Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Como ficar sozinho” as Want to Read:
Como ficar sozinho
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Como ficar sozinho

3.6  ·  Rating Details ·  8,831 Ratings  ·  762 Reviews
Em Como ficar sozinho, uma coleção de artigos selecionados a partir dos livros How to be alone (2003) e Farther Away (2012), muitos deles publicados previamente na prestigiosa revista New Yorker, Jonathan Franzen volta ao gênero praticado em A zona do desconforto (2006). Entre o lançamento desses dois livros de ensaios, o autor construiu, na ficção, a reputação de uma das ...more
Paperback, 328 pages
Published June 25th 2012 by Companhia das Letras (first published 2002)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Como ficar sozinho, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Como ficar sozinho

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Aug 20, 2008 Carly rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: elderly techno-phobes
Ok, Jonathan Franzen. WE GET IT. You're a martyr for truth and beauty and all that is good because you read books and don't like technology and smoke cigarettes and still use a rotary telephone. You are a superior human being because you don't watch t.v. You could've said that all in one paragraph, but you chose to do it in 300 palpably crotchety, Andy Rooney-esque pages. As Shruti rightly pointed out, it is surprisingly refreshing to read an author who annoys the shit out of you, especially wit ...more
Glenn Sumi
Apr 12, 2015 Glenn Sumi rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction
How To Be Alone – a.k.a., How To Make Some Quick Cash Between Novels

Full disclosure: I love Jonathan Franzen, novelist. The Corrections and Freedom are two of my favourite novels written in the past couple of decades. And I can’t wait to read his new book, out this fall.

But that’s Novelist Franzen. Do I really need to read Essayist Franzen? Especially when his prose is often fussy, whiny and awkward?

Here are two random passages from his uneven 2002 collection, How To Be Alone (take a deeeeep br
Richard Derus
This review has been revised and can now be found at Expendable Mudge Muses Aloud! I wish the title was more prophetic.
MJ Nicholls
Oct 03, 2012 MJ Nicholls rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: non-fiction, merkins
Franzen hits the target when literature is being discussed. The career-making accidental cri de coeur ‘Why Bother?’ and ‘The Reader in Exile’ and the Gaddis love-in-cum-demolition ‘Mr. Difficult’ are all sublime pieces, if a little uncertain. The more reflective, personal essays show Franzen’s likeable man-on-the-street intellectualism, especially the Alzheimer’s piece ‘My Father’s Brain’ and the hilarious Oprah-era insight ‘Meet Me in St. Louis.’ He is less successful when broadsheet feature wr ...more
Ian "Marvin" Graye
Perchance to Bother

This isn’t so much a review of the collection of essays called "How to Be Alone", but some responses to one of the essays, "Why Bother?" (also known as "The Harpers Essay" or "Perchance to Dream").

I’ve probably read the essay in one form or another half-a-dozen times since it was first published in 1996. I have to admit that each time the experience has become less satisfactory.

The essay is 42 pages long. Franzen cut about 25% of the Harper’s Essay and changed its name.

Aug 24, 2007 Fred rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
to describe my objection to this book of essays i'm going to use a word that i don't quite understand in this context but that feels correct to me somehow: generous. these essays aren't very generous. i'd imagine they were cathartic to write. they certainly do a good job of demonstrating the author's intelligence. but in essay after essay, i found myself waiting for the part where i'd find out why i was supposed to give a fudge about what i was reading. to choose one example that crops up over a ...more
A girlfriend took this with her after we broke up (along with many, many other books of mine). So I guess she did a far better job of teaching me how to be alone than Mr. Franzen ever could.
Nov 19, 2009 Mara rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: essays
So Jonathan Franzen doesn't know I exist and couldn't possibly have written this just to show up as confirmation during a week when I needed exactly this sort of confirmation, right? So it just felt that way.

Also it could be the title attracted me because cultivating the sort of isolation required for reading and writing does mean being a little dangerously far from the herd and I am ambivalent about it, just as I have an odd little relationship with goodreads because it's a way of not being alo
Nov 25, 2013 Shibbo rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Minha preguiça mortal do Franzen já virou lenda entre meus amigos, que me olham cheios de condescendência pensando - imagino - coisas como "ah, mas ela não sabe ler/não leu direito/não entendeu/é retardadinha".

Jonathan Franzen é bom um escritor? É.
Jonathan Franzen é um bom ensaísta/jornalista/whatever? Depois de ler esse livro, me sinto forçada a responder que sim.
Jonathan Franzen é o melhor escritor da nossa época e merece todo esse incenso em torno de sua preciosa bundinha letrada? Mas nem f
A lot of people bitch about Jonathan Franzen, and probably with good reason. Especially in a nation in which mainstream aesthetic values have become conflated with democracy (facepalm), he's viewed as an out-of-touch elitist, an academic leftist, who-- unlike other academic leftists-- actually winds up on bestseller lists, and thus forces his opinions into the national conversation. In fact, he's one of the few American writers today who actually seems willing to challenge the status quo, and fu ...more
Sep 20, 2015 Roberta rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: nonfiction, 2016
How to Be Alone è una raccolta di saggi pubblicati in vari momenti, il cui trait d'union, a quanto pare, è "the problem of preserving individuality and complexity in a noisy and distracting mass culture: the question of how to be alone". Inoltre l'intero libro vuole essere, almeno parzialmente, "a record fo a movement away from an angry and frightened isolation toward an acceptance - even a celebration - of being a reader and a writer".

A differenza di "Zona disagio", gli argomenti non sono quasi
Jul 02, 2008 Kat rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: eyeopening
Franzen is somewhat dark, but in a real world, plain in front of you real and dark. I like his explanations, his inclusion of family and his truthfulness. Perhaps his explanations are a mirror for me, but I had read a few of these essays before they appeared in this book. He is worth the poke of prod and read. He is infinitely human, and his work is readable, and ultimately, human in its dimension of honesty. I find it lovable and laudable, in that, he worries about readers understanding his wri ...more
Feb 02, 2017 G.G. rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: essays
No offense to Jonathan Franzen—whose novels I’ve not yet read—but I was surprised by how much I enjoyed this collection of his essays. Surprised because many of them were written more than twenty years ago and are about subjects that I’m completely unfamiliar with. Who’d have thought than an essay about the Chicago Post Office (“Lost in the Mail,” 1994), for example, or the (hitherto unknown to me) American novelist William Gaddis (“Mr. Difficult,” 2002) would be so interesting?

As an ex-smoker I
Feb 22, 2011 Richard rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2011
The thing that I like about this book is that it's written by a fellow curmudgeon who likes to complain about the current state the world. Hey! I like to do that too! For most of the book Mr. Franzen bemoans the decline of the literary novel, the wastefulness of modern society, the miserly plight of the working author, the degeneration of culture and the questionable morality of the criminal justice system. He complains a lot.

But Mr. Franzen's complaints are not like my complaints. That's to say
Aug 27, 2007 Nidhi rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: anyone with an hour to kill
He is a fairly pompous writer. I will start with that because it's important to know the tone from which you will be inflicted pages and pages of advice on how to be "proper" reader in today's society. This book is a series of essays written by Jonathan Franzen recently as well as revisited essays from his past. He laments the fall of the novelist, the over-importance put to privacy and the lack of care afforded to the the public, and deteriorating postal systems (this essay, I must be honest, I ...more
Franzen, we know you've been busy writing the Great American Novel and all, but you are overdue for a new collection of essays that embraces (or at least nods towards) the 21st century. Several of these essays claim a date somewhere in the 90's, but I swear his ode to rotary phones could be decades older. Has he not been introduced to the cell phone? He speaks of Touch-Tones as cutting edge communication devices. In 1995 he gave away a television that appears to have doubled as side table; how l ...more
Update: 13 November 2008 Franzen surprised me by saving the best for last. His second from the last essay, "Meet Me in St. Louis" turned out to be the best by far. It's the most personal and also brings the book back to where it started, his childhood home and mine, St. Louis. The first essay, "My Father's Brain" is about his father's slow drift into Alzheimers and the author's own reluctance to accept where his father's going. It is poignant in its understatedness.

In "Meet Me in St. Louis" Fra
Come stare soli è una raccolta di 13 saggi, tra i quali io mi sento di salvarne solo due:

Il cervello di mio padre (intoccabile per il tema che tratta)
Perché scrivere romanzi?

Di Franzen non ho ancora letto niente perché, sia la mole di Libertà che quella di Le correzioni mi incutono un certo timore, che non è lo stesso timore che incute un Tolstoj o un Dostoevskij, cioè un timore rispettoso, ma piuttosto un timore da “mattone”.
Tutto il libro ruota attorno al problema della diminuzione dei lettor
Oct 05, 2010 Caryn rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
This book sounded interesting, but when it comes down to it, Jonathan Franzen's personality keeps getting in the way. He's got a pole up his ass, and he's so damned full of himself. Anything interesting he might have to say is mitigated by the annoyance caused by hearing his persnickety voice in my head. I might agree with some of his ideas if agreeing with him didn't make me feel somehow dirty.
Bastian Greshake
This was kind of a weird read for me. Franzen seems to be the kind of supporter of the form of cultural pessimism (highbrow literature is dying! TV and the internet are making us accept capitalism! only rotary phones are acceptable! [seriously, I only half-made up the last one, there is an essay on his rotary phone] etc) that in a way is still prevailing. Still I enjoyed reading even some of those essays, even if I strongly disagree with his conclusions.

To have a closer look into the different
Dec 19, 2007 Patrick rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: boring magazine enthusiasts
I should preface this by saying that I don't really like books that are just repackaged essays or features from magazines, and if I'd been aware that that's what this was, I might not have been so eager to read it. As it was, I'd just finished reading 'The Corrections' and wanted to get my hands on anything Franzen related as soon as possible. This book slowed that urge to a screeching halt.

It's not as if Franzen is a bad writer. Far from it. He's amazingly smart and talented, and surprisingly h
Dec 27, 2013 Kenneth rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
There are thirteen essays making up this collection and though the theme is consistent - solitude, isolation, independence - the range is still broad and comprises topics as varied as writing, dementia, the prison system, city development etc. To me they all hold up very well with the exception of Lost in the Mail (about the postal system in Chicago; an excruciatingly dull subject and expose although I understand it's really about the breakdown of public society) and Erika Imports (too short to ...more
Zachary Martin
Sep 18, 2010 Zachary Martin rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: lit-crit
As a writer, I think this book of essays is bad for a person's soul. Franzen is a good writer, the arguments are interesting, and I would have a hard time denying he isn't on to something. For me, however, that something is a cynicism I find rather toxic. Ultimately, though I think his insistence that anything that doesn't stick to the Charles Dickens/Henry James model of the novel to be a waste of the readers time is about the most insecure reaction to experimental fiction going. I really liked ...more
Barbara Francolini
Non so perché ma forse a causa del titolo mi aspettavo qualcosa di molto diverso.. Alcuni dei saggi di questa raccolta abbracciano argomenti che mi interessano poco e sono affrontati in maniera abbastanza asettica; altri (soprattutto quelli che si basano su una visione catastrofica della tecnologia) palesano il limite del libro che rimane inevitabilmente "datato". Però, però, però.. devo dire che a me Franzen piace, e non ci posso far niente. Ho trovato la sua scrittura comunque piacevole anche ...more
Feb 06, 2011 Robert rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: x2010-11-season
It's rare I find myself agreeing with the New york Times, Boston Globe and Chicago Tribune, but their descriptions of Jonathan Franzen as a "pompous prick, an "ego-blinded snob", and a "spoiled,whiny little brat" are spot on.

While the language is just as complex and florid as in his novels, these essays reveal far to much about the man behind the typewriter, and none of it is flattering.
Jul 09, 2014 Drew rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Having read David Foster Wallace's essays recently, I picked this up on an impulse and must admit that the shine and effervescence of the former serve only to underline how lacklustre these attempts at reportage and literary deliberation really are.
Franzen's coy, standoffish discussion of the dichotomy between literature (or even just books) and television is indicative. He underlines his distaste for the Tube, describes the decrepit nature of the set that he has just got rid of, and then attem
Robert Isenberg
What a stick in the mud.

Jonathan Franzen should appeal to a guy like me: hip, Gen X, a thorough essayist and reporter, and a beloved New Yorker writer to boot. We share a certain level of technophobia and affection for found objects. What's not to love?

First, he's one of these novelists who can't understand why nobody reads anymore, and his woe-is-me loathing for TV and pop culture becomes very, very wearying. Franzen is either (a) not a happy person at all, or (b) pretends to be unhappier than
Christina Rau
The last time I was in the library, Jonathan Franzen written along a spine caught my eye. Why did I want to read this book? Where had I heard this name? The book looked brand new. However, most of its essays are from the late 90s and early 2000s. The political and social references are fascinating because they are now all in hindsight. Most (if not all) are pre-September 11th. They are all pre-current-economic-meltdown and new President Obama.

The essence of the essays are timeless. From learnin
Nidhi Pande
Feb 12, 2017 Nidhi Pande rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Experience: A Memoir
  • Changing My Mind: Occasional Essays
  • The Ecstasy of Influence: Nonfictions, Etc.
  • Both Flesh and Not: Essays
  • Water from the Sun and Discovering Japan
  • Otherwise Known as the Human Condition: Selected Essays and Reviews
  • Unacknowledged Legislation: Writers in the Public Sphere
  • Waiting for the Barbarians: Essays from the Classics to Pop Culture
  • Slaves of New York
  • In Rough Country: Essays and Reviews
  • And the Ass Saw the Angel
  • The Fun Stuff: And Other Essays
  • Kill All Your Darlings: Pieces 1990-2005
  • Shakespeare Wrote for Money
  • The Braindead Megaphone
  • Kiss Me, Judas
  • At Large and at Small: Familiar Essays
  • The Liberal Imagination: Essays on Literature and Society
Jonathan Franzen is the author of The Corrections, winner of the 2001 National Book Award for fiction; the novels The Twenty-Seventh City and Strong Motion; and two works of nonfiction, How to Be Alone and The Discomfort Zone, all published by FSG. His fourth novel, Freedom, was published in the fall of 2010.

Franzen's other honors include a 1988 Whiting Writers' Award, Granta's Best Of Young Ameri
More about Jonathan Franzen...

Share This Book

“Depression presents itself as a realism regarding the rottenness of the world in general and the rottenness of your life in particular. But the realism is merely a mask for depression's actual essence, which is an overwhelming estrangement from humanity. The more persuaded you are of your unique access to the rottenness, the more afraid you become of engaging with the world; and the less you engage with the world, the more perfidiously happy-faced the rest of humanity seems for continuing to engage with it.” 352 likes
“But the first lesson reading teaches is how to be alone.” 242 likes
More quotes…