by
3.43 of 5 stars
As new media mature, the changes they bring to writing in college are many and suggest implications not only for the tools of writing, but also for... read full description

reviews

Oct 19, 2011
Mike rated it: 3 of 5 stars
I am conflicted by this collection of essays, and will present the good before the bad. The end products for which the authors advocate are in themselves interesting. For a while, I too have felt that traditional composition classes need to "get with the program," and introduce theories and writing methods to present the technological advances of today. The Sirc article "Box-Logic" stresses that composition is more about the collecting and shaping of information than the line More...
Oct 19, 2011
Sean rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Perhaps because I come from a modern generation, and because I have a creative bent, and because I went to a magnet high school that required reflective group projects... this book seems like it is preaching to the choir. Yes, we should use not only variegated images in our rhetoric/teaching, but also the projects themselves should make students question the aspects of writing's presentation.

The real power of this book is the amount of "new media" activities that could rea More...
Jan 31, 2010
Michael rated it: 5 of 5 stars
In this fine collection, Wysocki, Johnson-Eilola, Cynthia L. Selfe, and Sirc provide a chapter or two each arguing about an aspect of new media and composition studies, and then a section offering classroom activities with rationales. This is the second time I've read it (January 2010), and I found even richer than the first time.

Just a few key notes that I want to remember from this text:

Wysocki: Because writing teachers are practiced in situating writing in context and More...
Jan 01, 2012
Katie marked it as to-read
Sep 10, 2011
Ugur marked it as to-read
Jun 13, 2011
Donora marked it as to-read
Jun 12, 2011
Mark added it
Jun 02, 2011
the little reader rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jun 16, 2011
Erin added it
May 16, 2011
Chris marked it as to-read
Apr 25, 2011
Chris rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Apr 18, 2011
Daniel rated it: 3 of 5 stars
May 23, 2011
Drew rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 17, 2011
Drew is currently reading it
May 31, 2010
Noel Studio added it
Aug 04, 2010
William added it
May 05, 2010
Randy rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Mar 06, 2010
Christopher added it
Feb 18, 2010
Whitney added it
Dec 30, 2009
Amberfutch rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Aug 11, 2009
Jacqueline rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jun 30, 2009
Chris marked it as to-read
Oct 07, 2008
Craig rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Nov 13, 2008
David rated it: 2 of 5 stars
Jun 19, 2008
Stephanie added it
Feb 18, 2008
Mark rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 10, 2008
Alice rated it: 3 of 5 stars