Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Volume 4: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965” as Want to Read:
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Volume 4: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Volume 4: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965

3.98 of 5 stars 3.98  ·  rating details  ·  52 ratings  ·  4 reviews
Two books have been particularly influential in contemporary philosophy of science: Karl R. Popper's Logic of Scientific Discovery, and Thomas S. Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Both agree upon the importance of revolutions in science, but differ about the role of criticism in science's revolutionary growth. This volume arose out of a symposium on Kuhn's work, ...more
Paperback, 292 pages
Published September 2nd 1970 by Cambridge University Press (first published 1970)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge

Republic by PlatoThe Prince by Niccolò MachiavelliThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnDiscourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy by René DescartesThe Myth of Sisyphus and Other Essays by Albert Camus
76th out of 157 books — 75 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 151)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Sep 12, 2011 Adam added it
read Kuhn's "Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research," the first essay in this book. On its own, ignoring Kuhn's more sophisticated work elsewhere, it's really pretty weak and unconvincing. Basically, he says Popper is wrong and puzzle-solving distinct from critical discourse, rather than tests, is what maybe could be said to distinguish science from non-science or pseudoscience.

Maybe nails Popper on one or two points, but fails to present anything interesting in its own right.

also read Ku
Oct 21, 2013 B rated it 3 of 5 stars
Shelves: westend, own
This book starts off pretty good, but then the last few authors wind up talking about their own super-abstract ideas rather than talking about Kuhn—and at great length.

Kuhn seems to be its own example of a paradigm. It really seems to standalone and be incommensurate. I wish I could see more engagement like this, but then I also wish this were more engaged.

The first couple of authors (esp. Masterman are very interesting).
Sep 06, 2011 Kimball marked it as to-read
It was recommended by James Bach. I am interested in philosophy. I would like to read it.
Kalo ditanya isinya, saya harus buka lagi. Lagian gak yakin dulu dah ngerti isinya. :D
Ghaida marked it as to-read
Apr 13, 2015
Nolan Turner
Nolan Turner marked it as to-read
Mar 21, 2015
Spectraz marked it as to-read
Feb 07, 2015
Lydia marked it as to-read
Dec 28, 2014
Meir Dick
Meir Dick marked it as to-read
Nov 11, 2014
John marked it as to-read
Oct 31, 2014
Janne Cecilie Johansen
Janne Cecilie Johansen marked it as to-read
Sep 26, 2014
Reed marked it as to-read
Aug 09, 2014
Neil Middlemiss
Neil Middlemiss marked it as to-read
Aug 04, 2014
Matthew Rehn
Matthew Rehn marked it as to-read
Jul 28, 2014
Rich marked it as to-read
Jul 14, 2014
Abas Salah
Abas Salah marked it as to-read
Jul 11, 2014
Octipi marked it as to-read
Jul 01, 2014
Evan Grillon
Evan Grillon is currently reading it
Jun 13, 2014
Nanina added it
Jun 12, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Philosopher of mathematics and science, known for his thesis of the fallibility of mathematics and its 'methodology of proofs and refutations' in its pre-axiomatic stages of development, and also for introducing the concept of the 'research programme' in his methodology of scientific research programmes.
More at Wikipedia.
More about Imre Lakatos...
Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery For and Against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence Philosophical Papers, Volume 1: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes Philosophical Papers, Volume 2: Mathematics, Science and Epistemology Histoire Et Méthodologie Des Sciences: Programmes De Recherche Et Reconstruction Rationnelle

Share This Book