by
3.98 of 5 stars
Cover art by Michael Whelan read full description

reviews

Jul 17, 2009
John rated it: 4 of 5 stars
If one reads this story on any level other than shallow, one will find several problems. The characters smoke like fiends, they drink to excess, they pass off bad habits to the aboriginal Fuzzies (including smoking and drinking), and the story comes close to advocating enslavement of a sapient species, even if it is in a gilded cage. If, however, one tosses off all care for moral considerations, this story is nothing but pure fun. All of our favorites in this series is here. Pappy Jack Hollo More...
Feb 11, 2011
Cheryl in CC NV rated it: 5 of 5 stars
I'm going to bump this series up to five stars. The sum really is more than the whole of its parts. Marvelous exploration of race, intelligence, loyalty, love, honor, friendship.... I want to keep them together, so even though I'm putting them in swap you can just ask for the set and I'll get it to you gratis if you promise to try to keep them together for more readers.
Mar 17, 2010
Mickey rated it: 5 of 5 stars
The long lost 3rd Fuzzy book was not published until the 80s. By the time this book was published, Ace had contracted William Tuning to write Fuzzy Bones and Ardath Mayhar to write Golden Dreams. This book definitely feels not quite finished, or edited. I think Piper probably would have fine-tuned it a but more before publishing it, had he lived.
Jul 23, 2011
Marilyn rated it: 3 of 5 stars
The manuscript for this book was found after the author's untimely demise, which makes is all the more interesting. Well, not the storyline, but the book's background.

The names of these books alone should prompt people to want to read them, as hard as they are to get through.
Jan 13, 2012
Ron rated it: 2 of 5 stars
After reading and enjoying [Fuzzy Nation] last year, John Scalzi's reboot of the original Little Fuzzy novel, I thought it would be great to read this original work that was a followup to Piper's first two Fuzzy novels. This story was not published in Piper's lifetime, and in fact it was two decades after his death before it saw print. Years ago I really enjoyed [Little Fuzzy], but I did not enjoy this one. It is really a sub-par novel. Part of the book, which follows a small band of Fuzzies led More...
Feb 07, 2008
Justin rated it: 5 of 5 stars
The third volume in Piper’s Fuzzy series, Fuzzies And Other People was prepared from a rough manuscript and published twenty years after Fuzzy Sapiens. I feel for the folks who had to wait that long. Lucky me, I didn’t read these books until the late 80’s and got to read them in order right away! This book provides a far more unified, appropriate third volume than William Tuning’s Fuzzy Bones, the book originally released as the third Fuzzy volume. While that book was good and introduced so More...
May 29, 2011
Baal Of rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Rating this a 3 from memory. I read this in high school, and I'm pretty sure I liked it then. I suspect that I would not enjoy it very much if I were to read it now.
Feb 25, 2011
Keith rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Published posthumously, if memory serves. Suffers a bit because of it. Needed work. Still good. Worth reading.
Jun 10, 2010
Marie rated it: 3 of 5 stars
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here
May 17, 2011
Callen rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Adorable story. Last book in my new favorite series!
Feb 28, 2011
I hate to say it, but I was disappointed by this book. There was a lot of stuff, but the situation was basically the same as it was at the end of Fuzzy Sapiens. If you're a trial lawyer some of the shenanigans in that area might amuse you. But I would hesitate to recommend this to anyone but people looking to scratch their Piper or Fuzzies completionist itch.
Feb 11, 2012
James is currently reading it
Feb 11, 2012
Evil rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Feb 05, 2012
Tr3n1ty rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 31, 2012
Michael added it
Jan 30, 2012
Jack marked it as to-read
Jan 29, 2012
Jess added it
Jan 29, 2012
Katharina added it
Jan 27, 2012
Lesley rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 19, 2012
Sarahanne rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 19, 2012
Katy marked it as to-read
Feb 09, 2012
Jonathan rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 14, 2012
Doug rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 11, 2012
Jamie rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 10, 2012
CatBookMom rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Jan 09, 2012
Vince rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 14, 2012
Deborah rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jan 08, 2012
Lateniteknitter rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jan 05, 2012
Jim rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Jan 04, 2012
Silvergift marked it as to-read