Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR ” as Want to Read:
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR

3.85 of 5 stars 3.85  ·  rating details  ·  8,357 ratings  ·  207 reviews
This Text Revision incorporates information culled from a comprehensive literature review of research about mental disorders published since the DSM-IV(R) of 1994. Updated information is included about the associated features, culture, age & gender features, prevalence, course & familial pattern of mental disorders. The DSM-IV-TR(R) brings this essential diagnostic ...more
Paperback, 4th, Text Revision, 943 pages
Published January 1st 2000 by American Psychiatric Publishing (first published 1952)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Be the first to ask a question about Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
My three cats Maslow, Ashley and Fanci were browsing my book shelf again. Ashley's gray paw caught on a big silver book that crashed to the floor.

"Ashley, what did I tell you about helping yourself to the books"

"Sorry." Ashley looked a little peeved. "Frankly I would rather help myself to the tuna cans."

Maslow looked the book over. "What's a Dasm Fourster?"

I checked it out. "Oh, you mean the DSM-IV-TR also known as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition Revised.
I feel the need to use the DSM to psychoanalyze the reviewers of this book. Whoa. It seems like people are personally offended by the existence of the DSM. Well, I for one, as a mental health professional, am quite glad that it exists because without it, I would be left to my own devices. There are many crazy therapists out there who would be diagnosing people with the most outlandish things possible if there weren't some guidelines in place. The DSM is not any of the following and if you're goi ...more
Billie Rain
know your enemy
Jun 14, 2012 Lesley rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: nobody with hypochondriasis
Shelves: psychology
In my experience, seasoned, sensitive, forward-thinking clinicians - the ones mostly interested in, like, helping people with their problems and, like, listening without judgment - claim to be kinda down on the DSM. It's an insurance company handbook, they say. It's a pharmaceutical company catalog. It's subjectivity masquerading as objective medical fact. Good points. I mean if you've ever had any doubt at all about the cultural impact on perceptions of mental illness, you need only compare DSM ...more
Apr 16, 2007 Sarah is currently reading it
Recommends it for: the crazies.
i learned that it is possible to diagnose friends, loved ones, and myself with many disorders. I also learned that it is probable that there's nothing wrong with any of us. Still waiting for the DSM to focus on what's right!
Morgan Blackledge
I gave it 5 stars just to be a dick. But really! It's just a fucking book. Relax already. I know managed care sucks. But try to imagine what the fields of psychiatry and clinical psychology were like before diagnostic criteria and strict licensure standards. Running with scissors anyone? P.S. check out Nicole's review. She has read it "front to back several times"?Wow! That's hard core. I love nerding out on this stuff as much as the next guy, but dangalang, reading (and re-reading) a reference ...more
I am not a believer is DSM manuals. Each one of us is unique; no one comes with bullet points.
Jeffrey Guterman
Where do I begin? It's hard to say that this is a "good" book or that this is a "bad" book. This is a diagnostic manual used to diagnose mental disorders. But maybe I should not be so quick to conclude that this is all the DSM is. The DSM is also a cultural artifact. It is the product of a so-called scientific community, largely the psychiatric profession, that for better and/or worse, has powerful effects. One of the biggest shortcomings of the DSM is that it fails to understand the ethical imp ...more
DSM IV is the latest installment of a series that has captured the hearts of readers. Brimming with erotic excitement and plot turns that keep you guessing until the last page, this is an instant classic for fans of the statistical-diagnostic-spy-thriller genre.
Bottom line, this is a diagnostic manual used to diagnose mental disorders, which in my opinion cannot be measured and is largely affected, or I should say "manipulated," by various variables such as the interviewee's culture background, ethnicity, communication, perception, in the moment emotions, etc, to name a few and the interviewer's interviewing skills, cultural sensitivity, personal bias and ingrained assumptions, etc, to name a few. Because of its unmeasurability, the constantly changing ...more
For some reason, I thought I'd be the only nerd to put this on his list. It's a great reference, and handy to have for any psychology major or for any reference geek. It's pretty easy to find what you need. It's well organized, and very informative. The DSM books are also regularly updated, which is good because you get the most current information on psychological disorders.
If you keep this on your coffee table, it will certainly freak out your friends and family. It can also be used to liven up dull cocktail parties.
The lack of strength based approached here is seriously lacking.

It is too tightly restrictioned to ridged normative culture, rather than using a scale. This is self evident and clearly displayed in its autistic, and bipolar sections.

Clinical perspectives I'd missing and a review of spirituality on any level missing.

The writing is very clear and easily understood.

Deficit based thinking plagues these pages in a strict manner that only serves to label one as sick and pathological. This is not v
Hmmm where to start. I remember my fascination with the intrigue and allure of the human psyche when I started my medical studies. I absolutely KNEW I was going to be a neuro/psych guy. I engulfed my neuro and psych courses in the pre-clinical years. The neuro syndromes and the ways neurological disorders could present fascinated me (they still do). The academics of psychiatric illness blew me away. To think a person's very soul could be studied was something that filled me intellectual enthusia ...more
Kaley B
Dec 30, 2010 Kaley B is currently reading it
This is the encyclopedia of mental disorders. I am finally a grad student, studying to get a Master's of Social Work and the DSM IV TR is a center piece to clinical social work. To be quite honest, I hate it thus far. Not because it is somewhat difficult to use, but because I battle with the concept of diagnosing people and the speed at which our society diagnosis and "treats" mental issues. My primary battle enemy: ADHD diagnosis in kids.
J. Keck
Having spent years within the covers of this book, I really appreciate the reviews of the Humorists and the Social/Anthropological readers. When the computer with emails began to proliferate in offices and homes, I began to wonder how long it would be before there was a diagnosis for "Information Overload Disorder."
Of course I didn't read the whole thing! C'mon!
I have read a lot of it though.
My views on the DSM have changed over time and I have some mixed feelings on the manual. I understand that providing diagnoses are a way to help people have services covered that they want and/or need by insurance companies. This is not ideal, but how the broken system works. A label can provide some form of explanation for experiences that can be freeing for some. And I do see the need for being able to categorize research on effective techniques.

On the other hand, labeling human beings can be
Mar 19, 2008 James rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Anyone working in, or wanting to better understand, the mental health field
As of March 2008, the most current edition of the primary reference for psychology and psychiatry, used to diagnose mental health problems and form the basis for treatment planning. This book is produced by the American Psychiatric Association and uses the "medical model" approach, similar to the way purely physical diseases or injuries are diagnosed, providing a list of objectively observable symptoms to determine or rule out the existence of a wide number of problems, grouped in categories suc ...more
I used to be very anti-label, but after going back to school for social work and working as a counselor at a methadone clinic I have reversed my opinion of this very critical reference book. The point of this book is to identify problematic behaviors so as to allow for treatment of such. Unfortunately, and far too often, the nature of this book gets abused, and at times certainly those who are responsible for its compilation have hurt their own cause with regard to at-large social understanding. ...more
Ayu Puspita Sari
First time I stepped my feet on my faculty's library, I was instantly drowning in clinical section. My goal on studying Psychology is to be a clinical psychologist, thus my intention on clinical books. And when I'm there to finish my assignment, my attention drew on this book. DSM-IV is a manual for every clinical problem in psychology and I found myself totally absorbed in this one.

As a manual should, this book contains informations in a scientific way, which would make many people bored least
Apr 30, 2008 Ty rated it 1 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: intellectual masochists in need of a serious headache
The last section at the end of so many dis/orders that stipulates that if your "oddity" prevents you from being functional in all portions of your life you have a dis/order does not account for the problem potentially being with society's bigotry instead of you. I'm not saying it's always the case but sometimes it is and the DSM does not leave room for that.
All the examples are from white culture, the only stats it cares about are from the US or other white dominated countries. I'm an atheist s
I'm currently suspecting some people I knew as having certain kind of personality disorders. And so I read this book from the beginning till the end. This book is pretty much scientific, but the interest of mental disorders keep me to read this book. And overall, the experience reading this is completely nice. I also found some of the personality disorders match up with some people I knew. Other thing that I am interested to is ASPD (Anti-Social Personality Disorder) but, they didn't name it as ...more
Hailey Ann
I just read this for fun, so there's that.
10/10 Would never touch again.
I can't give a rating to a diagnostic manual - it just doesn't seem right...
This book is kind of a double-edged sword but I won't take the time to get on my soap box about that right now. However, it's a necessary "tool" and offers some helpful guidelines for mental health professionals BUT the new edition is coming out this summer with many revisions (some BIG changes, some minor). So although I gained the basic foundation from this book, I'll will be waiting for the new edition before I reall
Sep 27, 2007 Jessica rated it 3 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: the worried well
Parts of this are a bit slow, it's redundant at times, and certain sections (e.g., gender identity disorder) already seem ridiculously dated. Despite all that -- and partly because of it -- this is a vastly entertaining read. I especially recommend the Personality Disorders, which you can just keep returning to again and again. I also find there's a certain kind of poetry to many of the parasomnias, while the Factitious disorders make a nice read, and it goes without saying that the paraphilias ...more
As informative as it is, the DSM is still controlled by a relatively small group of people. Whether they mean to or not, it's outdated in certain regards, and will stay that way until they change how the reference is compiled. It's actually a shame that so many opinions and diagnoses are based solely on DSM definitions. That doesn't change that it is a comprehensive resource on abnormal psychology and I will continue to refer to it because there's not much else that can compare.
Nádia Faria
As a Clinical Psychology Major, this is my bible.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Goodreads Feedback: Quotes problem 2 36 Nov 05, 2014 07:46AM  
Goodreads Feedback: 'You don't own this message' 4 100 Jan 29, 2014 01:53PM  
  • DSM-IV Made Easy: The Clinician's Guide to Diagnosis
  • Skills Training Manual for Treating Borderline Personality Disorder, First Ed
  • The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy
  • Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
  • Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change
  • The Family Crucible
  • The Complete Adult Psychotherapy Treatment Planner
  • Encyclopedia of Counseling Package: Encyclopedia of Counseling: Master Review and Tutorial for the National Counselor Examination, State Counseling ... Preparation Comprehensive Examination
  • Cognitive Therapy: Basics and Beyond
  • Psychoanalytic Diagnosis: Understanding Personality Structure in the Clinical Process
  • On Being a Therapist (Jossey Bass Social and Behavioral Science Series)
  • Issues and Ethics in the Helping Professions
  • Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders
  • Current Psychotherapies
  • Kaplan & Sadock's Synopsis of Psychiatry: Behavioral Sciences/Clinical Psychiatry
  • Psychiatric Interviewing: the Art of Understanding A Practical Guide for Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Counselors, Social Workers, Nurses, and Other Mental Health Professionals
  • Trauma and Recovery
  • Clinical Handbook of Psychological Disorders: A Step-by-Step Treatment Manual
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Quick Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria from DSM-5 Desk Reference to the Diagnostic Criteria From DSM-IV-TR

Share This Book

“the essential feature of the Dissociative Disorders is a disruption in the usually integrated functions of consciousness, memory, identity,or perception” 1 likes
More quotes…