book data
273 ratings,
4.10
average rating, 22 reviews
(more data...)
edit
published
November 18th 1947
by Gallimard
(first published 1947)
details
Paperback
isbn
2070205126
(isbn13: 9782070205127)
description
Simone de Beauvoir, novelist, dramatist, and philosopher, was the most distinguished woman writer in modern France. A leading exponent of French exis…more
find at:
Amazon • WorldCat • more options…
There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
friend reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is currently not featured on any Listopia lists.
Add this book to your favorite list »
other reviews (showing 1-20 of 574)
All ratings
|
5 stars (100)
|
4 stars (116)
|
3 stars (44)
|
2 stars (10)
|
1 star (3)
|
avg 4.10
editions: all | this edition
editions: all | this edition
Read in June, 2009
I liked this book, but I am not sure I will remember it in a few weeks. I don't read a lot of philosophy, and I probably picked up this book because it was cheap at Half-Priced Books and because I like SdB and Sartre, and their separate discussion about freedom. However, I have not read Being and Nothingness, which I should read and then reread this book to know what the exact critique is. Still, I found it useful in "diagnosing" different people's types of covering up their knowledge ...more
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
De Beauvoir largely succeeds here in refuting the ridiculous claims that people used when trying to argue against the existentialists. Her prose is fairly straight forward (at least compared to Sartre's) and her arguments are very well crafted. You really get a sense in this work of how existential thought arose as a response to the butchery of the second world war. She puts a more human face on her ideas than Sartre. Her concept of ambiguity in the book's conclusion deftly predicts much of the ...more
Like this review?
yes
(2 people liked it)
add a comment
Read in August, 2008
recommends it for:
Bourgeois or peti-bourgeois readers as far as background and serious studiers of philosophy
““If God does not exist, everything is permitted.” Today’s believers use this formula for their own advantage. To re-establish man at the heart of his destiny is, they claim, to repudiate all ethics. However, far from God’s absence authorizing all license, the contrary is the case, because man is abandoned on the earth, because his acts are definitive, absolute engagements. He bears the responsibility for a world which is not the work of a strange power, but of himself, where his ...more
Read in September, 2009
How else can one begin to into a book like this then start from the first quote in the book; "prima, quae vitam dedit, ora corpsit. The continuous work of our life is to build death," from Montaigne.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in January, 2008
recommended to Craig by:
Prof. Russon, also the best teacher in the worldrecommends it for: anyone interested in philosophy
This is one of my favorite books, and definitely my favorite philosophy book. It is by far one of the best books on existentialism. As you can tell from looking at the length of the book, she is very concise in her writing. This is a good thing as you don't have to put up with the fluff that some philosophers seem to enjoy so much. Don't be fooled by the length - this is not an easy read. I've read it 3 times and constantly want to go back for more because I get something new each time. For thos...more
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in December, 2008
I enjoyed the time reading this book. Not much to say but if you like Existentialism, you will enjoy her thoughts and views on the subject.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
awakens an echo in the heart of those to whom it is addressed...just started.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in August, 2008
This is a good companion to Sartre's ‘Being and Nothingness’ as it simplifies and abbreviates B & N while using it as a reference throughout. There is much use of philosophical terminology that can stump you if you weren't a philosophy major. Overall it sheds some light on the morals of man, the reasoning behind war / war crimes and the true definition of freedom. Although written several decades ago, the references and comparisons have eerie similarities to our current political times.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in May, 2008
It is indeed a tour de force on de Beauvoir's part to succeed in turning the absurdity of the human condition into a dialectic of ambiguity which proposes that "we are absolutely free today if we choose to will our existence in its finiteness, a finiteness which is open on the infinite." This book is actually a very uplifting and liberating book which does not propose an evasion from our human condition but a way to transcend it.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Read in December, 2007
I finished this book at five in the morning, just before passing out! I was reading it for a paper I had to write for existentialism, though I might have read it for fun otherwise. It was a quick and interesting read, though dry in some places. She addresses the question of whether there can be an existentialist ethics quite effectively, I thought.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in September, 2007
When I read dense philosophy, I usually read it twice. The first time I read it all the way through quickly, as if I were reading fiction, in order to pick up the main ideas. The second time, I read it more closely, which takes longer, but I'm able to then probe deeper and gain a more full understanding of the work. I'm on the second phase with this book.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Read in August, 2008
Definately the most readable overview of existentialism around, and a good crack at what an existential ethics would mean. She twists herself up in knots trying to cope with Stalinism, but other than that is philosophically consistent in her political approach.
Like this review?
yes
(1 person liked it)
add a comment
Umm. . . very thick. . . I read a little at a time, when I'm bored of other books, or need my mind to be totally absorbed. Not something you want to multi-task while reading. However, very enigmatic so far.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Dense philosophical study about existentialism and other topics, nowhere near as hard to read as Being and Nothingness (Sartre) but still a bit of a tough one.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
I am pretty sure I read this in school but will need to re-visit it one of these days if I am to have any real memory of it.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
Manages to create a more complete and more sympathetic model of existentialism in a third of the pages Sartre needed.
Like this review?
yes
add a comment
