Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Night of Four Hundred Rabbits” as Want to Read:
The Night of Four Hundred Rabbits
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Night of Four Hundred Rabbits

3.44 of 5 stars 3.44  ·  rating details  ·  1,257 ratings  ·  37 reviews

An unexpected "gift" has arrived for Carol Farley this Christmas: an envelope bearing a newspaper clipping and no return address. There, blurred but unmistakable, is a photo of a man missing for years and feared dead—Carol's father. It is a siren calling her to a world she has never known, to a place of ancient majesty and blood-chilling terror. Now, surrounded by towering

...more
Mass Market Paperback, 247 pages
Published April 15th 1989 by Tor Books (first published 1971)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Night of Four Hundred Rabbits, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Night of Four Hundred Rabbits

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,696)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Hannah
slight spoilers ahead


I love Elizabeth Peters (and her alter-ego Barbara Michaels). I've adored her books for several decades, and have most of them in my bookshelves. I noticed that this one wasn't in my bookshelf, so I checked it out of the library. I'm sure I read it long ago. Now I know why it isn't in my collection.



Quite frankly, it sucked.



Reading Elizabeth Peters/Barbara Michaels is my literary equivilent of snack food. I read her books to laugh, to get the heebie-jeebies, to take myself aw
...more
Ann
I have really enjoyed the Amelia Peabody mysteries, so I thought I would give another Elizabeth Peters a shot. Finally finished- did not like as well as the Amelia Peabodys- the main character just wasn't quite at captivating and interesting, nor was the plot.
Sarah Rhea Werner
GUYS. I do not even know what to say about this book.

Well, I do, actually. It was weird as hell, especially for esteemed mystery madame Elizabeth Peters. Light spoilers ahead, so be warned.

A quick primer: Elizabeth Peters is the pen name of Barbara Mertz (a.k.a. Barbara Michaels as well), and she's well known for writing clever, adventuresome thrillers and mysteries with romantic and often gothic twists. Her heroines are realistic (exception: Vicky Bliss), her heroes are lovably Byronic, and her
...more
Carly
**edited 01/30/14

Book summary in one sentence: Hey, kids, don't do drugs.

Longer summary: college student Carol loads up her mysterious past and deadbeat druggie boyfriend and goes down to Mexico to find her long-lost father. She meets up with him and quickly becomes perplexed and afraid of the mysterious behaviour of the people around her. Throughout, Carol fights constantly to pull her boyfriend away from the diabolical lure of drugs; the conclusion is obvious from the first dire foreshadowing
...more
Jeanette Johnson
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Skeetor
I see a lot of people didn't quite like this one, but I have to say, I loved it!
I love Elizabeth Peters but had, prior to this book, only read from the Amelia Peabody series. The characters in this book are quite different but just as enjoyable.
Roxanne
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
KDawn
I confess did not finish this book. I couldn't not figure out where she was going with it and kept letting my mind wander. A sure sign that it was time to call it quits. Ah well. So, I'll refrain from rating it. :)
Lindalee
An interesting yarn about a college student's week in Mexico. She's looking for her father, who abandoned the family when she was 12. In addition to lots of description of Mexican culture, manners, and antiquities, it deals with a bunch of mysteries, in addition to the original one about why dad left. Why is her boyfriend acting so strange? Who is that scruffy man that keeps showing up wherever she goes? What is the elderly maid trying to tell her in Spanish? It's an enjoyable tale that kept me ...more
Ginny
Is there a way to give a book negative stars? This author is one of my favorites, but this book really was terrible. None of the characters were compelling and the plot centered around drugs. Blah. Although it was nice to see that even favorite authors write duds. And it was interesting to see her style already emerging in one of her earlier novels.
Deborah Gebhardt
Read as "Shadows in the Moonlight"
Stacey
not as zippy as her other books, and very much drugs.
Robin
I picked this one up at a library book sale for a quarter. I'm not sure it was worth that much. Ugh. To be fair though, I had already experienced early Elizabeth Peters and wasn't thrilled, so it's not like I had high expectations. The plot was dated, the characters uninspiring, and I was kind of annoyed by the main character's continual references toward dark portents ahead. But-- it was short, quick, and I am able to take another book off my shelf.
Linda O
1971. 343 pgs. A departure for Peters from the Amelia Peabody series. This was a more modern-day setting, whereby a girl is drawn to find a father that she thought long dead. Lots of Mexican ruins and intrigue. It is SO era 1971!!! - mention of 'Fuzz,' Kent State, experimentation of LSD, peyote, etc., Vietnam War, NO Cell phones! It was enjoyable.
Jennifer
One of Peters' weaker works - but that's like saying it's not the best ice cream you've ever had. The plot ages less well than some of her others due to the drug angle, the heroine is nothing special, and the love interest is a tacked-on nothing, but the setting and historical detail compensate. Makes me want a Mexican vacation.
Potter
I'm a fan of Elizabeth Peter's gothic-romance/mysteries but I found this one to be below her usual standard. Along with other reviews I found the descriptions of drug use to be the main culprit. They were dated, distracting, and on occasion illogical. Otherwise it's a quick entertaining read-great for the work-commute bus ride.
Effie
This book was written in the early 70's, and it is very dated. Marijuana is the drug being smuggled from Mexico to the US. At different points is called weed, joints, dope, etc. Getting high is referred to as turning on, turning out, high, doped up, etc. LSD is the new evil coming up. If only the world was still as simple.
Jenn Estepp
Of all the Elizabeth Peters/Barbara Michaels books I've read, since going on a massive kick starting last spring (I think? Maybe last winter.) this is probably the book that has held up the least over time. It's super dated - drugs! hippies! - and I still enjoyed it for what it was, but it's far from her best moment.

2bnallegory
The story was in the first person narrative, it was slow to start and very dated in writing,1971. If you can get past that it was an alright story of college student Carol and her boyfriend Danny going to Mexico during vacation and being caught in a mystery that started with her fathers disappearance 13 years ago.
Maryann
This story was definitely dated... written in 1971. It was evident in the dialogue and in the way people related to each other. The story itself was okay. It was evident that the characters didn't understand drug addiction, but I guess that's appropriate for the date it was written.
Molly
I am a huge Elizabeth Peters fan and count Amelia Peabody and Vicky Bliss as two favorite protagonists. However, no matter how many times I tried, I just could not get interested in this story. Thank goodness I only paid ten cents for the book at a rummage sale.
Michelle Wardhaugh
Good. It lacked the humor many of her novels have that I enjoy the most, but it had a properly engaging couple of characters and a fairly involving plot. The romance at the end felt forced and tacked on to appese some established pattern or exacting editor.
Patrick\
There is always considerable drop-off in Peters' other books when one leaves the Peabody series. Vicky Bliss, for instance, does not have the same 'oomph' of the mutli-faceted Amelia.
Tish Painter
Couldn't stay interested enough to finish and has to return to the library. Although I love the Amelia Peabody series by the same author, this was not near as captivating.
SJuhl4
A vacation to Mexico ends up with unexpected involvement in a drug ring. Locating a missing father can be more dangerous than she expected. A good mystery with lots of twists.
Sarah Sammis
My mother gave me this book right after I got back from Mexico City. And I stubbornly waited 10 years (!) to read the book. It was wonderful. What the heck was I thinking?
Abbie
Boring, dated, preachy, and implausible. I really enjoy the Amelia Peabody books, but I just can't get into Elizabeth Peters's other books.
Frances Fuller
Like watching one of those idiotic movies on the dangers of marijuana in the 60's. If one can ignore the lectures, a readable tale.
Vincent
I liked it, but it is not up to Elizabeth Peters standards. I think I just prefer Emerson and the rest of the family.
Elizabeth
This was a very interesting story and it evoked my memories of the sixties and seventies.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 56 57 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Prince of Darkness
16549
Elizabeth Peters is a pen name of Barbara Mertz. She also writes as Barbara Michaels as well as her own name. Born and brought up in Illinois, she earned her Ph.D. in Egyptology from the University of Chicago. Mertz was named Grand Master at the inaugural Anthony Awards in 1986 and Grand Master by the Mystery Writers of America at the Edgar Awards in 1998. She lived in a historic farmhouse in Fred ...more
More about Elizabeth Peters...
Crocodile on the Sandbank (Amelia Peabody #1) The Curse of the Pharaohs (Amelia Peabody, #2) The Last Camel Died at Noon (Amelia Peabody, #6) Lion in the Valley  (Amelia Peabody, #4) The Mummy Case (Amelia Peabody, #3)

Share This Book