Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “At the Crossing Places (Arthur Trilogy, #2)” as Want to Read:
At the Crossing Places (Arthur Trilogy, #2)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

At the Crossing Places (Arthur Trilogy #2)

3.73  ·  Rating Details  ·  1,726 Ratings  ·  65 Reviews
Arthur de Caldicot arrives at Holt to be squire to Lord Stephen and accompany him on crusade. It is an exciting and bewildering time for him as he finds a warhorse, is fitted with armour, and improves his fighting skills. He dreads a confrontation with his blood-father, the violent Sir William, and dreams of finding his true mother; he discovers girls - including the vivac ...more
Paperback, 384 pages
Published June 1st 2002 by Orion Children's Books (first published 2001)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about At the Crossing Places, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about At the Crossing Places

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,827)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Gary
Jul 24, 2016 Gary rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Children and adults
Recommended to Gary by: Folio Society
At the Crossing Places is the second in the Arthur trilogy, as told by Kevin Crossley-Holland. This is a children’s book and I would say it is most suitable for 10-15 year olds, though that doesn’t mean other age groups would not enjoy it, just that they will get the most from it.

The story concerns Arthur, a 14 year old boy living in England, on the English / Welsh border, in the year 1200. The book is written by Arthur in the first person, so reads like his journal and is essentially the story
...more
Mariana
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Nikki
Feb 25, 2013 Nikki rated it it was ok
Took me a long time to get onto reading this. I can't remember what I was so eager about when it came to reading these books, because they feel so slight, somehow. There's a reasonable enough attempt at historical accuracy, but I'm not really here for Manor Arthur, I'm here for King Arthur, and this really didn't keep my attention on that score. I ended up reading this and the third book really fast today and I'm not sure they're going to stick in my mind at all: at least Gerald Morris' books, w ...more
Molly Siegel
Aug 28, 2008 Molly Siegel rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: fantasy
I didn't like this one as much as the first one. Mostly it was because I didn't like how frequently the story switched to the world of the stone. I didn't like the stories that happened in the stone and felt like they had no real connection to the main plot. I really like when Arthur describes his normal every-day medieval life, and I think that is the best part of the book. But I just had a hard time enjoying the things that happened in the stone and staying interested in them. If they had occu ...more
Stephen
Nov 02, 2014 Stephen rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: literature
I quite enjoyed reading this book. My copy is the Folio Society edition, which doesn't appear on Goodreads. The story is a nice tale that is easy to read - just what I want from a bedtime book. It carries on the story from the first part of the trilogy. Arthur is now preparing for his crusade. He has doubts about his origins and wants some form of finality, whilst also preparing for his future.

This resonates with Arthur-in-the-stone, who is starting to make a mess of his reign. That is a diffic
...more
Challis
Feb 13, 2010 Challis rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: ya-fantasy
This wasn't as good as the first one. This had a lot more about Arthur-in-the-stone, who we can no longer relate to. Much of the stories in the stone are not useful to the book and only add confusion and disgust to an otherwise charming and sweet tale. I grew weary of the tales of knights killing each other gruesomely and some weird honor code which I couldn't understand and a bunch of men who couldn't be faithful around a beautiful woman. Ugh. The end of the last book led us right into Arthur p ...more
Nilsson
I read this book out loud because my mother once told me stories seem different when you read them that way. I had to do it far away in the boat though, lest I should sound like a fool in front of my brothers. To my embarrassment, it's when I first discovered that voices carry across the water clear as a bell. I wonder if the fish enjoyed this story?
Kristel
Mar 16, 2012 Kristel rated it liked it
This book is certainly not as good as the first - it focusses much more heavily on Arthur-in-the-stone and the knights of the round table, but it's much harder to see how Arthur's life lines up with Arthur-in-the-stone's life. The stories about the knights just read like quick re-treads of stories we know from Arthurian legend, but there's little to be learned from them. (Essentially Arthur sees the knights promising to be one thing and then behaving exactly the opposite, but I'm not even sure t ...more
Charles
The Arthurian legends have always fascinated me, both as a child and as an adult. So Crossley-Holland had a wealth of material to deal with, and to synchronize the legends of King Arthur with those of young Arthur de Caldicot was no small undertaking.

The original concept behind Crossley-Holland's trilogy was commendable, with the aspect of the seeing stone serving to masterly integrate and contrast those two versions of medieval life. You do feel that certain elements are well-researched, such a
...more
Valerie
Jun 08, 2011 Valerie rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
This was the 2nd book of the trilogy. It was somewhat labrious reading. The customs and ideas of medieval England saved it. Was ok but not as well done as the first book.
Laurie
I especially like the way this author has a list of characters at the front of the book, so you can refresh your memory of who is who.
Matilda Rose
Arthur has finally achieved his dream and now works as a squire to Lord Stephen. He falls in love with Winnie, Lord Stephen's beautiful daughter, and they plan to get betrothed. But meanwhile, his best friend at home in Caldicot, Grace, is jealous of his love for Winnie, for they were originally going to be married. Unfortunately, they recently found out that they share the same father, and their betrothal had to be cancelled.

Arthur also dreams of being a crusader, famed for his courage and brav
...more
Mari
Mar 10, 2014 Mari rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
It's better than the first part and, since it's a children's book, I kind of rated it as I would a few years back, when I was at an age with the protagonist. I dig the "Arthur in the stone" stories, but most of the time it feels like the protagonist is mostly a boring distraction from the story I really want to read. And I must say I really, really don't like (sometimes even hate) 1st person narrative books, especially when it's a child's perspective as dull as this one. Anyway, when it comes to ...more
Collin Moen
Sep 20, 2012 Collin Moen is currently reading it  ·  review of another edition


This book has a very interesting start. The main characters name is Arthur, and his horses name is Pip. Arthur is a young boy who is leaving his village and his friend Gatty to go to Jerusalem. He has been escorted to a castle by Simon where he will become the new squire. I think at first Arthur well become homesick because he will be away from his village Caldicot for at least 2 years. In the first book Arthur was given a stone of obsidian which a wise man named Merlin told him was something h
...more
Dusty
Mar 08, 2009 Dusty rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Dusty by: Juan Lujan
Shelves: read-in-2009
This book, the second in the so-called Arthur Trilogy, obviously has its audience: It was recommended passionately to me by a student who consumes quest-themed books like cream-filled chocolates. But I am not that audience.

In a world so full with Arthur stories, not to mention plenty of good collections of these stories rewritten for teenagers, why do we need this book? It's about a boy who lives in the Crusades and who, like Arthur, has dubious parentage and an unusual interest in defining and
...more
Lily
Like the first book in the series, At the Crossing Places reads like a journal, but I found it more confusing! I wasn't sure what chapters were part of the main plot and I didn't know what to focus on the most. Still, it was cool reading material.~ Arthur is awesome!

This book is even MORE PG 13 than the first book... I’m not sure why it’s listed for middle grade readers. Is my moral standards too high or something? I dunno. :P
Katrin
Jul 21, 2013 Katrin rated it liked it
This book was difficult to rate. It actually is a book for children and at times had a somehow strange vibe to it, haha. I did like some things about the book, for example reading about the Arthur-saga and all the connected stories in a playful way or the life of a squire at that times. This was nice but somehow I still don't get the whole point with the seeing stone. I would have to read the other two books in the series maybe. Or then there would be no real revelation in the end, I don't know. ...more
Justin George
Apr 14, 2014 Justin George rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Though this book may only interest a few it is a pretty good book. In this book Arthur finds out his dad is William the mean old,guy and not john the cool nice guy. His visions into the stone are very cool. He also enters the crusade in this book. I like how the setting is real, like in the actual past. This is a great book read it if the opportunity comes by.
Cori Reed
Once again, a fun read.

If I didn't enjoy Arthurian legend, this probably would be rated lower, but Kevin Crossley-Holland has managed to make it very accessible, which is something I can appreciate.

This was the second book in a trilogy, and I imagine I will read the third at some point. I already own the companion novel, which revolves around a village girl central to the story.
Krista
Jun 11, 2010 Krista rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
A nice little book chock full of interesting tidbits about medieval manor life during the crusades. But I'm still waiting for how manor Arthur ties in with King Arthur and I'm beginning to think he doesn't, really, despite the fact that manor Arthur will inherit a manor called Catmole and sees the King Arthur legends reflected in a "seeing stone" given to him by a family friend named Merlin. The Seeing Stone was the title of the first book, so I expected Arthur of manor to be more intertwined wi ...more
Pam Baddeley
Book 2 of a trilogy. Quite a pleasant read about the growing up of a young boy in the 12th century, how he discovers his true parentage and how his life progresses. The fantasy element is just the fact that he has a 'seeing stone' in which he sees his legendary namesake.
Evan Hays
Jul 03, 2013 Evan Hays rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: fantasy, fiction
An excellent second part of this series. If you like fiction books about Medieval Europe, the Arthurian legends, or just a good narrative, you should definitely try this series.

It blends together the very well-researched history of the 13th/14th centuries, Arthurian legends, and tenderly written dialogue to form a very enjoyable whole. I would say this book felt a lot like the first one, but it had more of the Arthurian stories, and less of Merlin. There is still the question of how much the cha
...more
Lisa Rathbun
I didn't like this book anywhere near as much as the first. Arthur traveled from manor to manor in this book, but there were few of the interesting details of medieval life that filled the first book. The focus seemed to be on the scenes of Arthur's court seen in the stone, but they portrayed the parts of the story that I liked least: fantastical visions and monsters, unfaithful men, scheming and promiscuous women. Those stories were told baldly too, with little nuance or finesse to them. I espe ...more
Nick
Jan 29, 2012 Nick rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The second part of the trilogy is not as strong as the first, though it's still good. The issue is not the 'real' story of the olde English lad growing up with foster parents, but rather the King Arthur re-tellings. They have a dutiful feel, as if the author didn't find them as much fun as the sword-in -the-stone part of the story. But then again, who does? All the semi-religious wizardry, anguished purity, and noble self-denial of the Round Table gets a bit tiresome after a while, doesn't it? N ...more
Alison
Absolutely wonderful. A rich and complex sequel to The Seeing Stone; Arthur now 14 and a squire to Lord Stephen, preparing to join the crusade to Jerusalem. He is unsettled about the news of his parentage from the end of the first novel, his plans to become betrothed to Grace are in disarray and even this news doesn't mend his relationship with Serle, his foster-brother. The story of King Arthur in the seeing-stone reflects, predicts and comments upon Arthur de Caldicot's story, as he learns how ...more
Kellylynn
This one was not as good as the last. I still like the story of Arthur Caldecott, but this time it seems to get jumbled more with King Arthur's tale. Just a struggle.
Karen Campbell
Oct 14, 2014 Karen Campbell rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I enjoyed this series. I liked learning what comprised one's everyday life during this period of time, the order of things and people, the crusade, etc.
Daniel
Oct 11, 2011 Daniel rated it really liked it
Shelves: fantasy, children-s
Though a children's book, this is a great read for anybody interested in the Arthurian legends. Two stories run in parallel; Arthur-in-the-stone is the legendary King Arthur, and Arthur who holds the stone sees surprising similarities with the legendary king he watches. Kevin Crossley-Holland does well to bring the authentic tales of the Arthurian Cycle to life, as well as creating a believable and historically accurate view of thirteenth-century England. The characters are likeable and well-fle ...more
Dos
Jul 01, 2014 Dos rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Really boring, couldn't finish it... luckily the reader can go from #1 book to # 3
Brigid Keely
Aug 12, 2013 Brigid Keely rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: kids, fiction, 2013
"At the Crossing Places," by Kevin Crossley-Holland, is the 2nd book in his Arthur trilogy. Arthur has become a squire and is gearing up to join the crusades. This is very much a book of growing up and discovery. I especially like the further introduction and development of female characters, discussion of Jews in the era/locale (which I think is a bit more enlightened/modern of a viewpoint than most people of that era/place would hold but whatever), and the way pagan tradition/ritual are part o ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 94 95 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Squire's Quest (The Squire's Tales, #9)
  • The Lantern Bearers
  • The Chessboard Queen (Guinevere, #2)
  • I Am Mordred
  • The Cuckoo Tree (The Wolves Chronicles, #6)
  • Arthur the King
  • Here Lies Arthur
  • The Pendragon Chronicles: Heroic Fantasy from the Time of King Arthur
  • The Child Queen: The Tale of Guinevere and King Arthur
13878
Kevin Crossley-Holland is a well-known poet and prize-winning author for children. His books include Waterslain Angels, a detective story set in north Norfolk in 1955, and Moored Man: A Cycle of North Norfolk Poems; Gatty's Tale, a medieval pilgrimage novel; and the Arthur trilogy (The Seeing Stone, At the Crossing-Places and King of the Middle March), which combines historical fiction with the re ...more
More about Kevin Crossley-Holland...

Other Books in the Series

Arthur Trilogy (3 books)
  • The Seeing Stone (Arthur Trilogy, #1)
  • King of the Middle March (Arthur Trilogy, #3)

Share This Book