Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “On Certainty” as Want to Read:
On Certainty
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

On Certainty

4.14 of 5 stars 4.14  ·  rating details  ·  2,605 ratings  ·  57 reviews

Written over the last 18 months of his life and inspired by his interest in G. E. Moore's defence of common sense, this much discussed volume collects Wittgenstein's reflections on knowledge and certainty, on what it is to know a proposition for sure.

Hardcover, 90 pages
Published January 1st 1969 by Blackwell Publishers
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about On Certainty, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about On Certainty

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Manny
Some interesting things that people are certain about:

Religion

You have an invisible friend who is the most important being in the world and responsible for everything that happens.

Science

The great strength of science is that all its findings are provisional and subject to revision at any moment if new evidence comes in. This is why you should trust it.

Economics

Even 0.1% growth over a few tens of millenia would result in an economy bigger than the known universe. But, although it is impossible
...more
David Katzman
I’m not…certain how I feel about this book. What I mean more precisely is…that…it is impossible for me to be certain how I feel about this book. In fact, it’s impossible for me to really be certain of anything whatsoever. According to Mr. Ludvig Vittgen-shhhhhhhtein, that is.

On Certainty was a rather enjoyable read despite the fact that it contained 676 numbered paragraphs of somewhat repetitive analysis. But if one is as fascinated by philosophy as I am, then it’s no bother. Some would say Witt
...more
Deepthi
I will not be able to use "I know" in my vocabulary without first questioning my statement's certainty a hundred times. Would I be certain of my knowledge then? I might not be. Wittgenstein, in this book, uses short philosophical and linguistic reflections on "knowing" as a response to G. E. Moore's 1939 paper, “Proof of an External World”. He asks you to emphasize on "I believe" than "I know" whenever you "don't know", because when you think you "believe", and say that you "know", you actually ...more
Dia
What can we be certain of? The only thing Wittgenstein is certain of is that there's something fishy about philosopher G.E. Moore's assertions "I know that that's a tree" or "I know that here is a hand" or "I know that I have never been far above the earth's surface." Wittgenstein is terribly perturbed by these statements but doesn't know quite why. It has something to do with the fact that the only people who ever make such statements are philosophers; the rest of us "know" such things by simpl ...more
Jamey
Oct 27, 2007 Jamey rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Sully
Shelves: philosophy
Strange, wonderful little book. It has its dull moments, but there are moments of blazing light.

How certain am I, that I have never been to Jupiter?
"It is as certain as any grounds I could give for it."
Erik Graff
Nov 27, 2013 Erik Graff rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Wittgenstein fans
Recommended to Erik by: Bill Ellos
Shelves: philosophy
As recalled, this was my favorite volume of the very many produced by the clever fellows who have made careers out of his. Wittgenstein himself published very little, but an enormous body of works attributed to him have been culled from his correspondences, notebooks and students' notes of lectures and conversations.

On Certainty comes as close as Wittgenstein ever does to being a systematic philosopher rather than just playing at being a skeptic, phenomenologist, speculator or analyst of languag
...more
Theresa Macphail
I love Wittgenstein for, if nothing else, his pithy writing style. I also find him helpful for thinking through my research data in terms of the relationship between certainty, uncertainty, and the production of knowledge. Worth it, even if you haven't read Philosophical Investigations.
Rob
i couldn't decide whether this book is for humans or space aliens. i guess it's for both.

wonderful wittgenstein. 90 excruciating pages (676 numbered sections) on whether G. E. Moore was justified in holding up his hand and saying, "I know that here is my hand." the second half is quite creepy to read, as he was dying of cancer while writing it. the dates are on the entries, with the final page written two days before he died.

highlights:
127 - how do i know that someone else uses the words "I do
...more
Dipankar
Would it be extremely weird of me if I said it was a 'fun' read? As much as saying this amuses me, this was a really funny book, and I mean in a very positive and serious way. First thing Wittgenstein does to you, from the outset, is tear apart your cozy little way of thinking, and 'knowing'. I'll never 'know' anything the way I've known before, or at least I'll think a second more before I say I'm certain of something. Next, as you read and re-read and re-re-read almost every other sentence, yo ...more
Olli K
I read Tractatus Logico Philosophicus and On Certainty one after another and I must say that On Certainty is much more enjoyable to read than TLP. At least if you do not have any previous knowledge about philosophy.

I was happy to notice that this book was not so hard to read and gave the reader opportunity to form own opinions. At one point I even noticed that there was a flaw in Wittgenstein's thinking.

If you do not have any or very limited previous knowledge about philosophy and wish to read
...more
David Williamson
I know I liked On Certainty, but that would be playing the language game properly, and not making a statement of fact, of this I can be certain but not know, of which I can be wrong but still believe...

This book sometimes feel like its a head on collision between philosophy and the everyday. What we can say and its implications within varied contexts, contexts that can never be nailed down. It's almost like what it would be like if an AI computer had a mental breakdown. Good stuff.
Soeine
Wittgenstein always fascinates me. He is not easy to read unless you are willing to go into his terrain of mind. He has a different mind from most of us, above, on a meta level of what we call "things in life". This book questions all the things we take for granted in order to live, to the extreme extent of almost being silly. After the questioning, there is not much left to maintain the human life. I wonder how many people can overcome that void.
Matthew




Mohammad amin
ويتگنشتاين را در قم خواندم. يعني در تمام مدتي كه از ظلمت شب (با اتوبوس) به سمت طلعت سحر در تحرك بودم.
در قم بيشتر در باب يقين ويتگنشتاين غور كردم.
ويتگنشتاين آن چيزي نبود كه تصور ميكردم. بعدها سه كتاب از او را خواندم.
در باب يقين او حاصل دو سه سال آخر عمر اوست كه بعدها عليالظاهر جمع و نشر شده.
دو وجهه متفاوت از او برداشت كردم.
يك. ويتگنشتاين در خدمت تجدد
دو. ويتگنشتاين در خيانت به تجدد.

دوستانم معتقد به گزينهي دوم هستند. اما من ويتگنشتاين را ادامه مدرنيته و در خدمت جهان متجدد فهميدهام. البته فعلاً.
...more
Michael Starks
Sep 08, 2012 Michael Starks rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Recommended to Michael by: nobody
On Certainty was not published until 1969, 18 years after Wittgenstein’s death and has only recently begun to draw serious attention. I cannot recall a single reference to it in all of Searle and one see’s whole books on W with barely a mention. There are however xlnt books on it by Stroll, Svensson, McGinn and others and parts of many other books and articles, but hands down the best is that of Daniele Moyal-Sharrock (DMS) whose 2004 volume “Understanding Wittgenstein’s On Certainty” is mandato ...more
Jason
This was an excellent read. Wittgenstein's main works are, of course, the Tractatus and Philosophical Investigations, but some consider On Certainty to be his third major work. Unfortunately, On Certainty was not formally organized by Wittgenstein. It is more or less a collection of notes, which represent Wittgensteinian thought post-PI.

Some readers take Wittgenstein's stance in these notes to be sceptical. I personally don't sympathize with this view. If anything, Wittgenstein is starkly anti-s
...more
Hyperliteratura
Despre certitudine analizează structurile logice care determină prezența siguranței atât în discurs, cât și în gândire și acțiune și apropierea de adevăr. Scris la sfârșitul vieții, m-aș fi așteptat ca volumul să fie încărcat cu acea spaimă pe care, credeam eu, oamenii o simt inconștient și o transpun fără să vrea printr-o logoree monumentală și o dorință acaparantă de a spune tot, de a lăsa lumii suma lor de înțelepciune. M-am întâlnit cu liniștea unui om poate prea conștient ca să fie temător. ...more
Yaakov Bernadyn
I love Philosophy. I say again, I love Philosophy. This book is NOT philosophy. While reading this completely disheveled manuscript of loose ideas and workings, it appears to be the writing of someone bouncing poles while suffering mental illness. This should never have been published. The gist of the book was to convey that 'if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck it must be a duck'. The remaining portion of the book instructs everyone to 'question everything'. So, I say to the publisher ...more
Kory
Amazing. Wittgenstein goes in circles a bit trying to get across his point (then again, these are his notes/journal), but this ranks among my favorite books of all time.
Algirdas Brukštus
Wittgensteinas - tai lyg švitrinis popierius racionalumo skalpeliui šveisti.
Meghan
Jun 18, 2008 Meghan is currently reading it  ·  review of another edition
More Wittgenstein!
David F.
Wittgenstein’s On Certainty was written as a response to G. E. Moore's 1939 paper, “Proof of an External World.” In this paper, Moore applies what is known as the Moorean shift from modus ponens (if A then B; A, therefore B) to modus tollens (if A then B; not-A, therefore not-B). In particular, Moore offered as proof that there is a world external to our senses (a not-B in this case) by the act of holding up his hand and saying “here is a hand” (a not-A in this case). While Wittgenstein is clear ...more
Brian
Do we become more or less certain as we get closer to death? In Wittgenstein's case, judging from his notes during his final days, he was open to questioning even the most obvious and trivial facts. The book was published posthumously from notes compiled within his last two years alive in the early 1950s, and did not appear to a broader audience until nearly 20 years after his death.

The text was written mostly, but not exclusively in German. I benefited from having the German and English side-b
...more
Andrew
Really interesting book. A diary of Wittgenstein's thoughts on a couple of Moore's pieces, on which the latter proved the obvious: "This is my hand," "That is a tree." The aphorisms add up to a complex analysis of thought, belief, knowledge, language games, forms of life, learning, doubt, and what is a mistake is. The basic argument is that for Moore his hand really is certainly his hand, yet Moore's knowledge is not really anything more than his firm conviction in his own belief. All knowledge ...more
Philip Cartwright
As the title suggests, On Certainty is a sustained meditation on the philosophical problems surrounding concepts such as “certainty”, “knowledge” and “belief”. Unlike Philosophical Investigations, which Wittgenstein spent several years obsessively polishing and refining (though it was never actually finished), On Certainty is first-draft material jotted down over the last eighteen months of his life. As such it is both fascinating and frustrating to read. Fascinating because of the insights it c ...more
Amari
I don't much care for the format: the book consists simply of 600-700 numbered aphorisms, or in some cases simply statements, of Wittgenstein's. There is no real structure, though certain statements follow from those which preceded them.

That said, the numbered statements are really interesting and sometimes quite odd while quite logical. Also, as a beginning German student, it's wonderful to have short statements like this in a bilingual edition. Many words are used over and over again, and it p
...more
Robert
As a Philosophy undergrad, Wittgenstein's writing was refreshingly plain-spoken. So much Modern Western philosophy is poorly written, so much philosophy is poorly written. Which is frustrating because the point is to clearly present some idea.

Anyway, Wittgenstein's numbered series of questions and remarks strikes me as a more appropriate way to render philosophical ideas -- more appropriate than the grammatically confusing literature of all those Modern Western giants. W's writing seems less im
...more
Laura Westmeyer
Vic recommends author as favorite (linguistic) philosopher. Concept that language is only understood when externalized and everyone is on the same page.

The Beetle Box concept: "What I have in this box is a beetle. Tell everyone it is so." And then and only then when the masses understand the concept in the language it's in, can discourse about it occur.

Also, he writes in aphorisms.
Eric Black
Other reviewers provide more extensive comments.

Wittgenstein gives us in these notes from his last year a glimpse into a philosopher's mind. We ask endless questions, sometimes seeming to ask the same thing again and again, but as any philosopher knows, the same words strung together twice very likely mean something slightly different in the second occurrence as a result of the intervening context.

I wish Wittgenstein had lived to see the Apollo landing on the moon since one of his prime examples
...more
Cay Hasselmann
This is one of my all time favorite books as it touches the area of certainty from a pure entomological aspect, not trying to bring any belief or disbelief in the picture. This is not something I have seen often.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition
  • Word and Object
  • Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius
  • The Claim of Reason
  • Sense and Sensibilia: Reconstructed from the Manuscript Notes by C.J. Warnock
  • Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature
  • Truth and Method
  • Against Method: Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge
  • Mind and World
  • The Concept of Mind
  • Language, Truth, and Logic
  • Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind
  • Principia Ethica (Philosophical Classics)
  • The View from Nowhere
  • The Frege Reader
  • Introduction to Metaphysics
  • Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics
  • A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge
7672
Ludwig Josef Johann Wittgenstein (26 April 1889 – 29 April 1951) was an Austrian-British philosopher who worked primarily in logic, the philosophy of mathematics, the philosophy of mind, and the philosophy of language.

Described by Bertrand Russell as "the most perfect example I have ever known of genius as traditionally conceived, passionate, profound, intense, and dominating", he helped inspire t
...more
More about Ludwig Wittgenstein...
Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus Philosophical Investigations The Blue and Brown Books Culture and Value Remarks on Colour

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

“I am sitting with a philosopher in the garden; he says again and again 'I know that that’s a tree', pointing to a tree that is near us. Someone else arrives and hears this, and I tell him: 'This fellow isn’t insane. We are only doing philosophy.” 141 likes
“I act with complete certainty. But this certainty is my own.” 62 likes
More quotes…