Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America” as Want to Read:
The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Metaphysical Club: A Story of Ideas in America

4.06 of 5 stars 4.06  ·  rating details  ·  2,928 ratings  ·  316 reviews
The Metaphysical Club is the winner of the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for History.

A riveting, original book about the creation of modern American thought.

The Metaphysical Club was an informal group that met in Cambridge, Massachusetts, in 1872, to talk about ideas. Its members included Oliver Well Holmes, Jr., future associate justice of the United States Supreme Court; William J
ebook, 384 pages
Published April 10th 2002 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux (first published May 1st 2001)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Metaphysical Club, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Metaphysical Club

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Frank Stein

Although this is a supposed quadruplicate biography of Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior, Charles Peirce, William James, and John Dewey, it’s really an unparalleled intellectual history of America from the Civil War up through the turn of the century. Thankfully it doesn’t try to be a comprehensive intellectual history, and it doesn’t try to trot out every “important” thinker of the age and analyze them for relevance. It’s mainly a circuitous and winding story of how that most American of philosophic
Josh Friedlander
Popular philosophical history doesn't get better than this - rigorous (a good hundred pages of footnotes meticulously back up every quote and incident) and not shy on depth, but still enormously readable. Menand combines fascinating personal anecdotes with the political and intellectual history of the time to create a seamless flow of thought, moving logically from one idea to another. (In fact, if there's any criticism to be made of this book, it's that in making everything fit so perfectly, it ...more
The premise is that Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., William James, John Dewey and, to a lesser extent, Charles S. Peirce (who is the only one of the four that I'd never heard of until I read this book) were the first intellectuals of American modernity (a phrase that seems to communicate the correct amount of portent where simply "modern thinkers" would have fallen short) and that being young men who knew each other during the American Civil War (and who travelled in the same social circles) shaped a ...more
Brad Lyerla
Pragmatism is uniquely American. It is America's only home-grown school of philosophy. THE METAPHYSICAL CLUB is Louis Menand's award-winning book about the emergence of pragmatism as a distinct school of thought. The book's vehicle for describing the early decades of pragmatism is a discussion of a group of thinkers in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who belonged to a loosely organized club, that actually called itself "The Metaphysical Club". The members of the Metaphysical Club developed the foundin ...more
Shit this is great. Wonderful history of American pragmatist thought, starting with its roots in post-Civil War America and ending with John Dewey trying to figure out how to deal with World War 1 and the build to World War 2. Pop scholarship, too, so it was a good introduction to the ideas as a whole and helped me understand what the hell pragmatism in general was about. Which, in turn, helped me understand what pragmatic thinkers were trying to get at (such as Richard Rorty). Read it if you ha ...more
The title of this book is misleading. There's really not a lot about the actual Metaphysical Club. Records were not kept of their meetings. The subtitle was better: A Story of Ideas in America. But I would add "at the Turn of the Twentieth Century." It was an absolutely terrific read for those of you who aren't ashamed of having a brain.

Some of the racial comments were quite disturbing. Here's one by Giddon and let that suffice: "the most superior types of Monkeys are found to be indigenous exa
I found this book to be a fascinating and enlightening study of how certain ideas came to be prevalent in American society. The author examines the lives of four individuals whose ideas represent many of the underlying tenets of American thought: Oliver Wendall Holmes, William James, Charles S. Pierce and John Dewey. Beginning with the watershed event of the Civil War, the author shows how America changed in its institutions, its economics, its social makup, its approach to addressing and solvin ...more
This is probably the last book I bought at the now defunct Cornerstone Books in Salem, MA and that probably means nothing to you if you're just here trying to determine whether or not to read this one. Stick with me. I'm getting there. I bought it just before the birth of my daughter and began reading it in the hospital when she was born. She turns three next month. Does this suggest that I didn't thoroughly enjoy this book? Hardly. It's simply not a book that can be digested in small bite size ...more
Modernity. I've heard it mentioned so many times but have never paused to think of what it means. In this book, Louis Menard gives a simple definition. Modernity is the break from the cyclical world where one generation succeeded another by taking on the same tasks, to one where each generation is faced with a new world. Once, the son would become a farmer to replace his father. The peasant of medieval times would sire a peasant to be. Now the janitor can be father to the astronaut.

In the pre-mo
Betty Ho
Part history and part philosophy. This book is an eloquent biography of American intellectuals from 19th century. Boiled down, it's about Pragmatism.

Louis Menand demonstrates effectively how the foundation of modern American society ideas and principles took root through the semi-biographies of William James, Charles Peirce, Oliver Wendell Holmes and John Dewey whose paths crossed in different time and places. These pragmatists defined "thought" as an instrument or tool for prediction, action,
Ron Charles
In 1776, a congress of savvy landowners in Philadelphia announced to the world (particularly to King George) that they held self-evident truths.

One hundred years later, a few misfit geniuses in Boston confessed that they could hold no truths at all. In fact, they could barely hold each other's attention.

But both groups changed the world. The first, of course, created the United States of America. The second created the modern mind.

The story of how the idea of truth could evolve from self-evident
The story Menand tells - and it is very much a story, one of the book's chief strengths - is a familiar one in modern history: the attempt to reconstruct an intellectual and cultural firmament in the wake of a cataclysm in which the previous one was destroyed. Similar attempts after the World Wars have been amply studied. Likely we will see similar explorations of European culture after the Cold War; the last chapters of Tony Judt's superlative "Postwar" preview some of the directions such inqui ...more
Douglas Dalrymple
Personally, I have a hard time getting excited about John Dewey. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr is more compelling, and the first section of Menand’s book - dealing with Holmes’s experience of the Civil War - was thrilling and powerfully reflective. It’s the figures of William James and Charles Pierce, however, that really made this book for me. I only wish it had spent more time with them. I didn't know Pierce before. Reading about James, however pleasurably, is topped (I think) by reading James hims ...more
I have a habit of using philosophy books as self-help. And when I discovered the pragmatists, it was such a breath of fresh air... all of the sudden, so many variations on my general malaise became irrelevant. William James and Richard Rorty seemed to point the way to some plane of thought that was comfortable with contingency, uncertainty, and relative truth while at the same time making bold, positive statements and seeming to provide very useful ammo for dealing with the problems of the world ...more
Considering how riveted I was with this account of the rise of pragmatism in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, I feel very uncomfortable giving only four stars. It's a great read, incredibly informative, and creates numerous tributaries of interest drawing one to read and study more about the milestones of thought it chronicles. The star is withheld because it has no ending, no resolution, no theory of its own to answer the theories of Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., William James, Charl ...more
I'm quite proud of myself for finally finishing this one, after 7 years on the shelf. Turns out, this intellectual history of the years between the Civil War and World War I wasn't as intimidating as I feared. There's a reason why it won the Pulitzer--Menand renders complex ideas through character and narrative, mediums I understand. Thus, not only do I think I understand pragmatism, (Ask me about chickens in boxes, pecking for pellets), I also know that William James wrote The Varieties of Reli ...more
Bob Woodley
A review of 4 major thinkers of the post civil war era: Oliver Wendell Holmes Junior, Charles Peirce, William James, and John Dewey. It touches on the contributions of many others during the period of 1820 thru 1920. This was an era I knew almost nothing about and it was fascinating to trace the impact of the civil war and Darwin on science and philosophy.

I find it hard to understand philosophy without the historical context. James and Dewey make so much more sense once we realize they were att
Jan 10, 2011 Erik marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Listed by NY Times as one of the best of 2001: The club was a short-lived affair begun in Cambridge, Mass., in 1872, but the ideas espoused by three members and one of their disciples became foundations of American thought in the 20th century. The four men Louis Menand concentrates on are Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., William James, Charles Sanders Peirce and John Dewey. He argues that Darwin's ''Origin of Species,'' published in 1859, and the Civil War swept away the notion that a divine being gov ...more
This is a (successful) attempt at a reconstruction of a several synchronic slices of American thought, mostly following the Civil War. Menand focuses on four thinkers he thinks most influenced modern American gestalt before the Cold War. They include the three most familiar names in American "Pragmatism," Charles Peirce, William James, and John Dewey, along with Oliver Wendell Holmes. Menand also considers briefly why their thought has arisen again as relevant in the twenty-first century.

Fred R
As history, it's well done, but in its ambitions to explain the sociological origins of American Pragmatism, it falls flat. Menand seems to believe that Pragmatism was developed in horror against the (abolitionist) ideological excesses of the Civil War. In fact, as the book itself demonstrates, Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. was the only one capable of taking such a view of the war. To Dewey it was ancient history (and in any event his sympathies would have been with the Radical Republicans), Pierce ...more
Steve Horton
The Metaphysical Club is subtitled A Story of Ideas in America, and that is a bulls-eye description of this ambitious but ultimately accessible tour-de-force. Moving from the Civil War to the Progressive period in the US, the Metaphysical Club is populated with geniuses and demagogues, sometimes housed in the same person.

A phenomenon with which I was unfamiliar, but in the author's narrative seems obvious, is that the preamble to the Civil War and the war itself shredded existing paradigms. As
Nineteenth-century American history has always been a slightly shaky issue for me. The gaping hole in my knowledge in this area is pretty much bookended between my fascination with the first three presidencies – Washington, Adams, and Jefferson – and my basic understanding of the Civil War. Oh, and there is of course my quarter-long intensive reading in nineteenth-century American literature – most notably Melville, Hawthorne, Poe (all whom I found fascinating and engrossing story-tellers), Coop ...more
Tim Pendry
This is a highly recommended work of intellectual history with major insights into the construction of the American mind. Menand's approach can be easily summarised. He takes the lives of four significant American intellectuals - William James, Charles Peirce, Oliver Wendell Holmes and John Dewey - and weaves a history around them, their associates and historical events.

The purpose is to elucidate the pragmatic turn of mind that emerged as a central element in American political and intellectual
A mental workout, and one I enjoyed.
I haven't read much philosophy seriously and dipping my toes into some epistemology and other tough stuff for the first time in a long while was challenging, though Menand is a good guide.
What was fun (and thought-provoking) about the book was the way Menand strung it all together. You're marching from Oliver Wendell Holmes to William James to Charles Sanders Peirce to John Dewey with them all spiraling together but with time for detours for Alain Locke and Da
The Metaphysical Club introduces the origin and early development of American Pragmatism, by contextualizing it within American modernization and by grounding its philosophical points in the biography and contributions of four key thinkers.

Since scores of other reviewers write at some length what a pleasure to read Menand’s writing style is, I’ll just add that I agree, and was not remotely surprised that Menand had a background with The New Yorker. He’s varied and readable, and doesn’t let the
N.A. Ratnayake
I cannot apply a sixth star to this book, which prompts me to seriously consider re-normalizing all other ratings in my library to accommodate the fact that I was forced by the design of this site to apply only five.

The tone and vocabulary are fairly intellectual and elevated, and as a consequence the book may seem initially too dense to be of any profound value. I would recommend at least a basic awareness of the major subjects in American history (particularly Civil War and immediately followi
John Yelverton
There are many sections in this book that I do not agree with, but the author is very skilled in writing, which makes this an enjoyable read.
Robin Friedman
Louis Menand's "The Metaphysical Club" is a rare book which manages to be both scholarly and popular. As a popular work, it offers an accessible exposition of complex ideas and thinkers. On a more scholarly level, the book succeeds because it awakens in the reader an appreciation of the scope of intellectual life in the United States and a desire to understand and to perpetuate it.

The key figures in "The Metaphysical Club" include the great American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes and the philosoph
Todd Stockslager
Massively disappointing. The result is much smaller than the subject. What purports to be a synthesis of the intellectual ideas percolating change throughout American culture between the Civil War and World War I is instead a rambling collection of random facts without a thesis or a logical argument to prove it.

Menand pulls in seemingly random tangential people and circumstances, writing without discipline or direction. The disappointment is the greater because of the importance of the subject--
James Askari
Menand's book is more than the sum of its parts--unlike pragmatism, that cannot conceive of beliefs or behavioural dispositions other than as part of a whole complex of continuous adaptation to the world. Its mode is not intellectual history, in that the circumstantial connections between its main figures are slender, and anyway not the book's focus. The Metaphysical Club, bringing together William James, Oliver Wendell Holmes jnr, C. S. Pierce and its catalysing and inspiring figure, Chauncey W ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
  • William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism
  • Anti-Intellectualism in American Life
  • Voyagers to the West: A Passage in the Peopling of America on the Eve of the Revolution
  • Freedom from Fear: The American People in Depression and War, 1929-1945
  • William Cooper's Town: Power and Persuasion on the Frontier of the Early American Republic
  • Summer for the Gods: The Scopes Trial & America's Continuing Debate Over Science & Religion
  • The Americans, Vol. 3: The Democratic Experience
  • Philosophy and Social Hope
  • Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution
  • A Nation Under Our Feet: Black Political Struggles in the Rural South from Slavery to the Great Migration
  • Atlantic Crossings: Social Politics in a Progressive Age
  • The Transformation of Virginia, 1740-1790
  • The Modern Mind: An Intellectual History of the 20th Century
  • The Impending Crisis: America Before the Civil War, 1848-1861
  • Been in the Storm So Long: The Aftermath of Slavery
  • To the Finland Station
  • The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business
  • No Place of Grace: Antimodernism and the Transformation of American Culture, 1880-1920
Louis Menand, professor of English at Harvard University, is the author of The Metaphysical Club, which won the 2002 Pulitzer Prize in History. A longtime staff writer for The New Yorker, he lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
More about Louis Menand...

Share This Book

“If you look up a word in the dictionary, you find it defined by a string of other words, the meanings of which can be discovered by looking them up in a dictionary, leading to more words that can be looked up in turn. There is no exit from the dictionary.” 6 likes
“The lesson Holmes took from the war can be put in a sentence. It is that certitude leads to violence. This is a proposition that has an easy application and a difficult one. The easy application is to ideologues, dogmatists, and bullies—people who think that their rightness justifies them in imposing on anyone who does not happen to subscribe to their particular ideology, dogma, or notion of turf. If the conviction of rightness is powerful enough, resistance to it will be met, sooner or later, by force. There are people like this in every sphere of life, and it is natural to feel that the world would be a better place without them.” 2 likes
More quotes…