Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Age of Fracture” as Want to Read:
Age of Fracture
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Age of Fracture

4.07 of 5 stars 4.07  ·  rating details  ·  177 ratings  ·  24 reviews
In the last quarter of the twentieth century, the ideas that most Americans lived by started to fragment. Mid-century concepts of national consensus, managed markets, gender and racial identities, citizen obligation, and historical memory became more fluid. Flexible markets pushed aside Keynesian macroeconomic structures. Racial and gender solidarity divided into multiple ...more
Paperback, 352 pages
Published September 3rd 2012 by Belknap Press (first published December 21st 2010)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 536)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Steven Peterson
This book deals with an important issue: the decline of a sense of community in the United States. The dust jacket says: ". . .Daniel Rodgers shows how the collective purposes and meanings that had framed social debate became unhinged and uncertain." To explain the title of the book, Rodgers notes that (Page 3): ". . .the last quarter of the century was an era of disaggregation, a great age of fracture."

Some of the aspects of this fracture that are addressed: the change from a managed economy to
Joshua Buhs

Daniel T. Rodgers takes on a very difficult task--writing about the very recent past from a historical perspective--and does so really well. He is able to step outside the current ways of thinking--our controlling metaphors--and show how they came into being, what they illuminate and what they make difficult to see. The book touches upon social history, sociology, political history, and public policy--he's dealing with on-going debates, so it's had to divvy these subjects up--but this
Ldrutman Drutman
he Princeton Historian Daniel T. Rodgers has written a fascinating new book about how the U.S. has gone from being one big beacon of light to a thousand little points. The title gives it away. We are in an Age of Fracture. We’ve gone from shared sacrifice and shared identities to individual expression and diffuse identities. We’ve gone from limits to dreams; we’ve shed the confines of the past for the endless possibilities of future reinvention. The only problem is, it’s starting to look like we ...more
Peter Davis
This was a tremendous book. This is a must-read for anyone who is interested in a quite comprehensive intellectual history of the past 40 years. I'm one year into my reading project to answer "what the heck happened?" -- what, in the last half century, has led to our current American political malaise -- and this book has been one of the most useful in my pursuit of an answer.
Joseph Stieb
Probably the best book I read this term. Rodgers covers intellectual, political, and social history from the 1970's. His argument is the culmination of a lifetime of scholarship, which is reflected in his deep grasp of the zeitgeist of this time period. Rodgers characterizes this era as one of fracture and disaggregation in ideas and groups. Not only did Americans increasingly "bowl alone," but identities and conceptions of society and history that had long held sway started to fall away. Defini ...more
Alex Stroshine
"Age of Fracture" covers the history of ideas in the United States during the last quarter of the 20th century. Daniel T. Rodgers discusses how thought and theories affecting large topics such as economics, race, gender, language and power rapidly shifted, were rearranged and fell out of favour. The book reminds me of a larger scale version of George Marsden's "The Twilight of the American Enlightenment," where Marsden summarizes the major thinkers and books that shaped and informed the 1950s. R ...more
The good: This is actually a great work for pulling together so many different intellectual texts from so recent a time period (mostly 1970s & 80s). It's a good jumping off point for anyone looking to dig into this era of intellectual history more. There were certainly a lot of trends and shifts in thought that I didn't know about it, so it was valuable for insight into where we are now.

The bad: I felt that Rodgers was not particularly adept at explaining some of the more complicated concept
For Rodgers, the last decades of the twentieth century were a period of tremendous “disaggregation,” witness to a shift in the language and metaphors used to describe society from the “social” to the “economic.” It was a time when “strong metaphors of society were supplanted by weaker ones. Imagined collectivities shrank; notions of structure and power thinned out.” During the Age of Fracture, Americans began to parse society, economics, identity and history through the metaphor of ‘the market.’ ...more
Mike Hankins
In this intellectual history of the latter twentieth century (focusing more on the 70s into the 80s), Daniel Rodgers paints a bleak picture of disintegrating ideas and growing confusion.

As the prosperity of post-WW2 consuption started to die out, previously honored economic models like Keynesian economics were perceived to be failing. Without a clear strategy to replace it, various models competed, and nothing seemed to be working to combat stagflation. This wasn't just an economic problem, acc
"Across multiple fronts of ideational battle, from the speeches of presidents to books of social and cultural theory, conceptions of human nature that in the post-World War II era had been thick with context, social circumstance, institutions, and history gave way to conceptions of human nature that stressed choice, agency, performance, and desire. Strong metaphors of society were supplanted by weaker ones. Imagined collectivities shrank; notions of structure and power thinned out. Viewed by its ...more
Justin Evans
Some books win prizes because they're excellent; some books win prizes because they're timely. Chalk Rodgers' Bancroft up to timeliness, I'm afraid. This is a solid history of ideas in America since the seventies: new market-based politics; reactions to and extensions of '60s moral liberalism and relativism; constitutional scholarship; the post-war social sciences and reactions against them, particularly in terms of identity politics; historiography; political philosophy etc etc... He crams a lo ...more
The irony of The Age of Fracture is that it triumphs at asserting a style of historical scholarship that should not thrive in this age: a synthesis, in the style of Richard Hofstadter, Daniel Bell, or Christopher Lasch, that links ideas, politics and social change in an unabashedly essayistic style. And it's true that succeeding at this style is rare in an, um, age of fracture. But Rodgers produces a first draft of recent American history that every subsequent historian must address.

The argumen
A difficult intellectual history of America, 1975-2008. Very erudite, but so many books mentioned that it was a tough read without having read many of the books discussed. On the other hand, an excellent reference for some of the source material that may come in handy later on. I have to respect the scholarship here, but felt like I needed to be better read to fully understand the context.
Somewhat disappointing, but a field must begin somewhere. The organizing theme (the "fracture") is the loss of aggregates and the individuation of social thought. Rodgers traces this through chapters on presidential rhetoric, economics, African-American thought, the women's movement, and political and social theory. The penultimate chapter describes new varieties of de-historicized thought – here originalist jurisprudence is uncomfortably paired with the rhetoric of post-communist reconstruction ...more
Eric Michael Burke
Outstanding work of history. The best single characterization of an era's pervading intellectual character I've ever encountered.
Geoffrey Rose
Best book I've read on contemporary (post 1975) American political, cultural and intellectual history.

Rodgers's thesis is profound and provocative and has opened to my eyes to a new understanding of the fragmented age in which we're still living.

The chapter on Reagan's Cold War speeches is particularly noteworthy but the book is brilliant throughout.

I don't usually gush over a book but I wasn't able to put it down and several days later, I'm still tangling with the author's points.

Highly recomm
The Book : An Online Review at The New Republic
I LIVE IN A DIFFERENT country than the one into which I was born in 1942. I have never been quite able to pinpoint exactly what makes it so different. More than any other book I’ve read in recent years, Age of Fracture, by the Princeton historian Daniel T. Rodgers, has helped me to discover and to understand that difference. Read more...
Very readable intellectual history of the United States from the 1970s through the early 2000s. I pretty much spent seven years in grad school and read thousands and thousands of pages to cover what Rodgers does in 271 pages. Good introduction to a variety of thinkers and theoretical currents.

And it's actually made me want to re-read Rawls (I probably won't, though).
Explains a lot about what I experienced as a teenager who read the news and then later a college student being exposed to some of the echoes of the debates/streams of thought Rodgers discusses. If you want to know how we got from the U.S. of the 1950s to the U.S. of the 2000s, this is a great place to start.
I used this in our graduate historiography class in combination with Louis Menand's /The Metaphysical Club/. It provides an excellent overview of the intellectual developments that shape today's historical profession -- not to mention politics and other parts of academia. I would definitely assign it again.
Wherein Dan Rodgers grooves on topics ranging from Foucault to Reagan, Phyllis Schlafly to Judith Butler. Not much more to the argument than the title of the book, but Rodgers has so many interesting things to say about so many topics that you don't even care.
I read this book because the author is my son's advisor at Princeton. I found it an interesting read, full of disconcerting and thought-provoking truths about the changes wrought in the second half of the twentieth century.
Adam Gossman
painstaking contemporary history, drawing on several US Presidential Administrations and several decades of socio-economic and political thought. Very good read.
Streator Johnson
Well worth reading as a critique of modern culture and how we got there.
Trevor marked it as to-read
Nov 29, 2015
Dave marked it as to-read
Nov 26, 2015
B. G.
B. G. is currently reading it
Nov 24, 2015
Katie marked it as to-read
Nov 24, 2015
Anders S.
Anders S. marked it as to-read
Nov 20, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 17 18 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • To Serve God and Wal-Mart: The Making of Christian Free Enterprise
  • Stayin' Alive: The 1970s and the Last Days of the Working Class
  • Making a New Deal: Industrial Workers in Chicago, 1919-1939
  • American Nietzsche: A History of an Icon and His Ideas
  • It's Your Misfortune and None of My Own: A New History of the American West
  • The Incorporation of America: Culture and Society in the Gilded Age
  • Homeward Bound: American Families In The Cold War Era
  • Killing for Coal: America's Deadliest Labor War
  • Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America
  • Gunfighter Nation: The Myth of the Frontier in Twentieth-Century America
  • What Comes Naturally: Miscegenation Law and the Making of Race in America
  • No Place of Grace: Antimodernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880-1920
  • Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy
  • Invisible Hands: The Making of the Conservative Movement from the New Deal to Reagan
  • The Straight State: Sexuality and Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America
  • Rebirth of a Nation: The Making of Modern America, 1877-1920
  • Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860-1925
  • Fear Itself: The New Deal and the Origins of Our Time

Share This Book

“Caught in the middle of these debates in a special issue of Feminist Studies in 1988, Leslie Rabine was not alone in confessing to her "profound and often enraged sense of insoluble ambivalence toward deconstruction."36” 0 likes
More quotes…