Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Second Nuclear Age: Strategy, Danger, and the New Power Politics” as Want to Read:
The Second Nuclear Age: Strategy, Danger, and the New Power Politics
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Second Nuclear Age: Strategy, Danger, and the New Power Politics

3.84 of 5 stars 3.84  ·  rating details  ·  79 ratings  ·  22 reviews
A leading international security strategist offers a compelling new way to "think about the unthinkable."

The cold war ended more than two decades ago, and with its end came a reduction in the threat of nuclear weapons—a luxury that we can no longer indulge. It’s not just the threat of Iran getting the bomb or North Korea doing something rash; the whole complexion of global
Hardcover, 320 pages
Published November 13th 2012 by Times Books
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Second Nuclear Age, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Second Nuclear Age

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 302)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Peter Mcloughlin
this book is a scary book. It looks at a gap in our military outlook. The cold war is now looked at as deviation from rationality with huge nuclear arsenal. This view is taken on the cold war because people only remember the deterence aspect of nuclear policy. Nuclear weapons are sought after by states for many reasons besides simple deterence. The possesion of a nuclear arsenal not only deters against invasion but also gives a country offensive capability. A country can act more agressively aga ...more
The central thesis of this book is that we need a new nuclear policy for a different, multipolar nuclear world. It's very true. Most anything you read about the status of our nuclear forces today is not heartening.

Though it isn't the central thesis, the critical argument that makes this thesis ring true is the fact that nuclear weapons have a use, even if you don't fire them. Bracken illustrates several scenarios, results of war games, and historical precedents where the mere presence of nuclea
Everything you think you know is mostly wrong. Nuclear weapons still matter to everyone else, if not the United States. Bracken gives an excellent explanation why.
This book is a splash of cold water to the face for those of us raised in the Cold War. While we in the United States have lost our focus on the geopolitical implications of nuclear weapons in the post-Cold War world, the rest of the world hasn't, with Pakistan, North Korea and India starting or expanding nuclear programs and Iran poised to join the nuclear club. This book is a welcome reminder that nuclear strategy is still immensely important and that we have taken a 20 year holiday from think ...more
Steve Smits
Professor Bracken brings needed attention to the nuclear issues and dangers facing the world in the post-Cold War era. He demonstrates that our current policy on nuclear arms, while focusing on the important matter of non-proliferation, significantly neglects to strategically analyze and respond to the reality that nuclear weapons exist (and won't go away) in the Middle East, South Asia and East Asia. The presence of nuclear weapons in countries like Israel, India, Pakistan, North Korea -- and l ...more
Heather Marie
I agreed with his conclusions about needing to change our thinking about nuclear policy, and the shift in regional dynamics, but I also wholeheartedly disagree with much of his evidence. He makes the US out to be much more apathetic toward nuclear weapons than it actually is, and I feel that he plays down the importance of first strike capabilities, the US' arsenal, and the nuclear taboo to make his point. It is more of a 3.5 for me, but since I do agree with his ends, I gave him the benefit.
Lee Spitzer
Paul Bracken from Yale University urges us to think more systematically and creatively about the role nuclear weapons are playing in the twenty-first century, which he characterizes as being part of the second nuclear age.

Stylistically, the book is non-technical and quite readable, but he repeats himself too often; a good editor could have shortened his argument by several dozen pages. The charts are almost insulting in their simplicity; were they taken from poorly designed powerpoint presentati
Raj Agrawal
This is a good overview of how nuclear weapons play a role in a multipolar international system. The scenarios presented are plausible, and the courses of action are good starting points for discussion.

While non-state actors are largely ignored, this book provides a thoughtful primer for modern nuclear strategy.
John Schneider
When I picked this book up, I expected a dry but insightful look at nuclear strategy for the 21st century. "The Second Nuclear Age" was far more interesting and much more engaging than I expected; it was also quite succinct in its analysis which enabled it to cover a great deal of ground without repetition. If you are looking for an exhaustive analysis of nuclear strategy and every scenario imaginable, look elsewhere. If you are looking for a book that introduces you to a new way of thinking up ...more
Jul 12, 2014 Sherri rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: everyone!
For those of us who grew up with the cold war, this is a must-read to understand the changed landscape of nuclear weapons and war. MAD may be more unlikely, but maddening behavior by young nuclear states is happening more than we think. For those who are too young to remember the cold war, it's a primer to nuclear war, weapons, tactics and strategy for the current nuclear age. Nuclear weapons are very much alive and spreading. The major powers need strong new policies, strategy and tactics that ...more
Raj Agrawal
Good Westphalian-perspective primer on modern nuclear strategy

This is a good overview of how nuclear weapons play a role in a multipolar international system. The scenarios presented are plausible, and the courses of action are good starting points for discussion.

While non-state actors are largely ignored, this book provides a thoughtful primer for modern nuclear strategy.
Thank you for my First Reads copy!
The two stars are for writing quality. I suppose the author was aiming to make this an easy read for a general audience, but what he achieved was immature writing. I couldn't get past it because it affected the tone of the book, which should have been urgent and frightening.
Dave Leaumont
Good comprehensive discussion on the topic of nuclear strategy and how 21st century thought has changed that of the Cold War. The world has grown increasingly more complex and dangerous since that time and there are many nuclear hurdles to overcome to continue 67 years of peace from major wars.
After twenty years of *not* thinking about deterrence, mutual-assured destruction and the rest, Bracken makes me rethink nuclear weapons. His opinions about war, peace, and international diplomacy are ruthless but stunning. Excellent read, with provocative conclusions.
Jim Powell
A sobering book on the dynamics of the multipolar, post-Cold War nuclear world. Bracken makes a strong case for thinking through the relatively unexplored issues of how nuclear powers--large or small--might use these weapons in pursuit of their interests.
Louis C Smith
Bracken shows that the US nuclear policy is stuck in the 1960 Cold War. The 2nd nuclear age is here and the US is facing the wrong direction. A must read if you expect to be around more than 10 years.
Craig Fiebig
We treat the use of nuclear weapons in a simplistic, ignorant manner and pretend the lessons of the Cold War are applicable in the multi polar world at our peril.
Mar 30, 2014 C. added it
Shelves: ir, nukes
when asked why France needed an independent nuclear deterrent, de Gaulle famously shot back, "so we get incurred to arms control conferences."
Mary Storm
Worth reading. At times repetitive and pedantic, but also discusses the post-Cold War issues of nuclear proliferation about which we should all know.
Randi Buros
Not an exhaustive treatment, but an excellent discussion on the more subtle uses (and non-uses) of national military power.
interesting; makes a wide range of good arguments a little too oppositionally
Apr 03, 2013 PWRL marked it as to-read
Shelves: 2013-new
Michaël Yan
Michaël Yan is currently reading it
Nov 22, 2015
Odnoo marked it as to-read
Nov 18, 2015
Chase McCool
Chase McCool marked it as to-read
Nov 13, 2015
Ali Ismail
Ali Ismail marked it as to-read
Oct 28, 2015
Ujjual marked it as to-read
Oct 20, 2015
Budd Margolis
Budd Margolis marked it as to-read
Oct 15, 2015
Lana Perić
Lana Perić marked it as to-read
Oct 06, 2015
Dan Zak
Dan Zak is currently reading it
Sep 28, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic of Iran
  • Confront and Conceal: Obama's Secret Wars and Surprising Use of American Power
  • Terror and Consent : The Wars for the Twenty-First Century
  • After Victory: Order and Power in International Politics
  • Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis
  • The Great Convergence: Asia, the West, and the Logic of One World
  • Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry
  • The Pentagon's New Map
  • The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realist S View of Democracy in America
  • The Dictator's Learning Curve: Inside the Global Battle for Democracy
  • Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics
  • On Saudi Arabia: Its People, Past, Religion, Fault Lines - and Future
  • Counterstrike
  • Spy Wars: Moles, Mysteries, and Deadly Games
  • The Twilight of the Bombs: Recent Challenges, New Dangers, and the Prospects for a World Without Nuclear Weapons
  • Understanding Global Conflict and Cooperation: An Introduction to Theory and History (Plus Mysearchlab with Etext -- Access Card Package)
  • Power and Interdependence
  • The Unmaking of Israel

Share This Book