Candida
Paperback
Published
1952
by Penguin Books
(first published 1898)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
1,206)
- spooilers -
I cannot help myself but love this story. At first, it quite annoyed me and I was a little bit scared by its following. I thought, in some or another sequence, that it will end like Ibsen's piece of work. And I got scared because, however, I didn't want Candida to be separated from the lovely Morell.He was, for me, the only agreeable and dear character from this story and I have quite fancied with him - even though I cannot find a serious and real explanation for the matter. I have...more
I cannot help myself but love this story. At first, it quite annoyed me and I was a little bit scared by its following. I thought, in some or another sequence, that it will end like Ibsen's piece of work. And I got scared because, however, I didn't want Candida to be separated from the lovely Morell.He was, for me, the only agreeable and dear character from this story and I have quite fancied with him - even though I cannot find a serious and real explanation for the matter. I have...more
Mmmmmm. Not sure that I should rate this play, as I suspect my appreciation of G.B.S.'s intentions are confused. Part of the problem is that relevant points of characterisation do not emerge through the spoken word, but through stage directions - not all translatable into action. For instance, it is intimated in Act I via stage directions that neither Morell nor Candida are likely to appreciate the art of the Titian painting dominating the wall in the study, but this fact - which makes clear at...more
I think I'll grow to like this play better as I sift through more of its criticisms and interpretations. There were naturalistic splashes across the character of Marchbanks, and similar tints to Candida, as well, though I don't know how many others noticed them, or if they were there at all. But something made me cry out inside while reading Marchbanks' lines - 'what has the naturalist got against moral convictions, and why?!' But I surrender this thought; it being a tad irrelevant.
"The play is...more
"The play is...more
Here: 3 distinct attitudes toward marriage. Alas, this is not as good as the outstanding "Arms and the Man," nor, for that matter, the tepid "Mrs. Warren's Profession." It is regarded as "brilliantly plotted"; with one, or perhaps THE, most masterfully-plotted play. Also, it was what Shaw considered to be his favorite. But I was not moved by Candida. Perhaps it is the title that is to blame--being so closely related to that favorite of mine, Voltaire's "Candide" my expectations were... different...more
MARCHBANKS: I know. You feel that you could love anybody that offered–
PROSERPINE (exasperated): Anybody that offered! No, I do not. What do you take me for?
MARCHBANKS (discouraged): No use. You won't make me real answers – only those things that everybody says.
MARCHBANKS (hopelessly): Nothing that's worth saying is proper.
One of the biggest realizations I’ve had this past year is that there are relationship people and single people. Relationship people continue to be so even when they are single...more
PROSERPINE (exasperated): Anybody that offered! No, I do not. What do you take me for?
MARCHBANKS (discouraged): No use. You won't make me real answers – only those things that everybody says.
MARCHBANKS (hopelessly): Nothing that's worth saying is proper.
One of the biggest realizations I’ve had this past year is that there are relationship people and single people. Relationship people continue to be so even when they are single...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
From spoilersliterature.blogspot.ca-
I have been aware of Bernard Shaw for quite a long time but, for one reason or another, I have never got around to reading or watching one of his plays. However, that all changed as I read Candida (122 pages).
The story centres around a situation that has been around as long as story telling has (that’s just an educated estimation!); two men fighting over one woman. The woman in question is Candida and the two men are Reverend James Morrell (Candida’s current h...more
I have been aware of Bernard Shaw for quite a long time but, for one reason or another, I have never got around to reading or watching one of his plays. However, that all changed as I read Candida (122 pages).
The story centres around a situation that has been around as long as story telling has (that’s just an educated estimation!); two men fighting over one woman. The woman in question is Candida and the two men are Reverend James Morrell (Candida’s current h...more
Being an admirer of Bernard Shaw's witticisms in his social commentary plays like Pygmalion, Apple Cart, Man and Superman and Saint Joan, I was pleasantly surprised to find this heart-warming, whimsical turn by Mr Sarcastic himself. As the parson and the eighteen-year-old poet crossed swords I felt myself troubled by the tense situations (unlike his more famous plays where one can appreciate the comedy in the fast dialogue) and when Candida spoke I felt myself calm down. How is it that Bernard S...more
I'll start with the caveat that I'm a novice when it comes to plays, but that said, this was a thoroughly captivating work that I was able to finish in about 2 hours. It was light but dealt with weighty themes (love, relationships, sexism, etc.). The psychological insights were poignant, if not entirely subtle. I read this only with an idea of getting a better grasp on Shaw, but admittedly was not very enticed by the description of the play. After all of that I was very pleasantly surprised by t...more
Candidia is the free spirit wife of a minister totally devoted to the social gospel, but she would gladly be the lover of a local younger poet who is devoted to her. But would she stay? Written for a society that was devoted to marriage, Shaw gives us a marriage that is anything but conventional and yet somehow works. One can really see the influence of Ibsen on this play, especially in the character of Candidia, she is Nora from the Doll's House who somehow marries again, only this time she won...more
Chekhov wrote his realist stories between drinks at parties in his home, taking inspiration from the characters around him to create a world of small, short-sighted people who seem real through a combination of meanness and absurdity. They are dull enough to have the problems of a normal person, but eccentric enough to come off as individuals instead of simply mouthpieces or archetypes.
Shaw sometimes works along the same lines, but his approach to absurdity is much grander, and will not yield to...more
Shaw sometimes works along the same lines, but his approach to absurdity is much grander, and will not yield to...more
(Reprinted from the Chicago Center for Literature and Photography [cclapcenter.com]. I am the original author of this essay, as well as the owner of CCLaP; it is not being reprinted here illegally.)
The CCLaP 100: In which I read a hundred so-called "classics" for the first time, then write reports on whether they deserve the label
Book #19: Candida, by George Bernard Shaw (1898)
The story in a nutshell:
As one of many "comedies of manners" from the Victorian- and Edwardian-era playwright George Ber...more
The CCLaP 100: In which I read a hundred so-called "classics" for the first time, then write reports on whether they deserve the label
Book #19: Candida, by George Bernard Shaw (1898)
The story in a nutshell:
As one of many "comedies of manners" from the Victorian- and Edwardian-era playwright George Ber...more
This comedic tale was very entertaining. The banter between the two male leads was dramatic and hypnotyzing. I could not stop reading. The story centers on the theme of love within each character. Each character had their own unique love towards another character. It was quite a read. I am happpy for the ending, though as someone who could relate to Eugene, I was a little glum.Regardless if the ending this play was a delight and then some! Timothy~
3 1/2 Stars. I definitely enjoyed this play more than the previous Shaw play I read. Although I still didn't feel a deep affinity for any of the characters, I found them on the whole much more intriguing and as a whole more likeable. The plot unexpectedly excited me so that I eagerly pressed towards the ending. I look forward to diving deeper into the meaning of this play.
Audiobook Version performed by L.A. Theatre Works:
This is a brilliant play revolving around a woman who, in a time when women were supposed to be seen and not heard, takes control over her life and gets even . . . no, she gets ahead.
A really good play and if you are going to experience it, do it right and listen on audiobook by LATW.
This is a brilliant play revolving around a woman who, in a time when women were supposed to be seen and not heard, takes control over her life and gets even . . . no, she gets ahead.
A really good play and if you are going to experience it, do it right and listen on audiobook by LATW.
The only Bernard Shaw play that I have seen in person, this was a delight to read. During the actual play itself, some of the dialogue and settings passed me by at too rapid a pace to savor and take in. Witty repartees and a tight fast moving plot make this play memorable, even in written, not acted form.
From BBC Radio 4 Extra:
The life of a vicar's wife is turned upside down by a young poet. Romantic comedy from George Bernard Shaw with Hannah Gordon, Edward Petherbridge and Christopher Guard in a production first broadcast in August 1977 and directed by Ronald Mason.
The life of a vicar's wife is turned upside down by a young poet. Romantic comedy from George Bernard Shaw with Hannah Gordon, Edward Petherbridge and Christopher Guard in a production first broadcast in August 1977 and directed by Ronald Mason.
Jul 23, 2012
Serena
rated it
4 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Shelves:
literary-novels-and-plays
I loved the character changes in Eugene and Morell. Felt so sorry for Morell, but I kind of sympathized with Eugene too. Candida was kind of cool. Her Dad didn't seem all that bad either.
Apr 20, 2009
Claire S
marked it as to-read
·
review of another edition
Recommended to Claire by:
Himself, and CCLaP.
CCLap verdict: not a classic. Although George Bernard Shaw himself is a great figure of the literary arts, only one to win both a Nobel and an Oscar, etc.. etc..
Jun 25, 2010
Lobstergirl
rated it
1 of 5 stars
·
review of another edition
Recommends it for:
Todd Palin
Facile, antiquated, repulsive.
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
George Bernard Shaw was an Irish playwright, socialist, and a co-founder of the London School of Economics. Although his first profitable writing was music and literary criticism, in which capacity he wrote many highly articulate pieces of journalism, his main talent was for drama. Over the course of his life he wrote more than 60 plays. Nearly all his plays address prevailing social problems, but...more
More about George Bernard Shaw...
Share This Book
3 trivia questions
More quizzes & trivia...
“We have no more right to consume happiness without producing it than to consume wealth without producing it.”
—
52 people liked it
“Do you think that the things people make fools of themselves about are any less real and true than the things they behave sensibly about? They are more true: they are the only things that are true.”
—
10 people liked it
More quotes…

Loading...



























updated Jun 27, 2010 07:13am