Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Causality and Chance in Modern Physics” as Want to Read:
Causality and Chance in Modern Physics
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Causality and Chance in Modern Physics

4.16  ·  Rating Details ·  37 Ratings  ·  5 Reviews
Whereas the fundamental laws of physics were regarded as strictly deterministic until the early twentieth century, developments in modern physics have led many physicists to conclude that such determinism is not valid and that the basic laws are statistical in nature. In Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, Professor Bohm criticizes these notions. He argues that determi ...more
Paperback, 184 pages
Published January 1st 1971 by University of Pennsylvania Press
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Causality and Chance in Modern Physics

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Shea Levy
Sep 25, 2015 Shea Levy rated it it was amazing
In this book, David Bohm explores the concepts of causality, chance, and natural law as they arise in and apply to physics. After a general overview presenting his views on the subject and contrasting them with the mechanism/reductionism that is common amongst physicists, he explores the development of classical, relativistic, and quantum physics through both lenses. In discussing quantum mechanics, he concludes that the usual (Copenhagen) interpretation requires abandoning concepts of causality ...more
Ed
Aug 03, 2011 Ed rated it it was amazing
Shelves: physics, my-reviews
I think this is the best book about the fundamental assumptions of science I have ever read. David Bohm is one of the wisest and open-minded thinkers I've ever encountered. He believes that science should be based on the assumption of the "qualitative infinity of nature." We shouldn't assume that anything is what it is absolutely. "Any given set of qualities and properties of matter and categories of laws expressed in terms of these qualities and properties is applicable only within limited cont ...more
Jake
Apr 03, 2013 Jake rated it really liked it
Definitely an interesting read. Bohm is engaging and friendly to the uninitiated without sacrificing too much rigor. Bohm's project is to challenge the dominant interpretation of quantum mechanics, and in doing so he develops a philosophy of nature that provides a deep conceptual framework which puts the relationships between scientific practice, human knowledge, and the terminus of scientific inquiry in a new light while providing a general critique of certain mechanistic presuppositions inheri ...more
Christine Cordula Dantas
Jan 15, 2016 Christine Cordula Dantas rated it it was amazing
Shelves: physics
An excellent book by David Bohm, intertwining physics and philosophy (a rare combination in these days), in a clear, interesting viewpoint, with a well-written historical development of fundamental concepts. His criticism and unique view of science, as nicely described in this text, make it an obligatory reading for professionals as well as the general reader. His philosophical position, highlighting the infinitely qualitative nature of the Universe, reminded me of Spinoza, Schelling; and Bergso ...more
Kelly
Oct 04, 2015 Kelly rated it liked it
I read and enjoyed the first three chapters. Interesting philosophy of science. The fourth chapter was too science heavy for me, over my head, and I put it down.
LS
LS rated it really liked it
Dec 03, 2012
Andrew Donnachie
Andrew Donnachie rated it it was amazing
Jul 08, 2012
Vlatko Klabučar
Vlatko Klabučar rated it really liked it
Mar 15, 2013
Asaf Ben-shahar
Asaf Ben-shahar rated it it was amazing
Feb 28, 2013
Mark Gomer
Mark Gomer rated it really liked it
Sep 16, 2015
Firdaus Pozi
Firdaus Pozi rated it really liked it
Jan 16, 2014
Jon
Jon rated it it was amazing
Nov 19, 2011
Sky
Sky rated it it was amazing
Jul 30, 2013
Henry Grayson
Henry Grayson rated it it was amazing
Nov 09, 2012
Rasheed
Rasheed rated it it was amazing
Jun 15, 2014
Mohsen Al-Mohsen
Mohsen Al-Mohsen rated it it was amazing
Apr 17, 2011
TJ
TJ rated it it was amazing
Sep 25, 2010
Divjot Hans
Divjot Hans rated it really liked it
Nov 02, 2016
Hugh
Hugh rated it it was amazing
Jul 22, 2016
Joel
Joel rated it liked it
Sep 04, 2014
Joe
Joe rated it liked it
Dec 31, 2011
Johan Salmson
Johan Salmson rated it liked it
Aug 04, 2014
Gabrielle
Gabrielle rated it it was amazing
Aug 12, 2014
Bob Finch
Bob Finch rated it it was amazing
Jan 14, 2014
Warren Tappe
Warren Tappe rated it liked it
Jun 06, 2008
Tulika Shah
Tulika Shah rated it liked it
Oct 10, 2015
Toby
Toby rated it it was amazing
Jan 17, 2017
Carlos
Carlos rated it liked it
Mar 24, 2017
CY Beh
CY Beh rated it really liked it
Mar 11, 2009
Shamreen  Iram
Shamreen Iram rated it really liked it
Feb 01, 2013
« previous 1 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Goodreads is hiring!

If you like books and love to build cool products, we may be looking for you.
Learn more »
9809
David Joseph Bohm (December 20, 1917 – October 27, 1992) was an American scientist who has been described as one of the most significant theoretical physicists of the 20th century and who contributed innovative and unorthodox ideas to quantum theory, neuropsychology and the philosophy of mind.
More about David Bohm...

Share This Book



“At any particular stage in the development of science, our concepts concerning the causal relationships will then be true only relative to a certain approximation and to certain conditions.” 1 likes
“The notion of a thing is thus seen to be an abstraction, in which it is conceptually separated from its infinite background and substructure. Actually, however, a thing does not and could not exist apart from the context from which it has thus been conceptually abstracted. And therefore the world is not made by putting together the various “things” in it, but, rather, these things are only approximately what we find on analysis in certain contexts and under suitable conditions. To” 0 likes
More quotes…