<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book>
  <id>1506703</id>
  <title><![CDATA[Intellectuals]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0060160500]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780060160500]]></isbn13>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1227927734m/1506703.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1227927734s/1506703.jpg</small_image_url>
  <description><![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]></description>
  <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">55302</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">10</books_count>
  <desc_user_id type="integer" nil="true"></desc_user_id>
  <id type="integer">86312</id>
  <media_type>book</media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">1988</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>Intellectuals</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:220|5:49|4:86|3:59|2:18|1:8|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">220</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">810</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">358</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">33</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.68]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[8]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[3]]></text_reviews_count>
  
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1506703.Intellectuals]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1506703.Intellectuals]]></link>
  <authors>
    <author>
    <id>10764</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Paul Bede Johnson]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-M-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/10764.Paul_Bede_Johnson]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.89</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>1374</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>252</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="358">
      <review>
  <id>44255805</id>
    <user>
    <id>759827</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Paul]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Provo, UT]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/759827-paul]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>178</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>2</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jan 24 23:55:41 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Feb 13 23:11:47 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Really liked this book.  Johnson's contention is that the &quot;intellectuals&quot; who have been so critical of priets and religion in general, and who promote their social agendas really have no solid foundation for forcing their &quot;wisdom&quot; or political views upon us - their lives often sh...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44255805">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44255805]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/44255805]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>39674446</id>
    <user>
    <id>1711431</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Eric_W]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Forreston, IL]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1711431-eric-w]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1243733882p3/1711431.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1243733882p2/1711431.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Dec 09 06:10:57 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Dec 09 06:11:25 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Paul Hollander, in a review of Intellectuals by Paul Johnson defines &quot;intellectual&quot; as a western concept connoting &quot;preoccupation with and respect for ideas but not for ideas as sacred doctrines.&quot; (Society, Se/Oc 1989, p. 97) <br/><br/>The positive embodiment of this ideal is t...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/39674446">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/39674446]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/39674446]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>54269409</id>
    <user>
    <id>1850238</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Jason]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Colorado Springs, CO]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1850238-jason]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1506703</id>
  <isbn>0060160500</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780060160500</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">3</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1227927734m/1506703.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1227927734s/1506703.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1506703.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.88</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Apr 28 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Apr 28 13:36:49 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Apr 28 13:48:25 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The three stars I gave this book may be misleading. I didn't like the book at all...but I believe it was entirely accurate.<br/><br/>I initially expected this book to discuss the thinking of the intellectuals therein. However, although Johnson wrote a bit about this, the bulk of the book was basic...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54269409">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54269409]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54269409]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>66688105</id>
    <user>
    <id>988457</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Petunia]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/988457-petunia]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>0</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Aug 08 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Aug 08 17:33:31 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Aug 08 17:40:04 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Chapter 1 (Rousseau) was like doing a cannonball into a swimming pool of ice water.  My default opinion of &quot;the greats&quot; will probably be one of intense skepticism if not distrust from here on out, and I'm not sure that's a totally bad thing.  <br/><br/>Johnson definitely has his own opinio...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/66688105">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/66688105]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/66688105]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>75961731</id>
    <user>
    <id>2879759</id>
    <name><![CDATA[David]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2879759-david]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1506703</id>
  <isbn>0060160500</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780060160500</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">3</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1227927734m/1506703.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1227927734s/1506703.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1506703.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="non-fiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Oct 27 19:46:30 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Oct 27 19:50:40 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I really enjoyed this book. It did a great job of showing how the intellectual trends and movements I was taught to admire in my formal education were often the product of compensation for the same human weaknesses that prevent many of us from actually being &quot;great.&quot; It helped me realize h...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75961731">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75961731]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/75961731]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>51545942</id>
    <user>
    <id>1526509</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Josh]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1526509-josh-knape]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1254559557p3/1526509.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1254559557p2/1526509.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jun 01 00:00:00 -0700 2001</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Apr 04 21:42:47 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Apr 22 15:41:14 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Points out the hypocritical flaws of many intellectuals you've probably heard of, and some you probably haven't heard of:<br/> -Jean-Jacques Rousseau<br/> -Percy Shelley<br/> -Henrik Ibsen<br/> -Karl Marx<br/> -Leo Tolstoy<br/> -Ernest Hemingway<br/> -Bertolt Brecht<br/> -Jean-Paul Sartre<br/>...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51545942">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51545942]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/51545942]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>59028025</id>
    <user>
    <id>2392125</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Ron]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Toronto, ON, Canada]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2392125-ron]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jun 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jun 09 13:02:46 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jun 09 13:05:11 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Paul Johnson is quite right-wing but he dishes out some pretty convincing dirt on some of the West's leading intellectuals. Does it matter that these men -- and they were mostly men -- love humanity in the abtsract but often treat their families and acquaintances very badly? The inconsistency of hum...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59028025">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59028025]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59028025]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>65287096</id>
    <user>
    <id>1691953</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Jason]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1691953-jason-reeser]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1250809664p3/1691953.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1250809664p2/1691953.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 1996</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jul 28 11:52:00 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jul 28 11:53:47 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is a must read for anyone who is concerned about the people who have shaped thought and culture in the last century.  A troubling work that will force you to reevaluate much of what you know about these individuals. ]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/65287096]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/65287096]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>19391201</id>
    <user>
    <id>1052384</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Nicholas]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Charlottesville, VA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1052384-nicholas]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>true</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="books-i-quit" />
        <shelf name="history" />
        <shelf name="to-read" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jul 20 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Apr 03 13:45:50 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Aug 04 15:02:25 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A series of chapters on why a certain liberal Deities were just douchebags who didn't know anything. Good but I'm not really interested.<br/><br/><br/>Quotes:<br/><br/>&quot;Thus the culture in which man lived itself an evolving, artificial construct, dictated man's behavior, and you could impr...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/19391201">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/19391201]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/19391201]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>40897095</id>
    <user>
    <id>1184922</id>
    <name><![CDATA[William]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Austin, TX]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1184922-william]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1211687717p3/1184922.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1211687717p2/1184922.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="our-own-copy" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Dec 25 00:00:00 -0800 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Dec 25 16:22:26 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Dec 25 16:24:14 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count>1</read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A very strange book. It began well and declined from there, almost page by page. That said, there is too much love of intellectuals in our age and any book that deflates intellectuals is worthwhile.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40897095]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40897095]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>2159456</id>
    <user>
    <id>141740</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Lilith]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Rosemead, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/141740-lilith-chemenyan]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1182354210p3/141740.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1182354210p2/141740.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Anyone who'd like to feel better about screwing up]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Jun 20 08:09:57 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Aug 06 21:49:44 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[At first the thought of idealized cultivators of thought screwing up is fascinating.  However, it seems the author often exaggerates flaws, and is too easily appalled by ordinary human actions.  By the time I got to Tolstoy, whose biography I'd already read, I grew weary of the exclusive emphasis on...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2159456">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2159456]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/2159456]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>10914728</id>
    <user>
    <id>710201</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Skylar]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/710201-skylar-burris]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1222201795p3/710201.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1222201795p2/710201.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">89431</id>
  <isbn>0061253170</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780061253171</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">2</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals: From Marx and Tolstoy to Sartre and Chomsky]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/89431.Intellectuals_From_Marx_and_Tolstoy_to_Sartre_and_Chomsky</link>
  <average_rating>3.71</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>17</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p> A fascinating portrait of the minds that have shaped the modern world. In an intriguing series of case studies, Rousseau, Shelley, Marx, Ibsen, Tolstoy, Hemingway, Bertrand Russell, Brecht, Sartre, Edmund Wilson, Victor Gollancz, Lillian Hellman, Cyril Connolly, Norman Mailer, James Baldwin, Kenneth Tynan, and Noam Chomsky, among others, are revealed as intellectuals both brilliant and contradictory, magnetic and dangerous. </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="biography" />
        <shelf name="history" />
        <shelf name="nonfiction" />
        <shelf name="politics" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Dec 23 09:35:12 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Jan 04 08:51:15 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[In this intriguing volume, Johnson choose ten of history's most prominent intellectuals, including Karl Marx, Doestevsky, and Rousseau.  He discusses the lives and theories of these selected individuals, as well as their influence on history, but his work is tied together by an overarching theme.  H...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10914728">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10914728]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10914728]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>57606447</id>
    <user>
    <id>475943</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Michael]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Garland, TX]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/475943-michael-mills]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1191596996p3/475943.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1191596996p2/475943.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu May 28 07:42:41 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu May 28 07:43:29 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A good read for the backgrounds of famous philosophers. Compelling, but some chapters seem a bit too short.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/57606447]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/57606447]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>41769626</id>
    <user>
    <id>1860600</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Jose]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Sao Paulo, 27, Brazil]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1860600-jose]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2001</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jan 03 17:18:44 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 03 17:19:22 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[great book, Johnson shows like many of the genius were a bit crazy or eccentric. ]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41769626]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41769626]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>80781879</id>
    <user>
    <id>2582442</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Keith]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Salt Lake City, UT]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2582442-keith-slade]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1250633626p3/2582442.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1250633626p2/2582442.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="philosophy" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Oct 01 00:00:00 -0700 1991</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Dec 12 13:59:26 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Dec 12 14:00:24 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Interesting book about great philosophers and how they influenced our thinking today.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/80781879]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/80781879]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>40259652</id>
    <user>
    <id>1809407</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Bill]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Jackson, MS]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1809407-bill]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1229474284p3/1809407.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1229474284p2/1809407.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1506703</id>
  <isbn>0060160500</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780060160500</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">3</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1227927734m/1506703.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1227927734s/1506703.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1506703.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="biography" />
        <shelf name="essays" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Dec 16 16:47:31 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Dec 16 16:48:21 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Catty.  The section on Baldwin was absurd!]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40259652]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/40259652]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>53336093</id>
    <user>
    <id>1258773</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Douglas]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Moscow, ID]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1258773-douglas-wilson]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1231613054p3/1258773.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1231613054p2/1258773.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="biography" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon May 01 00:00:00 -0700 1989</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Apr 20 08:34:56 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Apr 20 08:35:21 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Excellent.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/53336093]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/53336093]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>59673385</id>
    <user>
    <id>2417817</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Aaron]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[New York, NY]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2417817-aaron-haspel]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Jun 14 19:13:01 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jun 14 19:13:01 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59673385]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/59673385]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>5556205</id>
    <user>
    <id>216284</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mark]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Pittsburgh, PA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/216284-mark]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1254348059p3/216284.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1254348059p2/216284.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">89431</id>
  <isbn>0061253170</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780061253171</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">2</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals: From Marx and Tolstoy to Sartre and Chomsky]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/89431.Intellectuals_From_Marx_and_Tolstoy_to_Sartre_and_Chomsky</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p> A fascinating portrait of the minds that have shaped the modern world. In an intriguing series of case studies, Rousseau, Shelley, Marx, Ibsen, Tolstoy, Hemingway, Bertrand Russell, Brecht, Sartre, Edmund Wilson, Victor Gollancz, Lillian Hellman, Cyril Connolly, Norman Mailer, James Baldwin, Kenneth Tynan, and Noam Chomsky, among others, are revealed as intellectuals both brilliant and contradictory, magnetic and dangerous. </p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="biography" />
        <shelf name="history" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2002</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Sep 02 19:53:45 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Sep 02 19:55:41 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I know Paul Johnson is famously conservative and I'm sure that colored his view of these people, but you can't argue with his erudition or writing ability. In these short essays on various artists and political thinkers -- Tolstoy, Sartre, Hemingway, Hellman, Marx and others, he takes an acerbic loo...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5556205">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5556205]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5556205]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>4060402</id>
    <user>
    <id>251317</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Izzy]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Santa Monica, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/251317-izzy-g]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1186182477p3/251317.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1186182477p2/251317.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">55302</id>
  <isbn>1842120395</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781842120392</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">28</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Intellectuals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320m/55302.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170449320s/55302.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/55302.Intellectuals</link>
  <average_rating>3.68</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>220</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Conservative historian Paul Johnson wears his ideology proudly on his sleeve in this often ruthless dissection of the thinkers and artists who (in his view) have shaped modern Western culture, having replaced some 200 years ago &quot;the old clerisy as the guides and mentors of mankind.&quot; Taking on the likes of Karl Marx, Bertrand Russell, Lillian Hellman, and Noam Chomsky in turn, Johnson examines one idol after another and finds them all to have feet of clay. In his account, for instance, Ernest Hemingway emerges as an artistic hero who labored endlessly to forge a literary style unmistakably his own, but also as a deeply flawed man whose concern for the perfect phrase did not carry over to a concern for the women who loved him. Gossipy and sharply opinionated, Johnson's essay in cultural history spares no one.<p>  Does it really matter that Henrik Ibsen was vain and arrogant, that Jean-Paul Sartre was incontinent? In Johnson's view, it does: these all-too-human foibles disqualify them, and other thinkers, from presuming to criticize the shortcomings of society. &quot;Beware intellectuals,&quot; he concludes (though, given the subjects of his book, it seems he means intellectuals only of the left). &quot;Not only should they be kept well away from the levers of power, they should also be objects of particular suspicion when they seek to offer collective advice.&quot; Whether one agrees or not, Johnson's profiles are frequently amusing and illuminating, as when he suggests that the only proletarian Karl Marx ever knew in person was the poor maid who worked for him for decades and was never paid, except in room and board, for her labors.  <em>--Gregory McNamee</em></p>]]>
  </description>
  <published>1988</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="ifyouhavetime" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Really smart people]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2006</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Aug 03 23:23:06 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Dec 17 03:41:01 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Get this: &quot;Older men like Voltaire had started the work of demolishing the altars and enthroning reason. But Rousseau was the first to combine all the salient characteristics of the modern Promethean&quot;. Heavy stuff but oh so true. This is a terrific read if you want a behind the scenes tour...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4060402">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4060402]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4060402]]></link>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
          <shelf name="to-read" />
          <shelf name="history" />
          <shelf name="currently-reading" />
          <shelf name="biography" />
          <shelf name="non-fiction" />
          <shelf name="philosophy" />
          <shelf name="nonfiction" />
          <shelf name="sociology" />
          <shelf name="intellectual-history" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link>
  <id>8</id>
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=1506703</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>