Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Rights Gone Wrong: How Law Corrupts the Struggle for Equality” as Want to Read:
Rights Gone Wrong: How Law Corrupts the Struggle for Equality
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Rights Gone Wrong: How Law Corrupts the Struggle for Equality

3.50  ·  Rating Details  ·  56 Ratings  ·  7 Reviews
A New York Times Notable Book for 2011
Since the 1960s, ideas developed during the civil rights movement have been astonishingly successful in fighting overt discrimination and prejudice. But how successful are they at combating the whole spectrum of social injustice-including conditions that aren't directly caused by bigotry? How do they stand up to segregation, for insta
ebook, 288 pages
Published October 25th 2011 by Farrar, Straus and Giroux (first published September 27th 2011)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Rights Gone Wrong, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Rights Gone Wrong

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 364)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jan 26, 2012 Lynn rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
The title and description of this book are misleading. The book is not about how the civil rights legal framework undermines the struggle for equality. The majority of the book is the author's oversimplification of discrimination issues in an intellectually dishonest way. He never mentions strict or intermediate scrutiny or rational review, which, as essential parts of the civil rights legal framework, bear mentioning since he is purporting to critique their efficacy in achieving equality. The a ...more
Michael Pahr
My rating here is definitely following the Goodreads rubric: it was ok. I initally wanted to give it 3 stars, but I saw that was listed as "I liked it," and I really wouldn't go that far. Some of the ideas introduced were really interesting and well worth thinking about, but I found the writing (and reasoning) to be sloppy. Still, if the topic of the book sounds interesting to you, there's a decent chance you'll be glad you read it once you've finished it.
Oct 12, 2012 David rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Kind of an interesting thesis, that framing social-justice efforts in a legal "rights" mode has perverse, counterproductive effects and often isn't the best way to achieve equality. Finding instances of seemingly trivial issues dragged clunkily through the courts isn't too hard (he must have a friend who complains bitterly about "ladies' night" at bars as discrimination against men, as this issue arises often), but to his credit he also takes on tougher cases (school districts' spending on speci ...more
Jim Olivi
Oct 04, 2015 Jim Olivi rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A very good report listing examples of where the interpretation of human rights turned into an appeal for privilege, advantage or downright fraud.
This book was interesting because it forced you to take a new perspective on the application of civil rights laws in the U.S.. That being said, I'm not sure I agreed with everything the author had to say -- perhaps because the issue is so complex.
Oct 09, 2012 Luís rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Very interesting, totally new perspective on a topic that's dear to me. Whether I agree with the author or not is beside the point - it was thought-provoking and that's what I want out of my non-fiction.
Aug 24, 2012 Pankaj rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
It was like reading a news paper feature. So I discarded it. I was hoping something along the lines with 'Lucifer Effect'. Frowned upon, because lulled me with dubious title.
Davor Nikolic
Davor Nikolic marked it as to-read
Feb 09, 2016
Mohamed marked it as to-read
Feb 08, 2016
Ali rated it liked it
Feb 07, 2016
Branford Barnes
Branford Barnes marked it as to-read
Feb 04, 2016
Chris Newton
Chris Newton marked it as to-read
Jan 30, 2016
Sonia marked it as to-read
Jan 22, 2016
Kyle marked it as to-read
Jan 21, 2016
Jennifer marked it as to-read
Jan 16, 2016
Rk Wild
Rk Wild marked it as to-read
Jan 17, 2016
Greta rated it really liked it
Jan 13, 2016
Devon Burger
Devon Burger rated it it was amazing
Jan 09, 2016
Aziz Davlatov
Aziz Davlatov marked it as to-read
Jan 04, 2016
Michael Giaccio
Michael Giaccio marked it as to-read
Dec 26, 2015
Sarah marked it as to-read
Dec 26, 2015
Matt Cadenasso
Matt Cadenasso marked it as to-read
Dec 25, 2015
Tgreenesj marked it as to-read
Dec 16, 2015
Kevin Patterson
Kevin Patterson rated it really liked it
Nov 29, 2015
De'shaun Harris
De'shaun Harris marked it as to-read
Nov 19, 2015
Will Saunders
Will Saunders marked it as to-read
Nov 13, 2015
Ujjual marked it as to-read
Oct 25, 2015
Ryan marked it as to-read
Oct 11, 2015
Francie Grice
Francie Grice marked it as to-read
Oct 11, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Who's Afraid of Post-Blackness? What it Means to Be Black Now
  • Pauline Kael: A Life in the Dark
  • [sic]
  • Beyond Bin Laden: America and the Future of Terror
  • My Year Inside Radical Islam: A Memoir
  • Ulysses S. Grant
  • Assassins of the Turquoise Palace
  • Long, Last, Happy: New and Collected Stories
  • The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom
  • Rights of Man, Common Sense and Other Political Writings
  • Holy War: How Vasco da Gama's Epic Voyages Turned the Tide in a Centuries-Old Clash of Civilizations
  • Human Rights: A Very Short Introduction
  • It Is Dangerous to Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom
  • Space, in Chains
  • Michelle Obama: In Her Own Words
  • Tangled Webs: How False Statements are Undermining America: From Martha Stewart to Bernie Madoff
  • Washington Rules: America's Path to Permanent War
  • The Plutonium Files: America's Secret Medical Experiments in the Cold War
Richard Thompson Ford is the George E. Osborne Professor of Law at Stanford Law School. He has published regularly on the topics of civil rights, constitutional law, race relations, and antidiscrimination law. He is a regular contributor to Slate and has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Boston Globe, and the San Francisco Chronicle. He is the author of Racial Culture: A Cri ...more
More about Richard Thompson Ford...

Share This Book