Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Free Will” as Want to Read:
Free Will
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Free Will

3.81  ·  Rating Details ·  14,642 Ratings  ·  997 Reviews
A BELIEF IN FREE WILL touches nearly everything that human beings value. It is difficult to think about law, politics, religion, public policy, intimate relationships, morality—as well as feelings of remorse or personal achievement—without first imagining that every person is the true source of his or her thoughts and actions. And yet the facts tell us that free will is an ...more
ebook, 69 pages
Published March 6th 2012 by Free Press (first published January 1st 2012)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Free Will, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

This question contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Gary Free will is a perception of self-motivating force where that force is a separate entity unto itself (i.e.: not having integral interactions that act…moreFree will is a perception of self-motivating force where that force is a separate entity unto itself (i.e.: not having integral interactions that act on it and so are independent of those interactions.)

In other words: Free will is the perception of a self-motivating force with regard to our mental life; i.e.: that we (the free will of self) instruct and put into action all of the other components of our being - physiology, behavior, continued thought, etc. (less)

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Apr 19, 2013 Stephanie rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science, brain, 2012
I am an agnostic which means I am firm in my belief that I have no idea what to believe. I don't know what is true and what isn't and no one, no matter how strong your faith, or how strong your lack of faith don't know either. You don't know what happens to you after you die. You pretty much have to die to find that out. You may really, really, really believe little alien souls are attached to your body and making your life miserable, and that the only way to make it all better is to ...more
Paquita Maria Sanchez
Oct 17, 2014 Paquita Maria Sanchez rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: truthiness

I am a stubborn girl, and there are some things I cling to like rope-ladders keeping me from falling into Freddy Krueger's soul swamp, such as possessing some degree of control over my own fate and figuring myself out in a manageable way, but this...this has challenged my perceptions of everything I am, believe, and compulsively stand by in a way which I have not been crossed in I don't even know how long. I don't bend easily, but Harris's argument is a water and light-tight kick in the dic
Apr 08, 2012 Trevor rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Trevor by: George
It has been one of those odd times when I seem to be getting tripped over by the same sorts of ideas over and over again. I can't for the life of me tell you why I thought it was a good idea recently to read Freud's Interpretation of Dreams -like the proverbial mountain, it was just there. Then I was tossing up what to read next and there was this other book on the brain called Incognito and that was more or less on similar ground although, obviously quite updated. Both, though, stressed the fac ...more
Riku Sayuj
Dec 30, 2012 Riku Sayuj rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Tanuj Solanki
Shelves: r-r-rs, pop-religion

On Free Will & Crime: How should society react to violent crime?

Glancing at the cover might have been more than enough to guess the full contents of this one...

Harris is right to an extent, but as many have already done, his argument is too easy to poke holes in. This is primarily because the argument depends on the definition/boundary that he imposes on it. It makes for a good argument in a monologue but will fall apart in a dialogue.

This is not to say that there is no merit in what he con
Jacob J.
Mar 29, 2015 Jacob J. rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Nietzsche is said to have said that he wished to say more in a couple lines than most philosophers could say in an entire book. The scheme may very well have been met by the great 19th century thinker, as each sentence could be dissected and interpreted in such ways that they beget numerous debates and discussions still. Sam Harris has expressed no such ambition, but if there is a modern philosopher/scientist to whom such a description could be accredited, it would be him (although he may be les ...more
Ben Zajdel
Apr 24, 2012 Ben Zajdel rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
I give this book a one star review not because I disagree with Harris' premise, but because of his faulty logic and irresponsible research.

My major point of contention is that Harris claims that in the future we will have brain scanning technology that can show us that our brain "decides" to do something many, many seconds ahead of our actual decision. I'll ignore the fact that our subconscious is just as much a part of our being as our conciousness, and just point out that one cannot claim to k
Amira Mahmoud
من قرأ في علم الكلام لابد أنه تعرض كثيرًا لحرية الإرادة كأحد أهم القضايا التي تناقشها الفرق
ما بين المعتزلة وإيمانهم بحرية الإنسان ومسئوليته عن تصرفاته وسلوكه
ومن ثم استحقاقه للثواب والعقاب سواء دنيوي أو أُخرويّ
وما بين الأشاعرة ونظرية الكسب لديهم، التي لا تستطيع فهم اتجاهها وإلى أيهما أقرب
لحرية الإرادة ومسئولية الإنسان أم للجبر
وما بين الجبرية، ونفيهم لقدرة الإنسان على الفعل
حين كنت اقرأ رأي الجبرية كنت أشعر بالسخف
وأن الفكرة لا تستحق حتى بذل جهد لتفنيدها أو حتى محاولة التفكير فيها
لكن إذا كان للكتاب
Ahmad  Ebaid
Jun 26, 2016 Ahmad Ebaid rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: فلسفة, علوم
"إن أفكاره الأنيقة دائما ما تستفزنا"

حيققة أني مارست الإنكار في بداية قراءتي للكتاب ,
لم أكن أقدر حينها على احتمال صدمة أنني لست ما أعتقده, أنني لا أمتلك تلك الإرادة الحرة التي أُعملها في الأشياء,

ولكن مع تتابع الصفحات, وعندما اقتربت من منتصف الكتاب تقريبا بدأت أميل لفكرته,

ولما لا أميل لها؟!

ألم أقل دوما بأن الجاني لابد وأنه كان مضطرا نوعا ما لارتكابه ما نعتقده نحن شرا, لابد أن هناك ما أوصله لهذا!!

أليس ما قاله سام هاريس في هذا الكتاب هو بلورة لتلك الجملة السابقة!!

نحن لا نمتلك الإرادة الحرة, وليس
Mar 06, 2012 Joel rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I like padding my reading challenge with ridiculously short books.
"You are not controlling the storm, and you are not lost in it. You are the storm." - Sam Harris

"It’s true that human persons don’t have contra-causal free will. We are not self-caused little gods. But we are just as real as the genetic and environmental processes which created us and the situations in which we make choices. The deliberative machinery supporting effective action is just as real and causally effective as any other process in nature. So we don’t have to talk as if we are real agen
Sara Alaee
This essay is a brief treatise on what author, Sam Harris, calls the “illusion of free will”. In his typical “Harris” fashion, he demonstrates that the popular conception of free will as that which allows us to “do what we want to do without any outer or inner compulsions” is in fact a confusion. We, humans, are no more than the product of our genes and our past life experiences - both of which we can’t exert much influence upon. In a more scientific term, it’s our “neurons” that determine our t ...more
May 20, 2015 Caroline rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Sam Harris’s book is essay length, and a wonderfully easy read, considering it presents some revolutionary ideas. The overriding one being his questioning of free will.

He tells us that various scientific experiments have shown beyond doubt that we reach decisions in our brains unconsciously - before we reach decisions consciously via the sense of “I think” that we know so well. These unconscious decisions are shaped by our genetics, our upbringing, our physiology, our culture, our current situat
Jun 14, 2012 Maaz rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: atheism, science

So, Sam Harris an atheist and a neuroscientist

He begins his book by telling a shocking story of how some burglars robbed, child-abused, raped, tortured and set a family's house on fire and killing them apart from the father who survived.
He then says that one of them had shown signs of remorse and attempted suicide a couple of times, and the other had repeatedly been raped as a child, and both of these men had been suffering from brain tumors.

He concludes that if any one of us had been in their
Chad Kettner
Aug 24, 2012 Chad Kettner rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: religion, philosophy
The only issue I can see people having would be based on semantics over the term "free will" - but as for the actual arguments, Harris seems to be spot-on.

However, I'd love to hear Sam Harris discuss what he thinks would be a better option. As in... how could free will be done better? Would we get to select our brains? Would we get to choose our body? Our gender? And what would make us choose one brain, body, or gender over the other? It seems the decision would still be caused by something beyo
Douglas Wilson
Harris is a smart guy, and an engaging writer. But he is just plain lost. He is not only lost in the sense of not having Jesus, but also lost in the sense that he cannot make his way out of the thicket of his own premises. He simply cannot see how what he is saying applies to what he is saying.
Aug 20, 2012 Sally rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: philosophy
Whether there is free will or not is an open question, but this book throws very little light on the subject. Full of assertions and absolutist thinking, it sets up the problem and the definition of terms in such a way that "no free will" is necessarily the conclusion. If free will means that the conscious mind (the everyday ego or the "monkey mind" of the Buddhists) has to have full awareness, control, and origination of all impulses, thoughts, and desires down to their very furthest roots, the ...more
Sep 02, 2012 Vanessa rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Man can do what he will but he cannot will what he wills. -- Schopenhauer

The theme of the book is disconcerting at best: Dr. Harris if not completely refutes the notion of free will in this little book of his, does certainly raise a serious contradiction to the longtime conviction that we are the authors of our thoughts. In the very first beginning of the book this theme got dramatically and horrifyingly accentuated when the author suggests, if he were to trade places with Komisarijevsky (one
Mar 07, 2012 Sky rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: favorites
As the second of Harris' "singles" books, I am really enjoying the format for certain works. His first single 'Lying' succinctly presented his thesis and described it clearly and quickly- this book is no different. In covering the topic of the illusion of free will Harris maps the conventional theories of determinism, compatibilism, and libertarianism while contrasting and explaining his case. Clearly written, logical, and very understandable- this book, like 'Lying' is a great introduction to H ...more
Brian Jo
Nov 27, 2012 Brian Jo rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
The author definitely sheds some light on aspects of free will that I never really considered. It is a powerful message that he is trying to convey with the limitations of the length of this book. At times I found myself nodding my head and agreeing with the author, but ultimately, I could not convince myself of his views on free will. His arguments start out very promising, but then falter and lose momentum as he tends to digress with meager examples and statements. I finished the book feeling ...more
Apr 09, 2012 Paul rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
I was looking for something to challenge my belief in free will. This book did nothing of the sort and if it had been any longer (it was only about 90 pages) it would have been a waste of time. It is anglo-american school analytic philosophy in all it's reductionist absurdity. The science is tenuous and almost non-existent, resting on the wafer-thin logic that our neurons determine our actions before we're conscious of them so that means our neurons are running the show. (all hail the neurons) W ...more
Kathleen Brugger
This is a booklet, not a book. I have been pondering the problem of free will for twenty years, it is a central part of the book I am just about to publish, so I was very interested to see what Mr. Harris had to say. I was extremely disappointed.

I was shocked by the shallowness of his arguments. The scientific evidence he draws on are experiments that I read about 15 years ago; I can’t understand why he doesn’t include the copious evidence against free will that neuroscience has amassed in the l
Apr 20, 2012 Lena rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In this brief book, Sam Harris makes the argument that the sense of free will that many of us inherently feel is an illusion. He explains that science has clearly demonstrated that decisions we think "we" have made were actually measurable in the brain some moments before we were consciously aware of them. He elaborates on our lack of free will by pointing out that we can take no responsibility for the circumstances and genetics that were bestowed upon us at birth, nor do we have total control o ...more
جوزيف الزيود
الكتاب لازم ينقرأ اكثر من مرة
Dec 18, 2012 Fil rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: philosophy
I was worried this would change my mind on free will, it didn't. The author does not make a compelling argument. He seems to make a distinction between our brain's neural state and who we are, there is no such distinction. He states Benjamin Libet's experiment, which demonstrates that there is activity in the brain's motor cortex before the subject feels he decided to move, as proof for the non-existence of free will: a flawed experiment with timing issues but, more than that, since the feeling ...more
May 19, 2012 George rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: psychology
In order to demonstrate that free will is an illusion, Sam Harris uses various arguments, some of which had already been published before in his previous book "The Moral Landscape." Some of his arguments seem to me fairly compelling, while others seem so obscure that they could as well be used to demonstrate that free will exists. For example, he says that the fact that we are able to adhere to a diet at some point in our lives but not always shows that "you cannot account for the fact that your ...more
In his book, Free Will, Sam Harris offers an interesting discussion on the merits of free will. According to Harris, our thoughts and thus our behavior results from a complex interaction of genetics, early-life experiences, economic, religious, cultural, social, and political situations present in our lives, as well as all the experiences we've had up to that moment, which include the world acting on us in ways that are often beyond our control. He points out that even conscious choices are limi ...more
Tulpesh Patel
Think of an animal.

Why did you think of that animal and not another? And exactly when did you actually make the decision to go with that animal? You didn’t cycle through all the animals you know and make a conscious choice, it just ‘popped into your head’. That little introspective thought experiment forms part of the basis of Sam Harris’ Free Will, which argues not just that that free will is an illusion, but that as thoughts and intentions simply ‘arise’ in the mind, “the illusion of free wil
Oct 07, 2014 Chris rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: science, philosophy
This essay is an effective exposition about free will and a fairly convincing demonstration that it doesn't exist—although I really would like a similar high-quality view from the other side to put Harris's perspective in balance.

In any case, if there's really no free will I'm not exactly sure how society would or should change as a result. Personally, I'm perfectly happy to live within an illusion of free will and will continue going on acting as I always have. The whole discussion is academic,
May 06, 2012 JK rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
How many times can you say the same thing? How many times can you say the same thing? How many times can you say the same thing? How many times can you say the same thing? How many times can you say the same thing? How many times can you say the same thing? Random firing of synapses in my brain led me to write that question so many times.

And that's this book in a nutshell.

I give it two stars because I agree with Harris' stance on free will to a degree. I feel like there was nothing of real valu
Jun 29, 2012 Mark rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Good book. Didn't realy challenge my perception of things but did 'enhance'(?) them. Basically we can't get mad at other people for how they decide to act, and retribution is folly except for the psycological feeling it inspires. I've always hated when I judge other people even though I do it. The book does talk about pure randomness being possible in the universe, but that it is unrelated to human action. At one point he dismisses pretty quickly a definition of free will that is closer to my vi ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
  • Society Without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment
  • Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon
  • The Good Book: A Humanist Bible
  • Moral Minds: How Nature Designed Our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong
  • The Believing Brain: From Ghosts and Gods to Politics and Conspiracies How We Construct Beliefs and Reinforce Them as Truths
  • Why We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith
  • Sense and Goodness Without God: A Defense of Metaphysical Naturalism
  • The Problem Of The Soul Two Visions Of Mind And How To Reconcile Them
  • Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists
  • 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God
  • A Devil's Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science, and Love
  • The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails
  • The Invention of Christianity
  • A Manual for Creating Atheists
  • Why Are You Atheists So Angry? 99 Things That Piss Off the Godless
  • Conversations on Consciousness: What the Best Minds Think about the Brain, Free Will, and What It Means to Be Human
  • God and the Folly of Faith: The Incompatibility of Science and Religion
  • God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question - Why We Suffer
Sam Harris (born 1967) is an American non-fiction writer, philosopher and neuroscientist. He is the author of The End of Faith: Religion, Terror and the Future of Reason (2004), which won the 2005 PEN/Martha Albrand Award, and Letter to a Christian Nation (2006), a rejoinder to the criticism his first book attracted. His new book, The Moral Landscape, explores how science might determine human val ...more
More about Sam Harris...

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

“You are not controlling the storm, and you are not lost in it. You are the storm.” 53 likes
“A puppet is free as long as he loves his strings.” 51 likes
More quotes…