Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Ratner's Star” as Want to Read:
Ratner's Star
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Ratner's Star

3.51 of 5 stars 3.51  ·  rating details  ·  1,163 ratings  ·  88 reviews
Billy Twillig has won the first Nobel Prize ever to be given in mathematics. Set in the near future, this book charts an innocent's education when Billy is sent to live in the company of 30 Nobel laureates and he is asked to decipher transmissions from outer space.
Kindle Edition, 446 pages
Published January 11th 2011 by Billy Twillig has won the first Nobel Prize ever to be given in mathematics. Set in the near future, (first published 1976)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Ratner's Star, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Ratner's Star

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Seems like Delillo took a bunch of postmodern conceits (funny names like Calliope Shrub and Elux Troxl; precocious kid; unrealistic, posturing dialogue; near-opaque symbols; metafiction) and threw them together in a broken blender. Everything works well for the first half, the elements blending together and whirling faster and faster like the book's aborigine. Then something goes horribly wrong; the top pops off, causing the blender to spew postmodernism all over the walls. And as we all know, p ...more
According to Wikipedia this is Don DeLillo's favorite of his novels. It's not mine. I think that I missed something in the book, like DeLillo was doing something that I didn't quite catch, or I caught but I wasn't that impressed by it. I'm not sure what I'm saying.

This is DeLillo's first 'big' novel. I haven't read Underworld yet, but from the books of his I've read I think I like him best when his books are compact. I think it's possible (this could change as I read the rest of his works) that
My reactions to this novel can be put rather succinctly. If David Foster Wallace is indeed a fan of Don Delillo, this is the novel he has stolen from most. If Don Delillo is indeed a fan of Thomas Pynchon, this is the novel that Pynchon most directly inspired. But regardless of its influences or the work it later inspired, because those things are speculatory, it is certainly true that this novel, Delillo's fourth, is his first great novel.

The novel centers around child math prodigy Billy Terwi
DeLillo has always been more of a novelist of ideas more than the basic linear event-event-event-conclusion linear plot style.

Here he experiments with mathematics, logic, and the meanings of language, and language as a means to shape the world. This is no bullshit and repetition of terminology - he's obviously done his homework - I see discussions of Higgs theory, the origins of language, and the intersection between the pursuit of science and the almost mystical devotions of mathematics/languag
Chiariamo subito che il libro si è preso una stella sola e che l'altra è per me, che sono riuscita a finirlo. Devo ammettere che in alcuni passaggi mi è sembrato addirittura di aver visto una luce, ma forse era il delirio indotto dalla lettura. Un'esperienza traumatica :D... però è servita a farmi capire alcune cose:

- Leggo perchè mi piace essere portata "altrove"; l'altrove in cui vorrei essere portata NON è lo scenario sconclusionato di questo racconto. La scrittura mi deve prendere per mano,
Sentimental Surrealist
This comes off to me as someone self-consciously trying to write a postmodern novel and not quite succeeding. There are big swaths of Gaddis, Pynchon, and Heller and little hints of Gass and Barth throughout this novel, but those authors did a far better job of combining the intellectual concerns Ratner's Star takes on with interesting stories. When Gravity's Rainbow (still a terrific novel, mind) has more narrative coherence than what you're doing, you're sort of in trouble.

Ratner's Star is a n
There is plentiful evidence of DeLillo's brilliance strewn throughout these pages, but for the most part the going is laboriously slow. In the imaginative conclusion, math and science are revealed to be just as much a creation of the human mind as mysticism and language, where no single one of these approaches is any more able than another to objectively answer the question: "What is the universe as it exists beyond the human brain?"
Opera del 1976 tra le prime di De Lillo (autore peraltro per nulla precoce).

Un premio Nobel preadolescente genio della matematica viene assoldato assieme alle menti più eccelse per studiare un linguaggio in grado di rispondere ad un messaggio pervenuto dallo spazio da - si pensa - intelligenze aliene.

Metalinguaggi, logica, matematica, astrofisica immaginaria ed una variopinta galleria di sciroccatissimi luminari che operano in una specie di centro - ricerche che ricorda un po'la fabbrica di cioc
Se la logica è la scienza propedeutica ad ogni possibile conoscenza, il Logicon è il linguaggio scientifico in cui riflettersi (e/o su cui riflettere) per riuscire ad interpretare le proprie avventure.

Le avventure (che si svolgono nei primi 12 capitoli) sono quelle dell'adolescente Billy Twillig , geniale premio Nobel per la matematica (il premio non esiste ma è stato appositamente inventato per l'occasione) chiamato a decifrare un codice proveniente dalla presunta stella di Ratner, si succedon
David Contreras
Man, woman or child:

Do not be alarmed. Ratner’s Star is complete bullshit. Your assessment within the first few pages will prove to be correct. This is a powerful study on the the excesses, the triumphs and failures of the human mind. Bruce Allen from the Chicago Tribune sums it up best. Ratner’s Star is a prodigious satire on those pioneers who journey beyond the frontiers of knowledge and end up more ignorant than they were when they set forth.

Billy, our Nobel Prize winning mathematical genius
Mo Ringey-gareau
For me, this novel is the full experience; challenging, hilarious, intellectually puzzling, thought-provoking, suspenseful and compelling. Though the more-pointed parts of the mathematical jokes are over my mathless head, the punchline is impossible to miss.

Having harbored a girly crush on Don Delillo's mind since my first reading of "Underworld", with the reading of this book I would say I am beyond smitten. The intellectual hilarity is, as noted in many a review, somewhat Pynchon-esque (I am
Earth has received an apparent message from a planet circulating Ratner's Star, and a brilliant mathematical boy is called in to decipher the message. Commentary on science and astronomy and a study on brilliant minds and how they relate (?)

Despite the interesting premise, this book was torture to read. The ideas expressed are as vast and disconnected as the characters created to portray them. The characters were not integrated into the plot - not only did you (slowly and painstakingly) read alo
Brent Legault
Reading this has been like panning for gold in a mud-riven creek bed. There were a few flakes of value but not even enough of them to buy a new mule. And my brain now feels like it could use a thorough hosing or beer bath.
Nov 03, 2007 Rustam rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people with some patience
One of the first Delillo novels, where I actually considered not finishing at two or three points. Very slap-sticky if you can geek out on the math/science commentary. It read kind of like a Kubrick movie.
This is a really odd, somewhat incoherent and ultimately quite wonderful novel. I’d only previously read ‘White Noise’, ‘Underworld’ and some of the author’s later books and stories, so I was surprised to find a totally different style at work in ‘Ratner’s Star’, one more comparable to Thomas Pynchon, Kurt Vonnegut or Philip K. Dick. To begin with it very much has the feel of a quirky mid-70s comic sci fi novel, being concerned in a fairly druggy way with conspiracy theories, secret transmission ...more
Math + fiction, how can you go wrong? This book starts out well as the main character is enlisted to decode an enigmatic radio transmission received from space. This takes place in a futuristic compound centered around Space Brain--a super computer that is mapping the universe. The protagonist, an insanely gifted child mathematician, encounters an odd assortment of scientists and academics and there are some interesting thoughts around the relation of math, science, and culture. From here, there ...more
Aug 02, 2008 Ashton rated it 2 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people who overanalyze literature so they can tell me what it means.
Shelves: sci-fi-fantasy
first half: a clever (though definitely off-kilter) satire of the scientific community peppered with allusions to philosophy. Also, it's pretty funny.

second half: digresses into an incomprehensible vortex of weirdness, leaving all possible insights or coherence buried under piles of bat guano ... literally.

The entire second part seems oddly extraneous, or maybe I'm just not intelligent enough to grasp it.
This is a load of bat guano.

“His most spectacularly inventive novel” according to the New York Times. This I fear wasn’t really to my taste at all. I like plot and there wasn’t much plot here to like.

The book is in two parts: “Adventures” and “Reflections”, it is set in a near future where the protagonist, Billy Twerlliger, is an underdevelopped teenager who is a maths prodigy, he has won a new Nobel Prize for Mathematics.

Mathematics and fiction, what could go wrong…?

Billy is called, somewhat re
Lara Bell
Totally tedious. Made me regret that I can't stop reading a book once I start it. Put me to sleep after 3 pages every night. It's that kind of pretentious, look how smart I am, off-kilter writing that a college math freshman would probably spooge over. The beginning is fun and sucked me in enough that I waded through to the end for the somewhat predictable payoff.
I guess if you like math give it a try...
I'm giving this two stars but only because I am not smart enough to understand it. This takes a good knowledge of mathematics, science, Kabbalah and other forms of mysticism. I'm pretty sure it's a masterpiece, if you understand those things...
Galen Weitkamp
A: Ratner’s Star is an off-kilter novel by Don DeLillo, both humorous and something else.
What is Ratner’s Star?

B: An off-kilter novel by Don DeLillo, both humorous and___I didn’t catch that last bit.

A: Never mind. Actually Ratner’s Star is the title of a novel by Don DeLillo. Within the novel Ratner’s star is a star, or perhaps a binary star system including a brown dwarf. It could be a stellated twilligon with an n-bottomed hole. No. Wait. That last is Mohole’s description of the universe. How
Whacky story where a young boy wins a nobel prize in mathematics and is then recruited to solve the messages seeming originate from Ratner's star.
Bizarre characters and scientific geek language abounds.
Fraser Kinnear
I read about 3/4 of it, and just got bored.

There is surprising little math and science for a book that is entirely about mathematicians and scientists working at a research institution. And what little there is tends to mostly be brief references to mathematicians in history and scattered astronomy factoids.

The characters are all very wacky, but seem stilted after my reading the pantheon of wacky characters in Infinite Jest and Oblivion.

Maybe Delilo is doing something I didn't notice to captur
My first DeLillo. Despite rave reviews for him, I found the story flat. It grabbed me initially, but it didn't conclude well.
La traducción no le hace justicia. Cuenta con varios pasajes (e ideas) satíricos memorables, pero el absurdo se agota muy pronto; el ritmo se disgrega; al igual que sucede con los objetivos de los experimentos, la historia va perdiendo en interés y, paralelamente, en propósito (el sin sentido es simplemente demasiado--y pertenece en exceso a su tiempo--1976-, en el que este tipo de experimentación resultaba novedoso); aunque, eso sí, las últimas cien páginas son verdaderamente buenas, trepidante ...more
Pet zvezdic za čudovito in kompleksno manipejsko satiro, ki pa nima usmiljenja do bralca :)
I can't believe this came out in 1976, making it 67 years old.
This book is a handful of scientific nonsensical babbling.

It's my first contact with DeLillo's work, which I expected to be a somewhat interesting author. I suppose I was unhappy on my starter pick, because reading this was painful!
You would expect the greatest scientists in the planet to be...well, smart. In this novel, though, the scientific mind is portrayed in such a weird and sophomoric way. I understand that the author is actually trying to mock the modern scientific method, yet everythi
I'm nearing the end of Delillo-thon. I read nine of his books last year, two more the year before that, and this is already my second this year. Though I was mostly marching forward chronologically, I'm having to loop back with a few of these, because I didn't own a copy of this or "Players" or "Amazons" (shhh...) when I set my list of nine last year. Coming off of a run of amazing '80s and '90s books, it's a little jarring to throw myself back into his mid-'70s style, which now seems almost lik ...more
Joshua Mooney
Did you ever read any of Johnathan Swift's Gulliver's Travels? Well if you haven't, or don't remember it very well, or got bored with it before you could reach the third book, go Google 'Laputa' and read the summary on Wikipedia. I'll see you again in just a few minutes.

Laputa is mainly a satire of the Royal Society, populated by absurd characters afflicted by by strange physical deformities and weilding whimsical inventions of dubious practicality that reflect a blindness induced by too much i
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Goodreads Italia: La stella di Ratner di Don DeLillo - Commenti e discussione 41 78 Jun 23, 2012 01:34PM  
coincidence 1 18 Aug 12, 2009 07:53AM  
  • Blind Man with a Pistol (Harlem Cycle, #8)
  • Chariots of Fire
  • In the Heart of the Country
  • The Dead Father
  • Giles Goat-Boy
  • Mason and Dixon
  • Main Street / Babbitt
  • Aaron's Rod
  • You Bright and Risen Angels
  • Omensetter's Luck
  • The Gold Bug Variations
  • The Atrocity Exhibition
  • Myra Breckinridge
  • The Public Burning
  • One Thousand And One Nights, Volume 04
  • The Captive & The Fugitive (In Search of Lost Time, #5-6)
  • For Whom the Bell Tolls (Sparknotes Literature Guides)
  • Amazons: An Intimate Memoir By The First Woman To Play In The National Hockey League
Don DeLillo is an American author best known for his novels, which paint detailed portraits of American life in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. He currently lives outside of New York City.

Among the most influential American writers of the past decades, DeLillo has received, among author awards, a National Book Award (White Noise, 1985), a PEN/Faulkner Award (Mao II, 1991), and an American
More about Don DeLillo...
White Noise Underworld Libra Cosmopolis Falling Man

Share This Book

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

“Shit is universal no matter which language.” 21 likes
“As always when he worked with this much concentration he began to feel a sense of introverting pressure. There was no way out once he was in, no genuine rest, no one to talk to who was capable of understanding the complexity (simplicity) of the problem or the approaches to a tentative solution. There came a time in every prolonged effort when he had a moment of near panic, or "terror in a lonely place," the original semantic content of the word. The lonely place was his own mind. As a mathematician he was free from subjection to reality, free to impose his ideas and designs on his own test environment. The only valid standard for his work, its critical point (zero or infinity), was the beauty it possessed, the deft strength of his mathematical reasoning. THe work's ultimate value was simply what it revealed about the nature of his intellect. What was at stake, in effect, was his own principle of intelligence or individual consciousness; his identity, in short. This was the infalling trap, the source of art's private involvement with obsession and despair, neither more nor less than the artist's self-containment, a mental state that led to storms of overwork and extended stretches of depression, that brought on indifference to life and at times the need to regurgitate it, to seek the level of expelled matter. Of course, the sense at the end of a serious effort, if the end is reached successfully, is one of lyrical exhilaration. There is air to breathe and a place to stand. The work gradually reveals its attachment to the charged particles of other minds, men now historical, the rediscovered dead; to the main structure of mathematical thought; perhaps even to reality itself, the so-called sum of things. It is possible to stand in time's pinewood dust and admire one's own veronicas and pavanes.” 4 likes
More quotes…