Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason (Paladin Movements & Ideas)” as Want to Read:
The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason (Paladin Movements & Ideas)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Psychoanalytic Movement: The Cunning of Unreason (Paladin Movements & Ideas)

4.12  ·  Rating Details ·  25 Ratings  ·  4 Reviews
How did psychoanalysis become so accepted by the public? This provocative book reconstructs the system of ideas upon which the theory and practice of psychoanalysis rests, describing a modern culture that has created a psychic or a spiritual void that psychoanalysis seems custom-made to fill. Gellner approaches the question as a sociologist and attains a broad perspective ...more
Paperback, Second Edition, 256 pages
Published January 1st 1993 by Fontana Press (first published January 1st 1990)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Psychoanalytic Movement, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Psychoanalytic Movement

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-52)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
J.M. Hushour
May 18, 2016 J.M. Hushour rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
It's remarkable that this book has so few reviews here on Goodreads, which might be more a testament to its relevance than anything negative, for Gellner's intention is clear: to take down one of the central pillars of our modern life, psychoanalysis.
Gellner's arguments are complex if impervious, because he keeps it pretty simple. I'll try to sum it up as best I can while trying to maintain the appeal of the work:
1) Psychoanalysis is a supreme confidence trick whose existence is predicated on th
David M
Oct 10, 2016 David M rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I think Gellner is at his best when he narrows his focus. The subject matter of Plough, Sword, and Book: The Structure of Human History is really too vast to be amenable to his breezy, essayistic style. By contrast, in this book and his work on Wittgenstein, he's able to achieve great force by picking a specific target and then attacking from avariety of different angles.

It's possible to debunk Freud and the movement he founded from an Enlightenment perspective. While today there is no non-contr
Dan Geddes
Nov 06, 2013 Dan Geddes rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
The Psychoanalytic Movement tries to answer the question: how did Freudianism come to achieve such a solid foothold in the intellectual life of the West, especially in light of the fact that Freudianism has such little scientific basis?

Gellner is sarcastically dismissive of the claims of psychoanalysis, but backs up his claims with a wealth of insight and argument. His premise is that no movement should be studied strictly on its own terms, that a movement’s claims should be verifiable against e
Jul 23, 2016 Will rated it it was amazing
In the 1950s psychoanalysis was popularized with the Anglo-American public through a series of bestsellers like Herbert Marcuse's Eros and Civilization (1955), Philip Reiff's Freud: The Mind of the Moralist (1959), and Norman O. Brown's Life Against Death (1959). From then until the early 1980s, it was relatively easy to defend psychoanalysis from its detractors, mostly because the best known criticisms were either belligerent (Karl Jaspers), incompetent (Sartre), or overly simplistic (Karl Popp ...more
David Dalakishvili
David Dalakishvili rated it really liked it
Apr 19, 2013
Sitzen rated it it was amazing
Aug 14, 2012
David rated it it was amazing
Sep 24, 2014
Wickstrom rated it it was amazing
Jul 28, 2014
Timedilation rated it it was amazing
Feb 06, 2012
Levan Ramishvili
Levan Ramishvili rated it really liked it
Mar 10, 2013
Michiel rated it liked it
Nov 22, 2016
Paul Cardwell
Paul Cardwell rated it it was amazing
Nov 01, 2014
Sankar Raj
Sankar Raj rated it really liked it
Jan 16, 2011
ne rated it it was amazing
Jun 28, 2013
Dealer rated it it was ok
Dec 28, 2015
Taryn rated it really liked it
Sep 21, 2013
Chin Jian Xiong
Chin Jian Xiong rated it really liked it
Aug 26, 2015
Steven rated it really liked it
Sep 06, 2012
Ruru Ghoshal
Ruru Ghoshal rated it it was amazing
Jul 03, 2013
Marysia rated it really liked it
Oct 31, 2011
David rated it really liked it
May 05, 2013
Pablo Stafforini
Pablo Stafforini rated it really liked it
Jun 12, 2006
Tom-ow rated it liked it
Aug 07, 2012
M Sz
M Sz rated it liked it
Oct 01, 2014
J-B rated it liked it
Jan 27, 2009
Víctor H
Víctor H marked it as to-read
Dec 02, 2008
Ruth added it
Jun 04, 2010
Yvonne added it
Jul 24, 2011
Harrison marked it as to-read
Jul 27, 2011
Ganbold Chelikov
Ganbold Chelikov marked it as to-read
Oct 08, 2011
Lazarus P Badpenny Esq
Lazarus P Badpenny Esq marked it as to-read
Apr 26, 2012
Sarah marked it as to-read
Apr 28, 2012
Samantha Garcia-McDonald
Samantha Garcia-McDonald marked it as to-read
Jun 03, 2012
Erin marked it as to-read
Jun 07, 2012
Kino is currently reading it
Sep 12, 2012
Abdulwahab marked it as to-read
Oct 04, 2012
Joshua marked it as to-read
Dec 12, 2012
Juanjo added it
Dec 19, 2012
Paul marked it as to-read
Jan 30, 2013
Ted Morgan
Ted Morgan marked it as to-read
Mar 09, 2013
David marked it as to-read
May 01, 2013
StevenF marked it as to-read
Jun 12, 2013
Blake marked it as to-read
Jun 25, 2013
Daniel Teo
Daniel Teo marked it as to-read
Aug 12, 2013
Maja Leibovitz
Maja Leibovitz marked it as to-read
Sep 24, 2013
Jean Fausto
Jean Fausto marked it as to-read
Oct 09, 2013
Shimaa marked it as to-read
Apr 10, 2014
Massimiliano marked it as to-read
Jun 03, 2014
Dave Pier
Dave Pier marked it as to-read
Jun 14, 2014
Martti Antero
Martti Antero marked it as to-read
Jun 16, 2014
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Ernest Gellner was a prominent British-Czech philosopher, social anthropologist, and writer on nationalism.
More about Ernest Gellner...

Share This Book

“The co-presence of mind and object simply is not sufficient for an apprehension or comprehension of any object. Before one can seize an object, one must be equipped with a whole mass of sensitivities, concepts, expectations, background assumptions. A layman looking at a car engine just sees a jumble of metal objects and wires; a person who knows about car engines can immediately identify the parts and see their interconnection. Countless similar examples can be invoked: the capacity to perceive depends on the possession of the appropriate concepts. ... And here’s the rub: the concepts, the anticipatory classifications and interpretations, contain theories which a) had to be discovered and built up by a long process, and b) may yet in the future turn out to be false. So even the purest of hearts, free of inner deception, will not perceive and understand an object unless endowed with proper intellectual equipment. Perception is never, so to speak, the innocent encounter of a pure mind with a naked object, and therefore capable of serving as an untainted foundation for an edifice of knowledge; perception is the encounter with some given element, which cannot be seized or isolated in its purity, but depends on a corpus of knowledge acquired up to that time, but open to revision in the future.” 1 likes
“But the whole idea of knowledge, even, or especially, of oneself and one’s own inner states, attained by direct contact and not dependent on theoretical and conceptual assumptions, is absurd.” 1 likes
More quotes…