The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas

4.04 of 5 stars 4.04 · rating details · 385 ratings · 99 reviews

The bestselling author of Liberal Fascism dismantles the progressive myths that are passed-off as wisdom in our schools, media and politics.

According to Jonah Goldberg, if the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist, the greatest trick liberals ever pulled was convincing themselves that they’re not ideological.

Today, “objective” journ...more

Hardcover, 320 pages

Published May 1st 2012 by Sentinel (first published January 1st 2012)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

The Constitution of the United States of America by James Madison

The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the U... by Thomas Jefferson

Best Conservative Books

114th out of 148 books — 100 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 858)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Jun 08, 2012 Hadrian rated it 1 of 5 stars

I normally do not read too often books which are TOO overtly political - often these are just distasteful and overdone exercises in rhetoric which whip up a loyal 'base' and leave all others annoyed or alienated. This is true for both right and left.

Ann Coulter, to use a prominent example, calls herself a "Polemicist" - one who deliberately deals with controversy, and that statement is quite accurate, to her credit. Such is their domain, leave them well alone.

But Goldberg is a new and insidious...more I normally do not read too often books which are TOO overtly political - often these are just distasteful and overdone exercises in rhetoric which whip up a loyal 'base' and leave all others annoyed or alienated. This is true for both right and left.

Ann Coulter, to use a prominent example, calls herself a "Polemicist" - one who deliberately deals with controversy, and that statement is quite accurate, to her credit. Such is their domain, leave them well alone.

But Goldberg is a new and insidious breed - he is a polemicist or rambler who thinks himself a serious intellectual, and attempts to write a book of 'ideas'. The book falls apart halfway through the title. Cliches are indeed tyrannical, but he falls victim to them. His first book, "Liberal Fascism", is filled with torturous and fallacious logic - "Hitler was a vegetarian, therefore all fascists are Vegetarians." I confess I have not read it entirely.

A main underlying theme is his conflation of the modern American Left with Totalitarian Communism. Liberals in his view, believe in government intervention in some economic matters. Totalitarians believe in total government control of all aspects of society. Because both of these actions involve government, therefore the two are the same. But Connecticut is not Cambodia. New York is not North Korea. San Francisco is not Stalinism. He does not even differentiate between parts of the left at all. They are all The Enemy, to be defeated.

I will not pretend that the modern American left is free of problems. But this 'criticism' is a cliche, and wholly meaningless.

And of course, Goldberg uses cliches of his own - the 'hippie liberal', multiculturalism is bad because immigrants and colored people are scary, "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism", that there are no compromise positions - "Either you're for me or against me!". And so forth. And so on. And so on.

The whole section on Ideology and Dogma is a farce. His own understanding of history is warped, distorted, and completely false. Any item which might support him is twisted to do so, and anything conflicting disappears. "The government does not produce jobs (External contracts, military, etc.), Jews were not killed during the Spanish Inquisition (Exiled, burned alive), and so on. It tires and numbs the mind.

Of course, attempting to deal with such large swaths of the complex American political spectrum can be difficult, and I confess that I fall prey to errors. But this is not a complex or rigorous argument at all. It is a child's wail - "Nuh uh! I'm not a stinky-face! YOU ARE!" Take away the punctuation, capitalization, spelling, and fancy quotes from respectable thinkers garnishing the edges, and it is a Youtube comment. It is not a 'book of ideas'. It is a polemic, something which will sell enough copies to get to the top of the New York Times, garner a few disdainful comments from real historians, and promptly fade into oblivion.(less)

5 likes · like · see review

Aug 12, 2012 Phil rated it 5 of 5 stars

I don't watch much TV so I did not know who Mr. Goldberg is. I guess he is considered to be a sort of right winger. But, his writing is great and he exposes modern cliches. I heard him interviewed on PBS radio and knew I had to read the book. I did my normal cautious approach ordered a Kindle sample then got hooked. I have been quoting some great lines from the book. I did not think that it was a criticism of Liberals unless of course you call all people who have knee jerk reactions to things li...more

3 likes · like · see review

Feb 19, 2013 Kevin Hanks rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

It was a great book, and enjoyable to listen to. I definitely hold the belief the the best audio books (I did listen to this one) are those read by the author themselves. And even better are those read by someone who is a professional speaker, be it television, radio etc. It makes the book enjoyable to listen to, as it really does feel like you're listening to the author talk about what he enjoys.

The subject matter is an important one, and I found myself question quite a few of the "cliches" tha...more

like · see review

Oct 03, 2012 Heather rated it 3 of 5 stars

This had a lot of really interesting points - especially when he would give the historical basis of some of the phrases we toss around so much. I thought he made some great points, but it was also not super cohesive and organized. And way too many "soap box" moments, if you know what I mean. Perhaps I would have liked this book better if it's purpose had been simply to educate about why we say what we say, and to point out how the use of cliches often shuts down real thought and dialogue. These...more

like · see review

Aug 12, 2012 Dale rated it 5 of 5 stars

A Worthy (and Very Different) Follow-Up to Goldberg's Liberal Fascism

Published by Sentinel HC in 2012.

Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism is one of the most profound political books that I have read in my entire life. It changed my view of politics and made me focus a lot of thinking that I had been doing about the actions of government in our daily lives.

So, four years later, I was pleased to hear that Goldberg had written another book. The Tyranny of Cliches is not as serious as Liberal Fascis...more

like · see review

Jul 26, 2012 Tom Meyer rated it 4 of 5 stars

An interesting and enjoyable book, albeit an uneven one.

It's central argument -- that liberals deceive themselves into thinking they have no ideology and that everyone would agree with them, if only they shrugged off their ignorance and dogma -- is surprisingly sound. With a few notable exceptions such as populist conservativism's belief that it speaks merely for "Real America," the Right tends to be more open an honest about its own ideology and biases. Goldberg convincingly traces this back to...more

like · see review

Jun 23, 2012 Jenni Haveman rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: nonfiction, politics

I truly enjoyed Goldberg's latest. Too frequently I acquiesce to the "easy" arguments (in the form of cliches) by others because I don't have a ready response. Goldberg carefully and thoughtfully looks at historical fact and what is ACTUALLY being said when a cliche is used to shore up an argument. Lazy thinking has never worked to make our country a great place, and Mr. Goldberg certainly doesn't allow it!

The chapters are short, easy to understand, and Goldberg's "voice" is humorous and convers...more

like · see review

Jun 17, 2012 Margie rated it 4 of 5 stars

Mr Goldberg makes a very strong case against the Liberal political folks who say a lot without really saying anything or use arguments-that-aren't-really-arguments tactics in order to avoid a real debate on the issues. My favorite quote from his book (more like an essay)in regards to extremism vs. centerism(?) was, "If we say we need one hundred feet of bridge to cross a one-hundred-foot chasm that makes me an extremist. Somebody else says we don't need to build a bridge at all because we don't...more

like · see review

Jun 12, 2012 Adam Bradley rated it 5 of 5 stars

Shelves: politics

My guess is this book will be treated in much the same way as Jonah's previous one: those who find themselves on the unfavorable side of his arguments will either misunderstand or willfully misconstrue his actual thesis and then go about setting that strawman ablaze.

I vividly recall a political light bulb switching on for me when I read Kuhn's "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" in my freshman year of college: neither scientists nor politicians are ever free from prior philosophical commit...more

1 like · like · see review

May 31, 2012 Patrick rated it 5 of 5 stars

Shelves: ideas

Amazon review:
“We are only as free as the least free among us.” Is that really true, or is it the kind of statement most people will nod at without actually thinking about? Best-selling conservative author Jonah Goldberg calls it a liberal cliché—fundamentally wrong and potentially very dangerous.
According to Goldberg, if the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist, the greatest trick liberals ever pulled was convincing themselves they’re not ideological. To...more

like · see review

Dec 13, 2012 Dan rated it 2 of 5 stars Recommends it for: Fans of Jonah Goldberg and other National Review writers.

Shelves: politics

In "The Tyranny of Cliches" Jonah Goldberg has written an often breezy but ultimately uneven collection of essays. There are highlights to be sure. Sections on "Youth", "Social Justice", and "The Catholic Church" are all worth a read. (In fact, "Youth" should be required reading for anyone under the age of 30 who has ever been tempted to pump a fist while screaming "YES, WE CAN!" or "TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY!") Fans of Goldberg and National Review Online will no doubt find other chapters that are en...more In "The Tyranny of Cliches" Jonah Goldberg has written an often breezy but ultimately uneven collection of essays. There are highlights to be sure. Sections on "Youth", "Social Justice", and "The Catholic Church" are all worth a read. (In fact, "Youth" should be required reading for anyone under the age of 30 who has ever been tempted to pump a fist while screaming "YES, WE CAN!" or "TAXED ENOUGH ALREADY!") Fans of Goldberg and National Review Online will no doubt find other chapters that are enjoyable. Indeed, every chapter has something to offer.

But there are weaknesses. The premise of the book is laid out in the sub-title: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas. Is this really a domain held only by liberals? Even Goldberg admits that it isn't. Conservatives cheat, too. Why then base the book on this hook? Well, I guess it had to be based on some idea... But an equally satisfying book with similar essays could have been given the title "The Tyranny of Run-on Sentences" or the "The Tyranny of Misplaced Modifiers", or "Ten Words I Chose at Random Out of the Dictionary". Some chapters seem to meander without any perceivable goal.

I read this book twice. I found it interesting and pretty enjoyable the first time. The second reading was more of a slog. The gleeful snarkyness that helped things bounce along the first time through eventually began to wear a bit thin.

Fans of Goldberg and National Review should go ahead and check out the book. Even people who dislike NR should check out a few of the essays. But, as with any book, these essays should be taken with a grain of salt (there's a good cliche for vol 2), and nothing should be swallowed whole without some consideration and research.

I received this book for free through the Goodreads First Reads program. I was not required to review the book -- which partly explains why it took me so long for me to do so. Maybe Goldberg's next book could be about the tyranny of procrastination. I need that book.
(less)

like · see review

Jun 12, 2012 Kathryn rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: 2012-reads, american, nonfiction

I'm a big fan of Jonah Goldberg, so naturally, I liked The Tyranny of Clichés, which is basically an extended G-File. It was a quick, fun read with a lot of interesting information on a variety of topics.

Jonah's overall thesis is that clichés, as an expression of ideology, are a convenient shorthand for arguments (two example clichés from opposite sides of the political spectrum: "If guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns" and "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter"). He...more

like · see review

Dec 15, 2012 Alan Marchant rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: intellectualism, nonfiction

Jonah Goldberg's The Tyranny of Cliches is clearly written, entertaining, and better organized than most book-length partisan commentaries. A succinct thesis statement (from the essay on Science) is "the tyranny of cliches can be understood as the use of allegedly nonideological insights to advance starkly ideological understandings of the world." The book is a collection of essays describing the origins, historical abuses, and crypto-ideology of loaded words and phrases that are commonly overus...more

like · see review

May 10, 2012 Kevin rated it 4 of 5 stars

I will have more to say when I collect my thoughts for a full review but, not surprisingly, I enjoyed Jonah's second book. It is more like a collection of essays than a straightforward book in many ways but the theme of cliches does tie it all together.

What comes through is just how much myth and mushy logica is contained in many of the catch phrases and bumper sticker slogans of the left. Jonah's argument boils down to the fact that liberalism pretends to be about facts and science and rational...more

like · see review

May 02, 2012 April marked it as to-read

I have to read me some Goldberg.

1 like · like · see review

Jul 03, 2012 Brian rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: social-criticism, politics, history

One thing that can be said about a Goldberg book is that you will be challenged in your thinking.
I enjoyed this book because it pokes fun at the silliness of liberals and their warn out cliches. Thats being said the conservatives have their own warn out cliches to. Being that I'm not a democrat and can barely join forces with the repubs, I thought Goldberg was fair in his anaylsis. The chapter are short and to the point seeing you could probably write a book about each of the chapter subjects. T...more

like · see review

Jun 30, 2012 Jennifer rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

I'm biased. I'm conservative, and I *heart* Jonah Goldberg. However, that being admitted, this book does its part in turning cliches on their heads. With every revelation, I found myself wondering how a liberal would interpret it. Use this book as a jumping-off point in political discussions, if nothing else.

As always, Jonah's writing style is to-the-point, and, well, funny and entertaining. It's not a light read, but lighter than "Liberal Fascism". Lots of references to "Monty Python" and weed,...more

like · see review

Jul 12, 2012 Nathan rated it 4 of 5 stars

I love Jonah Goldberg. As a result, I believe I set my expectations too high.
His first book "Liberal Fascism" changed the way I viewed the world (as trite as that reads). It was a political book with a central thesis supported by historical and philosophical research. The case is made so well that the only response from those intent on continuing in their beliefs is to ignore it.

In "The Tyranny of Clichés" Goldberg asserts that people use clichés as a substitute for thinking. He then focuses on...more

like · see review

Nov 16, 2012 Greg Kerr rated it 4 of 5 stars

Definitely not for the thin skinned liberal! To deny you have ideologies is to deny you have a fixed worldview that guides you through life as to what is right and what is wrong, what pleasurable and what is hurtful, what is funny and what is sad. This is to live in a constant state of flexibility to accept ever wind of change as just and valid. Even the denial that, as a liberal one does not have an ideology is in face a dogmatic statement. Evolution is not a dogmatic belief? Abortion on demand...more

like · see review

Jul 06, 2012 Dakota rated it 4 of 5 stars

Really three and a half stars, but the metrics system is limited. I definitely enjoyed much of this book, and Goldberg is spot-on in most of his criticisms of our modern political "language" (or as the book's title should make clear, clichés). I expected talking points but many of the chapters are comprehensive and deep in their treatment of our modern language handicaps and one-way views.

Doug Wilson had an excellent review here: http://www.dougwils.com/Book-Review/b...

"And here is Goldberg's ma...more

like · see review

Jul 14, 2012 Hobart rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: 2012-reads

Not much to say about this that's not in the publisher's description. This is a pretty good read--plenty of things I disagree with or quibble with, but even more that I can pretty much agree with. But all of it is pretty darn entertaining. Goldberg's one of the most enjoyable political writers of our time, there's more than a few chuckles to be had in the midst of his analysis. Which isn't to say he's taking things lightly--he's dead serious about this stuff, he's just found a way to be witty wh...more

like · see review

Jul 16, 2012 Andrew rated it 4 of 5 stars

Enjoyable read from an author whose political commentary I generally enjoy, and who I find to be clever and quite bright. His general point is that far too often, mostly meaningless cliches are used as a substitute for an argument, and that many of these cliches are quite ideological even as people pretend that they are not. He defends this point well at the beginning of the book. He follows this up with a long series of chapters with examples of cliches. My main criticism is that while he made...more

like · see review

May 21, 2012 Dean Anderson rated it 4 of 5 stars

Yes, this is a book about politics; but one of the things I found most interesting was what the book had to say about religion. Goldberg describes himself as a secular Jew but he does a much better job of defending the church and Christianity (past and present) than many Christians (even many in the clergy.)
The basic idea of the book is that many people substitute clichés they’ve heard for any real thinking on a variety of important issues: bumper sticker thinking. Goldberg elaborates in this...more Yes, this is a book about politics; but one of the things I found most interesting was what the book had to say about religion. Goldberg describes himself as a secular Jew but he does a much better job of defending the church and Christianity (past and present) than many Christians (even many in the clergy.)
The basic idea of the book is that many people substitute clichés they’ve heard for any real thinking on a variety of important issues: bumper sticker thinking. Goldberg elaborates in this paragraph from the chapter ‘Spiritual but Not Religious’: “YOUR KARMA RAN OVER MY DOGMA. You’ve no doubt seen the bumper sticker. The pun is easy to get, but the underlying point is more elusive. Most of the time, like so many bumper stickers, it’s more a smug declaration of superiority whose appeal derives more from the appearance of cleverness rather than the reality of insight.”
In this chapter, he points out that many in our culture have accepted a cliché that Eastern thought is more spiritual and less dogmatic. Goldberg responds that Buddhism is every bit as doctrinaire as Christianity or Judaism and in his book that’s not a bad thing. We all follow doctrines, creeds and systems of belief and that’s a good thing. There is wealth in collected wisdom in religious and political orthodoxies. We are more likely to get into trouble when we think we are pioneers finding our own pragmatic and individual truth, because we blindly fall into sloppy thought and practices.
I greatly appreciated his take on other religious clichés beyond, ‘I’m not religious; I’m a spiritual,’ such as ‘Science vs. Religion’. This is the idea that religion had opposed and feared scientific thought through the centuries. The key example that is always brought up is the story of Galileo. Galileo didn’t oppose religion, he wrote books of theology. He may have spent 3 days in jail, but who clamored for the Church to silence and punish the man were not clergy by “jealous, lesser, scientific colleagues.”
Goldberg deals with other supposed crimes of the church. He points out that the Crusades were not the first stirrings of imperialism but rather a defense response to the military conquests of Islam. He responds to Daniel Browns claim in “The Da Vinci Code” that millions were killed by the church in witch hunts with facts that show that thousands were killed (still a horrible thing) and usually by secular authorities, not the church. Yes, there were injustices committed by the various Inquisitions formed by the church through the years, but they were much more thoughtful then the secular courts of the time. Yes, the Spanish Inquisition did use torture, but in two percent of the cases. The Church has through the centuries acted contrary to the teachings of Christ, but it has confessed as such. But the leaders of the French Revolution acted true to their secular beliefs and killed more people during the few years of The Terror than were killed in 300 years of the Inquisition. Some in the church did act in barbaric ways in a barbaric age, but Goldberg argues that the church was not an anchor holding back the progress of Western Civilization but rather a sail.
Of course, the bulk of the book is devoted to politics, but even then theological ideas are important. The clichés that “Nothing was every solved by violence” and “Peace, Love and Understanding” have been presented as Christian ideas, but if they are presented apart from the Christian idea of human sinfulness, Goldberg clearly shows they lead to folly.
Goldberg presents serious issues, but illustrations from “Animal House”, “30 Rock” and “Monty Python” keep a lighter tone and easy page turning. This book probably won’t be used as a college text as Goldberg’s previous work, “Liberal Fascism”, has been. But it’s still insightful and a little more fun.
(less)

1 like · like · see review

Jun 16, 2012 Eric rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: books-i-own, non-fiction, politics

I've read Goldberg since the mid to late-1990s, when he started writing for National Review and National Review Online. His writing has often been a perfect blend of wit, humor, and serious ideas about politics and policy. In short, for a political junkie who appreciates a laugh, he's a lot of fun to read. This book is a more accurate representation of his writing. As much as I enjoyed Liberal Fascism, it didn't quite capture Goldberg's normal tone and personality. This one does that. It's fun t...more

like · see review

May 06, 2012 Vivian rated it 4 of 5 stars

Shelves: political, first-reads

First reads giveaway.

My husband is a political junkie and a huge fan of Jonah Goldberg. For him, Mr. Goldberg would automatically earn a five star review sight unseen (or read) just on his merit alone. However, he's not finished the book. . . yet.

I have to admit. When I first picked up the book, I had the immediate fear that it would read as stale as a textbook. You know, that government course you needed (and loathed) in order to graduate college? However, Jonah Goldberg is an excellent writer...more

like · see review

Jun 05, 2012 Scott rated it 4 of 5 stars

Very readable, enjoyable, and thought-provoking. He could have included several more chapter, with similar effect, but the length was about right. I found myself challenging my own positions on policy issues -- do I have as well thought-out ideas as I think I do? (Yes, yes, I do.)

Some chapters are better than others, and the book it set up so that you can read each chapter on its own. I loved the chapter on Youth. I appreciated the tone of the book: quite conversational, with some of Goldberg's...more

like · see review

Jun 30, 2012 Kevin rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

" ..what is lost in these debates [about global warming] is the crucial distinction between science and scientism. The former is a value-neutral enterprise that seeks, through the scientific method, to understand and manipulate the reality of the physical world. Science is a procedure defined by systematic observation and measurement, followed by experiment, and then by the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses. It is not the source of moral truths, but moral truths must be inform...more

like · see review

Feb 16, 2013 Rodger rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

An expose of just how Liberals think and trick the masses into believing their falsehoods. Some people are true progressives, they believe that the US would be a better place as we get more and more socialistic. Socialism is their goal. Many Americans who vote for them, don't really want to be socialists, but they are deceived by the cliches exposed in Goldberg's book. I wish all would read it, but alas, the multitudes are convinced that Liberals are smart and conservatives are dumb. (one of the...more

like · see review

Apr 15, 2013 Matthew rated it 3 of 5 stars Recommends it for: Political Brawlers

Recommended to Matthew by: National Review

Jonah Goldberg is one of my favorite columnists for National Review. His tone is always humorous and his writing is accessible. The Tyranny of Cliches is the first one of his books I have read. The thesis is that the left is so surrounded by people and institutions which reinforce certain political positions that these positions are accepted as unbiased facts rather than policy preferences that may or may not have been thought through thoroughly. It is smart for any kind of movement to instill i...more

like · see review

Mar 15, 2013 David Dent rated it 5 of 5 stars

Goldberg writes like I think and is a pleasure to read. He is obviously of the same age and has similar childhood influences as I do, which are a constant source of familiar pop-culture references to his points. His humor is poigniant without being cruel and his writing style is very "humanizing" of all of his subjects. His acknowledgements in the back of the book is very touching regarding the tragic loss of his brother and reminds us all that through all the political discourse and anger, we a...more

like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 28 29 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend it | Stats | Recent status updates

combine
Other Editions (9)

More editions...

Genres

Politics

46 users

Non Fiction

14 users

Philosophy

5 users

History

2 users

Culture

2 users

See top shelves...

Readers also enjoyed similar books

About Jonah Goldberg

Jonah Jacob Goldberg is an American conservative syndicated columnist and author. Goldberg is known for his contributions on politics and culture to National Review Online, where he is the editor-at-large. He is the author of Liberal Fascism, which reached #1 on the New York Times Best Seller list.

More about Jonah Goldberg...

Books by Jonah Goldberg

Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left from Mussolini to the Politics of Meaning

Proud to Be Right: Voices of the Next Conservative Generation

Goldberg Variations: Jonah Goldberg's Best Cover Stories from National Review (On Dead Tree)

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Trivia About The Tyranny of Cl...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Quotes from The Tyranny of Clichés...

“Hence the great irony: Hayek, one of the greatest champions of individual liberty and economic freedom the world has ever known, believed that knowledge was communal. Dewey, the champion of socialism and collectivism, believed that knowledge was individual. Hayek's is a philosophy that treats individuals as the best judges of their own self-interests, which in turn yield staggering communal cooperation. Dewey's was the philosophy of a giant, Monty Pythonesque crowd shouting on cue: "We're All Individuals!” — 2 people liked it

More quotes…

title link	preview: The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas
avg rating	preview: The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas Goodreads rating: 4.04 (385 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13482307-the-tyranny-of-clich-s?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1329967804l/13482307.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/13482307-the-tyranny-of-clich-s?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas by Jonah Goldberg[/url]

The Tyranny of Clichés: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website