Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Faktotum” as Want to Read:
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview


3.97 of 5 stars 3.97  ·  rating details  ·  28,619 ratings  ·  842 reviews
One of Charles Bukowski's best, this beer-soaked, deliciously degenerate novel follows the wanderings of aspiring writer Henry Chinaski across World War II-era America. Deferred from military service, Chinaski travels from city to city, moving listlessly from one odd job to another, always needing money but never badly enough to keep a job. His day-to-day existence spirals ...more
Hardcover, 174 pages
Published 1987 by Mladost, Zagreb (first published 1975)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Faktotum, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Faktotum

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Joshua Nomen-Mutatio
I have a sort of pre-emptive dislike-verging-on-loathing of Bukowski, which I think is rooted in my post-adolescent rejection of and disillusionment with the Beat writers (whom I absolutely adored in high school). I’ve never read Bukowski before, but I’ve seen Barfly and Factotum on the screen. I’ve seen two documentaries about him which likewise left me more disgusted and depressed than anything. This is where I’m coming from. There’s also this song that aided in informing me about the man.

Printable Tire
Having read two of Bukowski's books now, I've decided he's for two types of people: psuedo-intelectual masochists that want to slum a little and more genuine people that live very histrionic if arrogant and introverted lives. I can’t get over how conceited Bukowski is, how conceited his books and intentions are, or the way he treats his audience. I guess he’s sort of a modern day Oscar Wilde or Elephant Man, but reading his books gives me the impression that most people that read him think the j ...more
There were times while reading this short novel that I had to stop and wonder if my aspiration to one day be the female Bukowski is either setting my sights too high or placing the bar too low.

And then I up and went to a bar, since I was reading this on the anniversary of the Dirtiest Old Man in Literature's passing and all, so I stopped worrying about pretty much everything. YOU'RE STILL MY BOY, BUK.
Apr 17, 2014 Brian rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Brian by: Ned Mozier

"What kind of job you looking for?"
"Stockboy, shipping clerk, janitor."

The denizens of Bukowski's fictional world encompass the marginalized chaff of mid-20thcentury America. Barely a step ahead of abject vagrancy, Bukowski's protagonist and alter-ego Henry Chinaski is the everyman of the most base of our species comfortable asking the bare minimum of this world.

When you drank the world was still out there, but for the moment it didn't have you by the throat.

Chinaski's story isn't pretty, bu
Bukowski holds a strange attraction for me. I suppose reading his novels and short stories is something like staring at a car crash or returning to the scene of the crime: I just can't help it. There is a primitive, visceral draw. I have yet to read a Bukowski novel that I consider great. Factotum does come close, but its moments of brilliance are weighed down by excessive machismo and male posturing. Still, I can't say I regret reading it, and I know I will read Bukowski again.
P.F. Chang
people like talking shit about charles bukowski on goodreads, it seems funny.

i liked this book a lot. henry chinaski is an asshole but he knows he's an asshole and simply accepts being an asshole. everything seems detached and transient, nothing really matters to him, life is just this "thing that is happening" which he feels powerless to, so he doesn't invest much emotion in the things he feels like he needs to do to stay alive, and drinks to avoid feelings of alienation. i laughed out loud sev
This is the first Bukowski novel I read - I chose it because the movie version was coming out, and I wanted to read the book first.

As a first Bukowski novel, it's a wise choice, because it's a quick read. I blew through it in 2-3 days. It's a very conflicting book, because in some regards it's depressing to see how he lived, what his relationships were like, but on other levels, it's inspiring, because he was so dirt poor and bounced around from job to job, but was able to support himself and hi
5 stelle perché un po’ sono innamorata di Bukowski e poi perché il libro è divertente ed estremamente rilassante. Cioè, leggere di un ubriacone che perde mille lavori uno dietro l’altro in mille diversi modi dovrebbe più o meno farti innervosire in quest’epoca di disoccupazione e crisi. Ma manco per niente. Non so, magari l’effetto è del tutto personale. Però il modo di raccontare che ha quest’uomo è estremamente distensivo, tranquillizzante.

5 stelle anche per ragionamenti simili al seguente:

” L
Michael Oliver
Jan 22, 2008 Michael Oliver rated it 1 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: mine enemies
What a piece of shit. Chuck Buck prides himself as a worthless human filled with anger and bitterness towards all his fellow men. He has no respect for women or anyone else for that matter, and drinks himself into a state of absolute despair just so he can write about his depressive life in order to persuade the rest of the public to feel better about themselves (I assume). Bile. Waste. A foul excuse for contemporary literature- it's more like contemptuous literature. I'm embarrassed his writing ...more
A perpetually unemployed alcoholic. Henry Chinaski drifts through the seedy city streets of lower-class LA in search of a job. Factotum takes place in 1944 and follows the life of Chinaski in his search for a job that will not separate him from his writing. He is consistently rejected by the only publishing house he respects but he is driven by the knowledge that he could do better than the authors they publish.

When they call Charles Bukowski’s Factotum a beer-soaked, deliciously degenerate nove
Reminded of the book and what I've copy-pasted below by a comment a short while ago on this wonderful review: I haven't read this entire thing in probably three years or so, but a short search unveiled my dusty copy in a vile corner of my closet, lying next to an Enid Blyton book I nostalgically bought at a used bookstore once but never read. Reread about 40 pages of Factotum and gave up before I threw up. So what follows is just a comment I posted on th ...more
This is pretty typical Bukowski. As with most of what he wrote its supposed to be loosely based on his real life experiences. If you can get beyond his annoying habit of trying to convince you of how tough he is and exagerrating if not out and out lying about the frequency of his sexual encounters and the quality of the women involved then its a good quick read for a laugh. The best stuff in this is his humorous accounts of working various disposable menial jobs. Bukowski is very funny, a fact w ...more
Working sucks. So does changing jobs all the time. Have a drink. The humor interspersed with the transience and violence is hilarious.
Jonny Gibbings
You know, don't know what the fuss is about. Maybe it is me, maybe it was all the hype, but, I thought it Factotum was crap. For the record, I am no intellectual, I am not of the thinking it has to be hard to read to be good, but, for me, Factotum read like it was written by a 15 year old trying to imagine what a hard drinking womaniser would be like.

There was no depth, flimsy characters that the author paints a vague suggestion of, bouncing form job to job - each is brief but lacking. The tale
Roya Shaban
It was so fast ! but enjoyable read !
this story got no plot to follow . ..
you just go with Henry Chinaski hunting jobs , and meeting new people , drinking , hanging around !
i think my favorite character is Jan , no doubt .. am looking forward to read " Post office " even thought i kinda hated the simple writing style or whatever !

What Catcher in the Rye would have been if Holden grew a set. Excellent narrative that peers into the nature of a directionless young adult who finds sanity at the bottom of a bottle. Bukowski brilliantly penned this tale of a mans personal impotence who drifts aimlessly through a multitude of employment opportunities. He wanders much, cares for little, and drinks all.
Hmmm. So finally I managed to finish reading my first book by Charles Bukowski, and I really don't know what to say. And yet, I'm gonna use this space to say what I want to.

Henry 'Hank' Chinaski (supposedly Bukowski's fictional alter-ego) is an aspiring writer & the protagonist of this novel. His life revolves around three things - women, drink & jobs. And he can't stick to just one either, switching from one to another so fast that it's pointless to keep count.

Bukowski's prose is absolu
My first Bukowski novel... couldn't put it down. I find myself relating so much to Henry Chinaski. His manias, his phobias, his inept attempts at becoming a functioning member of society that lead him to realize he truly wasn't a man meant for this world... I find such comfort in his distressing words.

"The bus ran along a very narrow strip of cement that stood up out of the water with no guard-rail, no nothing; that's all there was to it. The bus driver leaned back and we roared along over this
Mike Lester
Factotum. I must confess I wasn't familiar with the word until I read this book a few years back, but once I knew the meaning, I had to read the book. This may be one of the most honest portrayals of living life under the radar I've ever read. Having worked a variety of jobs myself, often stultifying, never fulfilling, Bukowski's book was a constant reminder of the degree of dignity that must be surrendered in order to survive on a daily basis. If you ever find yourself in a job where you have t ...more
This book confirmed for me that Bukowski only tells the one story. That one story generally takes the form of several of the same stories over again, with different surroundings and characters. This book is about many of the jobs Chinaski works in between drinking, writing, and screwing. Women, on the other hand, is about the many women he screws in between drinking and writing. There may be a greater thread of illumination I am missing, but that's all I have to say about it.

This is not to say
I started reading Factotum (1975) by Charles Bukowski. Then I got a new job, got drunk and then got fired. Then I read the next chapter. Then I got on a train to New Orleans. After that I stopped to read the next chapter and listen to some Mahler. Then went to a bar, got sauced and read the next chapter. After that I went out and got a job at a warehouse. It was good for the first two days and I took a liking to the broad who worked in the office. We got together that night, got some port, had f ...more
I like Bukowski. I do. He tells it like it is. He doesnt try to make his alter ego Chinaksi into a hero. He's an everyday, down on his luck, boosing and one night standing kinda man.

Bukowski makes writing look easy. His stories are effortless. They flow off the page like a conversation. And here I am saying Stories, when.. in actuality this is a novel. Charles writes his novels in a sort of short story form. Each chapter is a story in itself, they can be read on thier own, in no particular orde
Factotum is my first encounter with Charles Bukowski and I really don't know what to say.

I gave this book three stars for two reasons: the honesty and the writing. The whole book is a vicious circle of work, boredom, sex, alcohol, unemployment, sex, alcohol, and again and again. The protagonist, Henry Chinaski (Bukowski's fictional alter-ego), is an uninspired, ambivalent, insipid, unmotivated, degenerate, vapid alcoholic and sees women only as a convenient way to waste time. The book has no plo
I kind of like reading reviews on Charles Bukowski's works. The negative reviews are good, especially the ones that are written after the reader has acknowledged not reading the entire work, but I find the positive ones to be more entertaining because I get a kick out of the awe and reverence and near hero worship toward the man and I feel like if I keep reading long enough I'll eventually stumble upon one calling for beatification. Did I use that word right? I enjoy these positive (booklicker?) ...more
Hannah Eiseman-Renyard
Nasty Drunk

I'd heard multiple times that Bukowski was a shit to women, but a really good writer. OK, I can deal with that. I mean, I wouldn't want to have a drink with the guy but it's not like misogyny's a new one on me. Bring it on: I will read your stuff.

I gave up about halfway through. Not because he was vile to women (he was vile to everyone) but because there was nothing, I mean nothing to engage me.

Sparse writing style is only a boon if you have something good to write about. This has th
“Quando scopriranno che il mondo ha quattro dimensioni invece delle solite tre, si potra’ andare a fare una passeggiata e sparire, niente lacrime, niente funerali, niente illusioni, niente inferni e paradisi…”

Con Bukowski e’ facile lasciarsi ingannare dalle apparenze, inizi leggendo pagine e pagine di oscenita’ abituandoti a quel ritmo, senza aspettarti altro e poi tra le righe, come lampi di luce improvvisi, appaiono riflessioni che sembrano messe li’ a caso, che ti costringono a spogliare il c
I read this because I kept hearing about the movie, which features Matt Dillon in the Chinaski roll, and I wanted to read the book first. To be honest, it's not Bukowski's best, but I guess I can see why they made a movie based on it, because there's lots of sex and a fair dose of violence. It's Chinaski as a young man, beginning during WWII. It starts off being a travelogue, switches to a chronicle of his sexual exploits, and by the end it's more or less a description of all the shitty jobs he ...more
Po Po
Alternately titled: 99 Jobs and Couldn't Keep A Single One.

The story is all over the place. Chinaski (Bukowski) criss-crosses the country, intoxicated the entire time, taking innumerable assorted menial jobs along the way which he always manages to get fired from.

Unlike his other novels, Chinaski is pretty much monogamous here (except for some flings in the first half) with an older woman named "Jan."

This is a decent read. Not as fun as Women or Post Office, but there's enough deranged antics an
Io a Bukowski voglio un gran bene. Leggerne uno ogni tanto è una cura meravigliosa.
I rarely give up on a book but I could not finish this. I got to page 62, about 100 pages from the end and the next chapter started in a completely different location and I thought 'No.'

I liked Post Office. I read it on buses mostly because that is what Bukowski's books are great for - a quick inbetween read. But now that I am rarely taking the bus, I could not fit Factotum into my life. Who sits down to read Bukowski? He writes with so little energy about a character with so little energy that
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
What is your favourite Charles Bukowski book? 15 133 Feb 16, 2015 04:55PM  
  • Clown Girl
  • Dead Babies
  • Skagboys
  • Leaving Las Vegas
  • A Snowball in Hell
  • The Fuck-Up
  • The Room
  • The Coma
  • The Basketball Diaries
  • Hey Nostradamus!
  • The Informers
  • Guts
  • The Contortionist's Handbook
  • 1933 Was a Bad Year
  • And the Ass Saw the Angel
  • Kingdom Come
  • Nineteen Seventy Seven (Red Riding, #2)
  • Selected Essays from: How to be Alone
Henry Charles Bukowski (born as Heinrich Karl Bukowski) was a German-born American poet, novelist and short story writer. His writing was influenced by the social, cultural and economic ambience of his home city of Los Angeles.It is marked by an emphasis on the ordinary lives of poor Americans, the act of writing, alcohol, relationships with women and the drudgery of work. Bukowski wrote thousands ...more
More about Charles Bukowski...
Post Office Ham on Rye Women Love is a Dog from Hell Pulp

Share This Book

“My ambition is handicapped by laziness” 4581 likes
“If you're going to try, go all the way. Otherwise, don't even start. This could mean losing girlfriends, wives, relatives and maybe even your mind. It could mean not eating for three or four days. It could mean freezing on a park bench. It could mean jail. It could mean derision. It could mean mockery--isolation. Isolation is the gift. All the others are a test of your endurance, of how much you really want to do it. And, you'll do it, despite rejection and the worst odds. And it will be better than anything else you can imagine. If you're going to try, go all the way. There is no other feeling like that. You will be alone with the gods, and the nights will flame with fire. You will ride life straight to perfect laughter. It's the only good fight there is.” 4571 likes
More quotes…