Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Maurice” as Want to Read:
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating


3.99 of 5 stars 3.99  ·  rating details  ·  12,716 ratings  ·  540 reviews
Depuis son plus jeune âge, Maurice est hanté par des rêves dont il s'explique mal la nature étrange et mélancolique. Puis, comme tous les jeunes gens de la bonne société anglaise, il part faire ses études à Cambridge. C'est là qu'il rencontre Clive, étudiant comme lui, auprès de qui il sent naître de nouveaux sentiments. Tentant d'abord d'ignorer cette passion, le jeune ho ...more
Paperback, 279 pages
Published January 1st 1989 by 10/18 (first published 1971)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Maurice, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Emily Carlin This isn't really about Forster as a person, but it may be of interest anyway -- it is an essay by author Zadie Smith on Forster's style as a writer +…moreThis isn't really about Forster as a person, but it may be of interest anyway -- it is an essay by author Zadie Smith on Forster's style as a writer + the reality of being a human:

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Mark ~ Sinfully All Male Romance
Perfect! There is probably nothing I can write that hasn't been written before about this work from one of our great English authors. It has no doubt been criticised, scrutinised, analysed, investigated, praised and acclaimed, I will just write about how the book made me feel.

The style of English was so refreshing to read. A style and mastery that has been long since forgotten. It has a beauty to it that flows and melts coming from an era where conversation really was an art. Where every word w
Mike Puma
I took the damned "Spoiler Alert" alert out--I think it keeps people from reading the actual review. That said, some of the following comments might be considered Spoiler, but I prefer to think of these comments as what Forster could have done better, should have done better, and any image of Hugh Grant spread-eagled on a table deserves to be noticed, IMHO.

At first, I thought rereading Forster’s gay novel for a group discussion would be fun. I liked it first time around and expected to like it a

Oct 25, 2007 Jessica rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: the gays, the classicists, admirers of the gays and classicists
A beloved college professor used this novel as his starting point for a glorious Humanities lecture on "The Unspeakable Vice of the Greeks." Except for the time I fell down the stairs of the lecture hall and dislocated my shoulder, that's pretty much the only morning I remember from my freshman year.

I love Forster's attitude toward his characters, which is similar to one a social worker might have towards his clients: he doesn't romanticize them and sees all of their faults, even emphasizing imp
Sep 08, 2007 Lin rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people who love romance stories
Shelves: owned
One of my favourite novels, and incidentally the one I wrote my MA thesis on. Maurice is, for all intents and purposes, a dime-a-dozen love story and a period piece. The only twist is that this love story concerns two men, which was unheard of in the time that it was written (1913). Forster wrote it mainly as a therapeutical effort, having grown tired of not being able to write about the kind of love that interested him the most, as a homosexual male. Published 60 years after it was written, Mau ...more

2,5 stars.

Written in 1913 Maurice could have made a history if the author had had the courage to publish it at that time. A story of a homosexual upper middle class Britain set in the early 20th Century! (view spoiler) With his idea and the main message - the acceptance of a human nature - E.M.Forster was for sure ahead of the times.

Unfortunately 100 years later it didn't exert the greatest impression on me. Along with the main characters that I didn't f
You know that moment you and start a book you’ve been wanting to read but haven’t. Maybe you’ve had trouble finding a copy of it or maybe all the hype around it has turned you off or maybe you’re not quite sure you’ll like the book simply because of who wrote it and when and why. And then you fall head over heels in love.

Yeah. That.

Whenever I read a classic, I prepare myself for the inevitable disappointment. In my experience, too many of the great works of literature only represent some form o
It's difficult for me to review this book.
I loved the story and I loved Maurice courage, and I most defiantly loved Scudder.
I can't not say, that, like my BR buddy, Lena, I would have enjoyed it without the visual help of the wonderful movie.
The book was written 100 years ago! The pace and language, was very difficult to keep my interest for too long, I needed breaks!

I'd give the book 3 stars, but I'm adding another one for the author's courage of writing a book on the subject of homosexuality i
It's not a secret that this is one of my favourite novels of all time. My reason for loving it so much is this: it blends together questions of sexuality, nationality, imperialism, masculinity, and class into this amazing matrix that questions every single one of those categories. At the end, the retreat into the English greenwood shows two homosexual men attacking/questioning England from a space outside England that is also, paradoxically, the heart of England...really, the thing I love best a ...more
(Possible spoilers follow... and I'll re-do this at a later date, most likely)

It's wonderful to read a m/m novel where the author focuses on the relationship and feelings as opposed to the physical to strengthen the adoration between the two leads. The language used is just an utter delight to read; it flows smoothly and certain emotions are transcribed in an almost lyrical fashion. Heavenly! E.M Forster - you badass! I'm just sorry this wonderful man wasn't alive to see his work published and
Oct 04, 2014 Irina marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
I can't belive I haven't watched this movie before today!

I loved it so much. Now I really want to read the book too.
Christy B
I wouldn't call this a review post, mainly because I doubt I'd be able to write a suitable one. However, I couldn't just let it pass without writing something about the book that will most likely end up being one of my all time favorites.

Written in the 1910s, but not released until 1971, after the author's death, Maurice is an Edwardian story about love, class, and finding oneself. The title character is a young man who comes to understand that he is homosexual. We see him through two relationsh
Julie Bozza
What to say? What on earth to say...? This is - well, not exactly where it began for me, this whole male-male romance thing - but this was my first real discovery of it all set out in words for me, and not just in vague imaginings curling round my head and heart.

I cannot remember when first I read Maurice, but it was yonks ago. Probably not as early as I like to think, but early enough in my own development. Probably my sister found it first, and recommended it to me. Bless her.

And bless EM Fors
Jul 01, 2008 janet rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people interested in gay fiction
Recommended to janet by: Alan
Forster is one of my favorite English novelists and I have always meant to read this book. The writing of it was probably very personal for him, and it is a very strong argument for the fact that people don't choose to be gay. He strongly suggests that society must accept it, or at the very least not outlaw it. I was interested to learn that it wasn't published until after his death.

In classic Forster form, he deals with class and social criticism through love and sex in this book as well. His
Vladimir Nabokov wrote in Pnin:
Some people—and I am one of them—hate happy ends. We feel cheated. Harm is the norm. Doom should not jam. The avalanche stopping in its tracks a few feet above the cowering village behaves not only unnaturally but unethically.
This is true for me as well. While of course I was cheering for the titular hero through the course of his internal and external struggle for identity, I can't help but feel, after finishing the book "well, that was very nice, but life is not
I consumed this book in one sitting. From the time I bought it last night at 7pm to when I licked the last bits of the epilogue at 2am. I first came across this story when I caught bits of the Merchant and Ivory production on tv. What? A British period piece where a man climbs into a gentleman's window for a night of sex? Isn't that Freddie from A Room With a View? This can't be Jane Austen. Ah, it's Forster! This books takes that one homoerotic scene of the pond from A Room With a View and turn ...more
It is quite impossible for me to write an objective review for Maurice, because its mere existence amazes me. So there you go, an "it's amazing", five star rating.

The novel is set in that time period where modern technology is starting to seep through homes, but the 20th Century has not quite made itself known yet. There is a character in particular who seems to have been displaced from an Austen novel, as she schemes to make advantageous marriages for her offspring. As such, some of the charact
In short, Maurice describes a long and painful process of coming to terms and accepting that which society does not, in this case, 'congenital homosexuality', as is referred to in the novel.

English (almost) beyond repair, Maurice is trying to form a sense of his self first within and then outside the box that are the many constrictions of his emotional and physical surroundings, i.e. his relation to his family and unfulfilled attraction to Clive, an old sweetheart. Forster shows an amazing comm
James Murphy
The fact of Maurice's candor about a verboten subject in early 20th century Britain is remarkable, even as we understand that it's only one example of that era's courageous fiction relating to homosexuality. That it bears the Forster stamp and reputation no doubt has encouraged its celebrity and status as perhaps the best known of those works, even as we understand that when it was finally published in 1971 the subject matter was no longer controversial. It's unmistakably Forster fiction, well-w ...more
"What an ending" to quote Maurice's tearful expression, though of course the ending was anything but tearful. After reading Giovanni's Room and Brideshead Revisited, I had prepared myself to expect nothing but tragedy from 'gay classics', but Maurice was such a pleasant surprise that I actually laughed out loud in the end. Forster's prose is beautiful and very accessible, even though at times it was excessively metaphorical and ambiguous, considering he was writing about the taboo subject of hom ...more
You know-- when you're reading a book and you just want to read a little more to see what happens...then, maybe just a little more..just the next chapter.... then you realize you've read half... that was this book for me. I just did not want to stop reading it and then I was kind of sad I was done.

This book was so intriguing to me. It was written in 1913, by a closeted homosexual, yet unpublished until after his death in 1971. Obviously, written in an era when homosexuality was in no way accept
Austin Bunn
Total cream. I've never read any Forster, I think because all the film adaptations of my youth made me think he was starchy, stuffy, Oxbridge-y. And I suppose it is but has such a beating heart. This book, for the fact that it's from 1913, may not exactly be "modern" on the subject of homosexuality but it's definitely subtle and precise enough to be appreciated now. I loved the short chapters, each built around a smart little pivot of feeling. And the romance itself was surprising and vigorously ...more
Who knew you could write a boring book about unrequited gay love in the Edwardian period? Somehow E.M. Forster managed to do so. There was no passion in this book, and indeed the love affair of two of the main characters was apparently chaste apart from the occasional kiss on the cheek, a state of affairs that stretched my credulity. And all the class snobbery throughout the book was a bit hard to take as well. I could never manage any sympathy at all for the protagonist, even though a story of ...more
Deanna also on Leafmarks because I miss Marco
Loneliness. Stark loneliness. That is what surrounds this book and oozes from its pages. Maurice is lonely in a way it is hard for us in the 21st century to fully emotionally understand. He is not particularly smart, but as an adult is good at business. He is not a loveable character but he is honest. He is not "normal" by his society's standards so he tries to disappear into a nothingness in his surroundings. If he trusted the wrong person with his desires, he could be arrested and killed. What ...more
rating: 5.5/5

Maurice, as a character, is complicated in his simplicity. He belongs to an upper middle class in 1912 Britain; has a mother and two sisters where he is the head of the household, an Oxford education, a pre-determined job, and a house and servants to manage. His life should be simple… work, marry, produce heirs. And yet he feels different. This novel explores Maurice’s path to finding out just what makes him different and how to reconcile it into his life in a society riddled with c
Emanuela ~plastic duck~
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Leo Robertson
As cute as it is progressive as it is posh, like a teddy bear with coattails that's really ahead of its time.
I'm being kind of hard on this book because even though I was SUCKED IN by it, I'm not sure I enjoyed it.

I mean ...

It's amazingly brave. (A homosexual coming-of-age story in early 20th Century England). And some of the writing is phenomenal. But there's a madness to it, a clinical anguish, that made it not just unpleasant to read -- but sometimes bewildering. And the ending, which Forster was determined to make happy (good on him), comes out of nowhere.

I think I would have given it 4 stars, had
Wack! Why haven't I read this yet.
This is an amazing novel considering the time at which it was written. It is still completely compelling and believable and doesn't feel dated as so many other books of this era do.

The three main characters are all likeable and plausible and understandable.

I would love to know more about what happened to these characters in later years but the journeys that we see in this book gives me hope that at least some of those endings will be happy ones.

Watching at You Tube.

Maurice (1987)

Director: James Ivory

Stars: James Wilby, Rupert Graves and Hugh Grant

« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Just Literature: Maurice 1 14 May 02, 2014 07:35AM  
The Issue of Class vs the Issue of Homosexuality 3 55 Sep 27, 2012 04:22PM  
Gay Literature 2 79 Sep 28, 2008 08:11AM  
  • The Charioteer
  • As Meat Loves Salt
  • The City and the Pillar
  • Christopher and His Kind
  • At Swim, Two Boys
  • Dancer from the Dance
  • The Front Runner (Harlan's Story, #1)
  • The Lost Language of Cranes
  • A Boy's Own Story
  • The Swimming-Pool Library
  • The Story of the Night
  • The Carnivorous Lamb
  • City of Night
  • Call Me by Your Name
  • The Catch Trap
  • Becoming a Man: Half a Life Story
  • Faggots
  • Dream Boy
Edward Morgan Forster, generally published as E.M. Forster, was an novelist, essayist, and short story writer. He is known best for his ironic and well-plotted novels examining class difference and hypocrisy in early 20th-century British society. His humanistic impulse toward understanding and sympathy may be aptly summed up in the epigraph to his 1910 novel Howards End: "Only connect".

He had five
More about E.M. Forster...
A Room with a View Howards End A Passage to India Where Angels Fear to Tread The Machine Stops

Share This Book

5 trivia questions
3 quizzes
More quizzes & trivia...
“You confuse what's important with what's impressive.” 103 likes
“You do care a little for me, I know... but nothing to speak of, and you don't love me. I was yours once till death if you'd cared to keep me, but I'm someone else's now... and he's mine in a way that shocks you, but why don't you stop being shocked, and attend to your own happiness.” 81 likes
More quotes…