<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book>
  <id>1558136</id>
  <title><![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0486434389]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780486434384]]></isbn13>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <description><![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]></description>
  <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">1558136</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">4</books_count>
  <desc_user_id type="integer" nil="true"></desc_user_id>
  <id type="integer">2790327</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">1971</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>Reconstruction in Philosophy</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:21|5:5|4:5|3:9|2:2|1:0|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">21</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">76</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">36</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.62]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[20]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[0]]></text_reviews_count>
  
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy]]></link>
  <authors>
    <author>
    <id>42738</id>
        <name><![CDATA[John Dewey]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42738.John_Dewey]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.89</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>1025</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>122</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="36">
      <review>
  <id>79126380</id>
    <user>
    <id>828758</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Hilary]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Rowley, MA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/828758-hilary]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201388948p3/828758.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1201388948p2/828758.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.65</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>20</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Nov 27 11:05:32 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Nov 27 11:05:32 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/79126380]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/79126380]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>78907120</id>
    <user>
    <id>2978807</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mike]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Forest Hills, NY]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2978807-mike-veripapa]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Nov 24 18:33:38 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Nov 24 18:33:38 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/78907120]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/78907120]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>76721607</id>
    <user>
    <id>2165045</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Caitlin]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2165045-caitlin]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1238131075p3/2165045.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1238131075p2/2165045.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Nov 21 15:46:13 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Nov 04 13:04:08 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Nov 04 13:04:08 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/76721607]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/76721607]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>75968998</id>
    <user>
    <id>2885330</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Meg]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Belfast, G5, The United Kingdom]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2885330-meg]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1256950233p3/2885330.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1256950233p2/2885330.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2764614</id>
  <isbn>0807015857</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780807015858</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2764614.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>1</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="my-personal-library" />
        <shelf name="philosophy" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Oct 27 21:00:52 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Oct 27 21:00:52 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75968998]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75968998]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>75781805</id>
    <user>
    <id>646331</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Ryan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Albany, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/646331-ryan-shaw]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1255643829p3/646331.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1255643829p2/646331.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2764614</id>
  <isbn>0807015857</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780807015858</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2764614.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Oct 26 10:27:30 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Oct 26 10:27:30 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75781805]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75781805]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>73976340</id>
    <user>
    <id>1971563</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Inna]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Tel-Aviv, Israel]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1971563-inna-shpitzberg]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1254725500p3/1971563.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1254725500p2/1971563.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">6082959</id>
  <isbn>5816300180</isbn>
  <isbn13>9785816300186</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Реконструкция в философии]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6082959._</link>
  <average_rating>0.0</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>0</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Текст этого тома был написан около четверти века назад - т. е. вскоре после Первой мировой войны - и печатается без изменений. ]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="philosophy" />
        <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Oct 09 10:27:54 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Oct 09 10:27:54 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/73976340]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/73976340]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>71802814</id>
    <user>
    <id>966206</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Bryan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Reston, VA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/966206-bryan]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1246568870p3/966206.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1246568870p2/966206.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="2009" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Nov 06 14:45:38 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Sep 19 14:40:09 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Sep 19 14:40:09 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/71802814]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/71802814]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>69034949</id>
    <user>
    <id>2672190</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Andy]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Waunakee, WI]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2672190-andy-gussert]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1251340076p3/2672190.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1251340076p2/2672190.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Aug 26 20:00:22 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Aug 26 20:00:22 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/69034949]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/69034949]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>63400438</id>
    <user>
    <id>2519266</id>
    <name><![CDATA[S. J.]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Grand Forks, BC, Canada]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2519266-s-j]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1247526092p3/2519266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1247526092p2/2519266.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="philosophy---general" />
        <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jul 13 23:56:32 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Jul 13 23:56:42 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/63400438]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/63400438]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>63209101</id>
    <user>
    <id>1057226</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Dan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Augusta, MT]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1057226-dan]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1245687992p3/1057226.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1245687992p2/1057226.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Jul 12 18:32:55 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jul 12 18:32:55 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/63209101]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/63209101]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>59284902</id>
    <user>
    <id>2299832</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Timothy]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Phoenix, AZ]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2299832-timothy-mccluskey]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1242279575p3/2299832.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1242279575p2/2299832.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jun 11 10:36:58 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jun 11 10:36:58 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59284902]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59284902]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>56468114</id>
    <user>
    <id>2122765</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Robert]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Dallas, TX]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2122765-robert]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1238011348p3/2122765.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1238011348p2/2122765.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="philosophy" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon May 18 06:57:01 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon May 18 06:57:01 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56468114]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56468114]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>56166432</id>
    <user>
    <id>2314989</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Bill]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Boston, MA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2314989-bill]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri May 15 07:36:19 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri May 15 07:36:19 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56166432]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/56166432]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>52703171</id>
    <user>
    <id>180785</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Ryan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/180785-ryan]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1231507689p3/180785.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1231507689p2/180785.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Apr 14 17:01:34 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Apr 14 17:01:34 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52703171]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52703171]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>51034759</id>
    <user>
    <id>2178614</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Ethan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2178614-ethan-forrest]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Mar 31 10:21:04 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 31 10:21:04 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51034759]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51034759]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>48499403</id>
    <user>
    <id>1758009</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Barb]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Greensboro, NC]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1758009-barb]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1236437505p3/1758009.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1236437505p2/1758009.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Mar 07 07:27:40 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Mar 07 07:27:40 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/48499403]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/48499403]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>48171755</id>
    <user>
    <id>1205587</id>
    <name><![CDATA[aldozirsov]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Jakarta, Indonesia]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1205587-aldozirsov]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1258572194p3/1205587.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1258572194p2/1205587.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">2764614</id>
  <isbn>0807015857</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780807015858</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2764614.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="philosophy" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Mar 03 19:19:49 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Mar 03 19:20:51 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/48171755]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/48171755]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>47934161</id>
    <user>
    <id>602333</id>
    <name><![CDATA[V]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Seattle, WA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/602333-v]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1235673577p3/602333.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1235673577p2/602333.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Mar 01 16:51:51 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Mar 01 16:51:55 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/47934161]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/47934161]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>46606519</id>
    <user>
    <id>2040621</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Kate]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brooklyn, NY]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2040621-kate-perkins]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1234861765p3/2040621.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1234861765p2/2040621.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Feb 17 01:14:54 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Feb 17 01:14:54 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/46606519]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/46606519]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>44569234</id>
    <user>
    <id>1963968</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Dave]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Philadelphia, PA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1963968-dave]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1558136</id>
  <isbn>0486434389</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780486434384</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Reconstruction in Philosophy]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024m/1558136.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1185201024s/1558136.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1558136.Reconstruction_in_Philosophy</link>
  <average_rating>3.62</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>21</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[For those of us trying to make sense of the world and the institutions we devise to cope with it, John Dewey's <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> offers tremendous insight. Writing a few years after World War I, the highly regarded American philosopher chose to embrace the modern sense of scientific optimism and apply it to the search for truth. He argued forcefully that our philosophical constructions are not based in reason, but only use higher thinking to justify themselves, and that we might find better ways of living if we examine our deepest beliefs and feelings with an eye toward their ultimate effects on us and others. This experimental philosophy, pragmatism, took several steps beyond the previous century's utilitarianism and was both hailed and reviled as a subsumption of philosophy and ethics into science.<p>  Written as lectures, <em>Reconstruction in Philosophy</em> is marginally less dry than other philosophical tracts, but for readers new to the jargon, some sections can be slow-going. The pleasure of Dewey's works, though, comes from the intellectual stimulation of following a brilliant mind into then-uncharted epistemological territory. The last chapter, &quot;Reconstruction As Affecting Social Philosophy,&quot; foreshadows so much 20th-century political thinking--from across the spectrum--that it ought to be required reading in high school civics classes. Did pragmatism change our lives for the better? The very fact that we can ask such a question is Dewey's legacy; the answer must remain an open question. <em>--Rob Lightner</em> </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1971</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jan 27 16:49:37 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jan 27 16:49:37 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44569234]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44569234]]></link>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
          <shelf name="to-read" />
          <shelf name="philosophy" />
          <shelf name="my-personal-library" />
          <shelf name="philosophy---general" />
          <shelf name="ru" />
          <shelf name="education" />
          <shelf name="e-dewey" />
          <shelf name="non-fiction" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link>
  <id>8</id>
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=1558136</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>