Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Par Delà Bien Et Mal” as Want to Read:
Par Delà Bien Et Mal
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview
Read Book* *Different edition

Par Delà Bien Et Mal

4.0 of 5 stars 4.00  ·  rating details  ·  32,358 ratings  ·  799 reviews
This work dramatically rejects the tradition of Western thought with its notions of truth and God, good and evil. Nietzsche demonstrates that the Christian world is steeped in a false piety and infected with a "slave morality." With wit and energy, he turns from this critique to a philosophy that celebrates the present and demands that the individual imposes their own "wil ...more
Paperback, 248 pages
Published October 1st 1987 by Folio Essais (first published 1886)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Par Delà Bien Et Mal, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Par Delà Bien Et Mal

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
J.G. Keely
I can think of few instances where an author's reputation is more different from the reality of who he was, what he believed, and what he wrote--perhaps only Machiavelli has been as profoundly misunderstood by history. Today, Nietzsche tends to be thought of as a depressive nihilist, a man who believed in nothing, and an apologist for cruel tyrants--but nothing could be further from the truth.

There probably are not many men who had more reason than Nietzsche to feel resentful and miserable: he g
Beyond Good and Evil simplified
- by Nietzsche's Ghost (with the borrowed use of an uncouth female GR reviewer's desktop)

i)I hate Germans and their silly jingoistic sense of self-worth.

ii)Women are fucking stupid and have no depth. 'They're not even shallow.'
"It is with Germans almost as it is with women: one never fathoms their depths; they don't have any, that is all."

iii)No bloody German university or professor spares a thought for my writings. Miserable old fools. I approve of the lone,
Barry Pierce
Nietzsche, the original Meninist. #NotAllPhilosophers
For those of you who are unfamiliar with him, Friedrich Nietzsche was an angry little man who protected himself from the Mean Old World by swaddling himself in an exaggerated ego (and an even more exaggerated moustache).

Rather than suggest that you read any or all of his works, I've taken the liberty of creating a "Nietzsche Book Generator" that you can use to construct your very own philosophical tomes, in the comfort of your own home!

Just follow these simple steps:

1) Make one or more completel
290. Every deep thinker is more afraid of being understood than of being misunderstood.

If Nietzsche had started here – rather than nearly ending with this thought – he might have been more comprehensible. His readers might have said – ‘oh, right, so that is how it is going to be, is it? We’re dealing with some smart-arse that is going to play games with us – well, play away…’

But, he doesn’t start here – he starts here:

“SUPPOSING that Truth is a woman--what then?”

Now, my lecturer at university go
I recommend, but with a warning. The vast majority of people will not get much out of this book. Filtering through these reviews, I see a lot of people who are clearly not meant for Nietzsche's writing. They tend to fall under a couple of categories
1) Easily Offended: when Nietzsche says something they find offensive, they are turned off reading the book. Nietzsche will offend you. However...
2) People who make a superficial reading and criticize accordingly. This follows from 1. Those who are in
نیچه در این اثر در پی روشنگری است. اسپینوزا را با شمشیر منطق سر میبرد و بر دینداری ولتر میتازد. استدلال افلاطون را به ورطه تناقض میکشاند و با فلوبر اندوهناک همدردی میکند. نیچه در فراسوی نیک و بد، خواست زنان برای خواستن را تقبیح میکند و مردان مدافع این نظریه را ابلهان مینامد. فراسوی نیک و بد بیانگر نظریات انتقادی نیچه در راستای تبیین فلسفه آینده و تعریف فیلسوف جدید است. در فصل پایانی کتاب، نیچه مفهوم "والا " را شرح میدهد و کار را بدست جان های آزاده میگذارد. در تعبیری بی نهایت افسونگر جان های آزاد ...more
Why exactly, should I strive to be kind, and not cruel? Why am I being taught to be fair and not selfish all my life? Why should I subscribe to equal rights, non discrimination, egalitarianism and freedom of speech?

Nietzsche posits that the above mentioned virtues and aesthetic and or moral imperatives (or indeed any imperatives) are merely legacy, the result of Darwinian (although he does not use this word) qualities which have ensured the survival and prosperity of the ‘issuing’ authority. Goo
*sighs* This is a difficult book.It's taking me a while to read and nietzsche's egocentric bizarre poetic prose is twisting my melon man.

Nietzsche, Nietzsche, Nietzsche, your alternative position on morality, your 'will to power', your fucking sexism is giving me a headache. I used to think that Nietzsche's 'good means bad and bad means good' was really cool. It was my type of philosophy, I thought. Yes Nietzsche, Art SHOULD make you think and who is to say what is right anyway? I'm down with be
As with my review of Thus Spoke Zarathustra, the below comprises the notes I jotted down—deciphered as best could be managed against the near hieroglyphic obfuscation of the chicken riot I call handwriting—when this was read some dozen or so years ago. As I failed to consistently make clear what were Nietzsche's words, as set against my own thoughts on the latter, the non-italicized portions may represent one giant act of plagiarizing. Luckily for me, the man seldom presented himself as possessi ...more
Although not what I expected, Nietzsche's Beyond Good and Evil was a more than satisfying meditation on morality. It wasn't what I expected because most of Nietzsche's words were spent prophesying about and discussing the "herd" mentality of democracy's slave culture, which prepares us for his final, magnificent essay, "What is Noble," but the overthrowing of my expectations was never a problem.

Too many pass over Nietzsche because they are pre-offended, missing what is powerful and vital in his
John Martindale
Nietzsche is for the atheist what Charles Spurgeon was for Christian preachers. He has a creative way of saying things and this book is filled with one liners. He makes me think of a preacher, in that he says extreme things with absolute confidence, but does not back anything up or go into much depth. This book seemed to me not so much about going beyond good and evil, but rather a justification of evil. Alexander, Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin and Mao in their rejecting the "slave" morality and embr ...more
The passage which really summed up this book for me was "Every deep thinker is more afraid of being understood than of being misunderstood." Yep, right there. It's what annoys me about a lot of philosophy - I just want people to be able to write clearly and honestly about what they actually mean. Nietzsche's language is so dense and impenetrable (and clearly deliberately so) that it is frustrating to read. There's definitely a whiff of the emperor's new clothes about this book.

And don't get me s
Christopher Robin
so... God is dead,
any questions?

no, he never existed, he's another chain or anchor that man put on himself to limit potential, and yet another means of putting a limit on personal freedom. Now that the Judeo-Christian moral code, and other moral codes like it have been laid to rest, we can finally make something of ourselves.
Nietzsche makes the claim that he is here to clear the way for the coming Ubermensch much in the same way that John the Baptist claimed to clear the way for Christ.
I guess t
Justin Evans
Utterly meaningless star rating alert! BGE is really a great book, the best place to start with Nietzsche, I think, because it states his most important ideas in digestible chunks (unlike Zarathustra, which is so over-wrought and self-regarding that I have trouble even flicking through it), and has no aspirations towards unity (and so is unlike Genealogy of Morality, which achieves that unity at the price of being transparently silly). Friedrich works best in paragraphs, and that's what he gives ...more

Friedrich Nietzsche seems to be a philosophical writer, who to me, has become a bigger legend than his own writing demands. Having read his work I found that I was surprised by both the wordiness and the repetitive nature of his actual writing. In fact to put it flippantly, most of his arguments in this book come down to: 'everything is meaningless and everything is subjective'. Of course that's a gross exaggeration but it is how Nietzsche reads to me. I challenge anyone else to explain to me wh
As always, Nietzsche presents a difficult, possibly contradictory array of views on the subjects of society, morality and history. I am certain that he wouldn't take offense to our picking-and-choosing among his philosophy- he wouldn't want to be taken dogmatically. To suggest that we find splendid truth in his writing alongside heinous invective would probably please him. He certainly wouldn't claim to have a monopoly on truth and wants us to come to our own conclusions.

In keeping with his othe

I saw many negative reviews for this work, most of which reflected something similar to "Nietzche is stupid" or "Sexists pig!" or, alas, even "This was too much to handle and therefore it sucks." So, seeing this incredibly biased, instantaneous hardening towards the subject, I felt the need the comment.

First of all, if the only thing one can say after reading a philosophical treatise is "That is entirely stupid," then one clearly isn't meant for the realm of philosophy, at least at this point in

Listened to as an audio book for enjoyment and not for review.
4.0 stars. It has been a long time since I read this (almost 20 years) and so I do not remember a ton about the subject matter and this is on my list to re-read in the near future. Therefore, without getting into the merits of Nietzsche's arguments, I do remember this being a fascinating philosophical discussion with some interesting ideas on the basis and nature of morality that looked at many of our preconceived ideas in a new light.
As the philosopher Rolfe once said:

What a load of monkeyfuck.

Nietzsche sounds like a heavily upgraded version of the typical sexually frustrated teenager (it goes without saying that the latter take to Nietzsche's work like cats to tuna). The cornerstone of his hateful "philosophy" is shameless bigotry. He is convinced that there is such a thing as people that are "meant" to be "superior", that it is good for people to oppress each other in fierce master-slave relationships, that women are barel
I recall that I had struggled with Thus Spoke Zarathustra, but this here, Beyond Good and Evil is something different, something beyond. I always wanted to read from the Author to not be misguided by what is said about the author especially key thinkers like Nietzsche who is frequently quoted and judged about his work and influence on the modern world. I always had a dark, strident, and gloomy view of his philosophy. Experiencing it myself now, I was met with surprising outcomes.

The major theme
You know it's a keeper when, after reading it, perhaps you did not learn anything true (must there be truths?) or even useful (why be useful?), perhaps you even misunderstood everything completely (why understand?), and on occasion you may have even been mildly offended (how immoral!)--but you know already what is in your heart and you've laughed about it all (about it, about you) and shaken your head, stood up and gone on with your life.

"Der Freunde harr' ich, Tag und Nacht bereit,
Der neuen Fre
سید مسعود حسینی
بعد از شاید 6 سال دوباره این کتاب رو خوندم. بارها از ته دل خندیدم از تصویرسازی های بی نظیر نیچه و هوش و ابتکاری که در متلک پرانی به خرج می ده: اینو ببینید

حکم ترکیبی پیشین چگونه ممکن است؟... [کانت پاسخ داد] به قوت یک قوه! ..مردم از [کشف] این قوه ی تازه سر از پا نمی شناختند!د
بدین ترتیب، ماه عسل فلسفه ی آلمان فرارسید و متالهان جوان حوزه ی علمیه ی توبینگن [هگل و هولدرلین و شلینگ] در پی یافتن "قوه" به بیشه ها شتافتند. و در آن روزگار چه ها که نیافتند - در آن روزگاری که روح آلمانی هنوز معصوم و پربار و
I have been hesitant to write this review simply because I have had so much fun re-reading this book, one which I consider, despite its small size, one of the most influential books on philosophy of the late 19th century. It is rare that one gets the chance to laugh at a philosopher's depictions of his art, but without a doubt, Nietzsche vast knowledge and his almost flippant hard driving style combines to serve as a monumental explication of most of his philosophy.

Beyond Good and Evil is subtit
Tamaş Andrei
O scriere care ridica la rangul de lege paradoxul. Mi-a placut: constructiv si evolutiv.
Lecturarea filosofiei sintetice nu e un proces ca oricare altul. Cel care -intamplator sau din capriciu- citeste filosofie, trebuie sa aiba mare grija: sa nu impartaseasca ideile ca atare, ci sa le aduca in fata unui -daca-mi permiteti sa-l numesc asa- "tribunal suprem al moralei", un tribunal cu un subiect si un obiect care sa disece eminamente fiecare celula a celor doua parti care sunt in proces: codul de
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Saurabh Saini
This is one of the books which will offend, inspire, confuse, enlighten pretty much every reader. In my opinion these writings are not absolute truths but Nietzsche's versions and opinions on what he assumes to be the truth. I don't think that he wants reader to appreciate and accept all his arguments but one can certainly gauge the depth of his logic and philosophical thinking by observing how he links all his various arguments.
Many a times I have found it confusing as he plainly opposes whate
Nietzsche is like a doctor with his one hand on mankind's pulse, and the other busy scribbling away the deepest, darkest wisdoms of human psychology. By being one of the best psychologists to date and by coupling that with his surprisingly vast knowledge of human history and literature and knowledge, Nietzsche was able to accomplish where many failed. While most others tended to the obvious or easy realities and truths, Nietzsche delved further into the dark, inaccessible tunnels of human psyche ...more
Colin Guy
I re-read this book and did not find it as complex as I did initially. Whilst you may not agree with Nietzche's philosophy, you cannot fault his passion and reasoning in his arguments. Given the age of this book, his outlook at life and the structures of civilisation are still fresh and resound with a truth that is still profound to this day, possibly because he talks about the nature of being human which never changes despite our progressions and evolving technologies.
Nietzche revels in the fla
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
the human condition 13 139 Jul 30, 2014 10:09AM  
  • Either/Or: A Fragment of Life
  • Critique of Practical Reason (Texts in the History of Philosophy)
  • Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist
  • Nietzsche and Philosophy (European Perspectives)
  • Phenomenology of Spirit
  • Truth and Method
  • The World as Will and Representation, Vol 1
  • Culture and Value
  • A Treatise of Human Nature
  • Essential Manners for Men: What to Do, When to Do It, and Why
  • The Problems of Philosophy
  • The Young Man's Guide
  • The Book of Deeds of Arms and of Chivalry
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (1844–1900) is a German philosopher of the late 19th century who challenged the foundations of Christianity and traditional morality. He was interested in the enhancement of individual and cultural health, and believed in life, creativity, power, and the realities of the world we live in, rather than those situated in a world beyond. Central to his philosophy is the ide ...more
More about Friedrich Nietzsche...
Thus Spoke Zarathustra On the Genealogy of Morals/Ecce Homo The Anti-Christ The Gay Science: with a Prelude in Rhymes and an Appendix of Songs On the Genealogy of Morals

Share This Book

“One must shed the bad taste of wanting to agree with many. "Good" is no longer good when one's neighbor mouths it. And how should there be a "common good"! The term contradicts itself: whatever can be common always has little value. In the end it must be as it is and always has been: great things remain for the great, abysses for the profound, nuances and shudders for the refined, and, in brief, all that is rare for the rare.” 227 likes
“Madness is something rare in individuals — but in groups, parties, peoples, and ages, it is the rule.” 175 likes
More quotes…