Six Years: The Dematerialization of the Art Object from 1966 to 1972
In Six Years Lucy R. Lippard documents the chaotic network of ideas that has been labeled conceptual art. The book is arranged as an annotated chronology into which is woven a rich collection of original documents--including texts by and taped discussions among and with the artists involved and by Lippard, who has also provided a new preface for this edition. The result is...more
Paperback, 280 pages
Published
April 30th 1997
by University of California Press
(first published November 1972)
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
198)
Jan 27, 2008
tENTATIVELY, cONVENIENCE
rated it
4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for:
thinkers
Shelves:
art
I read Ursula Meyers' bk "Conceptual Art" in 1976 & this one not until over 22 yrs later. By then, of course, I'd changed alot. Even though there's an overlap between the 2 bks (after all, both writers are mostly art world figures aware of NYC artists 1st & foremost), their mode of presentation is different. Meyers' bk has short statements & pictures. Lippard's is much more of a cut & paste reference. I recommend them both. However, the difference in when I read them makes me fav...more
Astonishingly wide-ranging and accessible. This is one of the most unconventional and satisfying books about post-WW2 art I've read. The structure of the book is more like an annotated bibliography that covers the author's art viewing over a 6 year period. Not a collection of reviews so much as a collection of impressions and experiences that slowly build a definition of art-objects and aesthetics. A sort of cut-and-paste argument for moving past 'modernism'. Blow up the picture of the cover for...more
I really enjoyed Lucy Lippard's introduction/summary to the book. I admit to not reading the details in full, but rather skimming them and finding highlights here and there. Fascinating to have this collection from a very interesting time.
i laughed for a good chunk of this book.
but how can you write a retrospective contemporary "history" of art from the late 60s without dictating a canon? (i remember my surrogate mother's friends laughing when i told them i was studying contemporary art history. i remember shivering when i found out marina abramovic was performing historic performance pieces at the gugenheim.) lucy lippard does it. lippard, like rosalind kraus, is a master of present observation, here using critique to investigat...more
but how can you write a retrospective contemporary "history" of art from the late 60s without dictating a canon? (i remember my surrogate mother's friends laughing when i told them i was studying contemporary art history. i remember shivering when i found out marina abramovic was performing historic performance pieces at the gugenheim.) lucy lippard does it. lippard, like rosalind kraus, is a master of present observation, here using critique to investigat...more
May 11, 2013
Bao
marked it as to-read
May 08, 2013
Izetta Autumn
marked it as to-read
May 05, 2013
Rigor Delay
added it
May 02, 2013
sdy
added it
Apr 21, 2013
Lordghoul
marked it as to-read
Apr 13, 2013
Ira Kotyurgina
marked it as to-read
Apr 04, 2013
Abbymerrick
marked it as to-read
Apr 02, 2013
Peawok
added it
Mar 29, 2013
Jeb
marked it as to-read
Mar 28, 2013
Tobias
marked it as to-read
Mar 25, 2013
Sreevidhya
marked it as to-read
Mar 09, 2013
Jenny Michlich
is currently reading it
Mar 07, 2013
Saelan
marked it as to-read
Mar 01, 2013
Majella Dowdican
marked it as to-read
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »

Loading...



















