<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book>
  <id>1771095</id>
  <title><![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0618658254]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780618658251]]></isbn13>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <description><![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]></description>
  <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">1771095</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">2</books_count>
  <desc_user_id type="integer" nil="true"></desc_user_id>
  <id type="integer">1769248</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer">4</original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer">10</original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2007</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:92|5:14|4:50|3:21|2:7|1:0|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">92</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">347</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">225</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">38</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.77]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[90]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[37]]></text_reviews_count>
  
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility]]></link>
  <authors>
    <author>
    <id>811161</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Ted Nordhaus]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/811161.Ted_Nordhaus]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>39</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
    <author>
    <id>77403</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Michael Shellenberger]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/77403.Michael_Shellenberger]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>39</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="225">
      <review>
  <id>22121913</id>
    <user>
    <id>684697</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Aaron]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Minneapolis, MN]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/684697-aaron]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1200838588p3/684697.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1200838588p2/684697.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.80</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>90</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Aug 04 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon May 12 21:04:26 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Aug 04 15:00:16 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is pretty subversive, extreme left, high order political thought in a very good and measured way. I see the basic premise of this book being very constructively humanist.  I like that.  I like people who are advocates for a cause because they care about people and not because they are angry at ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22121913">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22121913]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22121913]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>7149596</id>
    <user>
    <id>418065</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Pat]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Oakland, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/418065-pat]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1191346766p3/418065.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1191346766p2/418065.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[environmental policy makers]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Sep 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Oct 02 10:41:38 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Oct 03 17:23:44 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is an expanded critique of the green movement by the authors of the controversial essay &quot;The Death of Environmentalim.&quot; The authors are public opinion researchers and political consultants and, frankly, it shows. Their criticisms are often valid but their prescriptions are too depende...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7149596">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7149596]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7149596]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>9293366</id>
    <user>
    <id>626350</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Luke]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Minneapolis, MN]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/626350-luke]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1195494669p3/626350.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1195494669p2/626350.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Nov 18 20:37:39 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Nov 18 20:39:29 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I found myself in the position of mostly agreeing with this book while being really annoyed with it at the same time.<br/><br/>I think their message has merit and their plans for how to get off our asses on Global Warming are right on. Unfortunately they spend almost no time in the book outlining ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9293366">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9293366]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9293366]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>68282002</id>
    <user>
    <id>154132</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Anthony]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Toa Payoh, Singapore]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/154132-anthony]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1182860879p3/154132.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1182860879p2/154132.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Aug 20 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Aug 20 20:16:30 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Aug 20 21:04:54 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Break Through is the book-length expansion of Nordhaus and Shellenberger's &quot;The Death of Environmentalism&quot; essay and a 270 page fulmination against the political paradigm of post-materialist environmentalists and liberals alike.  Environmentalists, in their view, have been ineffective in s...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/68282002">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/68282002]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/68282002]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>56436533</id>
    <user>
    <id>1836812</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Eric]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Puyallup, WA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1836812-eric]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1235236592p3/1836812.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1235236592p2/1836812.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="non-fiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue May 19 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun May 17 20:22:07 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue May 19 13:07:20 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[From a public policy perspective, this is a fascinating read.  The primary argument that the authors try to convey is that environmentalism has evolved into a narrow special interest, and must redefine itself to adapt to a changing world.   Some of the examples used are more effective than others.  ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56436533">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56436533]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56436533]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>59338515</id>
    <user>
    <id>2347018</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mark]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[London, ON, Canada]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2347018-mark-young]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1243085103p3/2347018.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1243085103p2/2347018.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="top-ten-most-influential" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[environmentalists]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Jun 17 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jun 11 18:09:26 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Jun 17 14:05:19 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[If you consider yourself an environmentalist, which I do, this book will ask you to re-examine the approaches that the movement has taken lately to influence people's thinking about climate change. It has a lot of good examples of instances where the current approach of imposing limits and sacrifice...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59338515">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59338515]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59338515]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>37391124</id>
    <user>
    <id>1345046</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Todd]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Phoenix, AZ]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1345046-todd]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1217371245p3/1345046.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1217371245p2/1345046.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Nov 17 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Nov 10 20:39:09 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Dec 15 15:43:20 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A scattered critique of the current state of environmentalism as well as liberalism, poverty and post-materialism. There's a lot to disagree with in this book, but also a lot to consider for those frustrated with the limited success of environmentalism since its heyday in the 1970's. <br/><br/>The...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37391124">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37391124]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37391124]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>54260276</id>
    <user>
    <id>1070361</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Chade66]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1070361-chade66]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="green-living" />
        <shelf name="read-2009" />
        <shelf name="school" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Apr 28 12:24:14 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Apr 28 12:27:50 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I read this at the behest of one of my professors and I'm still at a lost how to work this into a paper about compact city/smart growth urban policy.<br/><br/>Parts of this were interesting, but not even close to outweighed by the irritation I encountered at many of their sweeping statements.  Esp...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54260276">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54260276]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54260276]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>67845123</id>
    <user>
    <id>1977159</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Bill]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Bainbridge Island, WA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1977159-bill-scarvie]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1233466223p3/1977159.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1233466223p2/1977159.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Sep 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Aug 17 22:42:59 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Sep 25 12:39:22 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[At first, I found the book provokative. The authors challenged the fundamentals of environmentalism and the stories we tell that are rooted in those fundamentals. I agree that we won't gain many converts by scaring them or by demanding profoundly unpalatable changes in behavior. But that doesn't mea...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/67845123">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/67845123]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/67845123]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>18618767</id>
    <user>
    <id>998104</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Karunagrace]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Ashland, OR]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/998104-karunagrace]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1239504950p3/998104.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1239504950p2/998104.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="books-i-proofed" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Mar 25 14:59:58 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 25 18:23:28 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is perhaps the most brilliant book I read all year. If you have felt that current politics are disconnected from your here-and-now concerns, this book will help you to imagine how they can be not only immediately relevant, but inspiring, unifying, and mobilizing. It offers a perceptive analysis...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18618767">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18618767]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18618767]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>14988206</id>
    <user>
    <id>891424</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Katerlio]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/891424-katerlio]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1203382794p3/891424.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1203382794p2/891424.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[sb]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Feb 17 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Feb 09 11:10:39 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Feb 18 17:00:40 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[this book fleshes out the authors' earlier essay of the same title - and as with the original essay, there are pieces of their argument i find compelling and pieces that seem too glossy. the touchstone argument is that &quot;we&quot; can be pro-growth and still care about the state of the world. <br/>...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/14988206">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/14988206]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/14988206]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>13405397</id>
    <user>
    <id>826514</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Solidarity]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Aliquippa, PA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/826514-solidarity]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201203879p3/826514.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201203879p2/826514.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Green activists, community organizers]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[Ivan Handler]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Sep 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jan 24 10:47:45 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jan 24 10:50:55 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Amazon.com: You argue that global warming is a &quot;monumental&quot; crisis that demands a response beyond the more limited (and limiting) environmental policies of the past. On the other, you acknowledge that, despite a great deal of press attention, &quot;global warming&quot; still ranks at the v...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/13405397">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/13405397]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/13405397]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>10283515</id>
    <user>
    <id>165593</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Alexa]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chicago, IL]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/165593-alexa]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201493141p3/165593.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201493141p2/165593.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="green-ish" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Dec 11 14:21:01 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jan 10 09:37:51 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[While sometimes reading books about super-philosphical topics like the purported &quot;Death of Environmentalism&quot; is painful and obnoxious, reading this book won't make you suffer at the mercy of too many large words but rather at the mercy of well-thought out arguments against the status quo. ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10283515">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10283515]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10283515]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>9297784</id>
    <user>
    <id>57901</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Jerzy]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Portland, OR]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/57901-jerzy]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1179086340p3/57901.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1179086340p2/57901.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="green" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Nov 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Nov 19 00:07:08 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Nov 21 09:02:05 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Okay, here's my problem. They say that environmentalists focus too much on limiting humanity's effect on Nature, which makes them uninspiring. And they say that's stupid, because there's no such thing as Nature - the idea is just a human construct, and nature changes all the time anyway. There's not...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9297784">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9297784]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9297784]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>8277493</id>
    <user>
    <id>296566</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Micah]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Philadelphia, PA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/296566-micah-hanson]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[objective environmentalists]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Oct 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Oct 26 09:45:29 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Dec 24 14:12:13 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The basic proposition of this book is that environmentalists need to learn how to place their concerns in the bigger picture.  The &quot;environment&quot; by environmentalists is seen as something &quot;other&quot; than us (humans, non-environment) and victim to abuse and destruction.  The only way ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8277493">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8277493]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/8277493]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>37539222</id>
    <user>
    <id>109128</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Michael]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Oakland, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/109128-michael]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1226529613p3/109128.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1226529613p2/109128.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Nov 12 12:43:56 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Nov 12 13:14:39 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Everyone knows that carbon-based fuels are a limited resource, and that carbon emissions are warming the earth's atmosphere at an alarming rate, but the question is: how do we move past carbon? Nordhaus and Shellenberger believe that the only way to do so is to create fuel economies that are more af...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37539222">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37539222]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37539222]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>7047451</id>
    <user>
    <id>138617</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Andrea]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Albuquerque, NM]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/138617-andrea]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1182224783p3/138617.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1182224783p2/138617.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="non-fiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[environmentalists who wonder why people don't care about global warming, etc.]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Oct 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Sep 30 16:03:46 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Oct 27 19:10:38 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The main premise of this book was pretty good -- that the environmental movement needs to move away from limits and lists of no-nos and towards a more comprehensive vision including things like debt-relief for foreign countries like Brazil, and embracing (ie funding) the improvement of clean-energy ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7047451">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7047451]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7047451]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>30169697</id>
    <user>
    <id>1213057</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Daniel]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Eugene, OR]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1213057-daniel]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1240823729p3/1213057.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1240823729p2/1213057.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Aug 01 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Aug 14 15:25:42 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Aug 14 15:33:09 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Shellenberger and Nordhaus wrote a controversial essay a few years ago called &quot;The Death of Environmentalism.&quot; This book expands on the ideas they presented in the essay. It's a provocative book that makes the valuable point that the environmental movement won't thrive on pessimism and con...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/30169697">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/30169697]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/30169697]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>22229050</id>
    <user>
    <id>1161746</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Rhys]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1161746-rhys]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1218344561p3/1161746.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1218344561p2/1161746.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="true-stories" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[everyone interested in how politics and the environmental movement work]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed May 14 08:12:00 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed May 14 08:16:43 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[While I couldn't agree with everything in this book it was certainly very thought provoking and really got me going with a lot of their ideas and ways of looking at the politics of environmentalism and government. Basically they use the book to expand upon an essay they presented at a major environm...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22229050">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22229050]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/22229050]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>12663533</id>
    <user>
    <id>762989</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Pete]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/762989-pete]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1200506659p3/762989.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1200506659p2/762989.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1771095</id>
  <isbn>0618658254</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780618658251</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">37</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Break Through: From the Death of Environmentalism to the Politics of Possibility]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666m/1771095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1188028666s/1771095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1771095.Break_Through_From_the_Death_of_Environmentalism_to_the_Politics_of_Possibility</link>
  <average_rating>3.77</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>92</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In the fall of 2004, two young environmentalists, Michael Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, triggered a firestorm of controversy with their essay, The Death of Environmentalism. In it they argued that the politics that dealt with acid rain and smog can't deal with global warming. Society has changed, and our politics have not kept up. Environmentalism must die, they concluded, so that something new can be born. Now, three years later, Break Through delivers on the authors' promise to articulate a new politics for a new century, one focused on aspirations, not complaints, human possibility, not limits.<br/><br/><br/>If environmentalists and progressives are to seize the moment offered by the collapse of the Bush presidency, they must break from the politics of limits, and grapple with some inconvenient truths of their own. The old pollution and conservation paradigms have failed. The nations that ratified the Kyoto protocol have seen their greenhouse gas emissions go up, not down. And tropical rain forest deforestation has accelerated.<br/><br/>What the new ecological crises demand is not that we constrain human power but unleash it. Overcoming global warming demands not pollution control but rather a new kind of economic development. We cannot tear down the old energy economy before building the new one. The invention of the Internet and microchips, the creation of the space program, the birth of the European Union - those breakthroughs were only made possible by big and bold investments in the future.<br/><br/>The era of small thinking is over, the authors claim. We must go beyond small-bore environmentalism and interest-group liberalism to create a politics focused as much on uncommon greatness as the common good.<br/><br/>Break Through offers more than policy prescriptions and demands more than casual consideration. With its challenge to conventional environmentalist, conservative, and progressive thought, and its proposal for a politics of possibility, Break Through will influence the political debate for years to come.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2007</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Mar 01 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Jan 16 08:55:22 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Mar 01 18:04:11 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[If you want a good dose of mainstream Internet Age progressive positivity then read this one together with Obama's Audacity of Hope. It's more an overall critique of the poor packaging of all of the Left's messages rather than a specific indictment of the environmentalist establishment. But I could ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/12663533">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/12663533]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/12663533]]></link>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
          <shelf name="to-read" />
          <shelf name="currently-reading" />
          <shelf name="non-fiction" />
          <shelf name="nonfiction" />
          <shelf name="politics" />
          <shelf name="green" />
          <shelf name="environmental-studies" />
          <shelf name="library" />
          <shelf name="project" />
          <shelf name="2nonfiction-to-read" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link>
  <id>8</id>
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=1771095</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>