6th out of 10 books
—
19 voters
A People's History of the World
by
Chris Harman
Chris Harman describes the shape and course of human history as a narrative of ordinary people forming and re-forming complex societies in pursuit of common human goals. Interacting with the forces of technological change as well as the impact of powerful individuals and revolutionary ideas, these societies have engendered events familiar to every schoolchild - from the em...more
Paperback, 752 pages
Published
November 10th 1999
by Bookmarks
(first published 1999)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
1,417)
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
Great introduction to the history of the world. Tries to fit most events into a Marxist context, explaining how the development of the "means of production" changed the course of the world at almost every juncture. A pretty good book to turn to if you are trying to place anchor some of these big ideas in actual history.
One of the strengths of the book is that while it is heavy on "dialectical materialism" the author readily points out when other, non-economic forces were also in play. He also is...more
One of the strengths of the book is that while it is heavy on "dialectical materialism" the author readily points out when other, non-economic forces were also in play. He also is...more
It is almost impossible to review a book with such an unrivalled scope as this. Chris Harman present a history of the world, a social history documenting the struggles of people the world over from 3000BC right through to the new millennium. It is a beautiful and admirable volume, packed with interesting facts about the inherent fairness of humanity and our desire to work together to create a better society. It is genuinely a world history too, rather than focusing narrowly on Europe or our west...more
I was inspired to read this book by the revelation of just how ignorant I was of world history pre-1895 (blame it on the cinematic foundations of my education). I was also intrigued with it following my recent reading of Zinn's history of the American people. And I must say, it proved a priceless source of information. I had, however, a lot of problems with the book, despite its undeniably splendid passages.
For one thing, the very ambition of the project gives way to certain ludicrousies. How i...more
For one thing, the very ambition of the project gives way to certain ludicrousies. How i...more
We didn't manage to get very far in my so-called World History class in ninth grade, like somehow we didn't get to Asia, or out of the medieval period. Like Howard Zinn's "People's History," I suspect that this tome is meant for people like me, who disenchanted by the long list of battles and kings they were forced to memorize by name in school, never developed a strong interest in what is called history. At least, that's why I picked up this book. Unlike Zinn's "People's History" though, this o...more
This is a unique book. A comprehensive history of humanity from the standpoint of the oppressed and exploited, not as victims but as heroes of revolutionary struggles with emancipatory potential. The book is much more than "history from below" though. It is also a refined application of the Marxist approach to history, setting the unfolding of events in the context of the interaction of humans with nature and among themselves as people make their own histories in conditions inherited from past d...more
Excellent book which gives you a fresh respective on world events. Weak on pre-history, the author is at his best discussing the class and labour fraemwork of a civilization and its influence on the rise and fall of said civilization. His explanation for the failure of some revolutions over others relies on analysis of class interests of the groups involved and notes how interests in the established order generally lead to a still born revolution. He takes a serious and honest look at the failur...more
Jul 22, 2011
Jayme
marked it as to-read-non-fiction
From The Independent's Ten Best History Books.
So I glanced at reviews and am already not surprised to find out that he is looking at this from a Marxist perspective (just from reading the introduction "BEFORE CLASS"). Anyway, I know so little about most of history that I figure anything I read will be new and educational, so it's okay that it has obvious bias (though it's nice to know up front). I will probably take some notes here on what I manage to read because I have no memory.
1.) Introduction: "Before Class" -- Summary -- people haven'...more
1.) Introduction: "Before Class" -- Summary -- people haven'...more
A good read, but repetitive in places (I guess because it is trying to show history as a cycle of class struggles) and of course as it covers such a great breadth of human history it sacrifices some depth.
Nonetheless an excellent and very educational read, I would challenge anyone to read it and not learn a lot if purely because of the breadth of the material.
Some of the conclusion is eerily prescient where he warns of possible future conflicts and nationalist tensions in the next (apparently in...more
Nonetheless an excellent and very educational read, I would challenge anyone to read it and not learn a lot if purely because of the breadth of the material.
Some of the conclusion is eerily prescient where he warns of possible future conflicts and nationalist tensions in the next (apparently in...more
This book was absolutely amazing. There are no other words to describe this amazing source of literature. The novel starts from the stone age and the development of civilization and then spirals its way up time all the way to the year 2,000 c.e. I found this book not only interesting historically (because I am history obsessed) but also just plain, old smart. The title explains it all, the novel carries one through history not in the old fashioned textbook way, but through the eyes of the people...more
Where to begin with such a broad and all encompassing topic as the history of humanity?
According to Harman “History is the sequence of events that led to the lives we lead today. It is the story of how we came to be ourselves. Understanding it is the key to finding out how we can further change the world in which we live.” The understanding that Harman’s all encompassing work portrays is not the worn academic path cataloging great leaders, thinkers, and innovators but a narrative that depicts th...more
According to Harman “History is the sequence of events that led to the lives we lead today. It is the story of how we came to be ourselves. Understanding it is the key to finding out how we can further change the world in which we live.” The understanding that Harman’s all encompassing work portrays is not the worn academic path cataloging great leaders, thinkers, and innovators but a narrative that depicts th...more
I was assigned sections of this historical tome for my graduate level course in European Economic History. At the time, I had a yearning to read an overview of world history and decided to tackle the whole book.
Anyway, the book offers a coherent world history from the Marxist perspective. I am, however, weary of the focus to put human history into some overarching and coherent narrative. I learned quite a bit from this book, despite largely disagreeing with certain parts of it.
Anyway, the book offers a coherent world history from the Marxist perspective. I am, however, weary of the focus to put human history into some overarching and coherent narrative. I learned quite a bit from this book, despite largely disagreeing with certain parts of it.
When I was in school I feel I was taught the world history of Western "civilization". It was the history of wars, imperialism and capitalism as perceived through the eyes of European and American history writers. This book does include the history of African, Middle Eastern, Asian, Oriental and island nations. I liked what I learned about other parts of the world that were largely ignored in my education.
If I was given a capitalist/imperialist account of history, this book was a socialist histor...more
If I was given a capitalist/imperialist account of history, this book was a socialist histor...more
This book is phenomenal. I could not put it down. It definitely doesn't follow Howard Zinn's methodology of using ordinary people's views of historical events, but it certainly does give a sense of how ordinary people are affected by historical change. The text is exciting to read and gives one an expansive view of history. While a western perspective definitely dominates the text, ultimately it is a book that illustrates how events in one part of the world affect events in other parts of the wo...more
Chris Harman describes the shape and course of human history as a narrative of ordinary people forming and re-forming complex societies in pursuit of common human goals. Interacting with the forces of technological change as well as the impact of powerful individuals and revolutionary ideas, these societies have engendered events familiar to every schoolchild - from the empires of antiquity to the world wars of the twentieth century.
In a bravura conclusion, Chris Harman exposes the reductive com...more
In a bravura conclusion, Chris Harman exposes the reductive com...more
I'm only just entering Civilization, but so far there've been a lot of uncomfortably unjustified assumptions about neolithic society. There's an awfully big difference between, for instance, "there is no evidence for class divisions within neolithic societies" and "there were no class divisions within neolithic societies", and Harman goes with the latter type of description in much of his narrative.
Excellent introduction to world history from a Marxist perspective. Presented similarly to Zinn's "People's History of U.S." focusing of the ordinary people who build our societies and the material conditions which shape it/us. And you know what? I liked the short length of the chapters, because even though I love reading history, I can get bogged down by the immensity of it. Great book!
It's everything that you think it would be -- Zinn + The World. The prehistoric part is pretty naive and more than half of the book is dedicated to the industrial revolution forward. He's projecting Marxism onto a lot of societies where it's a very ill fit. He designed the book to be a textbook, but it's too reactionary to be a textbook -- he's assumed that the reader has this greater body of knowledge that (s)he might not have (especially if he or she is an undergrad).
A Marxist analysis of the entire history of the world, Get's a little polemical around the late 1800s then turns into an apology piece in the 20th Century. Like the Marxist view of history, interesting and highly valuable but somewhat lacking in imagination and cross-application. No room for great actors or happenstance just class, class, class.
I had to read parts of this book throughout the year for AP World History.
After I finished it, I BURNED IT. HA!
Don't take AP World History, kids.
Oh, and I put this on my 'Made Me Cry' shelf because it did, but not in a good way. I failed multiple quizzes due to my inability to absorb a single block of word vomit.
After I finished it, I BURNED IT. HA!
Don't take AP World History, kids.
Oh, and I put this on my 'Made Me Cry' shelf because it did, but not in a good way. I failed multiple quizzes due to my inability to absorb a single block of word vomit.
Pretty good and through history of human existance. It's very obvious that the author is a marxist, and later he reveils himself to be a leninist-trotskyst too, but don't let that stop you from reading it. He sets up a great critique and class analysis of history.
I wish he'd spent a little more talking about Africa, Asia, and pre-columbian north american, and a little less time talking about europe, though.
I wish he'd spent a little more talking about Africa, Asia, and pre-columbian north american, and a little less time talking about europe, though.
Cleared out a lot for me. I especially liked the first parts on how and why class societies raised up in the first place, and the history of christianity and islam. I've never read clear materialistic explanations on these things before. Plus, most of all, it was very useful to get a much better sense of the motions of histoy.
The minus is because I expected it to be more focus on the daily lives of ordinary people, and maybe a bit more philosophical. But I guess there are other books for that. T...more
The minus is because I expected it to be more focus on the daily lives of ordinary people, and maybe a bit more philosophical. But I guess there are other books for that. T...more
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
British journalist and political activist for the Socialist Workers Party.
Harmann was involved with activism against the Viet Nam war but became controversial for denouncing Ho Chi Minh for murdering the leader of the Vietnamese Trotskists.
Harman's work on May 1968 in France and other student and workers uprisings of the late 1960s, The Fire Last Time, was recommended by rock band Rage Against th...more
More about Chris Harman...
Harmann was involved with activism against the Viet Nam war but became controversial for denouncing Ho Chi Minh for murdering the leader of the Vietnamese Trotskists.
Harman's work on May 1968 in France and other student and workers uprisings of the late 1960s, The Fire Last Time, was recommended by rock band Rage Against th...more
Share This Book
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Loading...





view 1 comment




















