Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Magnificence” as Want to Read:
Magnificence
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Magnificence (Trilogy #3)

3.39 of 5 stars 3.39  ·  rating details  ·  572 ratings  ·  126 reviews
Pulitzer Prize finalist Lydia Millet is "one of the most acclaimed novelists of her generation" (Scott Timberg, Los Angeles Times). Salon praised her for writing that is "always flawlessly beautiful, reaching for an experience that precedes language itself." The Village Voice added, "If Kurt Vonnegut were still alive, he would be extremely jealous."
This s
...more
Hardcover, 256 pages
Published November 5th 2012 by W. W. Norton & Company
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Magnificence, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Magnificence

The Casual Vacancy by J.K. RowlingThis Is How You Lose Her by Junot DíazNW by Zadie SmithTelegraph Avenue by Michael ChabonMr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore by Robin Sloan
flavorwire most anticipated books of fall 2012
14th out of 15 books — 178 voters
Fish Out of Water by Natalie WhippleCirca Now by Amber McRee TurnerRules by Cynthia LordOut of My Mind by Sharon M. DraperDying to Know You by Aidan Chambers
Goldfish
23rd out of 52 books — 7 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,187)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Roxane
This is a book I love because of its flaws. So many things go wrong here––the last 1/3 is rushed, the prose is full of excess and indulgence, the plot is thin and incomplete, there are overly convenient solutions to the problems the protagonist encounters, but it doesn't matter. A great writer can get away with these things. I really loved these flaws. I don't think women writers are allowed to be indulgent nearly enough. The writing is so lush and the protagonist, Susan is so human, so honest, ...more
Justin Evans
It's taken me a long time, but I think I've finally worked out what makes Millet's trilogy so odd, even though the books are perfectly readable and lack the obvious oddness of her other recent work (e.g., Mermaids in Paradise or Oh Pure and Radiant Heart!) The novels in the 'Dead' trilogy present themselves as almost perfectly generic modern fiction--told from one close third person point of view, with little plot, and a lot of the 'realistic' psychological detail that people like James Woods re ...more
Deborah
SO annoying, so self-indulgent.
Long, boring discourses (supposed to sound "off-the-cuff," but clearly arduously-researched) and on ridiculous subjects that no sane person has a genuine interest in.

The book jacket says "funny and heartbreaking." I guess that is code for melodramatic and depressing.
Pam
I don't know how I missed Lydia Millet up until now, but she is just so damn smart. The narrator of this book is not familiar to me, not 100% comprehensible, and yet I was so dazzled by her sensibility, in other words, the sentences used to create her. Wow
Holly
I messed this one up: reading a series out of order is something I just DON'T do. But I'd never read anything by Lydia Millet and somewhere picked up the mistaken notion that although this book was third in a trilogy it was also "stand-alone" (that reading the first two novels wasn't essential). So I downloaded an audio version and didn't read any reviews or background on the book - just blithely listened over 3 runs and a bout of insomnia in the wee hours.

I really did like Magnificence on its
...more
rachel
Jan 16, 2013 rachel rated it 4 of 5 stars
Shelves: 2013
The thing that I love most about Lydia Millet is that she not only captures the moment where one's brain goes off the rails into crazy talk born of desperate unhappiness in a way that's familiar, she takes it perhaps even a step further than you'd expect.

There is a scene in Magnificence where its protagonist, Susan -- late to an important appointment, a serial adulterer with a now-dead husband, heiress to a dusty mansion of taxidermied animals -- starts thinking about how she "loves pornography
...more
Holly Madison
I did not realize that this book was a part of a series when I began reading it. I am not sure if reading the other books would have changed my review or not, as the story seems to stand alright on its own. That being said, I did not enjoy this book. It felt like more of a chore than it should have, and I found the plot both dull and somewhat pointless.

The book follows a woman named Susan Lindley after she finds out that her husband was killed. She goes on to inherit her uncle's mansion full of
...more
Kelly
After reading other reviews I'm curious what people found so despicable about the protagonist. She was just honestly human, the way I see it.

In any case, I thought this book was really great. Sort of a commentary about life and death, about being remembered and being forgotten, about love returned and love unrequited. In addition to the story being compelling in an undercurrent sort of way, it was sprinkled throughout with sentences that either reflected my own sentiments or were just simple and
...more
Tuck
i liked her run-up [ghost lights] to this novel better as the adventures, confusions, and ultimate death of hal, susan;s husband seemed more driving, weirder, but also more likely. in this followup, susan, who fucked her way though her 20's, 30's and 40's and eventually getting caught by her husband hal, pretty much leading to his death, makes susan reel and question her guilt. she was already feeling down as her daughter is a paraplegic due to a car accident, and is a difficult daughter most of ...more
martha
are you out of your mind? Great set -up with a weird death in a foreign country, a bereaved (but barely) widow, and her inheritance of a house full of taxidermy. But shit, Lydia does nothing with it! We just read placards of the animal types - who cares? what we want to know is how it changes her. it doesn't change her at ALL.

how can a book with no antagonist be so highly acclaimed?
Mary Beth
The biggest flaw I found in this book was the lack of backstory on several main characters. At times, I felt as if I had stumbled into the middle of the narrative. I realized, two-thirds through, that "Magnificence" was written as the concluding book in a three book "cycle." Having not read the first two books, I'm not sure now I would go back to read them, since this book was very conclusive. Also, honestly, I'm afraid they would not be as good.
I loved this book, although some may find it murky
...more
Joy
I previously read Ghost Lights, which I understand is part of a trilogy that Magnificence completes. I did not read the first book. I liked Ghost Lights, and in my review I mentioned wanting to read more from Lydia Millet. But this continuation of the story was not as good as the previous novel. I started off liking it, but about half-way through it, I began losing interest. When Susan Lindley inherits a large mansion with a vast collection of taxidermy, I appreciated how this could change the c ...more
Carrieg
This is part of a trilogy! I'm excited, 'cause I loved this. Very restrained writing. In that sense, it reminded me of Olive Kitteridge although the character, place, and story were completely different. I'm surprised the ratings aren't higher.
Walt
First, I did not realize that this was the third book in a trilogy. That goes a long way toward explaining the background that is missing here.
Second, another reviewer characterized it as inert. I'd agree; there is way too much of Susan's rambling internal thoughts that go nowhere. Things do happen but the author's style puts everything at a distance so it seems to just mosey along.
Third, taxidermy is not one of my favorite topics and there is much too much talk of the great-uncle's house filled
...more
Jill Polsby
I think I'm too old for inanity. She is a highly recommended author, Pulitzer prize nominee. This book was stupid. A woman who sleeps with everyone she meets including the bag checker at the market. Story of cheating on your husband. He is killed in weird convoluted part of plot, she inherits huge mansion in pasadena with gazillions of stuffed animals on the walls. She immediately takes up with the lawyer. Not even worthy of calling it a beach book. I know it was the third in a series, but what ...more
Loren
Why such a low rating? Susan the main character really irked me throughout 95% of the book. I found her a wee bit better towards page 232 and then came the ending and I disliked her once again! I would enjoy a conversation with a reader that really liked the book and found Susan Lindley likeable. There was one passage within the book that I really loved and could relate to but even that was not enough for me to recommend this book or rate it higher, :(

I won't even begin to share my thoughts and
...more
Gerri Leen
This book was on every "Best of" list I ran across. It got great reviews. I still bought it with reservations given the synopsis. After 26 pages with this main character, all I can say is "Blech." I'm not one to totally hate an antihero, but this woman was beyond morally bankrupt. The idea of taking a ride for a whole novel with her was just too much. Ugh. Add to that the overly self aware wordsmithing that often had me rolling me eyes as it yelled "See, I was nominated for a Pulitzer once" and ...more
Carmine
I saw no indications that this novel was part of a trilogy until I came back to Goodreads and browsed a couple of reviews...I tend to skip the jacket copy because often it gives away too much. On the other hand, single books in trilogies should be able to stand alone, and this one didn't. In any case, it's difficult to imagine how this book could have been a satisfying conclusion to a longer story.

I liked how the book began, with the protagonist's snarky/sad observations about men, her marriage
...more
MaryJo
My colleague Trudy Lewis invited Lydia Millet to campus for a reading last spring, and Millet read from this book,the third novel in a trilogy that includes Ghost Lights and How the Dead Dream. I was immediately entranced. Millet has a day job working for the Center for Biological Diversity and ecological themes pervade her work. She has an acerbic style, and her depictions of gender relations can be painfully humorous, yet at the same time there is a certain generosity of spirit. (The opening o ...more
Nancy
The book's beautiful cover image reflects the story; it goes round and round without substance. Large events swirl around the emotionally vacant main character, about whom there is nothing heroic or admirable. Her egotism and uncanny capacity for destructive behavior appear infinite. Magnificence projects her thin character onto a series of fantastic plot events, endlessly illustrating that she is, yes truly, that shallow.
A Wheeler
This series of novels is amazing. I got a sneak peek at 'Magnificence' and it's the perfect literary triptych. Millet wraps the story of grief in a comfort of wit. While the characters in each book ('How the Dead Dream' and 'Ghostlights') navigate the bizarre behaviors that come from profound loss and death, the meta-narrative of humanity's abandonment of the natural world becomes more about the grief that connects us all.
Julianne
Listened to the recorded version in the car on the way to/from holiday travel. "Susan" has a crazy family but they were a rest compared to my own. Thought the book was grand, was glad it didn't descend into a plot-driven, solution-oriented package. I loved all the animals, regardless of species.
Amanda
I really enjoyed this book, but like many was unaware it was the third of a trilogy!

It was disappointing to learn I'd read it out of order, but at the same time I was also happy because I finished the book wishing there could be more from these characters.

I agree with many reviews that the characters lives were not totally in depth. But I do think there was real depth inside Susan's head and emotions. It was less about the actual plot and more about the emotional development of Susan.

I wasn't t
...more
Mary
The best part of this book is the cover picture of fish. As a finalist for the Pulitzer prize, very disapointing. Apparently the Pulitzer is about as worthless as the Nobel Peace Prize today.
Chris
3.5 Stars. This novel is about as pointless as you can get. Susan has her life shaken up and takes stock of her emotional state while simultaneously navigating a series of increasingly ridiculous metaphors for these internal questions. It's clever, but strained. We never step out of Susan's perspective and we're strapped in for all of her doubts, digressions and other stream-of-conscious artifacts. She's not even a particularly interesting character, but it was just novel enough to keep me hooke ...more
Marco Kaye
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Pauline
This book features one of the more interesting female characters I've read. Susan is certainly not totally likable, in fact is pretty annoying at times as she deals with her guilt around her husband's death (yes, it's part of her grieving process and I should be more sympathetic, so sue me).

But part of what I enjoyed about this book was what an odd series of circumstances she finds herself in and how she deals with obstacles. This book spends a lot of time in her mind as she mulls things over, m
...more
Lynn Pribus
Lovely little book, beautifully written. I was a bit put off by the self-described "sluttery" of the main character, Susan, early in the book. She learns she is a widow early in the book, views herself as the murderer, and inherits a strange large mansion populated by a huge cast of taxidermied specimans from armadillos to lions and birds.

Her daughter, previously rendered paraplegic in an auto accident, is an important character, although her paraplegia is simply her condition, not a major point
...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 72 73 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Shop Talk: A Writer and His Colleagues and Their Work
  • The Search for Heinrich Schlögel: A Novel
  • Wheat that Springeth Green
  • The Silence and the Roar
  • Interstate: A Novel
  • Traveling Sprinkler
  • American Appetites
  • In the Night of Time
  • Kind One
  • Karaoke Culture
  • The Event of Literature
  • Assumption
  • Jamesland
  • Reinventing Bach
  • Battleborn
  • New World Monkeys: A Novel
  • Hikikomori and the Rental Sister: A Novel
  • By Blood
8523
Lydia Millet is the author of twelve previous books of fiction. Her novel Ghost Lights was a New York Times Notable Book; its sequel Magnificence was a finalist for the National Book Critics Circle and Los Angeles Times Awards in fiction; and her story collectionLove in Infant Monkeys was a Pulitzer Prize finalist. She lives outside Tucson, Arizona. ...more
More about Lydia Millet...

Other Books in the Series

Trilogy (3 books)
  • How the Dead Dream
  • Ghost Lights: A Novel
Mermaids in Paradise How the Dead Dream Love in Infant Monkeys Oh Pure and Radiant Heart Ghost Lights: A Novel

Share This Book

“Oh how the world reflected you in its unending streams of atoms, churning atoms out of which significance beamed--significance, but not purpose.” 2 likes
More quotes…