<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book>
  <id>133095</id>
  <title><![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0307274942]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780307274946]]></isbn13>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <description><![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]></description>
  <work>
  <best_book_id type="integer">133095</best_book_id>
  <books_count type="integer">2</books_count>
  <desc_user_id type="integer" nil="true"></desc_user_id>
  <id type="integer">1050160</id>
  <media_type nil="true"></media_type>
  <original_language_id type="integer" nil="true"></original_language_id>
  <original_publication_day type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_day>
  <original_publication_month type="integer" nil="true"></original_publication_month>
  <original_publication_year type="integer">2005</original_publication_year>
  <original_title>Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution</original_title>
  <rating_dist>total:112|5:0|4:2|3:1|2:2|1:0|</rating_dist>
  <ratings_count type="integer">112</ratings_count>
  <ratings_sum type="integer">365</ratings_sum>
  <reviews_count type="integer">192</reviews_count>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">24</text_reviews_count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.26]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[101]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[22]]></text_reviews_count>
  
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution]]></link>
  <authors>
    <author>
    <id>76725</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Stephen Breyer]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1252512391p5/76725.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1252512391p2/76725.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/76725.Stephen_Breyer]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.25</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>114</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>24</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>
    <reviews start="1" end="20" total="192">
      <review>
  <id>41062459</id>
    <user>
    <id>1823693</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Tom]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Summit, NJ]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1823693-tom-sulcer]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1245609764p3/1823693.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1245609764p2/1823693.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>101</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jun 03 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Dec 27 21:55:48 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Dec 27 21:56:30 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Why is a Supreme Court justice writing a book? Because he's trying to influence public opinion. And it's one more sign that the Supreme Court has become politicized, making essentially legislative decisions (Roe v. Wade, Brown v. Board of Education, and so forth). A glaring example of politicization...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41062459">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41062459]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41062459]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>54123367</id>
    <user>
    <id>2256932</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mick]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Woodward, OK]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2256932-mick]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1240700280p3/2256932.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1240700280p2/2256932.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Oct 12 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Apr 27 09:01:08 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Apr 27 09:04:32 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The next time I read about a decision by the Supremes that leaves me scratching my head and wondering, &quot;What were they thinking?&quot;, I've at least got this little book by Justice Breyer to give me one or two clues. ACTIVE LIBERTY: INTERPRETING OUR DEMOCRATIC CONSTITUTION is a blueprint expla...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54123367">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54123367]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/54123367]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>41603918</id>
    <user>
    <id>938364</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Brian]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[East Montpelier, VT]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/938364-brian]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="law" />
        <shelf name="non-fiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jan 02 00:00:00 -0800 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Jan 02 09:29:09 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 03 13:35:35 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Justice Breyer's central point in this book is that the Constitution protects both &quot;modern,&quot; or negative, liberty--freedom from government infringement of individual rights--and &quot;ancient,&quot; or active, liberty--an individual's right to participate in the democratic process. Breyer ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41603918">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41603918]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/41603918]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>4459492</id>
    <user>
    <id>273793</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mark]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Pomona, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/273793-mark]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1187069328p3/273793.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1187069328p2/273793.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="political" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Aug 12 22:06:04 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Dec 17 04:55:41 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Describes the concepts of the personal rights of active liberty (participation in government) and passive liberty (freedom from government interference), and discusses how judicial decision making can be influenced by taking these rights into account.  This book is <strong>short</strong> and <strong>repetitive</strong>, but the fund...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4459492">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4459492]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4459492]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>52501733</id>
    <user>
    <id>71349</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Bethany]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Washington, DC]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/71349-bethany]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-F-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-F-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="non-fiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Apr 01 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Apr 13 09:40:21 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Apr 13 09:42:51 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I really did read this with an open mind, I swear.  I wanted to see how the more liberal 'evolving Constitution' justices explained their jurisprudence.  But this was a real snore.  Just not well written, no colorful examples, no personality really of any kind.  In person Breyer seems pretty fun, bu...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52501733">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52501733]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/52501733]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>57901605</id>
    <user>
    <id>385886</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Jason]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Washington, DC]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/385886-jason]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jun 05 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat May 30 19:04:40 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Jun 05 08:03:20 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[an alternative view of judicial interpretation, in contrast to the strict textualist Scalia view.  liked the focus on looking to how a given law/controversy should be interpreted in light of the constitutional purpose of promoting an active democracy on the individual level - in addition to the usua...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/57901605">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/57901605]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/57901605]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>49740498</id>
    <user>
    <id>812502</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mathalus]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/812502-mathalus]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
            <shelf name="currently-reading" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Mar 18 22:15:04 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Mar 18 22:16:06 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I started this after I read The Nine, but it is extremely hard to get through. I wish I could push through it and pick up some anti-Constructionist tips.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49740498]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/49740498]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>72581808</id>
    <user>
    <id>260609</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Cheng]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Powell, OH]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/260609-cheng]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1186503809p3/260609.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1186503809p2/260609.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Sep 15 00:00:00 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Sep 26 15:01:01 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Sep 26 15:01:56 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Very well written, a fast read, succinct, really gets his point across.  And of course, a point of view I agree with!]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/72581808]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/72581808]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>42564943</id>
    <user>
    <id>1885272</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Matt]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Lawrence, KS]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1885272-matt]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Jan 10 09:01:22 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Jan 10 09:02:08 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Kind of difficult to follow for somebody with no background in the field.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42564943]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/42564943]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>43759697</id>
    <user>
    <id>1936396</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mica]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Santa Rosa, CA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1936396-mica]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1232671559p3/1936396.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1232671559p2/1936396.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue Jul 01 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Tue Jan 20 18:58:05 -0800 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Jan 20 18:58:43 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Well written, but I'm not convinced. ]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/43759697]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/43759697]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>58783328</id>
    <user>
    <id>2384659</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Donald]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2384659-donald]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Jun 07 15:35:57 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Jun 07 15:50:38 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Another geeky Supreme Court book. Why?]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58783328]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58783328]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>38438369</id>
    <user>
    <id>903174</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Natalie]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/903174-natalie]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-F-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-F-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Nov 23 04:30:22 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sun Nov 23 04:30:22 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Short and sweet. ]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/38438369]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/38438369]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>11605598</id>
    <user>
    <id>208528</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Christopher]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Saint Paul, MN]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/208528-christopher]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1207012714p3/208528.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1207012714p2/208528.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon May 12 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jan 03 23:17:00 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon May 12 12:40:17 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Justice Breyer does a good job of laying out the case for a living constitution, though I he could have delved a bit deeper into the examples.  It is a great intellectual discussion rather than an argument, giving the basic ground rules and simple examples.<br/><br/>The workability of the theory h...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/11605598">more...</a>]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/11605598]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/11605598]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>7411613</id>
    <user>
    <id>506296</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Adrienne]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Arlington, VA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/506296-adrienne]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1191816725p3/506296.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1191816725p2/506296.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Those interested in theories of statutory and constitutional interpretation]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Sep 01 00:00:00 -0700 2005</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Oct 07 21:38:28 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Oct 08 08:53:53 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[If you read a Matter of Interpretation, you should read this book.  This book is a short exposition of Justice Breyer's theory of statutory and constitutional interpretation, and that, quite simply, is what makes it valuable.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7411613]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7411613]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>4785247</id>
    <user>
    <id>289521</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Gil]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Provo, UT]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/289521-gil]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1187831098p3/289521.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1187831098p2/289521.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">1063520</id>
  <isbn>0307263134</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307263131</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">2</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1180670068m/1063520.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1180670068s/1063520.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1063520.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.27</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>11</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[This book,<em> </em>based on the Tanner lectures on Human Values that Justice Stephen Breyer delivered at Harvard University in November 2004, defines the term &#8220;active liberty&#8221; as a sharing of the nation&#8217;s sovereign authority with its citizens. Regarding the Constitution as a guide for the application of basic American principles to a living and changing society rather than as an arsenal of rigid legal means for binding and restricting it, Justice Breyer argues that the genius of the Constitution rests not in any static meaning it might have had in a world that is dead and gone, but in the adaptability of its great principles to cope with current problems.  <br/><br/>Giving us examples of this approach in the areas of free speech, federalism, privacy, affirmative action, statutory interpretation, and administrative law, Justice Breyer states that courts should take greater account of the Constitution&#8217;s democratic nature when they interpret constitutional and statutory texts. He also insists that the people, through participation in community life, can and must develop the experience necessary to govern their own affairs. His distinctive contribution to the federalism debate is his claim that deference to congressional power can actually promote democratic participation rather than thwart it. He argues convincingly that although Congress is not perfect, it has done a better job than either the executive or judicial branches at balancing the conflicting views of citizens across the nation, especially during times of national crisis. With a fine appreciation for complexity, Breyer reminds all Americans that Congress, rather than the courts, is the place to resolve policy disputes.  <br/><em><br/>Active Liberty</em> is a declaration of the first importance, made by a judge often regarded as one of the court&#8217;s most brilliant members.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Legal Eagles]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Aug 19 18:20:43 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Dec 17 05:57:26 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This book is awesome. I really liked a lot of the constitutional discussion that Breyer details in this book--especially his views on civil rights and liberties. Highly recommended. It is a really short read.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4785247]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4785247]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>28033011</id>
    <user>
    <id>1164772</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Mary Ann]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Washington, DC]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1164772-mary-ann-mcgrail]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-F-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-F-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Jul 23 01:49:16 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Jul 23 01:50:40 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A good read - Breyer is thoughtful and a good writer - his concept of active liberty, as he conceives a kind of liberty associated with the greek city-states is thought-provoking.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/28033011]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/28033011]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>7522511</id>
    <user>
    <id>156757</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Jenny]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Atlanta, GA]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/156757-jenny]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1182998627p3/156757.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1182998627p2/156757.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="non-fiction" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Oct 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Oct 10 06:14:48 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Oct 19 09:37:45 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Justice Breyer is a horrible writer.  He is preoccupied with sounding scholarly and academic than with fostering real debate on the topic.  ]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7522511]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/7522511]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>4329136</id>
    <user>
    <id>267114</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Alexander]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Wellsville, NY]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/267114-alexander]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1186692931p3/267114.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/users/1186692931p2/267114.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
            <shelf name="summer-2007" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jun 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Aug 09 14:06:29 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Dec 09 07:58:51 -0800 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I generally agree with Breyer's views on constitutional theory, and his presentation is accessible and thoughtful.]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4329136]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/4329136]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>25594643</id>
    <user>
    <id>1274897</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Russ]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1274897-russ]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-M-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jun 26 14:53:10 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jun 26 14:56:00 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Reinforced my liberal, pro-gov't leanings with a real philosophical foundation. ]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/25594643]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/25594643]]></link>
</review>
      <review>
  <id>270826</id>
    <user>
    <id>26229</id>
    <name><![CDATA[Eunice]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Ann Arbor, MI]]></location>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/26229-eunice]]></link>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-F-111x148.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto-F-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  </user>
    <book>
  <id type="integer">133095</id>
  <isbn>0307274942</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780307274946</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">22</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282m/133095.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1172016282s/133095.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/133095.Active_Liberty_Interpreting_Our_Democratic_Constitution</link>
  <average_rating>3.26</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>112</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A brilliant new approach to the Constitution and courts of the United States by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer.<br/><br/>For Justice Breyer, the Constitution&#8217;s primary role is to preserve and encourage  what he calls &#8220;active liberty&#8221;: citizen participation in shaping government and its laws. As this book argues, promoting active liberty requires judicial modesty and deference to Congress; it also means recognizing the changing needs and demands of the populace. Indeed, the Constitution&#8217;s lasting brilliance is that its principles may be adapted to cope with unanticipated situations, and Breyer makes a powerful case against treating it as a static guide intended for a world that is dead and gone. Using contemporary examples from federalism to privacy to affirmative action, this is a vital contribution to the ongoing debate over the role and power of our courts.]]>
  </description>
  <published>2005</published>
</book>

    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="read" />
          </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Mar 14 13:26:17 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Mar 15 18:08:05 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[a tad repetitive.<br/><br/>quite a few of the points leave you thinking &quot;well, no duh&quot;]]></body>
    
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/270826]]></url>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/270826]]></link>
</review>
    </reviews>
  <popular_shelves>
          <shelf name="to-read" />
          <shelf name="currently-reading" />
          <shelf name="law" />
          <shelf name="non-fiction" />
          <shelf name="nonfiction" />
          <shelf name="politics" />
          <shelf name="summer-reading" />
          <shelf name="law-constitution" />
      </popular_shelves>
  <book_links>
    <book_link>
  <id>8</id>
  <name><![CDATA[WorldCat]]></name>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book_link/follow/8?book_id=133095</link>
</book_link>
  </book_links>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>