommends it for:
Doctors and patients, at least to skim
Did you ever wonder how doctor's diagnose you? And moreover, how to be sure they make the minimal number of mistakes? This book sets out to do this, list the kinds of mistakes that doctors make with a litany of horror stories of them to make you take notice. In a nutshell, the kinds of mistakes doctors make in diagnosis are the same kinds of mistakes that we all make, caused by: hubris, rushed judgment, and not thinking out of a the box. The ER particularly can be a tough place to get good help ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Has a copy to sell/swap
—
Read in July, 2007
recommends it for:
Anyone interested in medicine and how doctors think
The premise of this book is to parse out how doctors think--ie whether there is a rubric they follow, if there are multiple ways doctors think, whether they are systematic in their thinking at all, and above all, which rubric(s) work best for different patients. Groopman makes a point of saying that this book is aimed in large part towards patients who wish to improve the decision-making of their doctors. Much of the book does have suggestions for ways to get doctors to broaden their thinking...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in May, 2007
Really, it's about the kinds of cognitive errors that physicians make during diagnosis. I've read Groopman's writing in the New Yorker and liked it (many of the chapters here have been adapted for that magazine) and, I gotta say, they're better in the short versions. While interesting, many of the chapters here feel padded, and Groopman reiterates himself quite a bit. I'm also somewhat biased against him, as he says in the opening, "If our clinical problems is not an emergency, then out ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in March, 2008
recommends it for:
anyone who visits their doctor
I found myself taking notes while reading this book.
Dr. Groopman lays out some deficiencies in some doctors' thinking that can occur for several reasons such as seeing too many patients and the intense pull from pharmaceutical companies.
Today's patient needs to consider that they are co-partners in their medical treatment.
Dr. Groopman doesn't patronize the lay reader and I especially like that he's managed to navigate a difficult conversation so well-that being, how do doctors th...more
Dr. Groopman lays out some deficiencies in some doctors' thinking that can occur for several reasons such as seeing too many patients and the intense pull from pharmaceutical companies.
Today's patient needs to consider that they are co-partners in their medical treatment.
Dr. Groopman doesn't patronize the lay reader and I especially like that he's managed to navigate a difficult conversation so well-that being, how do doctors th...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in December, 2007
I love Jerome Grootman's articles in the New Yorker and since I recently joined an organization filled with doctors, I thought it would be interesting and useful to read his book. His writing style is intelligent and open - and his use of case studies to talk about how doctors make their leaps in thinking was extremely interesting. I got a bit bogged down near the end (as often happens to me when I'm reading non-fiction - I can usually only make it through 2/3 of the book unless its EXTREMELY we...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
non-fiction
Read in April, 2007
It's a fact of my life: I have to see a lot of doctors to keep me healthy. I click with some; others, not so much. I read this book to help me with the latter. The book is full of tips on what to say or do to get your doctor off of a "biased" thinking pattern to consider other possible diagnoses or treatments. There are lots of real life examples of how a doctor's mind can be inadvertently narrowed in the first place, and the doctor/author's writing is easy to understand without e...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
currently-reading,
non-fiction
Read in January, 2008
recommends it for:
Everyone
I've been reading Jerome Groopman's articles for the New Yorker for years now and was quite excited to hear about this book. It is interesting that he aims the book at lay people. As with all of his writing, there is a lot of introspection and insight. It is clearly evident that he not only enjoys what he does but that he truly cares. The great thing about this book is that it actually looks at how doctors make mistakes without devolving into an indictment of the system or individuals.
I have ...more
I have ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Has a copy to sell/swap
—
Read in December, 2007
recommends it for:
people seeking to be frightened about their healthcare delivery.
The book itself is somewhat haphazardly structured and the author is not great at weaving his series of anecdotes into a concise thesis. That said, I felt the book was interesting at least from my medical student viewpoint on the missteps of and problems with medical care. He also does a good job at avoiding cynicism while discussing a topic that really just asks for it.
I think the major weakness of this book is that it is written from the perspective of either the author's experiences ...more
I think the major weakness of this book is that it is written from the perspective of either the author's experiences ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
professional
Read in January, 2008
Dr. Groopman does a nice job illustrating many of the heuristics that Tversky and Kahneman wrote about, decades ago. T&V are/were economists, and studied human psychology. Groopman shows that doctors (like everyone else) are susceptible to the same mental shortcuts that can cause errors in many other fields. His stories are well told, and serve as cautionary tales for both people who are patients, and people who will be patients, as well as for people who treat patients.
In recent talk...more
In recent talk...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in May, 2007
Anyone who is a physician, has ever seen a physician, ever plans on seeing a physician, or has ever had or think they might have a health issue should read this book. Hmmm. I guess I could have just said that everyone should read it.
No, really. This is a great book about (among other things) the mental biases that sometimes influence how doctors form diagnoses or make decisions; the conflicting financial incentives for doctors in our medical system; how to spot a good doctor; and the ways in ...more
No, really. This is a great book about (among other things) the mental biases that sometimes influence how doctors form diagnoses or make decisions; the conflicting financial incentives for doctors in our medical system; how to spot a good doctor; and the ways in ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in April, 2007
great book, well, at least for the first few chapters, in which it really emphasizes how doctors should think beyond their own intuition (first guess) at a person's condition, and rethink what other diagnosis could be made upon the symptoms presented. really highlights some intriguing case studies in which doctors made horrible misdiagnoses, some of these lasting for years, and how other doctors stepped in, thinking outside the box, and made the correct diagnosis. then the book takes a turn fo...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
non-fiction
I thought this book was interesting, thought-provoking, and well written. I really loved the first half of it, but the second half dragged a bit for me. As someone who has had far more contact with the medical profession over the past year than I ever wanted to, it rang true in many ways. The book does a nice job of examining reasons behind many common cognitive errors doctors make without demonizing the doctors. It offers helpful suggestions to patients who hope to avoid such errors in thei...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
home
Read in January, 2008
Pressure from insurance companies mean doctors need to see many patients to afford a practice. This means juggling hundreds of individuals and limiting visits to less than 15 minutes. Easily identified issues are identified with these kinds of visits. Some doctors know within seconds the diagnosis, only order tests to confirm, and ignore minor evidence to the contrary.
Patients can stop this by encouraging doctors to slow down and expand their thinking. Good questions can result in doctors ma...more
Patients can stop this by encouraging doctors to slow down and expand their thinking. Good questions can result in doctors ma...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
bookshelves:
social-science
Read in August, 2007
Oh my god, going to a doctor when sick is just one horrible social psychology experiment! All right, it's not REALLY an experiment, though any study would be fully replicable, but the author does use enough social psych terms to grant me a mini-refresher course! In essence, doctors are just as guilty as the rest of us of hindsight bias, forming negative (and often incorrect) first impressions, and ultimately being fallible. Unfortunately, neither physicians nor the drug companies want to admit i...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in June, 2007
recommends it for:
Anyone interested in medicine, metacognition or problem solving
This is a good book on common cognitive biases, heuristics and error. It's a cautionary piece on why people need to take care that their doctors listen to them. Groopman emphasizes that the cognitive biases and tunnels that doctors fall in to are common to most human beings. He makes a strong case for mindful and methodical communication in order to minimize misdiagnoses, mistakes and misunderstanding. I will read, or listen to it again in the future. I recommend it to anyone who plans on e...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment

















