Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse” as Want to Read:
God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse

3.77 of 5 stars 3.77  ·  rating details  ·  133 ratings  ·  19 reviews
A brilliant dissection and reconstruction of the three major faith-based systems of belief in the world today, from one of the world's most articulate intellectuals, Slavoj Zizek, in conversation with Croatian philosopher Boris Gunjevic. In six chapters that describe Christianity, Islam, and Judaism in fresh ways using the tools of Hegelian and Lacanian analysis, God in Pa ...more
ebook
Published April 17th 2012 by Seven Stories Press (first published January 1st 2008)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about God in Pain, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about God in Pain

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 453)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Jonfaith
For the poor, those with no financial or military means, all they have is their discipline, their capacity to act together. This discipline is already a form of organization. - Zizek

The above citation is quoted in God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse. It is quoted from a previous text. It isn't a response or rebuttal. The situation becomes clear, Slavoj Žižek and Boris Gunjevic haven't brought swords, they've come to riff. The text isn't structured as a debate but a call and response of ideas,
...more
Jonathan Malone
Reading involves a great deal of trust. With the first paragraph the reader is trusting that the author is going to offer a narrative, argument, or grand point to make. In other words the reader is trusting that the author is offering a valid and coherent intervention into an ongoing discourse and that the reader is not wasting his or her time to entertain a series of ramblings. A book of two authors increases that level of trust.

This book required a great deal of trust for a reader such as myse
...more
David Sarkies
May 14, 2015 David Sarkies rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Christians
Recommended to David by: Some Guy on Goodreads
Shelves: christian
The Post-modern God
08 October 2013

One day while I was on Goodreads I noticed that one of my Goodread's friends had finished reading this book and the title instantly caught me. Being a Christian a book with the title 'God in Pain' was going to attract my attention, and not only that, but it also introduced me to a new author, Slavoj Zizek, that I had never heard of before. Having had a diet of Chomsky and other authors, and finding that they tend to repeat themselves after a while, I became int
...more
Nathan "N.R." Gaddis
An interesting collection of theological-political essays, an exchange of pieces between Slavoj Zizek and Boris Gunjevic. It is most certainly an 'exchange' more so than a debate, but the contours of their differences serve a good deal of interest. More importantly is what they have in common -- an interest in marshaling the reserves of potential within the core of Christian thought for a renewed emancipatory politics. This is recommended for both theists and atheists alike. Seasoned readers of ...more
James
Mind = blown. This book contains essays by Zizek, who goes from crazy high philosophy to Johnny Cash lyrics in the space of a page, using theology to enhance the materialist perspective, while Gunjevic uses the materialist perspective to enhance theology. There are so many brilliant insights in this book, many of them Hegelian reversals. Atheists as true Christians and Christians as true atheists... how did he do that? There's some heady stuff in here, to be sure, but it's an intellectual feast ...more
Mark
I was watching an interview Zizek gave in Croatian a couple weekends ago and a couple of things struck me as interesting.

First, that he was speaking in a very academic and high-level, dare I say it, Serbo-Croatian that I understood more completely than almost any discussion I've ever had with more than a few of my relatives. His reference to pop culture was occasional and sparse. It was here a colorful element of the discussion rather than the meat and bones of it, and seemed in this way more no
...more
Wilson Garrett
Brilliant, just as I expected from Zizek. Gunjevic also had some great things to say, especially the anticapitalist reading of Augustine's City of God. Though ultimately in the back and forth of dialogue I found myself more compelled by Zizek's theses, such as his comparisons of Christianity to Islam, as well as the theodicy of a suffering God being the only one who can save us. I close very few books excited to re-read them, and this was definitely one of them.
Lazarus
Allow me a moment of Philistinism while I begin my review of this highly theoretical work with a superficial observation: the cover design is very amusing. It purports to give us "95 reasons" why God in Pain: Inversions of Apocalypse is an interesting book, while allowing us to see five of them; each one referencing real arguments from the two authors. The "95 reasons" reference is clearly an allusion to the "95 theses" which Luther nailed to the church door in Wittenberg, marking the beginnings ...more
Scott
This is a book about the missing great narrative. Sound familiar? It should be because it is the story of our times.

The book is structured by chapters (which are only seemingly disorganized sunjects) which are divided between Zizek and Gunjevik each having their own chapter one after the other. Zizek begins the book in the first chapter. Then Gunjevik gets the second on and on and on all the way to the end. This creates the feeling of a hopeful synthesis about to emerge.

Gunjevik would have cer
...more
Benjamin
I bought this for the Zizek stuff and enjoyed it because of the Gunjevic essays. Admittedly, Zizek's chapters weren't too repetitious- perhaps because I haven't read lots of his theological stuff- but the Gunjevic work really introduced me to a whole other way of approaching theology from a much more political angle.
Javier de la Peña Ontanaya
Interesante, aunque sólo recomendado para verdaderos amantes de la filosofía.
James
If there is one interesting this exchange between Žižek and Gunjević does it recasts the structure of religion as a fundamental way to fracture the ideological constraints of today, sans a guarantee of a beyond by living in serfdom. Especially interesting is that Jesus is recast as a subversive entity in stark contrast to his implementation by the Right Wing as a figurehead of oppression.

Jane
some disjointedness here. I did not see how the articles by Gunjevic matched up with those of Zizek. Many of the Zizek essays seemed recycled, but I really liked with Gunjevic did with Zizek, and he helped me to become a better reader of him. G. has an agenda in his reading, to be sure, but it's a plausible one and a helpful Christian response to the rock star of critical theory.


Caleb
I enjoyed much of it, some of it was to heavy theoretically for me, while other parts seemed relatively too light. It was almost to mixed in content to be enjoyed, but I am convinced of two things by it: (1) Theology is the new site for revolutionary thought, and (2) I could write in this manner, and in this stream of thought
Peter
Žižek Mostly good , at times - utterly brilliant.
Gunjević had interesting ideas at times, clearly clever and well read yet stuck in the idea that the gods are real. His avoidance of nihilism by tadaa God was paradoxically empty at times
Ruth Ellen
My brain hurt, which I love. I like reading that resists a lazy reader (take note recent reviewer of my 3rd book) and appreciate the challenge. It's cold-water-in-the-face reading. Cheers.
Sevan
Awesome book. Only read Zizek's part, didn't really care for the other guy or what he had to say but Zizek as always is brilliant...
Kobe Bryant
Remarkably lucid and very interesting collection of weird thoughts and ideas
Phanidhar Krishna
Phanidhar Krishna marked it as to-read
May 24, 2015
Yuce
Yuce is currently reading it
May 22, 2015
T.R. Wolfe
T.R. Wolfe marked it as to-read
May 18, 2015
Mick
Mick marked it as to-read
May 11, 2015
Dmitri G
Dmitri G marked it as to-read
Apr 30, 2015
Shantanu Singh
Shantanu Singh marked it as to-read
Apr 28, 2015
Marjolein Post
Marjolein Post marked it as to-read
Apr 23, 2015
Jeff Learned
Jeff Learned marked it as to-read
Apr 21, 2015
Judah Martin
Judah Martin marked it as to-read
Apr 20, 2015
Abbey Maynard
Abbey Maynard marked it as to-read
Apr 20, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 16 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza
  • Economy of Desire
  • Nihil Unbound: Naturalism and Anti-Phenomenological Realism
  • The Idolatry of God: Breaking Our Addiction to Certainty and Satisfaction
  • Anatheism: Returning to God After God
  • The Politics of Truth (Foreign Agents)
  • The Silence of Animals: On Progress and Other Modern Myths
  • Infinite Thought
  • The Weakness of God: A Theology of the Event
  • The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism
  • Critique of Religion and Philosophy
  • The Enlightenment: And Why It Still Matters
  • Infancy and History: On the Destruction of Experience
  • Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate
  • Intensive Science & Virtual Philosophy
  • The Making of the Indebted Man: An Essay on the Neoliberal Condition
  • Aesthetics and Politics
2340358
Slavoj Žižek is a Slovene sociologist, philosopher, and cultural critic.

He was born in Ljubljana, Slovenia (then part of SFR Yugoslavia). He received a Doctor of Arts in Philosophy from the University of Ljubljana and studied psychoanalysis at the University of Paris VIII with Jacques-Alain Miller and François Regnault. In 1990 he was a candidate with the party Liberal Democracy of Slovenia for P
...more
More about Slavoj Žižek...
The Sublime Object of Ideology First as Tragedy, Then as Farce Violence Welcome to the Desert of the Real: Five Essays on September 11 and Related Dates Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture

Share This Book

“Someday when we get around to writing a genealogy of our failures, inadequacies, and disappointments, an important place in such a study will be the books we never read, for whatever reason. Aside from the music we never listened to, the movies we never watched, or the old archives and maps we never explored, the books we never read will be one of the indicators of our anachronisms and our flawed humanity.” 3 likes
“[T]aking the Third into account does not bring us into the position of pragmatic consideration, of comparing different Others; the task is rather to learn to distinguish between "false" conflicts and the "true" conflict. For example, today's conflict between Western liberalism and religious fundamentalism is a "false" one, since it is based on the exclusion of the third term which is its "truth": the Leftist emancipatory position.” 2 likes
More quotes…