Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Imaginary Weapons: A Journey Through the Pentagon's Scientific Underworld” as Want to Read:
Imaginary Weapons: A Journey Through the Pentagon's Scientific Underworld
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Imaginary Weapons: A Journey Through the Pentagon's Scientific Underworld

3.23  ·  Rating Details  ·  61 Ratings  ·  13 Reviews
How did a fluke experiment in 1998, involving a used dental X-ray machine & a dubious sample of radioactive material, become the Pentagon's pet weapons project? It had been rejected by one of the Pentagon's most important advisory groups, but the Pentagon found an eccentric scientist who believed that a super isomer bomb could be built & deliver the punch of a two- ...more
Hardcover, 304 pages
Published May 15th 2006 by Nation Books (NYC) (first published 2006)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Imaginary Weapons, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Imaginary Weapons

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 133)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Feb 13, 2016 Yibbie rated it liked it
I've never read a book quite like this one before. It was comedic, infuriating, interesting, baffling and eye opening. It's not very often that you find a book that opens a whole new world is such an engaging way. There is no conclusion, & no resolution. There was nothing the author could do about it either. In fact she did an excellent job of keeping what could have been a very dry and confusing issue very interesting. I really did enjoy it. There was one curse word.
Do halfnium isomers tri
Erik Graff
Feb 08, 2014 Erik Graff rated it liked it
Recommends it for: Military R&D fans
Recommended to Erik by: no one
Shelves: sciences
I picked this one up at the annual Park Ridge Public Library sale, being attracted to indications that it would be about fringe science funded by federal agencies. In fact this book is primarily about The Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency under the second Bush administration and the quest, funded by DARPA and other elements of the Defense Department, for a new lethal megaweapon which would not come up under the various arms control agreements to which the USA was signatory. It is also ab ...more
Mar 18, 2008 Mike rated it liked it
Shelves: nonfiction
Equal parts hilarious and terrifying. It focuses on one particular DARPA-funded project -- creating a bomb with the power of a nuclear weapon but small enough to carry in your briefcase (or under your turban?). A perfect storm of ignorant bureaucrats and military personnel (no doubt primed to ignore scientific consensus and peer review by decades of politicized science bashing), credulous journalists, a culture of secrecy in the Bush white House, and pathological science by a few outsider physic ...more
Feb 05, 2008 Ian rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Weinberger traces the politics of an unorthodox bit of physics which proponents claim could lead to a new superweapon, and detractors say violates the laws of physics.

With a background in nuclear and physical chemistry as well as physics, I fall firmly in the later camp. As laid out in the book, the people who make funding decisions in the Pentagon do not share that education, and rely on Jack D. Ripper types whose paranoia lead them to chase fringe science like ESP, teleportation, and cold fusi
Andy Love
Jan 14, 2013 Andy Love rated it liked it
Shelves: non-fiction
This book uses the story of "isomer weapons" as a way to tell the story of how the U.S. military pursues new weapons technology. The isomer weapon would theoretically produce more damage than chemical weapons can, without some of the disadvantages of nuclear weapons. However, as Weinberger documents there was very little evidence that isomer weapons would be technically feasible.

However, I wish that this book had been given a once-over by a scientist or two before publication. I noticed several
Feb 18, 2015 Jani-Petri rated it really liked it
Entertaining history of hafnium bombs. She writes on the crazy intersection of science,crackpots, politics, corruption, and national security. How pseudo-science thrives in darkness in the climate of fear.
Apr 18, 2016 Leslie rated it did not like it
Chapters 1-14 cover this imaginary weapon: the hafnium bomb. But the book has only 14 chapters, so let’s change the title to “Imaginary weapon”.
Oct 15, 2007 Luke rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: book-club-read
I really liked this book. The author goes to great pains to show not only how scientists can let personal feelings affect their results, and how this can effect not only military decisions, but public policy for a whole country. It's fascinating to watch the process unfold and see how politics can screw up even more the horribly complex process of peer-review. Fascinating!
An interesting read about the government's involvement in (i.e. funding for) fringe science concepts. Not a great book, but worth checking out if you're interested in physics research and/or the Department of Defense.
Apr 22, 2008 Collin.p.armstrong rated it really liked it
Read this twice - last year and this year. Where do your tax dollars go? To people building fake nuclear weapons from dental x-ray equipment. No shit.
Hugh Hyatt
Sep 06, 2010 Hugh Hyatt rated it did not like it
I read the first 50 or so pages amd found it slow-going and, contrary to my expectatiin, not a very interesting read.
Sep 08, 2008 Dirk rated it liked it
Not sure this is an actual must-read, but I think you should read this.

It's all true and all unbelievable.
Pat Bahn
Jan 07, 2010 Pat Bahn rated it really liked it
really a great story of how the damndest of concepts can
be funded when promoted by well placed individuals
George Tevelde
George Tevelde marked it as to-read
Aug 24, 2016
James marked it as to-read
Aug 11, 2016
Mark marked it as to-read
Aug 09, 2016
Karen marked it as to-read
Jul 10, 2016
Hans G.
Hans G. rated it it was amazing
Jul 09, 2016
Giovonni E
Giovonni E is currently reading it
Jun 03, 2016
Ben added it
May 28, 2016
Bret marked it as to-read
May 23, 2016
Axiolotl marked it as to-read
May 12, 2016
Lucas marked it as to-read
Apr 20, 2016
Puhnner rated it really liked it
Mar 10, 2016
Bryan rated it liked it
Jan 03, 2016
Michelle Pillers
Michelle Pillers rated it liked it
Jan 02, 2016
Axel Blaster
Axel Blaster marked it as to-read
Nov 18, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book