Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients” as Want to Read:
Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients

4.06 of 5 stars 4.06  ·  rating details  ·  3,639 ratings  ·  443 reviews
"Smart, funny, clear, unflinching: Ben Goldacre is my hero." —Mary Roach, author of Stiff, Spook, and Bonk

We like to imagine that medicine is based on evidence and the results of fair testing and clinical trials. In reality, those tests and trials are often profoundly flawed. We like to imagine that doctors who write prescriptions for everything from antidepressants to
Paperback, 456 pages
Published April 1st 2014 by Faber & Faber (first published 2012)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Bad Pharma, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Bad Pharma

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Stop Press: this should be compulsory reading for anyone…with a pulse, really. I can’t think of a single person who should be excused from the reading rota here.

This is the MOST appalling, horrific, mind-numbing expose on the current state of medicine I had never hoped to see, or know, or be a part of. Ever.

You ever go to the doctor? You a doctor? No? Maybe you expect the doctor, as the specialist, to be able to diagnose and treat you accordingly. I know I do: I go in with my ailments and I lik
Pedro Molina
I think this book may have an enormous impact in public health.
Read the first chapters and already amazed, enthralled and utterly shocked by some of the revelations. It doesn't surprise me that drug companies are withholding data from public scrutiny but it sickens me to learn that publicly funded regulators are also in the game... Now that I have finished it, I have a much deeper knowledge of how Big Pharma actually harms patients and, better still, a list of actions anyone can take to help imp
Goldacre has a way of making complex science subjects accessible to the wider public. His first book, Bad Science, highlighted the way that the media dealt with reporting science, and in this book he concentrates his ire onto the $600 billion global pharmacy industry, now dominated by a handful of behemoths.

And what he reveals is frankly terrifying. He details the way that the industry hides a large majority of the trial data, the way that the legislation requiring data to be published is ignore
Currently reading this but not so sure how much more I can take. There is some decent information here. The title is absolutely true. Drug companies are businesses and multibillion dollar corporations are not ethical paragons. They do not publish studies that make their drug look bad or even "as good as." There are sponsored journals that are sponsor biased. Sometimes legit journals want the most interesting "this changes everything" articles rather than another "dog bites man" article to boost ...more
I appreciate how Ben Goldacre is trying to open the eyes of the people to many of the issues relating to science reporting. I check his blog every now and then, but this is the first time I've read his books. As background, I'm a GP in NZ, British by birth and training, closer to the start of my career than the end and I don't see drug reps or attend drug sponsored CME (consciously at least; sometimes it can be difficult to tell). I'm also fairly clued up on the issues he presents here so in som ...more
Here Ben Goldacre follows up on his previous book, Bad Science, by turning his spotlight solely on the pharmaceuticals industry. This is a terrifying book because it argues in great detail that our understanding of the efficacy of many drugs and the extent of their side effects is fundamentally flawed.

Goldacre starts with the criticism he finds most damning: namely, when drug companies conduct a trial and the results don't support their own medecine, they frequently fail to publish the results -
Bastian Greshake
Okay, somehow Goodreads didn't save the last review I tried to write. So I'll try again:

If I only had read this book a day earlier I could have flagged it as the most depressing read of 2012. It made me cry out loud and swear a lot (just ask my girlfriend who had to listen to it for the most time).

Bad Pharma gives a great overview on how medicine is failing patients (aka each of us) all the time. Publication bias, missing access to raw data and all the other nuisances which might be familiar t
This is an outstanding book and everyone should read it. It took me about 3 sittings to get through it as I found rage slowly building as I read it and had to get up and pace around the house a bit.

The book systematically works through all the ways in which the practice of evidence based medicine is being distorted by the big pharmaceutical companies. It identifies all of the perverse incentives that make those distortions an unavoidable part of doing business, and then helpfully identifies ways
"The story of the serotonin hypothesis for depression, and its enthusiastic promotion by drug companies, is part of a wide process that has been called 'disease-mongering' or 'medicalisation', where diagnostic categories are widened, whole new diagnoses are invented, and normal variants of human experience are pathologised, so they can be treated with pills."

Ben Goldacre touched on the evils of the pharmaceutical industry in his previous book, Bad Science, and this book greatly expands upon thos
Donna Brown
Bad Pharma is actually a fairly scary book to pick up when you’ve just collected a prescription from the chemist but I’d heard a lot about Bad Science (which I’ve since read) and thought Bad Pharma would be incredibly interesting. I certainly wasn’t wrong.

This is pretty much a damaging expose of the pharmaceutical industry’s involvement in modern medicine. Not necessarily their manufacture and distribution of tablets that do improve people’s lives every day but more the unnecessary peddling of d
At first sight this might be seen as another piece of new-age anti-pharma ranting: Big Pharma is Bad and therefore we should not trust it or use its products, turning our backs on the knowledge that has extended life-spans and improved our health during our lives.

To make such an assumption would be to do this book a grave injustice; Ben Goldacre is himself a doctor and believes whole-heartedly in the benefits that modern medicine has brought to humankind. What he objects to is, as shown in his c
Literary Ames {Against GR Censorship}
From the introduction:
'Drugs are tested by the people who manufacture them, in poorly designed trials, on hopelessly small numbers of weird, unrepresentative patients, and analysed using techniques which are flawed by design, in a such a way that they exaggerate the benefits of treatments. Unsurprisingly, these trials tend to produce results that favour the manufacturer. When trials throw up results that companies don't like, they are perfectly entitled to hide them from doctors and patients, s
This is a great overview into one of the largest health and economic problems today. As someone with experience in both the world of research and clinical medicine, I can say that the information in this book is accurate. The information is presented in a surprisingly non-biased and non 'conspiracy theory' way. The organization is such that there is wonderful flow and each idea builds on itself. I appreciate the fact that there are proposed solutions to the problems, many of which have the poten ...more
Had to add a new shelf -- demagoguery -- for this one. Good God. But then again, his website says he frequently gives speeches in rock venues, so what do you expect.
Thomas Edmund
Bad Pharma is a sequel of sorts from the author of Bad Science: Quacks, Hacks, and Big Pharma Flacks an original piece about poor scientific process, across a variety of fields.

Pharma on the other hand lampoons the pharmaceutical industry (I bet you didn't guess from the name) targeting biased publishing trends, dodgy marketing tactics, and misinformed regulators (amongst other concerns) including his own ideas on solutions and prevention.

Unlike many polemics Goldacre's solutions are well thoug
Well, who'd have guessed it? The big pharmaceutical companies aren't altruistic, transparent purveyors of the unbiased and complete truth.

Actually this is an important and useful book, but one that struggles between its need to inform the casual reader and the necessity of ensuring all the arguments that a multi-billion dollar industry can throw at it can be rebutted. At time this makes it a bit slow and hard going.

The key points I took away were:
1) The results of many drugs trials aren't publis
The brilliant Ben Goldacre manages to tone down his vitriol enough to adopt a galvanizing but not irritating tone. Fascinating look at how captured by pharmaceutical interests the entire medical establishment is, from the scientists producing basic research to the family doctor deciding which drugs to prescribe.

A must-read. Now Web-MD is looking pretty good after all...
Athan Tolis
I was walking around Notting Hill with my buddy Elias, who runs a biotech company. “How’s work?” I asked, as one does.

He disappeared for a second in the famous bookstore from the Hugh Grant movie and emerged with this thick tome.

“Read this and then we can talk,” he said.

The book is a full-on attack on the pharmaceutical industry. No part of it escapes

The author starts with testing. In short, negative trials (the kind that say a new treatment did not work) disappear more often than they don’t. T
I wanted to like this book. It's about an important issue, made clear in the title. My problem with this book is that it's one-sided and comes off more as fear mongering than justified skepticism. Goldacre seems to have embraced the conspiracy theory point of view so toxic to this real problem. In order to paint medical science in a scary light, Goldacre starts the book with a gory description of the TGN1412 incident, just to frighten his readers.

He often argues from false dichotomy and paints a
Simon Howard
Perhaps the most important things to say at the start of a review of Bad Pharma is that I think that Goldacre argues convincingly for a sound central thesis. I accept the argument that there are serious flaws in the pharmaceutical industry’s approach to the research, discovery, production and marketing of drugs, and in the pharmaceutical industry’s relationship with doctors (and vice versa). Goldacre’s clear elucidation of many of the issues deserves praise, and makes this a worthy book.

I also,
Victor Tatarskii
5+ for the message, 4 for the style. But a must read
This is fascinating and appalling in equal measure. We blithely assume our doctors are doing the best for us and yet they are actively and routinely misled by the pharmaceutical industry. But you can't blame big business for this - these large companies are doing what they were made for - creating wealth for their shareholders. It is our fault for naively assuming that they will act like benevolent Victorian philanthropists and will have our best interests at heart. Without proper regulation, go ...more
This is a very important book that every doctor and every patient should read. The author explains the drug trials that result in medicines (often of no or doubtful use) being approved for prescription and sale, in the USA and elsewhere. The pharmaceutical industry often pays for tests and then hides any negative results, picking and choosing which trials should be published in order to make their new products look good, and doctors are only told what the manufacturers want them to hear. Many re ...more
This is a great instance of science not standing up to scrutiny by its own methods.

One of the great crimes of health care is that it is dominated by companies whose primary concern is profit, not necessarily our health; these are not the private health providers but drug companies. I have been around this area for years, from my days as a trade union campaign organiser in the public health sector and now in a university School of Sport and Exercise with a strong strand dealing with public health
Leo Abrantes
[O texto original pode ser lido aqui:]

Um meme recorrente em comentários de jornais, blogs ou sites a propósito de qualquer assunto sobre saúde é o ataque à Indústria farmacêutica. Quem ousa, por exemplo, criticar terapias não comprovadas, ou suplementos alimentares, ouve, invariavelmente uma repetição dos mesmos argumentos: “Quem faz a crítica é pago pela indústria”, ou “ a indústria está a deliberadamente a esconder a substância natural, sem efeitos secu
Harry Rutherford
Ben Goldacre's previous book, Bad Science, was effectively an adaptation of his Guardian columns of the same name, and although it wasn't a straightforward compilation, it had something of the same character: a bit of a grab-bag of subjects, held together by the broad theme of bad science and bad science journalism, with a emphasis on trying to entertain as well as inform.

This is a more focussed book. And a drier one, which you may or may not think is a good thing, depending on your tolerance fo
Todd Martin
In order to weed out fact from fiction scientists utilize the scientific method, a body of techniques that serves to produce an unbiased, objective set of results. In addition to providing the methodological framework for creating experiments, the scientific method also requires that experimenter’s perform extensive documentation and share all data so that others are able to review it and verify that the conclusions are indeed correct. Although the process is sometimes slow and tedious, it is th ...more
We all know that big drug companies try to influence doctors to prescribe their drugs with gifts from attractive sales reps and free travel to supposedly-educational conferences in lovely places. But did you know that those conferences are biased? A majority of their drug studies (the ones whose conclusions reveal ineffectiveness or bad side-effects or are otherwise undesirable to their sponsors) are never published, and nobody keeps track? That most study results are ghostwritten by specialized ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Bad Pharma from B. Goldacre - Truth or Fiction? Any related personal experiences? 3 71 Aug 12, 2013 07:26PM  
drug ads 4 20 Apr 15, 2013 03:40AM  
  • Trick or Treatment: The Undeniable Facts about Alternative Medicine
  • Deadly Choices: How the Anti-Vaccine Movement Threatens Us All
  • Testing Treatments: Better Research for Better Healthcare
  • The Geek Manifesto: Why Science Matters
  • Over-diagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health
  • Superbug: The Fatal Menace of MRSA
  • Paranormality: Why We See What Isn't There
  • Unaccountable: What Hospitals Won't Tell You and How Transparency Can Revolutionize Health Care
  • The Truth About the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do About It
  • The Emperor's New Drugs: Exploding the Antidepressant Myth
  • The Origins of AIDS
  • Suckers: How Alternative Medicine Makes Fools of Us All
  • Snake Oil Science: The Truth about Complementary and Alternative Medicine
  • White Coat, Black Hat: Adventures on the Dark Side of Medicine
  • Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk
  • Flat Earth News: An Award-Winning Reporter Exposes Falsehood, Distortion and Propaganda in the Global Media
  • Cracked: Why Psychiatry is Doing More Harm Than Good
  • Drugs Without the Hot Air: Minimizing the Harms of Legal and Illegal Drugs
Ben Goldacre is a British science writer and psychiatrist, born in 1974. He is the author of The Guardian newspaper's weekly Bad Science column and a book of the same title, published by Fourth Estate in September 2008.

Goldacre is the son of Michael Goldacre, professor of public health at the University of Oxford, the nephew of science journalist Robyn Williams, and the great-great-grandson of Sir
More about Ben Goldacre...

Share This Book

“The American Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics is sponsored by Coca-Cola.” 8 likes
“So, if we're to make any sense of the mess that the pharmaceutical industry - and my profession - has made of the academic literature, then we need an amnesty: we need a full and clear declaration of all the distortions, on missing data, ghostwriting, and all the other activity described in this book, to prevent the ongoing harm that they still cause.” 3 likes
More quotes…