El codigo del Apocalipsis: Descubra lo que la Biblia realmente dice acerca de los tiempos finales y la razon de su importancia en la actualidad
?Estamos en los ultimos dias? ?Cuales senales debo estar buscando?
"La mayoria de lo que has escuchado, leido o aprendido acerca de los ultimos dias es incorrecto," dice el popular presentador radial y apologista, Hank Hanegraaff. "Hemos llegado a aceptar una gran variedad de creencias y ensenanzas acerca del futuro, sobre la batalla final entre el bien y el
...morePaperback, 272 pages
Published
April 8th 2008
by Grupo Nelson
(first published 2007)
There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!
sign in »
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
119)
Crushing disappointment. "The" Apocalypse Code promises much, but fails to deliver. The title itself is disingenuous, and bears a troubling similarity to Hal Lindsey's Apocalypse Code (no "The" in the title). Hal Lindsey is another current writer in the Bible Prophecy field who the author of this book heavily criticizes (though, it can be assumed, he liked the title of his book well enough). Incidentally, I wouldn't recommend Hal Lindsey any more than I'd recommend Hank Haneg...more
The gravitas of one's writing is determined by whom one is writing against. Hanegraff, a radio populist by profession, writing against the bizarre wackiness of dispensationalist authors, has no chance of writing with gravitas. I will go ahead and list everything wrong with the book. Hanegraff creates his own acronyms, many of which are just silly, and often labels those who do not accept his reasoning as "not understanding the bible." His alliteration gets the best of him and is distra...more
5 Stars For Theology
1 or 2 star for Tone
Some of the other reviews sum it up well: he makes really good arguments. That said, the tone, while not as vicious as in some theological works, is still not a very good example of how believers are to deal with other believers who disagree.
TONE
We get it - dispensationalists are wrong. But, aren't there more respectful ways to present that than by pulling out our "baloney detectors" (most of chapter 4)? ...more
1 or 2 star for Tone
Some of the other reviews sum it up well: he makes really good arguments. That said, the tone, while not as vicious as in some theological works, is still not a very good example of how believers are to deal with other believers who disagree.
TONE
We get it - dispensationalists are wrong. But, aren't there more respectful ways to present that than by pulling out our "baloney detectors" (most of chapter 4)? ...more
So I was looking forward to reading this and finally got it on bargain...Let me say that there is nothing much here compared to the Seventy weeks of Daniel by Phillip Mauro, the Beast by Ken Gentry or Before Jerusalem Fell, or Chilton's "Day's of Vengeance."...Those are all better, as is N.T. Wright, although there are a couple good ideas here. Since most of the above can be had online FREE, I would start there and only buy or read Hanegraaff if you want to get his take on things.
These radio and tv eveangelists and religious authors are usually left for a very specific audience to indulge in. Yet Hanegraaff debunks much of the eschatolical myth that conservative Christians believe, and as such does his piece to make the Bible more believable and approachable.
Hanegraaff lays into premillenial dispensationalists like Tim LaHaye with the same passion that he examined the false teachings of the Word Faith guys. Good book on basic Bible interpretation. And he makes some great points about the Left Behind theology.
One of the few books I've gone out to find and purchase in hardcover on its release date. Hanegraaff had been talking this book up for years. It didn't live up to expectations, simply because he never really shows his cards.
I am no longer believe in the dispensation views toward final days. I have been taught erroneously my entire life.
Awesome book. Only read if you are prepared to have a pardigm shift in your eschatology.
So I decided not to continue reading this book because I feel like it is a waist of time. The book is all about trashing someone elses point of view. I wanted to read this book to learn a new perspective on reading and understanding the bible. This book did not deliver.
Amazingly bad form to so obviously and repetitively attack someone that sees things differently than the author. Makes one wonder when considering the "you will be known by your love for one another" concept. The author also has a few obvious glitches in reasoning yet is blind to gaping holes in some of his own theories.
Those interested may want to read "Breaking the Apocalypse Code: Setting the Record Straight About the End Times",
By: Mark Hitchcock, as a ...more
Those interested may want to read "Breaking the Apocalypse Code: Setting the Record Straight About the End Times",
By: Mark Hitchcock, as a ...more
I was looking for insight on views that oppose my own, instead, the author spends the majority of pages trashing other authors and religions, surpeisingly VERY anti-Israel. Poorly written, loose lipped, and in poor taste as a theologist. Skip it.
Have to agree with other reviewers that the author spends too much time and focus on demonizing the dispensational proponents. Other than that he makes some very good arguments.
Kind of lame-o.
I'm not reading any more Haanagraaf books. He's uneducated and opinionated and does not review his facts well enough.
I'm not reading any more Haanagraaf books. He's uneducated and opinionated and does not review his facts well enough.
Getting to the truth about how to read the Scriptures and what they really say in prophetic books and about the end times.
The perfect antidote for the silliness spread by Tim LeHaye and his ilk.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
Share This Book
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »
“The plain and proper meaning of a biblical passage must always take precedence over a particular eschatological presupposition or paradigm.”
—
0 people liked it
More quotes…

Loading...














view 1 comment

























