Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “A New Stoicism” as Want to Read:
A New Stoicism
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

A New Stoicism

3.4 of 5 stars 3.40  ·  rating details  ·  15 ratings  ·  2 reviews
What would stoic ethics be like today if stoicism had survived as a systematic approach to ethical theory, if it had coped successfully with the challenges of modern philosophy and experimental science? "A New Stoicism" proposes an answer to that question, offered from within the stoic tradition but without the metaphysical and psychological assumptions that modern philoso ...more
Paperback, 216 pages
Published July 21st 1999 by Princeton University Press (first published December 8th 1997)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about A New Stoicism, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about A New Stoicism

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 69)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Billie Pritchett
Lawrence Becker imagines what it would have been like if Stoicism had been an unbroken tradition from antiquity to the present. He argues that had Stoicism been allowed to develop in this way, it would have changed in much the way he argues for in his book. In antiquity the common Stoic maxim was to live in accordance with nature. Becker argues, however, that even though this assumption was motivated by a belief in a universe whose purpose was rational and good for its parts, including humans, t ...more
Moshe
Feb 07, 2010 Moshe is currently reading it
not that there's anything wrong with the old one...
Dan Mitu
Dan Mitu is currently reading it
Oct 17, 2014
Jake
Jake marked it as to-read
Aug 25, 2014
Julian
Julian marked it as to-read
Jul 20, 2014
Patrick
Patrick marked it as to-read
Jun 12, 2014
Rob
Rob marked it as to-read
May 27, 2014
Grant
Grant marked it as to-read
Apr 29, 2014
Michael Dorais
Michael Dorais marked it as to-read
Feb 02, 2014
Nick B
Nick B marked it as to-read
Jan 25, 2014
Caveman
Caveman marked it as to-read
Dec 21, 2013
Luke
Luke marked it as to-read
Dec 03, 2013
Daniel
Daniel is currently reading it
Oct 14, 2013
Lynn
Lynn marked it as to-read
Sep 07, 2013
Christopher
Christopher marked it as to-read
Sep 03, 2013
Ray
Ray is currently reading it
Jun 30, 2013
Jan Mazak
Jan Mazak marked it as to-read
Jun 01, 2013
Rod
Rod marked it as to-read
May 23, 2013
Ashwini Sharma
Ashwini Sharma marked it as to-read
May 14, 2013
Glenn H
Glenn H marked it as to-read
May 05, 2013
Jon Underwood
Jon Underwood marked it as to-read
Apr 18, 2013
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
A History of Western Ethics Reciprocity Property Rights: Philosophic Foundations On Justifying Moral Judgments Encyclopedia of Ethics

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

“Stoic ethics is a species of eudaimonism. Its central, organizing concern is about what we ought to do or be to live well—to flourish. That is, we make it a lemma that all people ought to pursue a good life for themselves as a categorical commitment second to none. It does not follow from this that they ought to pursue any one particular version of the good life, or to cling tenaciously to the one they are pursuing. …

Living virtuously is the process of creating a single, spatiotemporal object—a life. A life has a value as an object, as a whole. It is not always the case that its value as an object will be a function of the value of its spatiotemporal parts considered separately. But it is always the case that an evaluation of the parts will be incomplete until they are understood in the context of the whole life. What seems so clearly valuable (or required or excellent) when we focus on a thin temporal slice of a life (or a single, long strand of a life) may turn out to be awful or optional or vicious when we take a larger view. And it is the life as a whole that we consider when we think about its value in relation to other things, or its value as a part of the cosmos.

… In our view, a focus on the parts of a life, or on the sum of its parts, obscures some important features of ethical inquiry. One such feature is the extent to which an agent’s own estimate of the value of his life is necessarily inconclusive: others will have to judge his life as a whole, because its character as a whole is not likely to be predictable while he is around to judge it, and because many important holistic considerations, such as its beauty, excellence, justice, and net effect, are things that he is either not well situated to judge or at least not in a privileged position to judge. Another feature obscured is the range of ways in which a single event or characteristic, without wide causal connections to other elements of one’s life, can nonetheless ruin it; for example, the possibility that a monstrously unjust act can indelibly stain a whole life. A third, related obscurity introduced by ignoring a whole-life frame of reference is the extent to which both aesthetic criteria and the notion of excellence have clear roles in the evaluation of a life. The whole-life frame of reference, together with a plausible account of the variety of ways in which a life can be a good one, keeps Stoicism sharply distinct from Epicurean doctrines, or their modern “welfarist” offshoots. How well my life is going from the inside, so to speak, in terms of the quality of my experience, is only one of the things that enters into a Stoic evaluation of it.

We hold that there is a single unifying aim in the life of every rational agent, and that aim, guided by the notion of a good life (happiness, eudaimonia), is virtue, understood as the perfection of agency.”
1 likes
“Stoic moral training depends upon the defensibility of these schematic propositions: (a) Rational deliberative power (rational agency) is a defining feature of mature human consciousness. (b) Every agent’s rational powers, whenever exercised, operate in a particular and intricate deliberative field, in Barbara Herman’s felicitous phrase, that is laden with projects, preferences, affects, and attachments. (c) Each person’s deliberative field evolves continuously. Its initial information gathering and deliberative routines are givens (as if programmed) and, together with the initial situation, yield explicable beliefs. Initial sensibilities, sensitivities, values, aims, commitments, and preferences are also givens and, together with beliefs and deliberative routines, yield normative propositions for conduct. The circumstances in which such normative propositions are acted out or abandoned (that is, the relative strength or weakness of the will) are given, and actions follow. Each process from information gathering to action then becomes information for the next process. (d) The agent’s awareness of and reflection upon these iterated processes varies. But when awareness is high, it is fair to say rational agency is a self-transformative power: over time, its reflexive, recursive operations can transform its own powers, deliberative field, and operations—hence its norms and actions. (e) Agents can thus remake their characters over time. Note, however, that no uniform, essentially human content is specified for the deliberative field” 1 likes
More quotes…