Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Why Are We the Good Guys?: Reclaiming Your Mind from the Delusions of Propaganda” as Want to Read:
Why Are We the Good Guys?: Reclaiming Your Mind from the Delusions of Propaganda
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Why Are We the Good Guys?: Reclaiming Your Mind from the Delusions of Propaganda

3.52 of 5 stars 3.52  ·  rating details  ·  58 ratings  ·  11 reviews
A provocative challenge to the standard ideology that Western power is a benevolent force in the world.
ebook, 391 pages
Published September 1st 2012 by Zero Books
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Why Are We the Good Guys?, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Why Are We the Good Guys?

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 157)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Written to debunk the myth that western countries are the good guys in global affairs. There are plenty of political commentators out there with views in this vein, but many of the best-known focus on the USA, whereas this book is primarily about Britain, which is why I decided to read it. Disappointingly, I couldn't get into 'Why Are We The Good Guys' at all.

One thing that jumped out at me, having recently read Chomsky's 'Understanding Power', is that on points of fact Chomsky takes enormous a
Tariq Mahmood
I loved the argument presented. I thought it was very well researched and articulated, but unfortunately I was already sold even before I started reading this fantastic book as I have always had trouble digesting the Western medias narrative, being raised in a very skeptical Pakistani culture.

Although the book is very well presented but I feel the effort may be wasted on the majority living in the enlightened West. After all most are aware of their privileged position and probably keen to maint
I agree with another reviewer that Cromwell does quote many other sources who, to be honest, have better material. However, where this book excels is when Cromwell is highlighting the failures of mainstream media to raise necessary questions and in effect to report the news rather than just repeat the government line or other news outlets. Some of the failings by said media are down right shocking and the impacts are devastating and lasting. People sometimes tend to think the media as somewhat b ...more
This book could have been very good. I do not think it is particularly well written and it is in need of a good editor to help give it direction. As someone who frequently gets lost, it feels like reading about me walking one of my less than direct routes to somewhere quite close by to my starting point.

It comes from Medialens, a website which aims to cut through the clap trap of the news corporations and whose work I readily applaud. The book was, however, not very good at all. It seems to deal
Valid points made, as expected, on the nature of corporate-state power and its invaluable servants of propaganda, yet the author's emphatic anti-war stance seems to descend into mere anti-Westernism - to heap blame upon the Allies for the antics of Nazi Germany, for contributing to and intensifying the eruption of the conflict, appears a leap too far for the sceptical mind.
David Walsh
To be skeptical is to question rather than to accept. Common skepticism and philosophical skepticism are not so much distinct concepts as points on a continuum. A problem arises for those of us who maintain a skeptical view of the world - where, if anywhere on this continuum, to stop.

The primary theme of this book is a rebuke of the accepted western worldview, and Cromwell presents much evidence in support of his argument. However, to remain to true to skepticism, we should also be skeptical of
Steve Gillway
A good book to read when there is some crisis in the world. At the moment it is people drowning in the Med trying to get to Europe. Are we the good guys? If you watch the press/media, then we want to help. This book encourages a greater depth and to question. Have we helped to cause this? The writer looks at the reporting of war, particularly in Iraq and Afghanistan, economics - the crash and the aftermath and other issues. He analyses and questions from a left-wing perspective and even delves d ...more
Couldn't finish this. Agree with the author's politics, but this isn't particularly well written. It's rather rambling and there's a bit too much of his 'journey' in there, which is the fashion these days of course, but only works for me if the author's experience is particularly entertaining and noteworthy, or written with great insight or humour. I didn't find that the case here unfortunately.
Janusz Kania
The first half of the book is fantastic but it totally falls apart towards the end.
Best read on an e-reader that lets you change the text to green.
Emarakd marked it as to-read
Jul 24, 2015
Thomas Bishop
Thomas Bishop marked it as to-read
Jul 23, 2015
Olivia added it
Jul 17, 2015
Lyndon Jarvis
Lyndon Jarvis marked it as to-read
Jul 07, 2015
Keith marked it as to-read
Jun 22, 2015
Mikael marked it as to-read
Apr 20, 2015
Alexis marked it as to-read
Apr 06, 2015
Jon Lay
Jon Lay marked it as to-read
Apr 05, 2015
Joelle added it
Mar 29, 2015
Aidan Halligan
Aidan Halligan marked it as to-read
Mar 22, 2015
Moira Chaudhry
Moira Chaudhry marked it as to-read
Mar 18, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Private Planet: Corporate Plunder and the Fight Back Surviving Climate Change: The Struggle to Avert Global Catastrophe Haunting Tales Newspeak in the 21st Century State Formation: Anthropological Perspectives

Share This Book

“The trick here is arbitrary word assignment: that is, any violence engaged in by ourselves or our friends is ipso facto retaliation and counter-terrorism; whatever the enemy does is terrorism, irrespective of facts.’10 We might say, then, that the golden rule of state violence is: terrorism is what they do, and counter-terrorism is what we do. As Orwell himself observed in his essay, ‘Notes on Nationalism’: ‘Actions are held to be good or bad, not on their own merits, but according to who does them, and there is almost no kind of outrage – torture, the use of hostages, forced labour, mass deportations, imprisonment without trial, forgery, assassination, the bombing of civilians – which does not change its moral colour when it is committed by “our” side.” 0 likes
“In the version of democracy that we are all used to, every five years or so we enter a voting booth and choose a politician from the mostly narrow choice of political parties presented to us in general elections. We then let the victor get on with ruling over us until the next time the parties want our votes.” 0 likes
More quotes…