Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security” as Want to Read:
Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security

3.88 of 5 stars 3.88  ·  rating details  ·  72 ratings  ·  8 reviews
"If you've got nothing to hide," many people say, "you shouldn't worry about government surveillance." Others argue that we must sacrifice privacy for security. But as Daniel J. Solove argues in this important book, these arguments and many others are flawed. They are based on mistaken views about what it means to protect privacy and the costs and benefits of doing so. The ...more
Paperback, 246 pages
Published January 2011 by Yale University Press
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Nothing to Hide, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Nothing to Hide

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 289)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Roger Schmit
This book easy to read and understand, it was written for the general audiences enjoyment. Nonfiction and done well. It’s based a lot on the laws in the 1st and 4th amendments that protect, or should protect our rights to privacy and security of those rights. The misconceptions that most people including law enforcement and Government tend to have about those laws. He gives details to all the different forms of communication to include regular mail in an envelope to the newest technological ele ...more
John Carter McKnight
Solove is one of the best scholars of American privacy law, and does a great public service in writing for a broad range of audiences, from practitioner to scholar to citizen.

Nothing To Hide is a good overview of arguments for privacy protections against the national security state, and for some audiences it's probably a wonderful book.

It reads like it's written at the 5th grade level, however, and the very simple sentences grate horribly after a while. I found the book generally too basic to b
Solove offers a balanced discussion of the supposed conflicts between security and privacy. A theme running throughout is a dismantling of the notions that privacy = secrecy and that privacy is of only personal and not societal interest. The latter argument has been used by the government, and often affirmed by the courts, as a means of denying standing to those who would sue to force changes in government surveillance of citizens.

Though Solove mentions some of the abuses of the state secrets cl
This book clearly and concisely describes the arguments surrounding privacy versus security, and effectively makes the case that the United States should not, nor does it need to, abandon its values to be secure. His arguments are the perfect shield against the onslaught of all-or-nothing thinking about security or privacy. I highly recommend this book.
It was immensely refreshing to read an argumentative non-fiction book. I don't remember the last time I did that--or did I ever? Anyway, I read picked this up because it was a winter reading requirement for one of my courses, and I'm surprised how interesting it was. Normally I'm not very keen on the whole privacy and security debate, but Solove's writing was so concise, engaging, and full of insight that I didn't find this book much of a chore. Since the course that I'll be taking will revolve ...more
Alex Reinhart
Solove raises many interesting points about privacy and the need for oversight of government surveillance and subpoena powers, but fails to discuss the issues in any great depth. Opposing views are given a paragraph or two of explanation and then rebutted with one or two more, rather than being analyzed in any detail.

It seems like Solove intended for this book to be read by a much wider audience than his usual writings (such as law review articles) and hence simplified the writing and omitted de
Solove provides an engaging, superficial overview of some of the main arguments in the contemporary privacy vs. security debate. He shows how the 4th Amendment provides scant privacy protection, and argues that the 1st Amendment should become part of criminal procedure to help restore a healthier balance between privacy and security.

The initial chapters highlight what Solove sees as the flawed primary arguments in the privacy vs. security debate. This section is somewhat unsatisfying, all the m
James Hanson
Very topical book in light of recent headlines. Solove is technically excellent but slightly awkward in writing style. I highly recommend this book to anyone who is frustrated by recent events, but not sure about the context of possible alternatives.
Katie marked it as to-read
Nov 24, 2015
Raymond marked it as to-read
Nov 07, 2015
Fialhocomp marked it as to-read
Nov 02, 2015
Catherine marked it as to-read
Oct 31, 2015
Nicole Westen
Nicole Westen marked it as to-read
Oct 28, 2015
James "
James " marked it as to-read
Oct 06, 2015
Harsimar Dhanoa
Harsimar Dhanoa marked it as to-read
Oct 07, 2015
Agam Dua
Agam Dua is currently reading it
Sep 20, 2015
Loretta Gaffney
Loretta Gaffney marked it as to-read
Sep 15, 2015
Þróndr marked it as to-read
Sep 13, 2015
Angela marked it as to-read
Sep 08, 2015
Denis Lessard
Denis Lessard marked it as to-read
Aug 22, 2015
Mary marked it as to-read
Jul 25, 2015
Curtiss W.
Curtiss W. marked it as to-read
Jul 17, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Vaclav Havel: Or Living in Truth
  • The Pyrotechnic Insanitarium: American Culture on the Brink
  • Television: Technology and Cultural Form
  • Democracy for the Few
  • The Watchman's Rattle: A New Way to Understand Complexity, Collapse, and Correction
  • The End of Lawyers?: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services
  • The Cult of Information: A Neo-Luddite Treatise on High-Tech, Artificial Intelligence, and the True Art of Thinking
  • Antipatterns: Refactoring Software, Architectures, and Projects in Crisis
  • AMERICA THE VULNERABLE: Inside the New Threat Matrix of Digital Espionage, Crime, and Warfare
  • Code: Version 2.0
  • REST in Practice: Hypermedia and Systems Architecture
  • Visual Language for Designers: Principles for Creating Graphics that People Understand
  • Unlearning Liberty: Campus Censorship and the End of American Debate
  • The Predator State: How Conservatives Abandoned the Free Market and Why Liberals Should Too
  • Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism
  • IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results
  • Managing at the Speed of Change: How Resilient Managers Succeed and Prosper Where Others Fail
  • Top Muscle: The Rarest Cars from America's Fastest Decade

Share This Book

“Martin Luther King, Jr., whom Hoover had under extensive surveillance. FBI recordings revealed that King was having extramarital affairs, and the FBI sent copies of the recordings to King and his wife, threatening that if King failed to commit suicide by a certain date, the recordings would be released publicly.” 0 likes
More quotes…